Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 19, 2:53 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:36 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Dear Puppet S.: The five significant digits is the rounded-off
[snip]
Today, I ran a simple KE test. I dropped a ¾” dia. chrome steel ball
from a height of 3.3684 feet into a small flower pot full of just-
mixed artclay.
You expect people to believe you measured the height you
dropped this ball from to five significant digits?
"solution" to setting 1/2 mv^2 (sub chrome steel) = KE = 1/2 mv^2 (sub
PTFE fluoroplastic). The height of drop is found by determining the
TIME necessary for the falling objects to reach the "solution"
velocity. Then, the distance of fall necessary to reach such velocity
can be found by squaring the TIME (in seconds) and multiplying the
result by 16.087 feet of fall (in one second). The accuracy of my
fall distances was 1/16" plus or minus for the steel ball, and 1/4"
plus for the PTFE ball. I intentionally made the fall distance of the
lighter ball greater to prevent any nit pickers from claining that
that 1/4" (less) had caused the greatly reduced penetrastion into the
clay.
For the record, the smaller ball would have had to be dropped from a
height of about 250 feet in order to make the same dent in the clay.
12 feet of fall, as had satisfied Coriolis's equation doesn't even
come close to causing the KE needed.
I'll let history decide whether you are I come closer to your
Clearly you are some mixture of stupid, a liar, a troll, and insane.
"mixture".
The clay is still soft. When it has dried hard, I will measure the
That ball sank in close to its ‘equator’.
And you then expect people to accept "close to" as a measure
of penetration.
penetration. I wouldn't want anyone to accuse me of pressing that
steel ball deeper when I made the measurements.
Clearly, you are in an echo chamber!
Clearly you are some mixture of stupid, a liar, a troll, and insane.
Units are unnecessary when one is comparing the relative penetration.
I immediately went up my outdoor staircase and dropped a ¾” dia. PTFE (a
heavy fluoroplastic ball, weighing .2807 times as much as the chrome
steel ball), from an exact height of 12 feet. The KE value should be .
10469323 for each ball. Note: 12 feet of drop = .745944d, where d =
16.087 feet, the distance of fall in one second. The time of fall is .
86368 seconds for the lighter ball.
It would appear to be all of the above. You have reported 8
significant
digits for KE, but with no units. And you expect people to believe you
have *measured* the time of fall of this ball to five significant
digits.
My "weights" were determined using a balance beam. I could have taken
the specific gravities of the balls and used that proportion. But
different materials have ranges of specific gravities. My balance
beam solution is very accurate, probably to 100th of a gram.
At some point you should consider returning to public school
and completing your arithmetic lessons. You are a clue free zone.
Socks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: Puppet_Sock
- KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Prev by Date: Re: Refrigeration using polar polymers
- Next by Date: Re: What if the universe is a simulation?
- Previous by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Next by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|