Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.

On Aug 19, 5:01 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 19, 2:28 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





On Aug 19, 9:27 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 18, 7:38 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 18, 5:42 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Aug 16, 8:36 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Today, I ran a simple KE test.  I dropped a ¾” dia. chrome steel ball
from a height of 3.3684 feet into a small flower pot full of just-
mixed art clay.  That ball sank in close to its ‘equator’..  I
immediately went up my outdoor staircase and dropped a ¾” dia. PTFE (a
heavy fluoroplastic ball, weighing .2807 times as much as the chrome
steel ball), from an exact height of 12 feet.  The KE value should be .
10469323 for each ball.  Note: 12 feet of drop = .745944d, where d =
16.087 feet, the distance of fall in one second.  The time of fall is .
86368 seconds for the lighter ball.

The PTFE ball landed 1” from the chrome steel ball.  It sank into the
clay only about .75 as deep.  If Coriolis’s equation was correct, both
balls would be imbedded equally.  Those two balls are stuck in the
clay.  I will let everything air dry to serve to document my
experiment.

The above simple experiment can be run with any two equal size, but
different weight balls.  (Ping Pong balls excluded.)  Use Coriolis’s
equation to make the KE values for each ball weight equal.  If you
have access to a tall building where drops can be made from two
heights as required to satisfy the equations, the results, still,
won’t cause equal size holes in the clay.  A semi-parabolic equation,
like Coriolis’s, can never predict impact results when the Law of
Nature is a LINEAR increase in KE with respect to velocity!  My
correct equation is: KE = a/g (m) + v/32.174 (m).

Now, perhaps, you are getting a small dose of the critical review that
publishing experimental results will have to endure, NoEinstein. As
others here have pointed out, there are a number of things that you
document here that are obviously questionable. A published
experimental finding has to be polished and more carefully prepared so
that it will endure this kind of examination.

If you don't want to do that, then you have the wrong hobby.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: You are more impressed by the shine on the print paper than
you are by new scientific truths.  You should try chasing your own
tail.  Evolution never caused yours to disappear.  — NoEinstein —

It would do you well to answer some of the questions that have been
directed to you about your purported precision on some of the numbers
you claimed in your experimental write-up. Rather than desperately
trying to deflect the questions by calling people names.

You told me once that you are very good at explaining things. Yet when
asked questions that give you an opportunity to explain, you demur.
Why?

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD:  You have the prerogative of doing the six grade math
necessary to solve for KE.

That's not what I'm asking about. You said you did the following:
====================================
I dropped a ¾” dia. chrome steel ball
from a height of 3.3684 feet into a small flower pot full of just-
mixed art clay.  ...  The time of fall is .86368 seconds for the
lighter ball.
====================================
I want to know how you placed a ball to be at a height of 3.3684 feet
above the clay to a precision of 1 part in 33000.
I want to know how you measured the time of fall to a precision of 1
part in 85000.



 Unless you do, I'll not to be badgered to
keep providing you with more proofs of this or that.  Your mental
illness, like Eric Gisse's, is that you have an over-compensated
inferiority complex.  Since you don't like, or agree with anything I
say, just go away.  But since "shooting me down" is your primary
recreation, I won't expect a CHILD like you to give up your play.  —
NoEinstein —- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear PD: You are a persona non grata. Get help, fellow. —
NoEinstein —
.

Relevant Pages