sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: heath and weight
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• heath and weight
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: sharing violation and deep penetration about ded.A.no.E's fisting generousity
  • From: dedanoe
• sharing violation and deep penetration about ded.A.no.E's fisting generousity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• You, me, all of us, need “ Banksters ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Commercial and Advertisement: Sales and Marketing Department (Int.offer)
  • From: dedanoe
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Kna
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Are All of The Mathematical Implications of Quantum Physics S...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Congress should keep non-leveraged earnings yields steady.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Congress should keep non-leveraged earnings yields steady.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The political corruption of science
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Commercial and Advertisement: Sales and Marketing Department (Int.offer)
  • From: CWM-Banker
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Jerry
• Congress should keep non-leveraged earnings yields steady.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Rick
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Rick
• Quantum Gravity 292.6: France and Israel Demolish Non-Semantic Shannon and Kolmogorov Information Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.5: Modifying 292.3 for Time-Space Increasing Parabolas
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 292.5: Modifying 292.3 for Time-Space Increasing Parabolas
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: THE BAILOUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Mike Jr
• Quantum Gravity 292.4: U.K. and USA Split Gravity Off From Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: socratus
• Quantum Gravity 292.3: Constant Velocity Solutions u(x, t) = k Yield Spacetime Circles, Parabolas
  • From: OsherD
• Re: JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: JSH
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: Bummer -- Hubble down
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous vs. Time Harmonic versions of Maxwell's equations
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Whats difference between Mad & Normal person.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bummer -- Hubble down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Bummer -- Hubble down
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Igor
• Ep. 107: Nucleosynthesis: Elements from Stars
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Igor
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Igor
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: American class warfare
  • From: JSH
• There's only one John Fredriksen.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: doug
• Re: Two rainbows side by side spelling an M
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: doug
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: tadchem
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: tadchem
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• Along with dark matter and dark energy, astronomers can now add dark flow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• autonomic imbalance processor
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dedanoe vs. lorentz and einstein
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• Re: SR makes contradictory claims
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR makes contradictory claims
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: dedanoe vs. lorentz and einstein
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Solution manual to Microelectronic circuits by R. Jaeger 3rd edition
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Damaeus
• What is our intellect ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Wikipedia heading for a Lawsuit with their Uncyclopedia defamation of living person character
  • From: Vince Morgan
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Kna
• Re: SR makes contradictory claims
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: PD
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: PD
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: PD
• Re: Spheres within spheres
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The political corruption of science
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Calorie
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 29, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: alvaro_ziadi
• Re: Goggle offers $10 million rewards for any new idea put in writing
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 292.2: One-Dimensional Wave Equation Yields Probable Causation/Influence u = x^2 + t^2, u = x^2 + 2t Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 292.1: Mexico Finds GR Black Holes to be Bosonic Strings on Nonflat Background
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wikipedia heading for a Lawsuit with their Uncyclopedia defamation of living person character
  • From: Coax Nibbler
• Instantaneous vs. Time Harmonic versions of Maxwell's equations
  • From: ssylee
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Benj
• Re: The political corruption of science
  • From: Benj
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum wave and particle flow
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light flowing through force
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My frustration is mounting
  • From: Coax Nibbler
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• The political corruption of science
  • From: Mike Jr
• I'm clueless.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Calorie
• Re: JSH: American class warfare
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Frequency of light?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Frequency of light?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Igor
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Igor
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: tadchem
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The diameter of the Sun
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Talking about money/sex makes you want it even less.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I've been writing science books for some 40 plus years.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Talking about money/sex makes you want it even less.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Frequency of light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Calorie
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Frequency of light?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Darwin123
• can a hole be yellow?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: LHC webcam
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: tadchem
• I've been writing science books for some 40 plus years.
  • From: fitz
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Frequency of light?
  • From: orbound
• Re: JSH: My frustration is mounting
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion
  • From: Mitch
• Re: SR makes contradictory claims
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: JSH: American class warfare
  • From: jesse
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: glird
• JSH: American class warfare
  • From: JSH
• JSH: My frustration is mounting
  • From: JSH
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• LHC webcam
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: SR makes contradictory claims
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Solution manual to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: spectral line identification (approx. 670 nm)
  • From: tadchem
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion
  • From: Benj
• Re: THE BAILOUT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can a metal spring shrink to 26% on Mars?
  • From: Benj
• Found: the heart of a Martian
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Benj
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Sam
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• America's bums have “ quality ” educations.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: spectral line identification (approx. 670 nm)
  • From: dudi24
• Re: Investing in yourself; not dollars, not Fannie Mae.
  • From: Damaeus
• Headless Martian shows neck cross section.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• More from Syun-Ichi Akasofu
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion
  • From: Mike Jr
• Is the Earth still recovering from the “Little Ice Age”?
  • From: Mike Jr
• How can a metal spring shrink to 26% on Mars?
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Research Projects!
  • From: Mirror Space
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Benj
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: orbound
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Benj
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: orbound
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Benj
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: orbound
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: daniel
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: orbound
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: orbound
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any definitive proof?
  • From: vernono
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any definitive proof?
  • From: Jeff Liebermann
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Investing in yourself; not dollars, not Fannie Mae.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: Jason
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Simplification issue
  • From: Jason
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Tim Miller
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.0: Maximizing 1 + y - Dt(y(t, x)) = f(Dxx(y), Dxt(y)) Remarkable Results
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.0: Maximizing 1 + y - Dt(y(t, x)) = f(Dxx(y), Dxt(y)) Remarkable Results
  • From: OsherD
• Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: unstoppablespam
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: JSH
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renor...
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: JSH: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Innovation
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any definitive proof?
  • From: AES
• Quantum Gravity 291.99: More Re 1 + y - Dt(y) Generates Quantum Theory and Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any definitive proof?
  • From: DTC
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• JSH: Simplification issue
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity not tugging back on distant universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How the gas Giants planets gathered their gas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Innovation
  • From: PD
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Benj
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: JSH
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Sam
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Innovation
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Electrorheology Leads to Efficient Combustion
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Ray Vickson
• I'm a macho dirt lover.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Where have all the phys. entertainers gone
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Where have all the phys. entertainers gone
  • From: Spaceman
• Few “ Code Poets ” are rich.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Light in the atom
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sun's Power Hits New Low, May Endanger Earth?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Sun's Power Hits New Low, May Endanger Earth?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renor...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Whats difference between Mad & Normal person.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual ? Weyerhaeuser.COM ?, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual ? Weyerhaeuser.COM ?, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Goggle will fuck anyone $10 million rewards
  • From: tj Frazir
• JSH: Weird hostility of math people to new knowledge
  • From: JSH
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Quantum Gravity 291.98: Quantum Theory and Gravitation Generated By 1 + y - Dt(y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.97: The Numbers 3, 4, 5 of the Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Set Turn Out to Be Key in Tree Number Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 September 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Igor
• McCain's Anti-Anger Practice
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Pondering a shift
  • From: JSH
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.97: The Numbers 3, 4, 5 of the Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Set Turn Out to Be Key in Tree Number Theory
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: mL
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: PD
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: Uncle Al
• T.J.'s a virtual “ Weyerhaeuser.COM ”, trees ships and all.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: PD
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: zanthius . dxun
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Re: Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Conservation of momentum question
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: zanthius . dxun
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renor...
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Sam
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: cjcountess
• Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: new (c=const) relativity is heading your way
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: spectral line identification (approx. 670 nm)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Innovation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: spectral line identification (approx. 670 nm)
  • From: Androcles
• new (c=const) relativity is heading your way
  • From: dedanoe
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Waf
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• spectral line identification (approx. 670 nm)
  • From: dudi24
• Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Sam
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: NOVA [was The homeless have skills I admire.]
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Find a cheaper place to rent .. now ! duh.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Find a cheaper place to rent .. now ! duh.
  • From: Damaeus
• Magnetized metals and wave function collapse.
  • From: Zanthius
• Re: The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Is your savings in shares of ExxonMobil or Fannie/dollars ?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Innovation
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.97: The Numbers 3, 4, 5 of the Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Set Turn Out to Be Key in Tree Number Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.97: The Numbers 3, 4, 5 of the Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Set Turn Out to Be Key in Tree Number Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.96: Probable Derivative Causation/Influence (PDI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Where have all the phys. entertainers gone
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.95: India and Pakistan Solve Cosmic Coincidence Problem with w = -1, 0, 1
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.95: India and Pakistan Solve Cosmic Coincidence Problem with w = -1, 0, 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pondering a shift
  • From: Jason
• From physicsworld.com newswire (Week 39)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• JSH: Pondering a shift
  • From: JSH
• http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=anZHfo6tQi60
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part III
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The homeless need cheaper, better-supervised apartments.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Is your savings in shares of ExxonMobil or Fannie/dollars ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renor...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renor...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• The über-deluded U.S. Congress.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: Igor
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Igor
• Is your savings in shares of ExxonMobil or Fannie/dollars ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Innovation
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the gov. had trillions of dollars in surplus profits each year.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Amplitude characteristic and harmonic spectrum
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: If the gov. had trillions of dollars in surplus profits each year.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Innovation
  • From: erzen744
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: dedanoe's 2nd knol
  • From: Uncle Al
• Finding of Natural High Frequency Cut Off May Eliminate Renormalization Problem:
  • From: cjcountess
• If the gov. had trillions of dollars in surplus profits each year.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Is there any harmful effect from wifi (802.11.x) radiation? Any...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question the morons cant grasp
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Colour of Neutronium
  • From: Uncle Al
• solution manual for Probability and Statistical Inference ( 7th edition by Hogg & Tanis)
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part III
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part III
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Waf
• Re: The Colour of Neutronium
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I thought I _was finished. Part III
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The Colour of Neutronium
  • From: aijutsu
• Re: The lower your earnings yield**, the more the market will punish you.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Amplitude characteristic and harmonic spectrum
  • From: onofftopic
• Re: Newbie: Lightning/plasma question
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: NOVA [was The homeless have skills I admire.]
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Newbie: Lightning/plasma question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Goggle offers $10 million rewards for any new idea put in writing
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Can False Vacuum produce particle-antiparticle pairs?
  • From: Calorie
• Amplitude characteristic and harmonic spectrum
  • From: pApAk
• Re: Goggle offers $10 million rewards for any new idea put in writing
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Can False Vacuum produce particle-antiparticle pairs?
  • From: Mike Jr
• The scientific method
  • From: Thomas Heger
• The lower your earnings yield**, the more the market will punish you.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The homeless need cheaper, better-supervised apartments.
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: Damaeus
• Quantum Gravity 291.94: Some More Regarding 291.93
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.93: France Relates "Generalized Riccati Equations", Quantum Theory, Satellite Transfer
  • From: OsherD
• Goggle offers $10 million rewards for any new idea put in writing
  • From: Calorie
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Calorie
• Can False Vacuum produce particle-antiparticle pairs?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Matter has an absolute existence in relative space and time?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Newbie: Lightning/plasma question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Newbie: Lightning/plasma question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Solutions manual for Aerodynamics for engineers by Bertin and Cummings wanted
  • From: rcolon3
• Newbie: Lightning/plasma question
  • From: ker_01
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Igor
• Simple physics: trillions of dollars are wasted, “ fuel ” gets wasted.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• “ Earnings Yields ” actually matter !
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• How much can you compress a particle?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I wish I could waste trillions of dollars like Congress does.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Benj
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Matter has an absolute existence in relative space and time?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Matter has an absolute existence in relative space and time?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Simple SR Conundrum that turned SR and Einstein on its head -- and its implications
  • From: Celtic Toad
• Re: The homeless need cheaper, better-supervised apartments.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part II
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Lits O'Hate
• Re: Matter has an absolute existence in relative space and time?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: dedanoe's 1st knol
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: how can quark-gluon soup of universe fit into a pea?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how can quark-gluon soup of universe fit into a pea?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how can quark-gluon soup of universe fit into a pea ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The morons faked moon clocks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GT equals E equals mc² equals
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Time converts into mass.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question the morons cant grasp
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are homeless people less human ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: john180908
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: PD
• I thought I _was finished. Part I
  • From: Rick
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: PD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Benj
• Re: NOVA [was The homeless have skills I admire.]
  • From: Benj
• Matter has an absolute existence in relative space and time?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: dedanoe's 1st knol
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mass of universe versus Energy Density
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 2008 MacArthur Fellow
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part II
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Waf
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Solution manual to Computer networking a top down approach 3th edition
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Solution manual to Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics 5th edition by Fawwaz T. Ulaby
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Mass of universe versus Energy Density
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part II
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part II
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• dedanoe's 1st knol
  • From: dedanoe
• NOVA [was The homeless have skills I admire.]
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Would you jail Fannie & Freddie's lobbyists ?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part I
  • From: Rick
• Re: Would you jail Fannie & Freddie's lobbyists ?
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: I thought I _was finished. Part II
  • From: Rick
• Re: Mass of universe versus Energy Density
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Would you jail Fannie & Freddie's lobbyists ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: JunoExpress
• Mass of universe versus Energy Density
  • From: Calorie
• I've no assurances that you aren't just toying with me.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• 2008 MacArthur Fellow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: Solutions manual to Engineering Mechanics Statics 11th Edition By R.C.Hibbeler
  • From: joshwentz
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Jason
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Lits O'Hate
• Re: Like space and time, matter is relative
  • From: Math Err
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Like space and time, matter is relative
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: doug
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: Igor
• Seattle makes it difficult for down-and-outers to get on their feet.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: That tax-bracket isn't for me, I don't want it.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Find a cheaper place to rent .. now ! duh.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Find a cheaper place to rent .. now ! duh.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A brand-new one-bedroom apartment in Seattle for 350/month ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A brand-new one-bedroom apartment in Seattle for 350/month ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Japanese Scientists Work to Build Space Elevator
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: tadchem
• Gravitational-radiation from disappearing body?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: imbalance vs. energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Japanese Scientists Work to Build Space Elevator
  • From: Uncle Al
• That tax-bracket isn't for me, I don't want it.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Math Err
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: What does â?? yakey â?? mean ? Yakima ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: JSH Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Dudly
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is infinity?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• What is infinity?
  • From: socratus
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Waf
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Perpetual Motion" machine?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: manual solution
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: PD
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Cheap Advertising / Market-Sharing / Advertisement Campaign
  • From: Giuen
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: the strength of a rope
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• A brand-new one-bedroom apartment in Seattle for 350/month ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: Jason
• Re: Solution manual to Engineering Mechanics Statics 11th Edition By R.C.Hibbeler
  • From: khan . niazali
• JSH: Not how I thought it would be
  • From: JSH
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Benj
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's the earnings yield ? How leveraged are they ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: What's the earnings yield ? How leveraged are they ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: PD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: The OOPPs cant belive i said that UFO is time radio
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Spaceman
• Beyond our horizon, 45 giga light years .. thar be No dragons !
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The ufo question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Our horizon .. intrinsically, there's nothing special about it.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The TIME question relativists wount hurt head on.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The gravity should be renamed Time
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Gravity should have been named Time²
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer. E no M
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.92: Physical Quantities in India Paper That Equal Numerical Constants
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: John Polasek
• What's the earnings yield ? How leveraged are they ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.moronathon
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: fuck you fegets: you don't do even the first lesson of kinetics right!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Questions about Adiabatic Quantum Computation
  • From: Vend
• test
  • From: one
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE BAILOUT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: PD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: fuck you fegets: you don't do even the first lesson of kinetics right!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: mike3
• fuck you fegets: you don't do even the first lesson of kinetics right!
  • From: dedanoe
• Japanese Scientists Work to Build Space Elevator
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Coriolis energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Coriolis energy
  • From: Gerhard Nowak
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does conductors have refractive index for electrons?
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: ed wolf
• Here are some of my books (Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.) that you can read FREE
  • From: fitz
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• The Simple Question That Relativity Cannot Answer... And For Good Reason
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Atoms activity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Waf
• manual solution
  • From: ararat_kurd
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: PD
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: PD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: sirjo_le@xxxxxxxx
• Atoms activity
  • From: Peter
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 22, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 291.92: Physical Quantities in India Paper That Equal Numerical Constants
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.91 Examples From 291.9
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.91 Examples From 291.9
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.9: India Relates Branes and Higher Dimensions in Early Universe to PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Asthetics vs. cheaper apartments .. asthetics wins.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Uncle Al needed a little bit of Amps
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Are homeless people less human ? should we â?? harvest â?? them ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Test. (Can't Post for about 1 day.)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question up uncle ass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: why-o-why mole math
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: why-o-why
  • From: tj Frazir
• solutions manual (To search click in keyboard Ctrl+F)
  • From: solution
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Vince Morgan
• "Perpetual Motion" machine?
  • From: mike3
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Igor
• Re: Are electrical fields streaming matter?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Igor
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Questions about Adiabatic Quantum Computation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• LHC shutdown for two months after sector 3-4 magnet quench.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: Androcles
• Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• chef.avi rap
  • From: dedanoe
• Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: srp2inc
• What does “ yakey ” mean ? Yakima ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Proof that LHC is lying about black hole creation
  • From: eBayer
• Re: One glance at the pump prices, and you know the dollar's worth.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ideas are tested by experiments"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ideas are tested by experiments"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Earth's mantle is solid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question Uncle Alice spoonbuckets
  • From: tj Frazir
• The strength of a rope is more than the sum of the strengths of its separate
  • From: minimus
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Benj
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Jacques
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Which says nothing about the Mantle Re: You really are an idiot...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Which says nothing about the Mantle Re: You really are an idiot...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Earth's mantle is solid 2.5 ton per mile 5000 ton pi.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Earth's mantle's liquid acts solid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Earth's mantle is solid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Gravity"
  • From: Wab
• Re: the colorfull magnetism theory
  • From: dedanoe
• the colorfull magnetism theory
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: atomic number
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: atomic number
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Questions about Adiabatic Quantum Computation
  • From: Vend
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: OG
• perpetuum mobile
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Unraveling the mystery of the electron magnetic moment “anomaly”
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: atomic number
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: atomic number
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• atomic number
  • From: ssylee
• Test Bank And Solution Manual
  • From: Student Plus
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Hybrid Smart Battery Almost As Cost Effective & A Lot More Like...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Special Relativity would be wrong if time wasn't a spatial dimension.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• What is the relationship between force and energy
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: Y.Porat
• Special relativity may account for the spacecraft flyby anomalies
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Sue...
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass Suction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Glass Suction
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Questions about Adiabatic Quantum Computation
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: Prai Jei
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Identifying Two Physics Demos
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oscillating light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Jacques
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The G question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• forgot the title
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Hybrid Smart Battery Almost As Cost Effective & A Lot More Likely Than A Super Battery
  • From: Bret Cahill
• Re: HOW nature works
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: Benj
• HOW nature works
  • From: Jacques
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Ziontology, Freewill, Chosen People, etc.
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: solution
• solutions manual (To search click in keyboard Ctrl+F)
  • From: solution
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: aniramca
• Unraveling the mystery of the electron magnetic moment “anomaly”
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Does conductors have refractive index for electrons?
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• No black holes for 2 month
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Wab
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Quantum Gravity 291.8: P(Internal Self-Defense) = P(Jobs) = P(External Self-Defense) is Optimal
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.7: Rare Events Are the Biggest Causes, But Common Events Are the Biggest Effects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Questions about Adiabatic Quantum Computation
  • From: Vend
• Foolish reporters will tell you this was not a Martian animal and these were not numerous Martian cells, etc.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Johnnie In The Billows
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Quantum Gravity 291.7: Rare Events Are the Biggest Causes, But Common Events Are the Biggest Effects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Are electrical fields streaming matter?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are electrical fields streaming matter?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: Physics for Dummies !!!!!!!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Impossibility of extracting "zero point energy" from the vacuum.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: RLW
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Question: Exploding Water
  • From: Searcher7
• Re: Live lichen on Mars?
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Where does Krypton come from?
  • From: RLW
• Are electrical fields streaming matter?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Igor
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Igor
• Re: WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a pennymore...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where does Krypton come from?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Light in the atom
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• TO SLIDE OR NOT TO SLIDE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Rethinking Creationism - Is It Possible To Remake Creationism Into A
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER
  • From: RLW
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WASHINGTON, D.C.--Next year's federal budget may not contain a penny more...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Igor
• Live lichen on Mars?
  • From: Horace Heffner
• Re: Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No black holes for 2 month
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: john180908
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Ovulating Zetan Levels, spiritual feminism and the Church of Ziontology
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Predicting the Presidential Election is all in the Math, Maybe, Sort Of, Or Not
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: mind my asking: v/c index when light travels trough vacuum/glass/vacuum?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: mind my asking: v/c index when light travels trough vacuum/glass/vacuum?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mind my asking: v/c index when light travels trough vacuum/glass/vacuum?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NO BIG BANG. Rather, the speed of light decreases with distance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: john180908
• Re: You can condense photons into a single super-photon.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: hanson
• Percieved wavelength vs physical wavelength
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Wab
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Light and sound waves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: PD
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size..
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: PD
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: sirjo_le@xxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Evolution and Intelligent Design
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Evolution and Intelligent Design
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Compressing the universe to a basketball size...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• “ exploitable energy ”, density.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• You can condense photons into a single super-photon.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.6: P ' (A-->B) - P ' (C --> B) = -[P(B) - P(A)], P ' (A-->B) - P ' (A-->C) = P(B) - P(C)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 291.6: P ' (A-->B) - P ' (C --> B) = -[P(B) - P(A)], P ' (A-->B) - P ' (A-->C) = P(B) - P(C)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Sue...
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: Huang
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: Offentlig Fordonsupphandling - Bil Export & Handel - Försäljning
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: tadchem
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: john180908
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: How many Gravitons a mass throws every second?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: Igor
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: spacetime is a wave
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: Benj
• Re: Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: dedwards
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Neil B.
• Re: Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Evolution and Intelligent Design
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: john180908
• Greenies will like this - A 'novel' chemistry to make fuel from sugar
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Light and sound waves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• spacetime is a wave
  • From: john180908
• Re: Positive and Negative Urban Adjustments on GISS Temperature
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Water Hit With Young Star's Best Shot
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vector Fields
  • From: Androcles
• Vector Fields
  • From: Sean2008
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: PD
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: john150908
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Wab
• Re: Positive and Negative Urban Adjustments on GISS Temperature
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: PD
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: PD
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: PD
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: PD
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: sirjo_le@xxxxxxxx
• What are electrons?
  • From: dedwards
• Re: Positive and Negative Urban Adjustments on GISS Temperature data
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: tadchem
• Are PIGEONS and AHARONOV BOHM related?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What are electrons?
  • From: hwabnig
• Re: JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: JSH
• Evolution and Intelligent Design
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Benj
• RSS MSU temperature data shows a warming bias
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Positive and Negative Urban Adjustments on GISS Temperature data
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: tadchem
• Positive and Negative Urban Adjustments on GISS Temperature data
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Huang
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Igor
• Re: Symmetric Causality Fails, now to Material State Geometry
  • From: N
• Re: Symmetric Causality Fails, now to Material State Geometry
  • From: N
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: PD
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: PD
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Is it this easy to live on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can singularity have mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: PD
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: Spaceman
• The purpose of experimentation - Part III
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Anonymous Remailer (austria)
• Solution manual to Computer Networks Systems Approach3ed by davie peterson solutions manual
  • From: solutioncollector
• Solution manual to Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics 5th edition by Fawwaz T. Ulaby
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Damaeus
• "If this is rock, we are rocks."--a biology Ph.D. in Mars Forum
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Call for global magnetic monopole test help
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Wab
• Re: two versions of ampere's law
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Quantum Gravity 291.5: Germany Random Attractor Research Indicates Probable Causation/Influence (PI) = 1 Focus is Key
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 291.4: Riccati Differential Equation of the Barnes G-Function
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: ssylee
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 16 September 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Benj
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Benj
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Huang
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.3: Self-Interaction in Barnes G-Function in Toeplitz Matrix/Determinant Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.3: Self-Interaction in Barnes G-Function in Toeplitz Matrix/Determinant Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.2: Constant Diagonal Matrices and PI Pioneered By Indiana U. USA and U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 291.2: Constant Diagonal Matrices and PI Pioneered By Indiana U. USA and U.K.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: random polarizer
  • From: Prometheus
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Rethinking Creationism - Is It Possible To Remake Creationism Into A Scientific Theory?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: two versions of ampere's law
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Cwatters
• two versions of ampere's law
  • From: ssylee
• two versions of ampere's law
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: HardySpicer
• free current density
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: doug
• electric field intensity property of a isotropic, homogeneous, source-free, and linear medium
  • From: ssylee
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: doug
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: PD
• Nominated to the fumble pile Re: anoyment part 1!
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN)
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: doug
• Re: Proton mass at collision point
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Proton mass at collision point
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Proton mass at collision point
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Proton mass at collision point
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Inovabrasil 13_09_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (80 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Proton mass at collision point
  • From: rpattie
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: the universe moves
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: PD
• Re: Why aren't T.J.'s engines being sold by retailers ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Extracting a Climate Signal from 169 Glacier Records
  • From: Mike Jr
• Solution manual to Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics 5th edition by Fawwaz T. Ulaby
  • From: solutioncollector
• Solution manual to Financial management theory and practice 12e by Brigham
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Mike Jr
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Wab
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein is my hero
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Symmetric Causality Fails, now to Material State Geometry
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Joe Fretzl
• Solution to Elements of Electromagnetics ,Mathew O Sadiku 3rd or 4th edition
  • From: eerye887
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Help on functions of noncommuting operators
  • From: sirjo_le@xxxxxxxx
• Företags Reklam – Corporate Branding, Marketing, and Advertisement Sale
  • From: Giuen
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Spacemans clock theory in tatters
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Why aren't T.J.'s engines being sold by retailers ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Why aren't T.J.'s engines being sold by retailers ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• CERN's LHC can only produce a few pico-seconds of high density ..
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution Mission (MAVEN)
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: vortex-void
  • From: john150908
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: the universe moves
  • From: john150908
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Symmetric Causality Fails, now to Material State Geometry
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Einstein is my hero
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: anoyment part 1!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: If an Electron . . .
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH Complete theory for 2 variable Diophantine equations, paper now available
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: the universe moves
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• the universe moves
  • From: john150908
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: anoyment part 1!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hybrid Smart Battery Almost As Cost Effective & A Lot More Likely Than A Super Battery
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: random polarizer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: doug
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: doug
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: NICHE541
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Benj
• Re: Transporter Malfunction?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: PD
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The World Did End Last Week and Most of us Died!
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Michael Moroney
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The World Did End Last Week and Most of us Died!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: random polarizer
  • From: Prometheus
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: RP
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: PD
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: The purpose of experimentation, Part II
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Dimensions from stringhteory would violate the first law of thermodynamics
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Darwin123
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Wab
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: PD
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: PD
• Solution manual to Engineering Mechanics Statics 11th Edition By R.C.Hibbeler
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: pApAk
• Faraday's law and network theory
  • From: pApAk
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• The mountain tops prove GR time dilation is bullshit.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Video of cubic atomic model explains all
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Degrees of freedom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Transporter Malfunction?
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: JSH
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: The purpose of experimentation, Part II
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• The purpose of experimentation, Part II
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Transporter Malfunction?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Degrees of freedom
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• [OT] "Gnuplot in Action" Book - Free Content available
  • From: pkj
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: hanson
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Degrees of freedom
  • From: JSH
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Transporter Malfunction?
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Igor
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Degrees of freedom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: "Blasphemy" and the LHC
  • From: Igor
• JSH: Degrees of freedom
  • From: JSH
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: random polarizer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Schrodinger's Universe", the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may
  • From: Calorie
• Re: "Blasphemy" and the LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solutions manual for Aerodynamics for engineers by Bertin and Cummings wanted
  • From: akascootur
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "Blasphemy" and the LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• random polarizer
  • From: Prometheus
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Blasphemy" and the LHC
  • From: JimCo
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Large Hadron Collider
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Experimental Evidence for Special Relativity
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: jimp
• Re: A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: vortex-void
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• A causal explanation of non-local quantum entanglement
  • From: Stefan Ram
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: NICHE541
• Re: Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: 2008 KV42 Event Horizons
  • From: NICHE541
• Hawking bets CERN mega-machine won't find 'God's Particle'
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Why do relativists ignore the "missing" ticks of traveling clock?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Materion
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: The circumference of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicists hope to tie light beams in knots
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• 2008 KV42 Event Horizons
  • From: Academic Zodiac
• Re: vortex-void
  • From: Academic Zodiac
• Eureka! I have squared the circle
  • From: Rick
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Edward Green
• vortex-void
  • From: john140908
• Re: Even When Spaceman Sees That He Was Wrong... (was: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Androcles
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If an Electron . . .
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: CERN schedule
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Palin's religious craziness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The circumference of the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Oki
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: normski
• Even When Spaceman Sees That He Was Wrong... (was: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed)
  • From: Jerry
• Test Banks & Solution Manuals - NEW
  • From: Student Plus
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: Travis
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 291.1: Comparing Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Squared versus Euclidean Distance Squared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 291.1: Comparing Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Squared versus Euclidean Distance Squared
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Materion
• Re: Ultrasound Ovens?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Q about 2nd Law of Thermodynamics
  • From: Strange Creature
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: CERN schedule
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Jerry
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Fundamental constants?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Fundamental constants?
  • From: Raphanus
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Hugh Oxford
• Perceived wavelength vs physical wavelength relative speeds.
  • From: Spaceman
• Question:Heim quantum theory
  • From: falderals
• Re: What is Trianetics?
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Eight unmistakable organic tissues discovered on Martian Winkie's skull
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Ultrasound Ovens?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHATʼS NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Ultrasound Ovens?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: CERN schedule
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: CERN schedule
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Eight unmistakable organic tissues discovered on Martian Winkie's skull
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Vinny
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Ultrasound Ovens?
  • From: Positron
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: Edward Green
• shielding effect on tsunami runup
  • From: Peter Thor
• Japan Goes to the moon!
  • From: Rick
• Nice art from Cern
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Quantum Gravity 291.0: Japan, India, Italy Show Riccati Matrix Equations Fundamental in Symmetry Reduction from Unitary Group to Subgroups
  • From: OsherD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: Complete theory for 2 variable Diophantine equations, paper now available
  • From: JSH
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Complete theory for 2 variable Diophantine equations, paper now available
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Benj
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Divorcing Time from Space
  • From: Androcles
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Divorcing Time from Space
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: force moves objects -- not velocity, not velocity, not velocity!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lorentz, Einstein, Coulomb and Newton Down!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: If an Electron . . .
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Divorcing Time from Space
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Cosmic Rays don't behave like LHC's proton collision
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Easy Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Materion
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: If an Electron . . .
  • From: Materion
• Can a magnetic field do work?
  • From: marcus_b
• If an Electron . . .
  • From: armistid_rap
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• The purpose of experimentation, Part I
  • From: PD
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Benj
• The mad CERN as way.
  • From: socratus
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Oki
• Living in a Void: Testing the Copernican Principle with Distant Supernovae
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Schrodinger's Universe", the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: And now, for somehting completely different...
  • From: Androcles
• And now, for somehting completely different...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Biggest Crime in History Progress Energy over Billing
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 290.9: Steganography (Secret Messages in Innocuous-Looking Text) From Boston U. and PI, Entropy, Bit Rate Sent
  • From: OsherD
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• On the credibility of climate predictions
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: tracinoltd
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Quantum Gravity 290.8: Japan, Quebec Canada, China on Dxy-Related SUSY KdV Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 290.8: Japan, Quebec Canada, China on Dxy-Related SUSY KdV Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Ganesh J. Acharya
• Re: JSH: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: JSH
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: doug
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: PD
• Re: Particle Beam Weapon vs LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: PD
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: PD
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: jonathan cyriax brast
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Captain Correct
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Particle Beam Weapon vs LHC
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: falderals
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: doug
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: doug
• Re: Solutions manual for Aerodynamics for engineers by Bertin and Cummings wanted
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: doug
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: hanson
• Solutions manual for Aerodynamics for engineers by Bertin and Cummings wanted
  • From: corligens
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: doug
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• No infinite energy needed for lightspeed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: Captain Correct
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: doug
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solutions manual to Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, 8 th By Ferdinand
  • From: fabio . marin . jimenez
• Re: Solutions manual to Vector Mechanics for Engineers: Dynamics, 8 th By Ferdinand
  • From: fabio . marin . jimenez
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Igor
• NASA is hiding numerous optical micrographs at "Browse Archive" here:
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: JSH
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: Androcles
• JSH: The mathematical Catch-22
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: JSH
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: PD
• Particle Beam Weapon vs LHC
  • From: Calorie
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: vibhuav
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: falderals
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Maxwell's equations difference between those that are found on Wikipedia/Hyperphysics and those that are in Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics by Balanis
  • From: Xaustein
• Re: Why am I not dead?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• The experiment relativists are afraid of.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Maxwell's equations difference between those that are found on Wikipedia/Hyperphysics and those that are in Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics by Balanis
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: doug
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: PD
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformations really true?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: versusview
• Re: Serious critique welcome: The Scientific Method and Global Warming
  • From: versusview
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Galactic Collision
  • From: Uncle Al
• Please join us
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: Awesome simplification
  • From: Captain Correct
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: doug
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: PD
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Interplay of Spin and Orbital Angular Momentum in the Proton
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Laser combs
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Oki
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: JSH
• solutions manual (To search click in keyboard Ctrl+F)
  • From: solutionfee
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: PD
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: greysky
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Eight unmistakable organic tissues discovered on Martian Winkie's skull
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: PD
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: PD
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: THE TIME DILATION OF GOD
  • From: mogi77
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: grasshopper
• Re: How to create Black Hole?
  • From: dedanoe
• Global synchronous changes in the carbon isotopic composition of carbonate sediments unrelated to changes in the global carbon cycle
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Which way is up?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: falderals
• Which way is up?
  • From: falderals
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Jeroen Belleman
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 290.7: University of Hawaii Establishes That (in my words) Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Entanglement Via Twisting Folds Proteins
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why am I not dead?
  • From: Jeroen Belleman
• Re: Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Ganesh J. Acharya
• Re: Galactic Collision
  • From: Rick
• Potential risks involved with Large Hadron Collider?
  • From: Ganesh J. Acharya
• Re: JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Galactic Collision
  • From: Rick
• Re: Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Twins paradox debunking 101.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another relativity question
  • From: John Park
• Another relativity question
  • From: falderals
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: doug
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: Arborisk
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Sam Wormley
• CERN schedule
  • From: Matt Menge
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 37)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: another hadron black hole question
  • From: wade . hines
• JSH: Awesome simplification
  • From: JSH
• August 2008 is 39th warmest since 1895
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• How to create Black Hole?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Igor
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Igor
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Uncle Ben
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Re: Upper mass limit for black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The LHC Real Danger (Interdimensional Hazards)
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The search for sterile neutrinos and extra dimensions at Fermilab
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: hanson
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: Cold Fusion
  • From: Rick
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Cold Fusion
  • From: Rick
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: hanson
• Re: Cold Fusion
  • From: Rick
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: hanson
• Cold Fusion
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: Androcles
• Upper mass limit for black holes
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Inflationary Theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Quantum Gravity 290.6: Canada Advances Light Perception
  • From: lassie
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: the14thdisciple
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: Have Scientist ever seen Anti Matter?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Re: The search for sterile neutrinos and extra dimensions at Fermilab
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Schrodinger's Universe", the new book written by Dr. Milo Wolff, may
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: another hadron black hole question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: nohiggs
• Re: Toutain nargue EDVIGE !
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Benj
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Inflationary Theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Biggest Crime in History Progress Energy over Billing
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Re: Inflationary Theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Inflationary Theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: hanson
• Inflationary Theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: PD
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: grasshopper
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 290.6: Canada Advances Light Perception
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• The search for sterile neutrinos and extra dimensions at Fermilab
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Vector fields and differential forms?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: the14thdisciple
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS Dont MOVE stupid.
  • From: tj Frazir
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Oki
• Re: Why am I not dead?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 290.5: Quantum Gravity Probably Requires That Physics Study Perception
  • From: lassie
• Re: selectively modifiying density
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Androcles
• selectively modifiying density
  • From: grasshopper
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: PD
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Magnetic Cooling
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Another LHC question
  • From: Cwatters
• Another LHC question
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: fghnj
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Magnetic Cooling
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Magnetic Cooling
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Magnetic Cooling
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: jimp
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• another hadron black hole question
  • From: wade . hines
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: doug
• Girl commits suicide over LHC
  • From: Mokusatsu
• Steve McIntyre’s Ohio State University Address on Mann
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Quantum Gravity 290.5: Quantum Gravity Probably Requires That Physics Study Perception
  • From: OsherD
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: dan
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: gh
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Particle Physics -- What If?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• fghnj
  • From: romanse
• gh
  • From: romanse
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: OG
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Igor
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Igor
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Alberto
• Re: The LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• Re: Etymology of "Ziontology","Trianetics" and "Shambolic Publications"
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: PD
• Prof Higgs Retired
  • From: kronecker
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: PD
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: the14thdisciple
• Re: Muon stupidity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: the14thdisciple
• Muon stupidity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Roll the bones!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: nohiggs
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Etymology of "Ziontology","Trianetics" and "Shambolic Publications"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Etymology of "Ziontology","Trianetics" and "Shambolic Publications"
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: anton . van . oosten
• Re: Biogeophysical Impacts Of Cropland Management Changes On Climate
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GISS Global Temperature Dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The sun is heated by magnetic fields from the supermassive black hole at the center of the Galaxy.
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: you have nothing fundamental if you don't accept my lever in your ass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Biogeophysical Impacts Of Cropland Management Changes On Climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: PD
• Biogeophysical Impacts Of Cropland Management Changes On Climate
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Igor
• Re: GISS Global Temperature Dips in August
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Igor
• GISS Global Temperature Dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Darwin123
• Roll the bones!
  • From: Rick
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: PP
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: PD
• test
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: [Large Hadron Collider] Why am I not dead?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electric airplane
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The LHC
  • From: rustyjames777
• Re: The LHC
  • From: rustyjames777
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: The LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: The LHC
  • From: rustyjames777
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum entanglement?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: mL
• Re: One Battery Does Not Fit All
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The LHC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• The LHC
  • From: mlohare
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: [Large Hadron Collider] Why am I not dead?
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Quasi-stable Black Hole production by the LHC
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: LHC "First light"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ziontology
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Large Hadron Collider
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Oki
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Large Hadron Collider
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quasi-stable Black Hole production by the LHC
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quasi-stable Black Hole production by the LHC
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: Alberto
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Quantum entanglement?
  • From: PP
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: findeastlondon
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: Vector fields and differential forms?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Jeroen Belleman
• Re: LHC "First light"
  • From: carl_barnet
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• LHC "First light"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Vector fields and differential forms?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: solutions manual (To search click in keyboard Ctrl+F)
  • From: ricardo
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Quantum Gravity 290.4: Dxy Entanglement vs Probable Causation/Influence (PI) 1 + y - x
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Corr Edwards
• Re: Quantum Gravity 290.3: Ukraine Provides Valuable Dxy Equations/Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: LHC, is it on?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• LHC, is it on?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vector fields and differential forms?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A simple Physics question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Higgs
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Vector fields and differential forms?
  • From: allegretti
• A simple Physics question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The Higgs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ziontology
  • From: thomheg
• Re: Condition for LHC not to produce a dangerous black hole
  • From: Sanny
• The Higgs
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: thomheg
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• The LHC and the YUT
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: Permanent Batteries
  • From: Rick
• Permanent Batteries
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Ziontological Theory of the Origin of Species
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Acceleration Formula please
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: cyclotron cern black hole
  • From: wedge058
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: you have nothing fundamental if you don't accept my lever in your ass
  • From: Huang
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: Huang
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: doug
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: The Ziontological Theory of the Origin of Species
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Higgs boson
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Higgs boson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Ziontological Theory of the Origin of Species
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Higgs boson
  • From: OG
• Re: you have nothing fundamental if you don't accept my lever in your ass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Higgs boson
  • From: bearnol
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Igor
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: mL
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: mL
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: OG
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: OG
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: Beagle
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Help needed understanding "Greenhouse Effect"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is Trianetics?
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: Condition for LHC not to produce a dangerous black hole
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: Beagle
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: Raphanus
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: PD
• Re: gravity theory
  • From: spudnik
• Re: LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• LHC disaster tomorrow -- and what comes after.
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: you have nothing fundamental if you don't accept my lever in your ass
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• The Ziontological Theory of the Origin of Species
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Acceleration Formula please
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Acceleration Formula please
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is Trianetics?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: you have nothing fundamental if you don't accept my lever in your ass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• What is Trianetics?
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Acceleration Formula please
  • From: Photon713
• Re: Quantum Gravity 290.3: Ukraine Provides Valuable Dxy Equations/Solutions
  • From: lassie
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: jscorrales1122
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Miniature Nuclear Reactors
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Ziontology
  • From: abysmalbathos
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Question regarding CO2 statistics and manmade global warming
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Elementary space-mechanics paradox ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Benj
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• solutions manual (To search click in keyboard Ctrl+F)
  • From: solutionfee
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Oki
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• President's Honor and Entropy-Metered Space Ships???
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Solutions manual to Engineering Mechanics Statics 11th Edition By R.C.Hibbeler
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newsweek: The Large Hadron Collider
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Mini Black Holes No Danger
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Elementary space-mechanics paradox ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Elementary space-mechanics paradox ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Elementary space-mechanics paradox ?
  • From: problems
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: hanson
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: doug
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: doug
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: kronecker
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: Huang
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: LARGE HADRON COLLIDER IS AT THE READY
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• LARGE HADRON COLLIDER IS AT THE READY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Nostradamus Predicts LHC & Strangelets?
  • From: lassie
• Re: Nostradamus Predicts LHC & Strangelets?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Nostradamus Predicts LHC & Strangelets?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: OG
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Androcles, Y. Porat will explain Einstein
  • From: glird
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
  • From: Beagle
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why Earth's mantle is solid gold
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Jet vs. Turboprop
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: glad to hear that plug-in evs won't
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Planck's quantum of action: analogy with angle swept by arrow-like particle
  • From: Materion
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: jimp
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• glad to hear that plug-in evs won't
  • From: strollivarious
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Mini Black Holes No Danger
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: jimp
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (1 & 2 Edition), By David J. Griffiths
  • From: akhazr
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: Alberto
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: PD
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Androcles
• UAH Global Temperature dips in August
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: doug
• Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Will the LHC Supernova?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: HCN Physical properties
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• HCN Physical properties
  • From: Alberto
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• The Sun Will Eventually Engulf Earth--Maybe
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Oki
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: john_redman
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Physics and My Plugged UP Gutter
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: PD
• How fast would this object be falling?
  • From: john_redman
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 7 September 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Ramification if Wave Function is Bohmian vs Copenhagen
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Physics and My Plugged UP Gutter
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Quantum Gravity 290.3: Ukraine Provides Valuable Dxy Equations/Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if: the Church had NOT condemned Galileo
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Planck's quantum of action: analogy with angle swept by arrow-like particle
  • From: Y.Porat
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Sep 08, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Androcles, Y. Porat will explain Einstein
  • From: Androcles
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: OG
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Cannabis / Marijuana / The Tree of Knowledge
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Androcles, Y. Porat will explain Einstein
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Androcles, Y. Porat will explain Einstein
  • From: hanson
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: Owl-Stretching Time
• Stupid dead cats and the fallacy of scales
  • From: Huang
• Re: Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Anybody understand how the WWF arrives at global cooling being the fault of carbon?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: hanson
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Ramification if Wave Function is Bohmian vs Copenhagen
  • From: Calorie
• Inovabrasil 06_09_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (84 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Planck's quantum of action: analogy with angle swept by arrow-like particle
  • From: Materion
• Re: Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: hanson
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Sarah Palin Comedy
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: PD
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: What if: the Church had NOT condemned Galileo
  • From: hanson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why Earth's mantle is solid
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if: the Church had NOT condemned Galileo
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Gan
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Gan
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: From the AIP: Discovery of Global Warming
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: hanson
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tlu
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Solutions manual
  • From: solutionfee
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A New Interpretation for Time
  • From: mogi77
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Its turtles all the way up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: John Park
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Planck's quantum of action: analogy with angle swept by arrow-like particle
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Jerry
• Solutions manual to Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics 5th edition by Fawwaz T. Ulaby solution manual
  • From: happyman
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: Calorie
• Does Memory Reside Outside the Brain?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Initiation of rolling without an opposite force.
  • From: Gan
• Planck's quantum of action: analogy with angle swept by arrow-like particle
  • From: Materion
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Gan
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Made It Up As He Went Along
  • From: Damaeus
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is dark matter/energy the gravity from extra dimensions ins stringtheory?
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Gan
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Higgs Boson
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New massive particles found!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: doug
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: doug
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Google Earth news
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: NoEinstein
• LHC Roundup
  • From: Mike Jr.
• NASA to Explore "Secret Layer" of the Sun
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: From the AIP: Discovery of Global Warming
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Eric Gisse
• From the AIP: Discovery of Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Benj
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: THE GRAVITY ILLUSION
  • From: Huang
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Roger Pearse
• Re: Higgs Boson
  • From: PD
• Re: LHC : At rest, Einstein's partisans are cretins
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: PD
• Re: New massive particles found!
  • From: PD
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: Higgs Boson
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: A Name Was Not Specified
• Re: A Kick, I Can Not Even get a Thankyou for Helping
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: A Name Was Not Specified
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: THE GRAVITY ILLUSION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is dark matter/energy the gravity from extra dimensions ins stringtheory?
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 290.2: Turkey's 290.1 Based on U.K.'s Work (U. Cambridge)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• solution manual
  • From: solutionfee
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can Planet Earth Ever Have Rings?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: hanson
• Shaping Single Photons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New massive particles found!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to prove light speed is not constant to all frames
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Planet Earth Ever Have Rings?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• What if: the Jewish Media had NOT hyped Einstein?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: doug
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light has no electric charge or magnetic poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why accelerators cannot push electrons travel at speed more tha...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is dark matter/energy the gravity from extra dimensions ins stringtheory?
  • From: Gerhard W . Gruber
• Re: New massive particles found!
  • From: PD
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tlu
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Michael Moroney
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: A Name Was Not Specified
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: A Name Was Not Specified
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Quantum Gravity 290.1: Turkey Shows Gravity Generates Finite Mass Yang Monopole With Fundamental Set 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Natural mathematics, strings, creation and eternity
  • From: Peter Riedt
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Dark Matter - Mass Distribution in Galaxies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: Benj
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION WITHOUT FORCE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New photo shows Mars particle nearly identical to Earthly microbes.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: doug
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: doug
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: The Strich Book
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dark Matter - Mass Distribution in Galaxies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The dimension trick that Einstein pulled on all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: Richard Henry
• Dark Matter - Mass Distribution in Galaxies
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: The seven SI Units unification, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: doug
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: doug
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Can Planet Earth Ever Have Rings?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: The dimension trick that Einstein pulled on all
  • From: doublecrown7
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Rick
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: doug
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: tadchem
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: doug
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: doug
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• symmetries
  • From: klidge
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Pmb
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dark Matter/Energy
  • From: Igor
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Igor
• Re: ORBITAL MOTION WITHOUT FORCE
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: Spaceman
• The Strich Book
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: A Name Was Not Specified
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Physics of Heaven
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Why no faster than light electrons or protons yet?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2 $B!l (B will have $B!F (Blittle impact $B!G (B on temps
  • From: Benj
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Sep 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Benj
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Even doubling or tripling the amount of CO2′ will have ‘little impact’ on temps
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: Imperfections of classical thermodynamics
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New massive particles found!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: ATTENTION MATHEMATICIANS WHO UNDERSTAND PARABOLAS:
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: The dimension trick that Einstein pulled on all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: PD
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The dimension trick that Einstein pulled on all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closest look yet at the supermassive black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: strich . 999
• Inside Science News Briefs -- Oceans Warmer, Hurricanes Stronger, etc.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hey I think I know what makes that funky sound
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: doug
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The atomic fusion's know-how, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The seven SI Units unification, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: strich . 999
• Re: Predictions made by string theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Most STUPID conjecture by PHYSICIST
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Five peer-reviewed reasons to distrust GISS temperature data
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Five peer-reviewed reasons to distrust GISS temperature data
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: One Battery Does Not Fit All
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• A Kick, I Can Not Even get a Thankyou for Helping
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: doug
• Detecting the Higgs Bosun...
  • From: Rick
• Re: Is dark matter/energy the gravity from extra dimensions ins stringtheory?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: PD
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Leaving a Black Hole
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Antirelativity - The true motive
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: STRICH Thread: Putting Relativity to Rest
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
  • From: doug