Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 09:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 29, 12:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA!
If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited
last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this
country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn’t signify that there is
less POWER in “the weaker sex”, it just differentiates the Hockey Moms
from the Pit Bulls!
At last week’s Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked
the throng, “Are you ready to take back this country?” That question
seemed to imply that Obama’s motive for ‘change’ is to wrest the
control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and
return control to the People. On that one goal Obama and I agree—The
PEOPLE SHOULD BE IN CONTROL! That said, having Barack Obama be
elected President would be THE most catastrophic thing to happen to
this country, 9/11 included…
As was highlighted by Republicans last night, Barack Obama has ZERO
executive experience. He’s running to be President because his
lifelong inferiority complex—caused by to his being biracial; ’poor’;
and brought up without a father—demands to be compensated. When more
and more Blacks began identifying with Obama’s angry tone of speech,
even though he was still in his teens, Obama began being hyped by
Blacks as their future leader. With each public speech that he
delivered, his ego swelled. Eventually, he deluded himself into
believing that he’s entitled to be President. The country owes him
such, simply because of his sad childhood.
Obama’s undeserved rise to power was bolstered by the deeply corrupt
Democratic Party. Such was needing a Manchurian Candidate—without the
independence of the Clintons—who would be the puppet of Howard Dean
and his band of thieves. Those like Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle and
Bob Casey endorsed Obama, not because he’s exceptional, but because
he’s unexceptional enough to be needing them to help him “run things”
in Washington. Take away the implied rewards for those endorsing
Obama, and the endorsements would have been few, indeed.
For the record, my New Constitution requires that any civil employee
or office holder be fired for publicly endorsing a candidate for
government office. That stipulation will stop the you-owe-me-one
obligations, once in office, which have so compromised candidates’
ability to do their jobs of representing the People.
Screaming Howard Dean, the DNC Chairman, knows that he himself will
never be President. But that hasn’t stopped Dean from lusting to have
as much behind-the-scenes power in the White House as he can muster.
Up until Dean “lost it” in 2004, he had been incredibly successful at
generating ideological and financial support over the Internet.
Barack Obama has followed Dean’s example—perhaps under Dean’s tutorage—
to gain “grass roots” support via the Internet. Very early, 90 plus
percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be “compensated”,
too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with
their relentless neighborhood recruitments of voters, and new
registrants to vote… for Obama. The latter is a tacit violation of
principles of democracy.
A Black man who was interviewed in Time Square right after Obama’s
acceptance of his party’s nomination, sounded proud as he said, “This
year I contributed $50.00 to Obama. Obama won’t accept contributions
from special interests.” Well, I’ve got news for you: Blacks ARE a
special interest! And they are a hugely threatening one to the future
of the USA!
If Blacks manage to win “the game” of getting Obama elected, there
will be in-your-face celebrating. Right off the bat, Blacks will be
expecting to see the last vestiges of racial discrimination end. They
will be expecting to have their lot in life be improved, yesterday—
because they are Black—and that is the worst form of racism. There
will be violence from Blacks when they aren’t as empowered by Obama’s
election as they had hoped. And there will be violence from whites if
Blacks are empowered, inequitably. The Democrats and Obama have
gotten this country into a loose/loose situation if Obama gets
elected. The Watts Riots will look like soccer celebrations by
comparison.
Sarah Palin is a Breath of Fresh Air (!) in the midst of the dire
situation that the USA finds itself in. If John McCain, the current
standard bearer of the Republican Party, becomes President, our broken
and corrupt “two party” government will be sitting there, unscathed.
Yes, McCain is a maverick who sticks to his principles. And even
though Palin is a “barracuda”, the US Constitution doesn’t grant the
Executive Office the POWER necessary to implement the changes that
need to be made in our government.
Sarah Palin is a genuine gold nugget charmer! But it pains my heart
to have such a HOPEFUL PRESENCE as she be sacrificed against the
Calcified Wall of Corruption that is our Congress.
However, Sarah Palin need not be sacrificed! To save both McCain and
her from failure in ‘correcting’ our government, all that McCain and
she need to do is to: Publicly acknowledge that it is PRUDENT to let
the American People vote on my democracy-based New Constitution, in
November of 2010! By making just that one simple acknowledgment,
Congress, and the World, will be put on notice that the American
People are determined to take back control of government. For much
too long political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the “great
traditions” of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same
old ineffectual things.
Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government;
and anti taxes. But as long as we’re in debt—and we are, big time,
because of Bush’s wars—taxes can’t be lowered much. On a positive
note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local,
state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of
the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%.
Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be
reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this
country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And
never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the
People captive, simply because the People are too law abiding.
This week on CNN’s ‘Larry King Live’, Jesse Ventura tells us that he
wants to be a player in this country’s… Revolution. Ventura says that
he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican.
Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks
that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he’ll run as an
Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking
control of our (party-dominated) governments.
Because of the above, and individual observations, too, thinking
Americans, everywhere, should realize: The major changes needed in our
government will require tearing down and rebuilding from the ground
up. But the Plans and Specifications to do so are poised and
polished. People, start DEMANDING to learn more about my New
Constitution! The media is giving hints that it can’t keep its
collective heads buried-in-the-sand much longer regarding the prospect
of there being a New Constitution.
One day, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will make a great first woman
President of the United States of America. To help assure that such a
goal isn’t an impossible one for her, simply realize: “A New
Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Aug 27, 7:29 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OBAMA, A MANTOOSMALL ON A STAGETOOBIG.
Democrats had their spectacle last night in Denver. Some say such was
a lot of ‘air’—rock singers, wrong-colored flags being waved, printed
posters held up-side-down, and general mass hoopla over the wrong man
for President. Most of the latter was a build-up to have Barack Obama
say: “I accept the Democratic Party’s nomination to be President.”
But after doing so, Obama’s nearly hour-long speech was, essentially,
a repeat of his same-old-same-old, trademarked, read-from-
teleprompters, unfulfillable promises. As I predicted, his robot-like
facial expression and unvarying vocal tone made watching and listening
to that speech painful. The same genre of political promises have
been getting people “hoping” and “dreaming” every four years—only to
be let down after… “the honeymoon” is over for the new President.
The weakest speaker last night was Al Gore. He was squeezingtoomuch
verbiage intotoolittle time. His tone and facial expression was
that of an angry man. Part of his anger was probably because Barack
Obama is getting a shot at being President, rather than Gore. But
Gore got assaulted badly enough in 2000, by our failing political
system, to last him a lifetime. Easily, the most stupid thing that
Gore said, was to refer to “our great democracy”. Mr. Al Gore, I’ve
got news for you: From the date of our country’s founding, we’ve had
only a poor APPROXIMATION of a democracy. Mainly, that’s because
every decision made by Congress gets compromised by the anti-democracy
Senate. Senate seats aren’t allocated based on population. From day
one, my New Constitution will ELIMINATE the untenable US Senate! And
the Federal Government will start functioning efficiently for the
first time in its history.
Wisely, the American People want CHANGE! On that one fact, I agree
with the Democrats. However, the huge problems facing this nation
aren’t because we’ve never elected a Black President before. They are
because we have allowed two quasi governmental groups, the Democratic
Party and the Republican Party, to serve as clearinghouses for
everything that can get done at the Federal and State levels. The
original Constitution made no provision for having any such
intermediaries between the People and their government. So, from day
one following the ratification of my New Constitution, political
parties shall be outlawed!
I have designed a straight-forward, three voting day process to
determine who our President and Vice President are. The first vote
can have any number of candidates who can get the requisite number of
registered voters to sign a petition. The second vote will reduce the
slate to just eight candidates. And the final vote will name the top
two vote getters President and Vice President. Because the primary
system and the conventions will be entirely eliminated, the race for
President will take just four to six months. And such won’t require
that anyone spend mega-bucks on advertising. It’s the incredible, and
ridiculous, costs of getting elected to public office that,
repeatedly, prevents us from being served by the most qualified
candidates. Rather, we only get to choose between those ego maniacs
who can SNOW the votes enough to get them to throw away their hard
earned money. The latter is what Barack Obama’s crazed machine is
doing with a vengeance. He is “BaRacking the Vote…”
On CNN, Donna Brazile has liked to brag—with her sick smile—that
voters for Obama are being registered so diligently, that “the polls”
won’t matter come election day. Obama, Donna Brazile, and her ilk of
Democrats are so lacking in moral personal constitutions that they
don’t realize that getting people to register to vote… for Obama, is a
violation of a basic foundation of Democracy, namely: “Don’t screw
with, or try to bias, the individual voter’s right to make private
voting decisions!” The primary caucuses this year, and in the past,
have been a violation of democracy for the same reason. THE DECISIONS
OF THE VOTERS SHALL BE THEIRS AND THEIRS ALONE. Getting people to
register to vote is wonderful! But having that be done by anyone who
is affiliated with a candidate, or with any party, unfairly biases
those new voters. Additionally, my New Constitution will disqualify
any candidate for public office who is involved in any way with the
transport of voters—new ones or existing—to the polls.
If Obama gets elected, he’ll discover very quickly that being a great
“Reader of Speeches” will be a poor lever to get a DIVIDED Congress to
do a single thing which he is recommending. And if anything that he
does recommend gets enacted, such will have been so compromised by the
ruinous influence of lobbyists, the media, party-against-party
bickering, and by the Senate-against-the-House, one-upmanship—that
what gets signed into law will serve the People, poorly.
Yes, CHANGES are needed! But as long as the main cause of this
country’s problems—the Democratic and Republican Parties—remain
tangled up in our governmental processes, this country is screwed… and
the whole World is screwed,too. Folks, no matter how spectacular the
final night of the Democratic convention was, after the election it
will be business as usual in Washington; that is, unless… those 80
plus percent of our voters, who are dissatisfied with the direction
that this country is headed, simply unite. They can deny either the
Democrats’ or the Republicans’ candidates from office. When that
happens, lobbyists; the corrupt media; and career politicians
everywhere will start shaking-in-their-boots! The positive things
needed to save the USA, will begin happening, simply, by voting for
LIBERTARIANS in November!
That wonderful Black delegate, for Hillary Clinton, whom I last wrote
about, is Ms. Anne Price Mills. Mills considers Clinton to be more
presidential than Obama. And she lamented: “His resume… his resume..
No graduate right out of Harvard gets hired to be the CEO of a major
corporation.” Barack Obama wants to placate his ego, so he’s vying—by
hook or by crook—to become our next President. His resume shows he
has ZERO executive experience. All that he’s got is a sick sense-of-
entitlement to be President.
Basketball great, Charles Barkley, is considering running as an
independent to be the Governor of Alabama. He says he won’t be
running as a Democrat or a Republican, because the latter aretoo
corrupt. Folks, Charles Barkley said that, live, on national
television, Tuesday night. It’s the same thing I’ve been saying,
every week, for nearly a year! The CHANGES which most people know
that this country needs, can’t be made if the UNDERLYING causes of our
problems—the divisive Democratic and Republican Parties—are allowed to
remain in place.
Ego-maniacal and under-qualified Barack Obama can’t affect ANY of the
changes needed. However, even the prospect of our ratifying my New
Constitution, in 2010, can begin the processes for CHANGE!
Ask yourselves these questions: “Will needed changes be likely to come
from an inexperienced candidate who can make good speeches? Or will
needed changes be more likely to come from me—a man who has observed
the decline in the integrity of our government over my lifetime—and
who has spent the last twelve plus years writing and polishing a New
Constitution to correct all of the underlying problems? Folks, unless
we correct the myriad underlying problems, then no new President has a
chance to fix things. Haven’t we “been there and done that” with
President after President?
Obama has plagiarized from me, to say: “Obama, the change that we
need.” But I said something better, and said it FIRST!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
On Aug 26, 8:21 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
CLINTON GETS UPSTAGED BY REMARKS OF ONE OF HER DELEGATES.
Last night, I was watching CNN’s coverage of the Democratic
Convention. The expected highlight, Tuesday, was the long anticipated
speech of a “defeated” Hillary Clinton. If you will recall… following
the botched-up primaries, Clinton—for whatever reason—put aside her
year long differences with Obama and endorsed him. She seemed to be
doing so because she thinks that the “party’s goals” are more
important than her goals had been. Her most eloquent speech, last
night, was better delivered than most speeches which I can remember—
not just her speeches, anyone’s. Mainly, that’s because such seemed
to be coming from “some part” of her curious heart. Her husband and
daughter, watching in the audience, looked to be as touched as I was.
And most who listened, including the commentators, were,too.
Of all those who were shown on camera during the speech, Michelle
Obama had the most poker face. She had probably heard, as had those
following “the news”, what the outline of the Clinton’s speech likely
included. From the Obamas’ and the Democrat’s positions, those
18,000,000 voters AGAINST Barack Obama, who were FOR Hillary Clinton
must somehow be delivered to Barack on a silver platter, or he won’t
be elected President.
The interesting lead-in Speech by the former Governor of Virginia
showed more of Ted Kennedy’s hopes and dreams. Still, there’s a huge
piece of the “suitable to be President” pie that must be found.
Michelle Obama knows that her husband falls short of Clinton as a
speaker. And though Michelle is an attorney, her own speech Monday
night didn’t approach the power of Clinton’s, either. Somehow, the
oft-repeated fact that the Obamas came from “poor
...
read more »- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: PD
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: Re: Instantaneous is a lot "Faster" Than C!
- Next by Date: Re: Perpetual Motion Research - HELP!
- Previous by thread: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
