Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:23:53 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 4, 2:13 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Posts in this thread:
NoEinstein - 63
Tom Potter - 8
Jeff Relf - 6
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 5
Eric Gisse - 4
Androcles - 1
Marcus Aurelius - 1
Benji - 1
PD - 1
zzbunker - 1
I think we should note from this that
- NoEinstein likes to hear himself talk
- He has only figured out one channel online where he can talk
unfettered, whether it is on topic or not
- The only people who have been willing to engage him are those who
are also famous for using a newsgroup as a personal blog
PD
Dear PD: Unlike you, I have a desire to make this world a better
place. But you enjoy making put-downs of those striving toward
positive ends. Like I've said before, you are negativity
personified. Regarding my posting in just one spot: People know where
to find me, on sci.physics, so that's where I'll be posting, whether
you like it or not. — NoEinstein —
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: PD
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- References:
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- From: PD
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Prev by Date: Re: Seas to Rise Faster This Century
- Next by Date: Re: Sun's face virtually spot-free for months
- Previous by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Next by thread: Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|