Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
- From: Igor <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 11:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Sep 9, 10:55 pm, Beagle <beagle...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 9, 5:06 pm, Igor <thoov...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 8, 6:03 pm, Beagle <beagle...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Folks,
If LHC (or any experiment) does not discover this elusive particle,
e.g. *ever*, will that prove something valuable about the nature of
the universe (and mass)? If so, what does that result reveal?!
How does the absence of something over a finite range falsify its
existence?
Your conclusion is it does not prove or disprove. That seems to side
step the situation and conventional thinking in that they expressly
built and promoted the system powerful enough to cause it. In this
case, finding it was not existing is difficult to overcome the
conclusion that therefore 'no such particle'.
Sounds like you're using inductive reasoning. In other words, if they
don't see it, it doesn't exist. That won't fly.
What is the meaning of finite range in this context?
Finite range of energy.
You think we needed the LHC to discover this conclusion? What we have
is apparently all we've got!
I think you need to learn about the scientific method. Try learning
English too!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: GISS Global Temperature Dips in August
- Next by Date: Re: GISS Global Temperature Dips in August
- Previous by thread: Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
- Next by thread: Re: The Day LHC Discovered Higgs Boson Does *Not* Exist!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|