Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.

On Sep 8, 1:26 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

RED, WHITE AND… BLACK WILL NOT SUFFICE FOR THE USA!

The flag of choice for “legitimizing” Barack Obama as a candidate for
President misses the mark. For him trying to seem presidential is a
simple thing. His formula is to wear a coat and tie and to look
suave. Most of you should have noticed that at every opportunity—as
in Obama’s ubiquitous media ads—one or more freshly-starched, red,
white and Black, PHONY replicas of our flag are situated behind him.

I’m most concerned about any BASTARIZATION of our cherished Red, White
and Blue! My blood relative was the COMMANDER of Fort McHenry during
the War of 1812. Washington had been burned, and the British fleet
was sailing into the harbor at Baltimore. But the foresight of my
relative had caused him to commission a huge Red, White and Blue
American flag.

When the ruinous bombardment of Fort McHenry began, my relative
ordered everyone out. That night, those men hunkered down in relative
safety behind the fort while bombs were bursting in air. Francis
Scott Key was a prisoner on one of the British ships. But he could
see… the rockets’ red glare. Key was rightly concerned—not only for
the fort and for those men—but for the very survival of the USA. If
Baltimore had fallen to the British, there is a likelihood that our
country would now be controlled by Great Britain.

Before dawn’s early light, my relative ordered those men back into the
fort. Immediately, they ran up our proud, new, Red-White-and-Blue
flag! The fort—which the British had assumed to be defeated—wasn’t!
Rapid cannon fire from Fort McHenry began sinking the surprised
British Ships. Because of the difficulty of maneuvering in the small
harbor, the planned land invasion of Baltimore was called off. As
quickly as they could, those ships tacked out of the harbor, and
returned home in defeat.

In large measure the USA owes its continued existence to my relative!
Would such a relationship quality me to have my New Constitution be
considered by the American People? Additionally, I, my sibling, and
my first cousins are the closest living relatives of someone many of
you have heard about: pioneer patriot, Daniel Boone. I’m also proud
to say that I am 1/16th American Indian! Part of my passion to SAVE
this country from itself, is in my BLOOD!

Suddenly, from out-of-the-BLACK comes an ego-maniacal *** named
Barack Obama. Before that psycho had even graduated from Harvard Law
School—where he was accepted, preferentially, because of his being a
’disadvantaged’ Black—Obama was setting-his-sights on the White
House. He knew what it takes to ‘appeal to blacks’. So, he took a
low-paying job as a community organizer of Blacks and Black churches
in Chicago. Obama realized how great such a job would look on his
resume. And such would disguise his selfish motives for entering
politics. All that remained for Obama to do was to vote-his-way
“Present.” through the Illinois House of Representatives, and into the
US Senate. Eventually, enough Blacks realized how wonderful a speaker
he is, and how suave. That’s why they pegged Barack Obama as their
President of choice. And by so doing, many Blacks seem to be
thinking: “Doing what is right for America be damned… I’ll just do
what is right for Black power!”

My New Constitution will DISQUALIFY any candidate for public office
for campaigning while intentionally standing in front of an American
flag, or bunting. The rationale is this: Because of the corrupting
influences of the two major political parties, and of the elitist
media, ego maniacs tend to be the only people who are attracted to be
our “leaders”. And part of the appeal to those rascals is their
mistaken idea that government is sanctioned by the present
Constitution to control what goes on in this country. But nothing
could be further from the truth!

Most politicians who aspire to public office do so to elevate their
“status”. Government has evolved away from the ideals of our founding
fathers. Now, our elected officials are, essentially, our “elected
dictators”. It would be too much of a put-down for our elected
officials to consider themselves to be servants of the People. But be
it known: Under my New Constitution, government officials will BE
servants of the people, “… or be going on their way!”

The one-sentence objective of my New Constitution is this: “By way of
democracy and fair play, return the power to the PEOPLE, and take the
power away from every single corrupting group influence, and away from
government!” Because flags are displayed in and around so many
public buildings, those seeking public office have come to associate
flags with the power of government over the people. Sadly… ***The
American flag has been allowed to become a symbol of our oppressive
government.*** And that idea must be REVERSED!

The flags that Barack Obama favors are the BASTARDIZED red, white and
Black variety. Those were the only flags that were available for
purchase, in “support” of his campaign, at that Denver football
stadium, and were being waved while Obama made his cold-hearted, read-
from-teleprompters acceptance speech. That man’s preference in flags
isn’t very subtle in its implications for the control that Obama is
expecting his Black minority to have over the People.

Many of you probably believe, as I do, that it’s unacceptable for Jews
to control the media, and thereby, to effectively control government.
The latter is bringing this country down, fast. But not nearly as
fast as will occur if Blacks start thinking that they are in control,
as a matter of entitlement, because that *** Barack Obama got
elected. The backlash to having Obama be elected will quickly doom
the USA in its own right. But it will also deny you, the American
People, the right to consider my New Constitution—the only hope to
REALLY change Washington.

Barack Obama isn’t subtle with his continued usage of wrongly-colored
flags. Nor is he subtle in taking offense regarding the capabilities
of a woman like Sarah Palin to be President of the USA. His… “Put
‘lipstick’ on a pig; and it’s still a PIG.” remark was within a week
of Sarah Palin have described herself as a hockey mom. Palin had
asked, “Do you know the difference between a hockey mom and a pit
bull? Lipstick!” Barack Obama is consistently disrespectful to
women! Clearly, he was showing his frustration that a personable
woman has upstaged him. But isn’t it high time? Obama’s main
platform is: “We don’t need four more ‘Bush’ years.” Haven’t we heard
that statement enough already?

Michelle Obama has danced with ‘Ellen’ and “wowed” those on ‘The
View’. But she made the latter appearance only after passing out a
list of topics not to be discussed. Days later, an angry-toned
Michelle—stumping for her husband—has promised thousand dollar rebates
if Obama is elected. An even more angry-toned, baggy-eyed Hillary
Clinton said: “No McCain; No Palin; No way!” What Hillary now knows
is this: There is “No Way” that she will ever become the first woman
President of this country. Now, it seems likely that such honor will
be going to Sarah Palin!

A panicky Barack Obama has met with Bill Clinton for a… strategy
session. Afterward, Clinton announced that “Obama will win, easily.”
Apparently, Obama is having more trouble than he and the corrupt
pollsters are letting on. If not, why would he be going hat-in-hand
to Bill Clinton for advice? To wit: Obama has lost the vote of
women. And he hasn’t gotten the blue collar, rural voters who had
been for Hillary.

While Obama laughs-it-up with David Letterman, he really doesn’t have
much to be laughing about. There aren’t enough corrupt Donna
Braziles; Roland Martins; Gloria Borgers; and other members of “the
best political team” covering “Ballot Bowl”, to get Obama elected.
The INTERNET is where the power of FREE SPEECH now resides!

In two more years, following the ratification of my New Constitution,
there will be no more hired media “experts”, and no more news anchors
or self-appointed media celebrities… assessing—in the present or
future tense—the prognosis of any race for public office or any
referendum. Similarly, polling regarding the latter shall be
outlawed. In effect CNN, Time-Warner, and all of the others, will
have to reinvent themselves or be closed down. And the new Federal
Communications Commission will be empowered to do just that! Never
again will the likes of “smiling” Campbell Brown be allowed to second
guess subjects like “the Bridge to Nowhere.” The media can only COVER
the political news as it happens, not interact with the news so as to
change the outcome. Nor shall they keep replaying clips of
yesterday’s news that are most favorable to the ideology of their
management.

In spite of the above, the American people won’t be lacking for the
news! They’ll get it, unedited, and without any biased assessments by
those in the media. Never again will reporters be “filling time” by
talking to their news anchors or to other reporters about what that
day’s political events mean. The only conversations allowed to be
aired regarding the political scene will be those involving non
celebrity, non paid, and non ideologically-screened public citizens.
If Larry King wants a celebrity on his show, King had better not
discuss politics, or his show will be shut down! Also, the airing of
the opinions of movie stars, like Matt Damon, is anti-democracy, and
shall be forbidden in the future. The only “opinions” that matter in
political contests are the opinions of the voters on election day!

Barack Obama’s campaign has elevated him to the status of the Anti-
Christ—get him elected, and be damn the consequences to the USA and to
the World. Obama should consider becoming a ‘GQ’ model. There will
be pictures of him in the media AFTER the American people have
reinstated the Red, White and BLUE as their Stars and Strips of
choice! The prospects for America are bright, but only if we will
TAKE BACK control of our government from all of the corrupt group
influences and special interests!

Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘CHANGE’ that we need!”
Pass it on!

Respectfully submitted,

— NoEinstein —

Happy Days… !
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/9903367481ce7970/ae4338645fbefbf5?hl=en&lnk=st&q=Happy+Days...!#ae4338645fbefbf5


On Sep 4, 12:03 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

PLANS FOR CHANGE: CHOOSE ONE.

The backlash against the Bush Years virtually assures that Democrats
will be in control of both houses of Congress in 2009.  Strangely,
history shows that the American electorate has a tendency to choose a
President who isn’t from the party that controls Congress.  By that
standard, John McCain looks strong.

Obama-Biden and the Democrats are pinning their hopes on their ability
to convince the voters that the McCain-Palin ticket is in the mold of
G. W. Bush.  However, such a message has already overplayed its
usefulness.  Nonetheless, Obama is planning a very costly, 50-state
campaign to get out his message to the voters.  If quantity of
advertising can swing an election, he will test that theory.

Following the introduction, this past week, of John McCain’s choice
for V. P.—Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska—it is being reported that
Republican campaign contributions are way up.  So, it seems that both
major parties must believe that the American People are dumb enough to
say: “So-and-so had the most ads, so I’ll vote by that standard.”  For
a country strapped with bank failures and mortgage foreclosures, does
it make sense to be throwing good money into the coffers of the
media?  Don’t the voters already know enough about… the candidates?

Desiring to become President has to be the stuff of kids’ dreams.  But
in reality, desiring to become President is tantamount to lunacy.
Both Obama and McCain are huge egotists.  John McCain, who is
understandably less energetic than Obama, sells himself as a tested
veteran of the unpopular Vietnam War.  If sticking-to-his-principles
counts with the voters, McCain’s chances look pretty good.

McCain is touting how he and Palin will be able to work with Congress
to cause the changes this country is needing.  He’s been a US Senator
for decades.  Did the needed changes happen during those years?  No,
they didn’t.  But McCain expects us to believe that, magically, after
he’s elected President, he’ll have the power to make Congress correct
its problems.  But weren’t many of those same Congressmen at least
partly responsible for the messes we are in?

I understand enough about human nature to know that you don’t get
people, who did wrong, to make corrections when those people are the
ones in power.  Needed changes will come about only by removing out-of-
touch Congressmen from power!  Under my New Constitution, the American
People will have the say-so .  No longer will there be an anti
democracy US Senate.  And “Representatives must represent, or be going
on their way!”

Barack Obama is a more persuasive speaker than McCain.  But in the
long-on-ceremony and short-on-results Congress, making and listening
to ‘powerful’ speeches is the ho-hum stuff of their daily existence.
Neither Obama nor McCain have a ‘snowball’s chance in hell’ of causing
the needed changes, simply, by talking about those things.

For nearly two years I’ve been explaining to you readers that Barack
Obama doesn’t have the right personality, nor does he have the good
CHARACTER necessary to be President.  He’s just an exceptionally
detail oriented, egotistical loner.  With every interview that he
gives, he can argue the nuances of this or that way of doing things.
However, being a Chief Executive requires someone who ISN’T detail
oriented; has a general overview of issues; works well with people;
trusts others to do most of the work; can delegate authority; and is a
likeable person with a positive disposition.  How does Obama stack
up?  Not very good, I’m afraid.

Barack Obama is one of those always right people.  Such don’t tend to
be well liked as bosses.  His being overly detail oriented means that
he’ll spread himselftoothin.  He’ll be second guessing those who
should be smart enough to come up with needed plans.  Though he will
delegate “authority”, he’ll be the bottleneck to having the proposals
of anyone under him be implemented.  And because of the latter, he
will have a hard time keeping a good staff—simply because he won’t
trust his staff to do their jobs.

Obama has a negative, didactic personality.  He doesn’t work well in
groups.  Because of his mixed race, he has had a lifelong identity
crisis.  That’s why he can’t express a normal range of emotions.  His
stony exterior will cause others to view him with suspicion.  And many
will consider him to be untrustworthy.  Since negotiating isn’t in his
nature, he’ll be a failure at foreign policy.  His pushy personality
is more suited to a dictator than to a consensus builder.  The
impression he makes is that of an overbearing, unhappy person.  Those
around him won’t be feeling much sunshine.

The USA will be in dire straits if Barack Obama is elected.
Supposedly, he is smart.  Anyone with his personality and character
flaws, who continues to campaign to become President—as a matter of
entitlement—deserves to be tagged… the Anti Christ.  If Obama was a
man of character and honor, he would have dropped out of the race
months ago.  The future of the USA doesn’t matter to him.  The only
thing important to Obama is to placate his maniacal inferiority
complex, turned superiority complex, because of his being fatherless,
and racially half-and-half.

No seventy-something man like John McCain should be promising to
‘fight’ for anything.  Admittedly, being a candidate for President is
an honor.  But choosing the unnecessary “fight” route to the needed
changes makes no sense.

When I began writing my New Constitution twelve years ago, I knew that
the outlawing of political parties would be a difficult pill for many
to swallow… unless; unless the MAIN OBJECTIVES of both parties can be
realized, fairly.  Amazingly, by making government a more responsive
and efficient institution, the business and economic climate in this
country will improve so much that there won’t be any need to keep
looking to government for favors, or even for handouts.  Lobbyists for
business interests won’t be needed, if the American economic situation
starts improving on its own!

A misguided concept which is alltoocommon in this country: “If
others are using shady dealings to get ahead, I, or my company, willtoo.”  The latter genre of thinking is why the USA is in such dire
straits right now.  But suppose that the new philosophy in the USA is
this: “I will be FAIR in all of my business and personal dealings.”
As I’ve said: “What goes around, comes around!”  Instead of revenues
declining—because there are no more lobbyists to gain undeserved
advantages—rightful advantages will start coming, because more and
more people are dealing FAIRLY with their fellow Americans!

As I have done for the Republican Party, the major objectives of the
Democratic Party are addressed,too.  While writing our New
Constitution, I didn’t “take sides”.  Rather, I defined optimum
relationships wherefrom the large majority of our Citizens can be
secure in their “Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.”

If Barack Obama manages to get elected, I’ll lock up my New
Constitution.  Case closed.  I could never shake that scoundrel’s
hand, even if he extends it.  All of my written-in corrections of the
injustices to Blacks will go unrealized, that is… if the ignoble Black
BLOCK voters place more importance on “winning”—by-hook-or-by-crook—
than they place on having their reasonable objectives BE MET.  My New
Constitution will assure that Blacks, and all minorities, get the fair
and equal treatment that they deserve.  But there will be no such
guarantees if Barack Obama gets elected…  Is there any way that I can
make that simple fact MORE clear?!

McCain-Palin needs to wise up.  They should inform the country that
they’re OPEN to the idea of letting the American People consider my
New Constitution for ratification in 2010.  Sincere statements to such
effect will send huge shockwaves throughout our government!  I’ll
predict that there will be little or no opposition from Congress
regarding any reasonable proposal coming from the White House.  And
our country’s new charmer, Sarah Palin, won’t be sacrificed against
that “immovable, calcified wall that is the US Congress.”

Additionally, John McCain won’t have to be “acting tough” in foreign
affairs.  That’s because the level of world tensions will start going
down!  The scuttle***, everywhere, will be that the USA is about to
become a “Kinder, Gentler Nation!”  Hopefully, the lame-duck US Senate
will decide to go-out on positive notes and work WITH the House rather
than (as so often) against it.  A national health care program should
be a top priority.  So many positive things can happen in the next two
years.  Everyone should be amazed, if we will all just think positive!

Any third party candidates out there, who want to help improve the
world, should also declare their openness to having my New
Constitution be considered.

Barack Obama—effectively more than figuratively—is the ‘Angel from
Hell’.  But be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that
we need!”  Pass it on!

Respectfully submitted,

— NoEinstein —





On Aug 29, 12:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA!

If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited
last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this
country over to them!  Wearing lipstick doesn’t signify that there is
less POWER in “the weaker sex”, it just differentiates the Hockey Moms
from the Pit Bulls!

At last week’s Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked
the throng, “Are you ready to take back this country?”  That question
seemed to imply that Obama’s motive for ‘change’ is to wrest the
control of our country from

...

read more »- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.