Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed

jonathan cyriax brast wrote:
Spaceman schrieb:
Eric Gisse wrote:
Where's the motion in E = mc^2, space***? The particle ISN'T
MOVING!

The parts inside the particles are moving Eric.
ERROR: Doppler Effect would terminate specific quantisation of emitted
Light.

Total bull*** talk.
Doppler effect would not do anything of the sort.


That is how they have "energy".

Not at all: W, E, T, Q and V are not the same for a reason.

LOL
You truly have been brainwashed beyond help huh?
they are all parts of the dang parts.
Sheesh.


That is why gas can expodes and coal burns and nukes
make realy big booms
gas cans explode because of thermic energy
coal burns because of chemical energy
nukes explode because of nuclear energy
first is kinetic energy form mechanical processes
second is electromagnetic energy form electrodynamical processes
third is chromodynamic energy from quantumchromodynamical processes
three absolute different cases

All simply explained by mass in motion if you actually ever
learned classical physics.


Are all of the particles 1/(sqrt(2))*c fast?
Then why don't the collapse when they get cold?

Why should they collapse?
The smaller stuff inside it freezes too and everyone knows
when you freeze things they pretty much always expand and
don't collapse.

And why don't the just dissipate?

Because you stopped the motion and they froze instead.

That seriously is bull***.

No,
Your model is serious bull***.
Built from bull*** upon bull*** with a topping of
puke and bull*** and a total ingorance of classical physics.
and of course.. all worshipped just like the religion
it is.

So Jonathan.
Still can't show "finites" that create infinites huh?
Is that why you are gettting mad?




.

Loading