Re: No infinite energy needed for lightspeed

jonathan cyriax brast wrote:
Spaceman schrieb:
No it would not.
It shows all the same "stuff" with the same speeds as the same
colors. And when you change the speeds of the "stuff" like when you
change a state or such you can even get different colors.


It can't have the same speed in every direction for it would
dissipate.

We were talking about atoms at rest and they can have the same
frequency heading in any direction the light reflects it to.
some actually have multicolor depending on the angle of reflection.
You are now proving you are more of a "partial" physics troll
that is merely in love with Einsteins SciFi instead of actually
knowing anything about "real" physics.
You read a lot of books and can memorize crap pretty
good, but can't actually figure out things with actual thought.


Modern physics that advances the best uses old physics that are
correct and enhances them to be even more accurate when better
equipment and tools become available.
That is how it has worked fine for 1000's of years til the rubber
ruler cults showed up.

Well I has worked for 100 of years, before that the local church
dictated the world view, and science as community didn't exist.

It has not worked all the time.
It fails in many cases you just refuse to listen to even though
I have given examples.
It is a paradox laden theory based upon rubber rulers and malfunctioning
clocks.

C is not actually constant.
I though I showed you that already?
c is only constant to "at rest" things.
That is why E=mc^2 only works "at rest" and you need
KE and more once you get moving things involved.
c is a speed, speeds can not be constant.
(I forgot to warn you about the brainwashing part of relativity
that makes you ignore the relative motion parts when needed
to support the rubber ruler theory.)
my bad..
sorry about forgetting to tell you that.
You can't ignore relative motion speeds and neither can
light.
Or is light able to violate relative motion even though it
is moving at a speed and all speed should be relative?

Yes, thats the whole fun. Relative motion doesn't add normally.

Actually it does.
It is even proven by particle acclerators.
You see if the speeds were not added as if no changes
occured, they would not hit each other at the correct time.
To hit the particles together they use no time dilation at all.
You might want to get a clue.
And of course as I already told you, for GPS to work
they need to remove the clock malfunctons.
Simple proof the time dilation and speed addition crap
is wrongly explained by relativity.

Lets try a simple thoguht about such.
Two spaceships are heading towards a collision point
(we will be nice and keep the spaceships sub c speeds)
Lets say both ships (A and B) are heading towards
collision point (I)
A third observer (D) verifies the ships are moving at 0.75c
towards that point (I) and heading directly towards each other
and will crash at (I)
So A is doing 0.75c and B is doing 0.75c,
according to the third observer (D) those ships will crash
in 3/4 second.
What time do do the ships think they will crash at
with one observing the other
(use you silly transform and you will crash before you thought
you would since you would have slower speeds according
to each other.)
It's all about your point of view. You are outside, not moving.
I'm inside moving. We will appear not like 1,5c to each other, but my
time is also slower (think about how clocks work).

That is the point.
you think your time is slower but the collision occurs
as the outside observer measured it would.
You are the one that needs to think about the damn clock
It malfunctions, and when a clock malfunctions, it also
gives the wrong distance per time.
Sheesh!
You are proving you do not have a brain that can actually
break the brainwashing.
That is sad.
You will ignore every single problem the real world
and basic math can show you.
REAL SAD.


Division my zero is not proof
You should not even be using anything that comes up
as division my 0 since that means you have a big problem
with that math that is coming up with anything being
devided by 0.
It states: IF you try to accelerate up to c THAN you'll get problems.
IF you stay below c everything is OK, a little strange but still
reachable.

It says you are using stupid ass math that is incorrect to begin with.

Since your basic math that proves basic math wrong
Where?
must also be wrong via your own proof.
:)

Well you didn't prove it wrong, but you just couldn't get the reason.

OMFG.
I don't have to prove math that violates basic math as wrong.
It is wrong just because it is trying to say basic math is wrong.
If you don't get that, you really do not know math.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory
Spaceman


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The speed of gravity revisited
    ... and many physics texts read as if the experiment was done and the result is known. ... No one can apply math to physics until they understand physics. ... This holds for every point the test body ever occupies, ... I do have issues with the math of GR for strong fields and high speeds. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... segment that speeds up; and one segment that slows down ... It is clear you have not done the math and it looks like you have never ... light velocity increased beyond 'c'. ... light can be calculated by dividing the static distance by the time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... segment that speeds up; and one segment that slows down ... It is clear you have not done the math and it looks like you have never ... light velocity increased beyond 'c'. ... light can be calculated by dividing the static distance by the time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... segment that speeds up; and one segment that slows down ... It is clear you have not done the math and it looks like you have never ... light velocity increased beyond 'c'. ... light can be calculated by dividing the static distance by the time. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... segment that speeds up; and one segment that slows down ... It is clear you have not done the math and it looks like you have never ... light velocity increased beyond 'c'. ... light can be calculated by dividing the static distance by the time. ...
    (sci.physics)