Re: Einstein's Relativity Over With in the Twinkling of an Eye?

In news:sci.physics, PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> posted on Tue, 23
Sep 2008 04:50:17 -0700 (PDT):

On Sep 22, 11:08 pm, Damaeus <dama...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the same reason you asked about infinity.  There is no "might"
become infinite.  The universe is already infinite.  The Big Bang
effect has been confining infinity to a finite space.

That's interesting babble. How do you confine infinity to a finite
space?

By squeezing it down to a point of heat and light, blowing it up and
calling it the Big Bang. Of course, I don't think the Big Bang
contained all the matter in the universe. I think part of what causes
the spreading is the constant influx of new dark matter from outside
the finite bubble. Infinity is already filled with dark matter. That
dark matter is pouring into the "big bang area" to accelerate its
equalization with infinity.

 Once that
"membrane" of the big bang effect is gone,

What membrane?

Oh, someone somewhere else asked me what boundary I was talking about
when I said the infinite universe was confined to a finite space. He
didn't seem to *see* that this finite space would be the accelerating
boundary of the Big Bang effect, obviously. But then he came back to
me and said he saw the finite universe as having a membrane and
outside the membrane was infinity. Well, in mental visualization,
what he described was precisely my model! His "membrane" was the
finite container for the infinite universe. The membrane is symbolic
of the edge of the big bang effect.

And what will make it go away?

When the effect of the big bang becomes large enough, and far enough
away from "ground zero", it will eventually fade away. That dark
matter currently pouring into finite space from infinite space through
that boundary is what is accelerating the expansion.

Once infinity is no longer contained, the way Einstein's Relativity
works changes.  We can then actually move through the universe at
speeds exceeding light because the medium will no longer be
compressed.  Since space is compressed by a finite container, it slows
down photons going through it.

And there's no more or less evidence I could point out for this than
science has for claiming de Sitter's is the universe we're headed for.

What evidence do you think exists for de Sitter's space? Have you seen
the current month's issue of Scientific American?

No. I only say the physicists seem to prefer de Sitter's universe
because that's all that was pounded into my head the last time I
engaged a bunch of physicists.

Their claim is illogical, anyway.  If the universe has been expanding
for 13.7 billion years, and is still made up of 84% dark matter, and
if dark matter keeps pouring into the universe from "somewhere"

Woah, where did you get the notion that dark matter keeps pouring into
the universe?

Well, it has to be. If black holes are sucking stuff out of the
universe, and the universe still consists of 84% dark matter, it has
to be coming from somewhere. Apparently the black holes suck matter
out of the universe so it can be recycled and sucked back in by some
other method. Black holes might be like the cleaning system on your
pool. Suck the water out of the pool, along with the dead ants on
top, and blow it back into the pool after it's been filtered.

, then apparently de Sitter's universe will have too much matter
in it to suffer a heat death.

What on earth gave you that impression?

Because apparently de Sitter's universe dies when matter becomes so
dispersed that you can't see anything from any one place anymore, not
even stars. If there's too much matter in de Sitter's universe, it
won't be able to die the kind of death that physicists say it will.
And if the universe is still 84% matter after all this expansion,
especially since it's been said there was no matter actually *IN* the
big bang, itself, then the fact that the universe even has 84%
invisible matter at all is surprising. So it has to be coming from
somewhere.

Where are you getting all this crazy information?

It's from putting together information that's already there, and not
sticking to any one theory as having all the answers. All of them
have certain elements of truth in them. You can figure it out if you
just read them all.

Does your requirement for hope become the catalyst that turns
"might" into "will"?

No, of course not.  Hope is what I think people feel when they look
for something to happen that will help their physical existence as
they know it now.  I already *know* that a the universe I envion is
coming.

And how do you "know" this?

I see it and feel it happening regularly. I can't lie about my own
experience. It would do no one any good.

 My *hope* is that I find a job that pays well enough that I
can be comfortable until the universe reaches that state, which I
think will be in 2012.

Finding a job to make you *comfortable* is your life's objective for
the next four years?

Since I don't need a huge amount to make myself comfortable, yes. I
don't want to spend my time building some massive financial empire if
space-time curvature is going to straighten itself out and allow
faster-than-light travel from 2012 and beyond. At the same time,
while there's nothing I *need* to do to help this along, there might
be some things I'd like to do between now and then. Since I'd like to
see the United States and Canada, I'd like to do some kind of work
that allows me to travel the states in my own vehicle. I love to
drive. Heck, I might even say I *live* to drive, sometimes. Just
being in the car rolling down the highway is fun for me. If I could
get some line of work in which I could both drive, think and provide
solutions to problems around the country doing so, that would be a
dream job for me right now. I might sound like a lunatic on this
newsgroup, but it only illustrates my imagination bursting at the
seams to solve problems.

You have no greater impact aspirations than this?

I might update them as 2012 approaches if I see that what I'm thinking
is going to isn't going to happen. But in that I can't stop what's
happening even if I wanted to, what I do about 2012 will depend more
on the universe than me.

Damaeus
Damaeus
--
Cannabis helps you return to feeling like who you really are as a human being, and get away from what you have had to become to survive in this world. --Damaeus
.

Relevant Pages

  • Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported
    ... >> Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported ... >> universe after the Big Bang. ... matter was evenly distributed in all ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported
    ... >> Vestiges of Big Bang Waves Are Reported ... >> universe after the Big Bang. ... matter was evenly distributed in all ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Can any old earther refute common genetic ancestry?
    ... variability to infinite variability. ... We live in a slightly bio-friendly universe. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Origins and Mental Activity
    ... activity before continuing to chew on the laws of intelligence. ... elements formed after the big bang -- except maybe helium and hydrogen ... throughout the universe, and in great quantity. ... will get the furthest in tracking the formation of matter, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Limited Evolutionary Potential? - for Marc
    ... I didn't say the big bang theory must be wrong. ... I have a difficult time with the idea that the universe could happen ... I like to think of a design studio with lots of designers, ... I am also taken by how long the evolution of matter from energy took ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading