I thought I _was finished. Part III

Am I avoiding discussing n dimensional space?

The reason I didn't discuss all the rest of the weird and wonderful aspects of
this is because i wanted to keep it as simple as possible.

The big suck, not a big bang, there is no evidence for a big bang, there is
just evidence for the quantum foam, expanding, and as it expands, it creates
background radiation.

The universe may not be static, but it is as close to static as you can
imagine, when no matter where you look, the background radiation is about 2.7
kelvin.

And so we looked at the very small, and we see that quantum foam bubbles are
uniform in size, because the superconducting superfluid of absolute space-time,
has a particular elasticity value, and the rate of expansion of the universe
is constant.
Well it may not be constant, but it doesn't vary widely, and as it changes if
it changes so does the size of the bubbles and everything stays relative.

So again if you consider that it is expanding, along the t axis, well our
reality is expanding along the t axis, so we are after all, living in the now,
and so we can't see that expansion happen.

Like a balloon with a ruler painted on it.

However, we can look over millions of years, into the sky into the past, or,
just look at the earth, over time, by the age of the rocks, and see, that
contrary to other theoretical ideas, the real theory, of the quantum world, and
quantum gravity, that I have been discussing, does predict it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kL7qDeI05U

But is it changing in size? Or is it just the molecules are flowing making it
look as if it has expanded in size, when in fact, it has been expanding into
hyperspace?

Well both.

Thats not enough expansion to give rise to gravity in real time, but that is
evidence of the secondary effect of that expansion, that it does tend to drag
things outward making them larger, just because of the constant force in that
direction.

Just as the moon is moving away from the earth.

Well that amount 2.5 centimeters per year, is probably in accordance with that
rate of expansion shown in that video.

The same secondary effect.

And GR has two red shifts to account for that.
The red shift of light and the red shift of gravity.

Although we are quite certain, what the real universe is like, down to a
quantum bubble of Plank Length, and can predict its behavior with accuracy, and
can even tie that into to macro events without violating any physical theory in
use such as GR or SR or Newtonian physics, quantum theory, particle physics or
chemistry, microbiology, etc, and we know that the bubble has to have a pi
type value that is a rational number.
So we can say that without invoking other dimensions than 3 physical and 1
time, we can say it is a closed system.

Outside of the edge of the visible universe, is probably more universe. We
think it is 90 billion light years across, but others have suggested it is
twice that. That is how much superfluid there is.
Maybe when you get past all the stars, there is still quantum foam, still
background radiation for another 100 billion light years. We can't see that
far.

Maybe when you run out of foam bubbles it is just superfluid and that goes for
100 billion light years and then you start to find more quantum foam, and then
you find another universe.

Not a parallel universe, just another universe to this one, like another galaxy
is to any other galaxy.
That is entirely possible without invoking more dimensions or infinities of any
kind.

A megaverse.

Where a universe is a galaxy by comparison.

That doesn't mean that there is another you there reading this or anything of
that sort.
But probably the laws of physics would be the same.

Then of course you have the notion of the set.

Since our elements are in a set, what about other universes which are just
offset from our frequencies?

That is the multiverse concept. All that is required for that is if Plank
Length is a different number as everything in our universe, our real universe,
should be divisible by Plank Length. It is quantized.
However, it is more reasonable to believe that what we can detect, is not all
that there is to our own set .

That is to say, that that bubble is doing things, that we can't detect also,
and we can detect it at Plank Length.

A quantum leap, is something that defies description because common sense
dictates that there is infinity, that it leaps over.
But infinity is ok in geometry. Infinity is ok when it is just a number set. As
long as it is not real.

And we say that anything below the level of Plank Length, is merely not real.
We accept that there may be virtual particles.
We expect there are.

In fact, if you consider that the universe is expanding and has been for a very
very long time, well a very old black hole, may be like looking back in time in
its center, and so how small can small actually get?

You may be able to get small for hundreds of billions of light years and still
not actually get to a singularity.

Its just that we have a boundary region of Plank Length and it is a relational
number.

So imagine a plastic sphere as an event horizon. and enter that event horizon
and your scale changes.

Space-time is strongly warped, your ruler on your balloon is no long the same
size as the ruler on your twin balloon just outside that event horizon.

So inside there you could hypothetically go back in time as you head to the
center of that black hole.
It is dropping back in time.

You see it is resisting expansion because it has so much mass, when it
imploded, as part of its supernova, it overcame the power of expansion of the
universe, and since the t axis is that expansion, it is in negative time inside
that event horizon.

How elastic is that superfluid?
Well it may be perfectly elastic. You may be able to stretch it forever, but
one property of it may have a fixed type value.
When it comes to making bubbles in it, it generally makes bubbles according to
the ambient pressure of its surroundings.

And in that region past the event horizon, the bubbles would be getting smaller
and smaller by comparison as you head back in time.

You can posit that that superfluid is not the final word, but it is made up
itself of something else.
Maybe held together by yet another force.

But for the sake of keeping it real, we have to at a point say well, lets not
unduly complicate things with things we cannot know.

We know about the foam, and we know about the superfluid.
Its easy to tell there is something down there.
Vortices in a rotating superfluid tell us that there is absolute space-time.

Plenty of work is out there like this...
http://www.springerlink.com/content/u18k4t2324r78j2g/

Newton has a new bucket.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: hubbles constantly expanding universe
    ... existence of an absolute sale of length from quantum physics requires ... such bound systems to remain the same size. ... world such expansion of the universe would be unobservable. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hooray: the Church of Scotland shows the way
    ... we also have mathematics, philosophy and the arts. ... who is widely considered to be the father of the quantum computer. ... the fabric of reality provides the rules for a quantum universe ... Human existence and the existence of all the material things that we ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
  • Re: Plate Tectonics and Earth expansion
    ... To me this subject of earth expansion is interesting because ... the entire universe is expanding. ... expansion is due to the increase in self repulsive matter or energy. ... A Quintessential Introduction to Dark Energy ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: Is time an illusion?
    ... Physicists have long struggled to understand what time really is. ... In their quest for deeper theories of the universe, some researchers increasingly suspect that time is not a fundamental ... One group has recently found a way to do quantum physics without ... we begin by measuring the y spin, that disturbs the spin in the x direction, creating a 50-50 probability for both measurements. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Is time an illusion?
    ... Physicists have long struggled to understand what time really is. ... In their quest for deeper theories of the universe, some researchers increasingly suspect that time is not a fundamental ... One group has recently found a way to do quantum physics without ... we begin by measuring the y spin, that disturbs the spin in the x direction, creating a 50-50 probability for both measurements. ...
    (soc.retirement)