sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 31 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• where exactly newton made da wrong turn
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: PD
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: shareyourknowledge@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: PD
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: Androcles
• "Gravity"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: john271008
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: shareyourknowledge@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• How much do you weigh ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: shareyourknowledge@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: srp2inc
• the lever law is not about conservation of energy
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: PD
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Gan
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Gan
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: PD
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: tg
• Quantum Gravity 295.4: U.K. and Japan Find Protons and Neutrons to be Skyrmion-Type (Multi-) Solitons
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.3: Maximizing q(x, y) at F = 1/2 or p = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 295.3: Maximizing q(x, y) at F = 1/2 or p = 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.2: Bi-Logistic q(x, y) Differential Equation using Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: Huang
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: BradGuth
• JSH: Tail does not wag the dog, simply explained
  • From: JSH
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.2: Bi-Logistic q(x, y) Differential Equation using Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 295.2: Bi-Logistic q(x, y) Differential Equation using Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: clark91297
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: JSH
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: John Park
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Republicans are Saying it Appears We Won In Iraq
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: John Smith
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: Nintendoislife
• SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: Nintendoislife
• Re: Republicans are Saying it Appears We Won In Iraq
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: Nintendoislife
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: PD
• JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: JSH
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: mcraymyles
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: tadchem
• Re: We can Never Ever claim anything is infinitely dense||vacuous.
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: New Thermo in Sci Am
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• We can Never Ever claim anything is infinitely dense||vacuous.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: PD
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Each ship could be made of two ships, in case one fails.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.1: Simplification of q(x, y) when A U B = universe
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: john271008
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Benj
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sizes of infinity jump
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: PD
• Re: Scotch Tape-potent x-ray source Hammer creates magnetisum
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's ...
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: For Europeans
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: testtest505050
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Gan
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 295.1: Simplification of q(x, y) when A U B = universe
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 295.0: When q(x, y) is in [0, 1] for q = ap + bp^2 + cF + dF^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.7: Quantum Theory/Physics May be Continuous and Fundamentally Probabilistic (Yale University)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Androcles
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: john271008
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: OG
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: john271008
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Scotch Tape-potent x-ray source Hammer creates magnetisum
  • From: Benj
• Re: PLEASE STOP ALL WARS NOW !!!!!!! http://georgewbush.ws
  • From: Benj
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: winston71
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Rowan University "validate" free/new energy claim
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: RP
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: winston71
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: OG
• what srt comes down to
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Scotch Tape-potent x-ray source Hammer creates magnetisum
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Androcles
• Re: the direction of gravity and electric force
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: PD
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Loc
• Vehicle taking a turn
  • From: Gan
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Double slit exp.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: RP
• Double slit exp.
  • From: winston71
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Androcles
• the direction of gravity and electric force
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quantum Gravity 294.9: Some More on Lie Fields
  • From: OsherD
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Quantum Gravity 294.8: A "Double-Logistic-Like" Causal Probability of Form q(x, y) = aP + bP^2 + cF + dF^2 with a, c > 0, b, d < 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Time Machine question
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: JSH
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: john271008
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: .
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: New Thermo in Sci Am
  • From: AshtarSheran
• arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: xxein
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.7: Quantum Theory/Physics May be Continuous and Fundamentally Probabilistic (Yale University)
  • From: xxein
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: RichD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Igor
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: Igor
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Quantum Gravity 294.7: Quantum Theory/Physics May be Continuous and Fundamentally Probabilistic (Yale University)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is a test.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: test
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chemical Thermodynamics part 1 is uploaded
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: john271008
• Re: Solutions manual to Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (1 & 2 Edition), By David J. Griffiths
  • From: huntds
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.6 Re-Announced: Probable Causation/Influence --> Memory --> Life (Czech Republic)
  • From: AshtarSheran
• New Thermo in Sci Am
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: The growing list of the lies, sins, and scandals of Sarah Palin. It has grown quite a lot since 08/29/08!
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: jimp
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Loc
• Giuen Holding Trust Ltd. Financial Derivatives
  • From: Bank-1.
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: RP
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 294.6 Re-Announced: Probable Causation/Influence --> Memory --> Life (Czech Republic)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: Androcles
• Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• arxiv endorsement request
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Chemical Thermodynamics part 1 is uploaded
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• smallest particles and the LHC mentality
  • From: john271008
• how to add a spin -1/2 to a singlet state?
  • From: ginzzer
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: john161008
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CMB and expanding wavelength energy question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Chemical Thermodynamics part 1 is uploaded
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Igor
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CMB and expanding wavelength energy question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Inside Science News Briefs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: This is a test.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: eric gisse
• This is a test.
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Is it possible to suck your own cock?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• CMB and expanding wavelength energy question
  • From: Stico
• Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: hanson
• Re: discovering the proo/anti nuclear forces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: stretching spacetime & CMB wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• .
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nonexistent B fields
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 27, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Who is Androcles?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Nonexistent B fields
  • From: RP
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time Machine question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Time Machine question
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: jimp
• Re: hello everyone
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Darrell Lakin
• please help stop wars and starvation -C
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: xxein
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: xxein
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: xxein
• Re: electric fields on vid cams
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: xxein
• Re: electric fields on vid cams
  • From: Buboise
• Re: Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: Huang
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PLEASE STOP ALL WARS NOW !!!!!!! http://georgewbush.ws
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: hello everyone
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electric fields on vid cams
  • From: jimp
• Re: electric fields on vid cams
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: waynegage@xxxxxxx
• electric fields on vid cams
  • From: Buboise
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: test
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: theoratical physics
  • From: Androcles
• theoratical physics
  • From: spidertrap160
• The Litvinenko Polonium 210 poisoning case
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Androcles
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• test
  • From: Uncle Ben
• InovaBrasil 25_10_08 - OS 20 ARTIGOS MAIS LIDOS - (83 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: john161008
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Explain magnetic field lines please.
  • From: jim
• Quantum Gravity 294.6: Probable Causation/Influence --> Memory --> Life (Czech Republic)
  • From: OsherD
• Chemical Thermodynamics part 1 is uploaded
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for fraud
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: External Electric Field vs. Electric Field
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential
  • From: JSH
• BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The highest limit of acceleration/deceleration
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: Q
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: jimp
• Re: Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: Q
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Cwatters
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Loc
• Re: From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 43)
  • From: hanson
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Spaceman
• Q? Gravity Probe B
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: External Electric Field vs. Electric Field
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 43)
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Is it possible to suck your own cock?
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.
  • From: fossilid
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: External Electric Field vs. Electric Field
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: mike3
• Z[sqrt(-2)] euclidean domain
  • From: G Patel
• External Electric Field vs. Electric Field
  • From: G Patel
• Re: velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 294.5: As x --> 0, p^2 - xy --> 0+
  • From: OsherD
• Re: velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: BURT
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Taking a closer look at Eric Gisse ( and Anne Elliott ).
  • From: Benj
• Re: velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: Spaceman
• A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: work, play, pray for peace!!!!!!! http://georgewbush.ws
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• An escape velocity of c would violate Special Relativity because ..
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• It goes both ways, Google: “ Jeff Relf, Seattle, WA ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Taking a closer look at Eric Gisse ( and Anne Elliott ).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: if someone is flying towards the earth at 0.9 c (90% of speed o...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: solid state chemistry IIT file upgraded
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: shahars10
• Taking a closer look at Eric Gisse ( and Anne Elliott ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Uncle Al
• solid state chemistry IIT file upgraded
  • From: adichemadi
• solid state chemistry IIT file upgraded
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: AshtarSheran
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Loc
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Maximal entropy random walk and euclidean path integrals
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Androcles
• Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Taking a closer look at Sagittarius A*.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 294.4: A, B Positively Dependent and P(A) < = 1/2 Imply p^2 > = P(A)P(B) = xy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fact checking (was: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?)
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 294.3: A, B Statistically Dependent Implies p > = xy = P(A)P(B)
  • From: OsherD
• Fact checking (was: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?)
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Jim Black
• Quantum Gravity 294.2: Inequalities on dp/dt with various functions x of time t.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: Sam Wormley
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 43)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 23 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.1: Some PI Scenarios in y < = x < = (1/2) + y/2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 294.1: Some PI Scenarios in y < = x < = (1/2) + y/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: “ The constituting particles would reach the velocity of light. ”
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Igor
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Coater
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Igor
• “ The constituting particles would reach the velocity of light. ”
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wreck Of The Titan
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Scotch tape's surprising power: X-rays
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof
  • From: jimp
• Maximal entropy random walk and euclidean path integrals
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: PD
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof
  • From: John Park
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Exponential video
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Scotch tape's surprising power: X-rays
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: donkey71
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Loc
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Greg Neill
• Physics Class Change or Free Hydrogen Causation
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Therese Shellabarger
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Gravity due to rotation
  • From: Androcles
• Gravity due to rotation
  • From: donkey71
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: Androcles
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Androcles
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Androcles
• Scotch tape's surprising power: X-rays
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Reflection and refraction
  • From: OG
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Cwatters
• Reflection and refraction
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: A Good Battey Justifies Some Drug Use In Some Researchers
  • From: gabydewilde
• Exponential video
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Benj
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Mastering Physics answers
  • From: Eric Gisse
• X-Rays from sticky tape
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: Mastering Physics answers
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Mastering Physics answers
  • From: PD
• Re: Mastering Physics answers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solution manual to Vector Mechanics Dynamics Beer 8th Edition
  • From: eslamanov
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: Benj
• Mastering Physics answers
  • From: Tipu Jaffar
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "A Basic Look at Hebie Herbie"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ronncher
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Hagar
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 'g' is a FORCE not an ACCELERATION.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof
  • From: jimp
• Re: Spaceman fears precision, end of story.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Advanced Quantum Theory: Relative state
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Good Battey Justifies Some Drug Use In Some Researchers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• .holographic romance
  • From: HolographicRomance
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Applications of the renolyds number and uncertain geometry Navier Stokes!
  • From: Jacko
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: PD
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof
  • From: John Park
• "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Loc
• Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: happyman
• Solutions manua to Separation Process Principles, 2nd Ed., by Seader, Henley
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38)
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?
  • From: W. eWatson
• How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Advanced Quantum Theory: Relative state
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Spaceman fears precision, end of story.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Ocean Falls, BC was a paper-mill town, not a mining town.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Quantum Gravity 294.0: Bulgarians and USA Go From PI^2 To "Square Wedge Wedge Products (in Forms)"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Optimisation in Reverse Auctions (Price combinations)
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.0: When p^2 = P ' (A-->B) ^2 > = P(A)P(B)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 294.0: When p^2 = P ' (A-->B) ^2 > = P(A)P(B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Therese Shellabarger
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Therese Shellabarger
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.9: The Cause of Alternating Accelerating/Constant/Decelerating Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go dry
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: djd
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• LHC. Alive will envy dead.
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Quantum Gravity 293.9: The Cause of Alternating Accelerating/Constant/Decelerating Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38)
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38)
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: shahars10
• Re: Where is there an OOL Informed Discussion Group?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: PD
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: PD
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: gjedwards
• Where is there an OOL Informed Discussion Group?
  • From: erudyte
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is coal liquefaction/gasification pointless? Progress Energy Polut
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Optimisation in Reverse Auctions (Price combinations)
  • From: Merrows
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ronncher
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Loc
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Solution manual to Vector Mechanics Dynamics Beer 8th Edition
  • From: solutioncollector
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Synergetics definition
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• The rapports about Remote manipulation weapons are of historical importance, really,
  • From: alice
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: Vince Morgan
• This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.8: Golden Mean and Riccati dp/dt = 2C for p = (x-->y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Quantum Gravity 293.8: Golden Mean and Riccati dp/dt = 2C for p = (x-->y)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: doug
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: drownfrog
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I can't afford a â?? free â?? house.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.
  • From: Hank Kroll
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: pedrochivasmp3
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Some transform sillyness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: all the four fundamental interactions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: shahars10
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: electrostatics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: RP
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: RP
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• electrostatics
  • From: shahars10
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: schuby87
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: all the four fundamental interactions
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: mL
• Some transform sillyness
  • From: Spaceman
• Early Jurassic watering hole
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Women and Minority Students Now More Likely to Take Physics
  • From: hanson
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Möbius
• Re: all the four fundamental interactions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: hanson
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• I can't afford a “ free ” house.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I'm not one of T.J's Bermuda buddies.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.7: Riccati Equation for Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Linearizes Time Coefficients and Creates Opposing Two-Force Scenario
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Loc
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: a . lazy . hobo
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: Raghar
• I'm not one of T.J's Bermuda buddies.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Eric Gisse
• I'm not one of your Bermuda buddies, Giant John.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• If you send me a ticket and directions ..
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Benj
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: RP
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: namnai7
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: john161008
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH about LHC's proton collider
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH about LHC's proton collider
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH about LHC's proton collider
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH about LHC's proton collider
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark matter is a commie sucker
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark matter is a commie sucker
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark matter is a commie sucker
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• I like you, RP ― What's your background ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 293.7: Riccati Equation for Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Linearizes Time Coefficients and Creates Opposing Two-Force Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• You want money for your “ Poetry ” ? here's how it works:
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• InovaBrasil 19_10_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (80 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Tej
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: sir . illegal
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• The LHC creates very compact neutron starlet
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Essentially, “ mass ” is just momentum; “ rest mass ” is semi-random.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 293.6: Japan Results Yield Relationships between Spectral Theory and Probable Causation/Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: doug
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Seeing, testing, and verifying Giant John's inventions.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: What ship are you on ? where are you headed ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How would I know if you were pulling my leg or not ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: JSH
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: PD
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: BURT
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: time must also be three dimensional as space is
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: the sun must be in the center of earths elliptic trajectory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Universe beginning and end
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: JSH
• Universe beginning and end
  • From: Therese Shellabarger
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Essentially, “ mass ” is just momentum; “ rest mass ” is semi-random.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• What ship are you on ? where are you headed ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• How would I know if you were pulling my leg or not ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Huang
• Re: I'm not looking Seattle skyline cam
  • From: tj Frazir
• CHESSCLUBFRIENDS <=== http://tinyurl.com/chessclubfriend <===
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Seeing, testing, and verifying Giant John's inventions.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: I'm doing fine, I don't need more money, I like my landlord and...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• You're on the cutting-edge, Giant John.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.
  • From: tj Frazir
• I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Why Whale engines haven't hit the market.
  • From: tj Frazir
• I'm doing fine, I don't need more money, I like my landlord and my city.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Giant John's recently-created, sea-going, automated, hydro-dril...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 42)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Why Whale engines haven't hit the market.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.
  • From: tj Frazir
• solution manual for Probability and Statistical Inference ( 7th edition by Hogg & Tanis)
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: RP
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Giant John's recently-created, sea-going, automated, hydro-drill rig.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: You can't buy a Doble-run â?? Super Soaker â??-like fire hose.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Causality"
  • From: Tej
• You can't buy a Doble-run “ Super Soaker ”-like fire hose.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gabydewilde
• Population control, sheltering everyone.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• TINC-Blog Award 2008
  • From: nanopaprika
• Evel Knievel's Thunderbolt-II 475°F Water Rocket engine.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: where could you fing Who kann man die "Annalen der Physik" als Texte finden? Where could you find the "Annalen der Physik" in a textual format?
  • From: lbrtchx
• where could you fing Who kann man die "Annalen der Physik" als Texte finden? Where could you find the "Annalen der Physik" in a textual format?
  • From: lbrtchx
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: #14 the reason why all these strange particles of pions, K-mesons,
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: doug
• The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• JSH: Now I'm getting upset
  • From: JSH
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: JSH
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: RP
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: hanson
• Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: HardySpicer
• BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: 'g' is Time its self.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Evel kevel Jumps canion with 1 stroke water rocket.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 1880 tank boiler Whale pic
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: RP
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: doug
• Re: Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• BHs *produce* the matter surrounding them.
  • From: john161008
• JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: JSH
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Doug can not define resonance.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Women and Minority Students Now More Likely to Take Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: Huang
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: 'g' is Time its self.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: RP
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: dedanoe's a.i.processor, e.t.generator and light accumulator united in one warp engine for intergalactic cruisers (building castles in the sky)
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Definition of 'Money' - basic to know - {HRI 20081011-V1.0}
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Definition of 'Money' - basic to know - {HRI 20081011-V1.0}
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Pure Gamma Ray Pulsar
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• dedanoe's a.i.processor, e.t.generator and light accumulator united in one warp engine for intergalactic cruisers (building castles in the sky)
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Charlie Crist â?? feeds the pigeons â??.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Women and Minority Students Now More Likely to Take Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Science and Math Education Challenges Face Next President, Congress
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Like a drunk, the U.S. gov. chose “ a hair of the dog that bit me ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Charlie Crist “ feeds the pigeons ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• “ Hummingbird ” engines.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Fearless Johnny's “ Whale ” engines.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Prediction before facts paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: A magnetic field does not exist.
  • From: hanson
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 42)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: La grande myopie
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A magnetic field does not exist.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• All solution manuals you want are here
  • From: lsms9
• Re: ain't no God without Devil nor Goddess without Satan
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide
  • From: sms123
• Re: Where is the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I'm a big fan of â?? Classic â?? Bic lighters.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs
  • From: john161008
• Re: Definition of 'Money' - basic to know - {HRI 20081011-V1.0}
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Trillions and Trillions of dollars in poorly-regulated derivat...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Photons Do so Much
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A magnetic field does not exist.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: boundary of the universe... for dummies.
  • From: PD
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: boundary of the universe... for dummies.
  • From: ronybc3
• Re: Electric field polarization questions
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Dov Henis
• Quantum Gravity 293.5: Is Dark Energy = Probable Causation/Influence (PI)?
  • From: OsherD
• magnetic field polarization
  • From: ssylee
• Quantum Gravity 293.4: Does Uniform Distribution of Causation Explain Alternating Acceleration/Deceleration/Constancy of Universe?
  • From: OsherD
• Electric field polarization questions
  • From: ssylee
• Re: La grande myopie
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Electric field of a uniform plane wave at a interface
  • From: ssylee
• Time-harmonic magnetic field analysis
  • From: ssylee
• Quantum Gravity 293.2: (x-->y)^2 > = d^2 iff d < = 1/2 iff (x-->y) > = 1/2 for d = |y - x| = x - y, y < = x
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: OsherD
• Questions about a time-harmonic wave analysis
  • From: ssylee
• Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 42)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: doug
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs
  • From: john161008
• Re: the next generation of propulsion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fearless Johnny's Sea Giant ( France, 1979 ) was 1,360 feet long.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: History will remember you George
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: The physical education.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything
  • From: Tim Tyler
• History will remember you George
  • From: Rick
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• The physical education.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: PD
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: RP
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physics help
  • From: PD
• Re: physics help
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: RP
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: RP
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: physics help
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: Raphanus
• Re: physics help
  • From: Androcles
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: misterfact@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: misterfact@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trillions and Trillions of dollars in poorly-regulated derivati...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Benj
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: RP
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: OG
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: physics help
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Fearless Johnny's Sea Giant ( France, 1979 ) was 1,360 feet long.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Michael Moroney
• Re: physics help
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: RP
• physics help
  • From: A2
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: physics help
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: physics help
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: boundary of the universe... for dummies.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who are these guys #2?
  • From: hanson
• physics help
  • From: A2
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: grcn_3
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: PD
• Re: Marinas with permenantly docked, upright â?? Disney â?? ships.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Marinas with permenantly docked, upright â?? Disney â?? ships.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Re: USS Bush and USS Bob Hope
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: History will remember you George
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fermilab and symmetry breaking
  • From: socratus
• Re: Sea Giant was bigger than TI Africa.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Our Horizon is currently 45 giga light years away and receding.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Huang
• Energy = Mass = Momentum
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: how to answer this problem??
  • From: Greg Neill
• “ c = 1, m = 0, v = 1, Energy = Momentum ”
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Tej
• Books on Python and Science/Physics
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: PD
• Re: boundary of the universe... for dummies.
  • From: PD
• Re: Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: OG
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Higher Education World University Guide
  • From: family-living
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: Huang
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: RP
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• boundary of the universe... for dummies.
  • From: ronybc3
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Solution for no indent posts.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Who are these guys #2?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Neutron droplet or neutron hole?
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• how to answer this problem??
  • From: rigor
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Androcles
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.1: PI Squared is Closer to PI (Probable Causation/Influence) than Euclidean Distance Squared is For Uncommon Events
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 293.1: PI Squared is Closer to PI (Probable Causation/Influence) than Euclidean Distance Squared is For Uncommon Events
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: RP
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: RP
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Igor
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: PD
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: send to me too!
  • From: freesolutionmanuals
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Applications of the renolyds number and uncertain geometry Navier Stokes!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Benj
• Twins paradox debunked and broken down
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa
  • From: Dov Henis
• Sea Giant was bigger than TI Africa.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: BURT
• Marinas with permenantly docked, upright “ Disney ” ships.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: dedanoe
• Trillions and Trillions of dollars in poorly-regulated derivatives.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Valuing assests based on earnings and management, not the market.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Comet Tuttle's Split Personality
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Sanny
• Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: Sanny
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oil Industry Biggest thing on earth must see
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Cwatters
• Seattle real estate.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A bulker of coal comes to town
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Benj
• Re: A bulker of coal comes to town
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A bulker of coal comes to town
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A bulker of coal comes to town
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate a working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A billionaire can demonstrate TGOTB steamer
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate a working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Knock Nevis ( 1981, .3 miles long ).
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Applications of the renolyds number and uncertain geometry Navier Stokes!
  • From: Jacko
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Huang
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Cwatters
• Training & jobs
  • From: kiran
• Re: Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: Fact checker
• Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: john180908
• Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.999: 292.998 Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Relationship to Minimal Distance of 1-point Algebraic Geometry Codes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Huang
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Huang
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: thsfr31
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: Spaceman
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ESA - The Next Big Rocket
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ESA - The Next Big Rocket
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: 'g' is TIME Slope is a energy gradiant
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 'g' is a FORCE not an ACCELERATION.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: conflation and expansion of levers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 'g' is a FORCE not an ACCELERATION.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Where does infinity begin?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ystrasystrar
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Mark Thorson
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: hanson
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ellebelle1988
• Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: squashed sunset
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• squashed sunset
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Science Verses Religion - The Final Battle
  • From: Sam
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• American Vacuum Society antique ?
  • From: MarkAren
• Re: The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Who are these guys?
  • From: hanson
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Tom M
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Tej
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Curvature isn't energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Small Businesses avoided the shotgun weddings.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Neutron ( spin-.5 ) condensates via opposite-spin pairing.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: A neutron ( spin-1 ) is Not spinning faster than a proton ( spin-.5 ).
  • From: PD
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate a working/testable engine ? !
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Who are these guys?
  • From: Tom Potter
• The most exotic aminals on the planet are right here on Usenet.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• The Knock Nevis ( 1981, .3 miles long ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Is the Concensus being threatened?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is the Concensus being threatened?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.999: 292.998 Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Relationship to Minimal Distance of 1-point Algebraic Geometry Codes
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: jimp
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: redbadmail
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A bulker of coal comes to town
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Igor
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• send to me too!
  • From: shadowsamurai35
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: jimp
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: doug
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Inside Science News Briefs - October 13, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Is the Concensus being threatened?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: jimp
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Solution to Elements of Electromagnetics ,Mathew O Sadiku 3rd or 4th edition
  • From: freesolutionmanuals
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: robert . joiner
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Laser
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light Accelerates
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How did Moby trick you ? Big Moe ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Did Moby get a Viking funeral ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Laser
  • From: Benj
• A neutron ( spin-1 ) is Not spinning faster than a proton ( spin-.5 ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Laser
  • From: OG
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How did Moby trick you ? Big Moe ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Where does infinity begin?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Laser
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: LEVER is upon what NEWTON's mechanics breaks apart
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: â?? Rest Mass â?? is virtual, notional, not real.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: “ Rest Mass ” is virtual, notional, not real.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 13, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Laser
  • From: swapna
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: socratus
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: jimp
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Did Moby get a Viking funeral ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 292.999: 292.998 Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Relationship to Minimal Distance of 1-point Algebraic Geometry Codes
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.998: Germany, Spain, France Find Open Problems in Fibonacci Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: Androcles
• energy <=infotwist=> anarchy
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: xxein
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: xxein
• Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity
  • From: Calorie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: RLW
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How do you explain Gravitational Lensing ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: zeemo
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• Paper on Uncertain Geometry Available
  • From: Jacko
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: jimp
• light-gravity link & universe architecture
  • From: Ajmal
• Re: O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: Spaceman
• The speed of light is not the highest speed in the Universe, it is actually the slowest
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: gabydewilde
• O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Acceleration and mass
  • From: hanson
• Re: How did Moby trick you ? Big Moe ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Acceleration and mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Acceleration and mass
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Acceleration and mass
  • From: fido
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Minkowski spacetime and GRT.
  • From: socratus
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Calorie
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• How did Moby trick you ? Big Moe ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• CERN will make the embryo of neutron star
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• “ Rest Mass ” is virtual, notional, not real.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Nihilists are about as dangerous as x-rays
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: A brief history of sunspots.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A capped plasic bottle with some-dry ice in it .. ka-boom !
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: CERN's collider is about as dangerous as your average atomic cl...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Nihilists are about as dangerous as x-rays
  • From: gabydewilde
• CERN's collider is about as dangerous as your average atomic clock.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Is CERN the global terrorist?
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• InovaBrasil 12_10_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (107 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Quantum Gravity 292.997: The Infinite-Velocity Zero (Nil) Acceleration Big Bang
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Burned, Nasdaq investors ran away, killing tech-jobs.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• When can I see, test and/or read about actual, running engines ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Putin is human, Russia has oil, slander is the product of a weak mind.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• “ Rest Mass ” is notional, virtual, not real.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• A capped plasic bottle with some-dry ice in it .. ka-boom !
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• If you send me the x-ray equipment, I'll shoot the “ gamma ” moon.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.996: Remarkable Case of a = sqrt(1 - v^2) Near v = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.996: Remarkable Case of a = sqrt(1 - v^2) Near v = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: BURT
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Androcles
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: bluemanca
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: bluemanca
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: tinesan
• QG 292.995: More Regarding Acceleration vs Velocity in Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.99: How PI Converts "Deterministic Laws" to Probability
  • From: OsherD
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The conception “acceleration”.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Phil the Farmer
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder
  • From: tinesan
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: BURT
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: BURT
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: Androcles
• How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?
  • From: bluemanca
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Layman's explanation of Nambu's work
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Layman's explanation of Nambu's work
  • From: JunoExpress
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Shubee
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Shubee
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: NASA's EGRET is not X-Ray film in a tin can over Lake Union.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA's EGRET is not X-Ray film in a tin can over Lake Union.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Burned, Nasdaq investors ran away, killing tech-jobs.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: Huang
• Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.
  • From: David
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Fermilab and symmetry breaking
  • From: socratus
• Re: Waving at light speed
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Dave
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Benj
• Burned, Nasdaq investors ran away, killing tech-jobs.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• The conception “acceleration”.
  • From: socratus
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nasdaq turned 10 pounds of gold into just one, 9 years later.
  • From: tj Frazir
• BattChgPro Ver 1.7
  • From: scott93727g
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Curious battery effect
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Curious battery effect
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Monopoly game allways ends same way
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse ME RIGHT ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: No one can verify T.J.'s gamma moon.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Coldest September for 14 years
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Six Sigma Course Materials
  • From: SixSigmaCourse
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Resonant WFC Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Scientists Create Ultracold Molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.99: How PI Converts "Deterministic Laws" to Probability
  • From: johoie
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Nothing's at rest, there is no rest mass, only imponderable 4-D fields.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: john180908
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Civil Wars, piracy, drug running, etc.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Ecir
• Quantum Gravity 292.994: Velocity versus Acceleration Domination (Canada)
  • From: OsherD
• The only “ Gods ” that matter.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Civil Wars, piracy, drug running, etc.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Dave
• Directly or indirectly, most people work for the government.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest
• T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: Y.Porat
• No one can verify T.J.'s gamma moon.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Dave
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.993: Mass is a Cause in Gravitation, an Effect in Accelerating Universe Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.993: Mass is a Cause in Gravitation, an Effect in Accelerating Universe Scenario
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.992: Variable G Changes "Velocity and Space Causes Acceleration" to "Acceleration Causes Velocity and Space"
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.991: Remarkable Reversals of Causation from Accelerating to Decelerating/Constant Universe Scenarios
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.99: How PI Converts "Deterministic Laws" to Probability
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: nestea . plunge
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 41)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity metrics?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity metrics?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity metrics?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativity can be proven is by first assuming it is correct
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: â?? Lake Union â??, Seattle.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• what is CERN after?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Accelerating universe + Unruh Radiation = Energy?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Benj
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: glird
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: EINSTEIN'S PROOF OF THE 12 GODS OF EGYPT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Interior of a star comparable place to an high energy colliders?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• maximum work during reversible process??????
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Androcles
• “ Lake Union ”, Seattle.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: hanson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Big Bang main proof of General Relativity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time speeding up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Stretching Apartment Spacetime Size
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Ecir
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: I invest in myself, not others, not stock or houses.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physicists caused wall street melt down...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physicists caused wall street WAR we won
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Pondering General Relativity, like a fat-man ponders food.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest
• Re: THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa
  • From: dejudicibus
• Gravity Waves
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Accelerating universe + Unruh Radiation = Energy?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 292.98: Pakistan and India Again on Riccati-Like Solution of Cosmic Triple Coincidence Problem By Triple Interacting Fluids
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: doug
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Accelerating universe + Unruh Radiation = Energy?
  • From: Starblade Enkai
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.97: The Probable Causation/Influence (PI) of One Set on Another Can Influence Their Mutual Cardinality (Hungary)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.97: The Probable Causation/Influence (PI) of One Set on Another Can Influence Their Mutual Cardinality (Hungary)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Why No Second Nobel for Einstein in Relativity??
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Uncle Al
• 2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry goes to Three U.S. Researchers...
  • From: swormley1
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: Androcles
• Re: solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: tadchem
• Re: NASA’s David Hathaway updates solar cycle 24 prediction
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Androcles
• The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NASA?s David Hathaway updates solar cycle 24 prediction
  • From: Uncle Al
• solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight
  • From: misterfact@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big Bang main proof of General Relativity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Robert Latest
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: PD
• Re: Solution to Elements of Electromagnetics ,Mathew O Sadiku 3rd or 4th edition
  • From: jason . r . fuller
• Damn, the traveling relativity twin can't login to his computer account.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Ecir
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• G.R. tells us: “ rest mass ” is random, a product of ignorance.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• The Sun burns a lot of fuel .. but the cosmos burns more.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: CERN's LHC burns a lot of fuel .. but the sun burns more.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: has light got mass?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Can't look back in time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: Time is No More (must invent new term for Time)
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest
• Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeing is believing!
  • From: www.Radiondistics.com
• Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: Androcles
• Heat transfer in a dilute gas
  • From: boblatest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 294.96: Remarkable Internal Similarity Between Minkowski Measure and Riccati Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 292.95: Correction: Dr. L.A. Glinka is Not Russian
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables
  • From: JSH
• Re: "Impossible" EM space drive?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: There is no Higgs.
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Interstellar Boundary Explorer set to launch Oct. 19 on a Pegasus rocket
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• NASA’s David Hathaway updates solar cycle 24 prediction
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• My phone is used by my PC-modem to talk to people all over the world.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Selling to a bigger fool .. me.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: RP
• Re: Can't look back in time
  • From: Uncle Al
• Big Bang main proof of General Relativity?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Is Time Quantized Motion (Time Dilation)?
  • From: xxein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.
  • From: john180908
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: john180908
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: PD
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: PD
• Re: Who pissed off Allah?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: There is no Higgs.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: wugi
• Re: THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: A ‘ CAPTCHA ’ is a type of challenge-response test.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: New Specie of Ape-Man Discovered, Almost Human
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: hanson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Spaceman
• Is Einstein a Time Traveller?
  • From: Calorie
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is Obama really!"
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: John Polasek
• How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Proof of Farmer Brown's Conjectuure that two mulitiplied one time equals two
  • From: z
• Re: ESSENCE OF GENERAL RELATIVITY: AMBIGUOUS SPEED OF LIGHT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: There is no Higgs.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Hot Point:" Question on Fusion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time is No More (must invent new term for Time)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: The U.S. is borrowing like||because there's no tomorrow.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Like a drunk, the U.S. is bipolar, it loves booms and busts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA Kool-Aid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA Kool-Aid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Curvature isn't energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: NASA Kool-Aid
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: The U.S. is borrowing like||because there's no tomorrow.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Like a drunk, the U.S. is bipolar, it loves booms and busts.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: PD
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Newton didn't know: “ c = 1, Energy = Mass ”.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• udar vrz fundamentite na vashata fizika
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 292.94: KdV Equation in Real Zero Approximation Via Probable Causation/Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Matter and “dark matter"
  • From: socratus
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: socratus
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• There is no Higgs.
  • From: smithjd15
• A ‘ CAPTCHA ’ is a type of challenge-response test.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: kev
• Re: Proof of Farmer Brown's Conjectuure that two mulitiplied one time equals two
  • From: Rick
• Head in the beam
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Automating plain-text editors on Flash||network drives.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: Rick
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Has anyone seen Poincaré?
  • From: Rick
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Igor
• Re: What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?
  • From: Igor
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof of Farmer Brown's Conjectuure that two mulitiplied one time equals two
  • From: z
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: could someone enlighten us as to the precise relationship between differentiation
  • From: zen
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Inovabrasil 05_10_08 - 10 artigos + lidos (65 artigos postados)
  • From: Rogerio
• Re: How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Need help from members
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: could someone enlighten us as to the precise relationship between differentiation
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: "Hot Point:" Question on Fusion
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: "Hot Point:" Question on Fusion
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?
  • From: socratus
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Porn Addiction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Discs formation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "No Change" implies "No Time Dilation"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Time Quantized Motion (Time Dilation)?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Online Bullying Hits Most Teens
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Proof of Farmer Brown's Conjectuure that two mulitiplied one time equals two
  • From: Rick
• Re: Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: How can a metal spring shrink to 26% on Mars?
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 06, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: hochun0809
• What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 292.93: Newton's Law of Gravitation Examined by 292.9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: New Specie of Ape-Man Discovered, Almost Human
  • From: hanson
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Quantum Gravity 292.92: List of Quantum and Wave-Related PDEs Satisfying 292.9 Approximately
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.91: 292.92 Derived From Optimizing Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.9: Quantum Theory As An Approximation to Zero-Valued Variables
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 292.91: 292.92 Derived From Optimizing Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• eve rabotim na dokrajchuvanje na vashiot svet!!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 292.9: Quantum Theory As An Approximation to Zero-Valued Variables
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: "Hot Point:" Question on Fusion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Hot Point:" Question on Fusion
  • From: giveitawhirl2008
• Automating plain-text editors on Flash||network drives.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Why didn't Spaceman reply ? think about that one.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Digitizing Vibrating Strings, Cords, in Oscillating Renosance Chambers ! (:-D
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Digitizing Vibrating Strings, Cords, in Oscillating Renosance Chambers ! (:-D
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.8: Some Mathematical Indications Via Probable Causation/Influence That Light Speed is Not a Maximum Barrier Due To Wrong Inversion/Duality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• The topic occationally drifts to physics, so what ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: New Specie of Ape-Man Discovered, Almost Human
  • From: Spaceman
• You'd be much better off paying Individual.NET 10 Euros per year.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: Igor
• Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: unstoppablespam
• Re: Why didn't Spaceman reply ? think about that one.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why didn't Spaceman reply ? think about that one.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: BURT
• Why didn't Spaceman reply ? think about that one.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• ** Mein Kampf ** by Hebie Herbie
  • From: hanson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: Ejo
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: Spaceman
• Gravity interaction of ellipsoid
  • From: Raghar
• Global Warming Alarmism is Unacceptable and Should be Confronted
  • From: Mike Jr
• DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: The Draper family
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Like a drunk, the U.S. is bipolar, it loves booms and busts.
  • From: eric gisse
• Wildest dream and nightmare come true on Mars.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: greysky
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.
  • From: Tom Potter
• The birth of General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.8: Some Mathematical Indications Via Probable Causation/Influence That Light Speed is Not a Maximum Barrier Due To Wrong Inversion/Duality
  • From: johoie
• Re: Test Message
  • From: johoie
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: OG
• Re: Test Message
  • From: Uncle Al
• Test Message
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Antigravity
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: OG
• Re: pls help me find info on this
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sucessfull is the business which in every next turn makes more and more money
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: pls help me find info on this
  • From: Spaceman
• pls help me find info on this
  • From: o-michael-o
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: hanson
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Motion is quantized (Time Dilation)??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: you must maintain the formal equality in your relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stan Meyer's Water Fuel Cell International Independent Test-Evaluation Report
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Motion and the unified field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solutions manual to Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 7/e JAY L.DEVORE
  • From: Hwhitney
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: Jim Newman
• NASA misidentified Mars salts in press conference.
  • From: Lin Liangtai
• Re: Motion is quantized (Time Dilation)??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Motion is quantized (Time Dilation)??
  • From: Calorie
• DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 3 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Winds are Dominant Cause of Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheet Losses
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 292.8: Some Mathematical Indications Via Probable Causation/Influence That Light Speed is Not a Maximum Barrier Due To Wrong Inversion/Duality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.7: IBM and CalTech USA Use Fibonacci Numbers in Quantum Computer
  • From: OsherD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• One does not advise one's proverbial “ landLord ” ( e.g. the state ).
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: OG
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: OG
• I won't blindly take on assets/liabilities.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• In Seattle ? when ? I'd have to see it to believe it.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time is No More (must invent new term for Time)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time is No More (must invent new term for Time)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein?s Theories.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein?s Theories.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Outside forces dominate my life.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Two of my works before the election next month. New Direction Europe against unconditional powers and solution to Dark Matter established
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Outside forces dominate my life.
  • From: tj Frazir
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Most of us will be taking it down a notch, settling for less.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: glhansen@xxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: hanerim
• Re: Quantum Gravity 292.7: IBM and CalTech USA Use Fibonacci Numbers in Quantum Computer
  • From: Shurley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: iqgoogol
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: srt previdot na ajnstajn & lorenc
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Using Sunlight More Efficiently
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Percieved wavelength times frequency.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: srt previdot na ajnstajn & lorenc
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Using Sunlight More Efficiently
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Using Sunlight More Efficiently
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• srt previdot na ajnstajn & lorenc
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• sensor faucet online
  • From: chinabestsanitary@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: Outside forces dominate my life.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Sci.Physics is full of “ retired ” men .. old farts.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Most of us will be taking it down a notch, settling for less.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: Jerry
• Did Spaceman make more money as a system administrator ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: sean
• Money isn't vital.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• 2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December
  • From: Mike Jr
• electromagnetic waves reflection and transmission
  • From: ssylee
• Re: can a hole be yellow?
  • From: Mike Jr
• You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Electromagnetics boundary conditions.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Right here, I see many un/under-employed “ code poets ”;
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: doug
• Electromagnetics boundary conditions.
  • From: ssylee
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: doug
• Re: Macroscopic motion, kinetic energy is also quantized
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Macroscopic motion, kinetic energy is also quantized
  • From: Calorie
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dark flow
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: no more no less
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: no more no less
  • From: tadchem
• attraction; repulsion and neutral interaction
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: no more no less
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light may not be an EM-field after all.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein?s Theories.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: doug
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Photons -- Hidden Fundamentals
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bailout from Armageddon?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• no more no less
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: Jim Newman
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• knee jerking the EM space drive
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Light may not be an EM-field after all.
  • From: lundslaktare
• Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: doug
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual “ Weyerhaeuser.COM â€?, trees ships and all.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• “ Downtown Detroit ” might become a ghost town.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What do you mean “ No lawyers ” ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Twins Paradox Car for sale
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Twins Paradox Car for sale
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: tadchem
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: John Park
• How 'bout you, Gisse ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: for sale 120,000 mt copper 1/2 billion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: conversation of momentum
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Basic Question About Relativity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Using Sunlight More Efficiently
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy
  • From: Jacko
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: tadchem
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: TimR
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Cwatters
• Twins Paradox Car for sale
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: jimp
• Re: the situation is worse than you thought
  • From: Dylan_Grace
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: John Park
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: conversation of momentum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Air canon, sanity check on my calculations
  • From: thomas . greenleaf
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Are you poking holes in the walls ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE BAILOUT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If worse comes to worse, I'll be happy with less.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Congress should keep non-leveraged earnings yields steady.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Game Theory Shows How Salmonella Bacteria Stack the Deck to make you Sick
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: PD
• Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light
  • From: strich . 9992
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• I ponder the long-term obligations.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• If worse comes to worse, I'll be happy with less.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quick cash doesn't matter, I need Steady/Predictable earnings.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• conversation of momentum
  • From: gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 292.7: IBM and CalTech USA Use Fibonacci Numbers in Quantum Computer
  • From: OsherD
• Outside forces dominate my life.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Using tautological spaces
  • From: JSH
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Using tautological spaces
  • From: Fact checker
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: Using tautological spaces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why does a real world circle obey.... (Black Hole, etc...)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why does a real world circle obey.... (Black Hole, etc...)
  • From: jimp
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: orbound
• JSH: Using tautological spaces
  • From: JSH
• Re: heath and weight
  • From: tadchem
• Re: heath and weight
  • From: tadchem
• Are you poking holes in the walls ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Igor
• Why does a real world circle obey.... (Black Hole, etc...)
  • From: Calorie
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: doug
• Re: cesium clock question
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: There's only one John Fredriksen.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Photons -- Hidden Fundamentals
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I'm clueless.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: heath and weight
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: You, me, all of us, need â?? Banksters â??.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can the con men explain this
  • From: PD
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Rick
• Re: Two fundamental questions about QM
  • From: Rick
• Re: God OR Science
  • From: Dylan_Grace