Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.

From: strich.9991@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:05:59 -0700 (PDT)

On Oct 7, 9:11 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nope. There is no room for interpretation in an experiment.

Bzzzzt.

All experiments are interpreted. For example, when an accelerator
produces something at 175GeV with a postive charge, that is
interpreted to be the production of a top quark. The top quark is not
really seen.

You need to read up on epistemology.
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: PD

References:
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  - From: PD

Prev by Date: Re: The U.S. is borrowing like||because there's no tomorrow.
Next by Date: Re: Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...
Previous by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
Next by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread