Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.

On Oct 8, 8:10 am, strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 7, 5:38 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On Oct 7, 2:10 pm, strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Oct 7, 12:56 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Oct 7, 9:05 am, strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Oct 7, 9:11 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nope. There is no room for interpretation in an experiment.

Bzzzzt.

All experiments are interpreted.  For example, when an accelerator
produces something at 175GeV with a postive charge, that is
interpreted to be the production of a top quark.  The top quark is not
really seen.

Bzzzzt. Nope.

Bzzzzt.

Have you seen, heard, taste, sense or smell an atom?  Bzzzzt!
A neutron?  Bzzzzt!
An electron?  Bzzzzt!
A photon?  Bzzzzt!
A quark?  Bzzzzt!

All of these are interpretations.  Granted they are pretty good, but
they are still interpretations.

I see. So you don't believe in the reality of atoms because you cannot
see them, hear them, taste or smell them?

Let's see how stupid you really are.
Where do you think the boundaries are, that define which things are
real and not just interpretations?

Do you believe, for example, that electrons exist? Really, definitely
exist?

As for your 30 books on epistemology, I suggest you dust them up and
start reading.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Stew PD, was there anywhere in my post where I said I did not believe?

OK, but an electron is an *interpretation*, right?

What is the boundary between reality and interpretation?


Your mind is so narrow that you can pass it between two Casimir plates.

.

Relevant Pages
Loading