Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.


<strich.9993@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ae7006d5-b016-4b17-beef-3698b0a06192@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 9, 12:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 8, 10:23 am, strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Oct 8, 9:20 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

What is the boundary between reality and interpretation?

What do you think?

Do not ask a question where you have no clue about the answer.

Dear strich.9: PD does that all the time! But mainly he does that
to... change the subject. Reply to PD, and be prepared to be made to
go in circles. ? NoEinstein ?

Yes. He thinks he's taking us for a spin, when everybody can see he's
just chasing his own tail like a confused dog.

=====================================
No, no. Phuckwit Duck chases his own tail like a confused duck.

Draper:
I have to admit that I am demoralized at the moment.

I had hoped that we could fight ignorance with a proactive rather
than a reactive approach, but this is clearly the improper forum for
that. A quick survey of the length of threads initiated by or drifting
to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking
reveals the true interest in the proposal.


While it would be a useful project to contribute to the FAQ, the
intent was to educate in the context of discussion, a virtual
"classroom" if you will. There's no point in contributing to a
reference that none of the "students" will read or attempt to learn
from. The intention was to focus on *exactly* what is wrong in
someone's thinking (which varies from person to person), set it
straight, and then make progress from there.


I had high hopes -- really -- that perhaps one misguided soul would
read something sensible and say, "Oh... Really?...Oh. I see I was
confused. OK, I get it now. Now what about...?" My head knew better,
my heart does not.


[sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to
appear]
PD

Oh boy, is that duck ever blind...




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: .Simple SR question...
    ... Tee hee, mighty cute, lots of word soup but no experiments or math, Phuckwit Duck! ... Go ahead and demoralize ... to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking ... intent was to educate in the context of discussion, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
    ... to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking ... intent was to educate in the context of discussion, ... [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to ... Blah boom, blah boom, blah boom! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Lightspeed exceeded
    ... if a set of axioms fails once then it is ... to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking ... intent was to educate in the context of discussion, ... [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_KE_=3D_=BD_mv=5E2_is_disproved_in_a_new_falling_objec?= =?ISO-8859&
    ... no. Phuckwit Duck chases his own tail like a confused duck. ... to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking ... intent was to educate in the context of discussion, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
    ... to nonsense compared to the length of threads based on sound thinking ... intent was to educate in the context of discussion, ... [sitting in the duck blind, waiting with a shotgun for a duck to ... Blah boom, blah boom, blah boom! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)