Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich.9993@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 9, 12:12 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 8, 10:23 am, strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 8, 9:20 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What is the boundary between reality and interpretation?
What do you think?
Do not ask a question where you have no clue about the answer.
Dear strich.9: PD does that all the time! But mainly he does that
to... change the subject. Reply to PD, and be prepared to be made to
go in circles. — NoEinstein —
Yes. He thinks he's taking us for a spin, when everybody can see he's
just chasing his own tail like a confused dog.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: Androcles
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- References:
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Prev by Date: Re: Heat transfer in a dilute gas
- Next by Date: “ Lake Union ”, Seattle.
- Previous by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Next by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
