Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativity can be proven is by first assuming it is correct
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:38:15 -0700
strich.9993@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
[snip crap]
The premise was simple...
Clocks E and M in inertial frames E and M are at rest with respect to
http://cc3d.free.fr/Relativity/Relat1.html
Special Relativity for yard apes
<http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
Experimental constraints on Special Relativity
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/>
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
Experimental constraints on General Relativity
empirical idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- Prev by Date: Re: â?? Lake Union â??, Seattle.
- Next by Date: Re: Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?
- Previous by thread: what is CERN after?
- Next by thread: Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity metrics?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|