Re: cesium clock question
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:11:20 GMT
Tom Potter wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:jPIGk.
Doppler got it right--the measured wavelength from the perspective
of the observer in motion with respect to the source is indeed shifted.
That's the way nature works... Yer not one of those frame hoppers are
you Potter? Pick one and stick with it.
I am pleased to see that my pal Sam Wormley
agrees with me,
that you can't the display of a digital or analog watch
by running at it,
and that you can't change the natural resonance of
a system by running at it.
Wrong again Potter. Special relativity has been shown to be
correct in its predictions... every time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question
- References:
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question
- From: Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question
- Prev by Date: Re: The birth of General Relativity
- Next by Date: Re: Accelerating universe + Unruh Radiation = Energy?
- Previous by thread: Re: cesium clock question
- Next by thread: Re: cesium clock question
- Index(es):
Loading