# Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime

*From*: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:04:51 -0700 (PDT)

On Oct 13, 12:19 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

wrote:

[...]

Because the math is correct about the "clock" changes occuring,

but the theory is incorrect about the "cause" since if time really

did change

there would be no reason to remove the change.

Thank you for acknowledging the mathematics are correct.

I have never said the math that figures an atomic clock

malfunction is not correct.

How do you know the mathematics are correct when you are unable to

display competence in general mathematics?

[...]

.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**References**:**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Eric Gisse

**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime***From:*Spaceman

- Prev by Date:
**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime** - Next by Date:
**Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?** - Previous by thread:
**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime** - Next by thread:
**Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime** - Index(es):