Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:04:51 0700 (PDT)
On Oct 13, 12:19 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[...]
Because the math is correct about the "clock" changes occuring,
but the theory is incorrect about the "cause" since if time really
did change
there would be no reason to remove the change.
Thank you for acknowledging the mathematics are correct.
I have never said the math that figures an atomic clock
malfunction is not correct.
How do you know the mathematics are correct when you are unable to
display competence in general mathematics?
[...]
.
 FollowUps:
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 References:
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Eric Gisse
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 From: Spaceman
 Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 Prev by Date: Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 Next by Date: Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
 Previous by thread: Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 Next by thread: Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime
 Index(es):
Relevant Pages
