Re: Antigravity

On Oct 4, 6:45 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ny2292000wrote:


Dear Sam,

I see that you are not an experimentalist otherwise you would go to my
site and experiment the equation to see if it provides G. On the other
hand, you are not a theorist since you cannot understand that what is
a Fundamental or Cosmological Constant is not necessarily fundamental.
There is always a possibility that someone really intelligent will
derive it in a more fundamental paradigm. I did that.

Thus try to have an open mind (which might require you to acquire a
mind in the first place)...:)

Make your insults in the form of objections to my theory. It is much
more productive and make you look and sound less idiotic.

Cheers,

MP


On Sep 20, 9:54 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ny2292000wrote:
Dear  Uncle Al,

It seems that your really understand Science.  Here is my blog with
the derivation of the Gravitational Constant
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2007/11/cosmological-con...

Please, feel free to ask any questions.

idiot

That blog contains the equation for G.  The derivation is within the
pdf file containing the full theory. Please read it and feel free to
ask poignant questions..>:)
Only by criticism one can create a good theory...:)

idiot  Big G cannot be calculated.  Big G is an observed coupling
constant.

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html

Newton's law only strictly
works for bodies at rest with respect to each other.
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com/2008/09/gyrogravity.html

hopeless idiot

I noticed that I have to show the reference frames.

Noticed?  NOTICED?

Dear Sam Wormley,
Your comment showed the same kind of prejudice that others had shown.
You tried to deem my work not worthy of publication because you
suppose I don't have or never had an association with academia.

Your "work" is not worthy of publication because it is crap.  It
contradicts observation.  It is already empirically falsified.  It is
wrong.  It is crap.

Please, feel free to redeem yourself and provide a counter-argument to
anything I wrote.

<http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments....>
 Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2006-3/>http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0311039
 Experimental constraints on General Relativity

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Einsteins Unfortunate Legacy #2"
    ... [snip 120 lines of crap] ...  Experimental constraints on Special Relativity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
    ... [snip 80 lines of crap] ...  Experimental constraints on Special Relativity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Whos Missing ..?
    ... This is a Not-Killfile, you idiot. ... It would be a simple matter to find the posts in the past where you've ... Cut the self-pity and aadp crap. ... Now you are claiming French nationality, ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: UK focus on speed decreases safety.
    ... so it's a load of crap. ... hell out of being universally recognized as the resident idiot of RAD? ... obviously wouldn't know shit from shoe polish. ... always omitting any credible reference and relying upon "I said so" as ...
    (rec.autos.driving)
  • Re: John Gabriels Theorem Revisited.
    ... What did I just say about Wade? ... contribute but crap. ... You have not been able to refute anything you fool! ... Archimedes used limits you bumbling idiot!! ...
    (sci.math)