Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:03:59 -0400
Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
PD wrote:
Of course. But the revolutions of the earth are not the basis of
time these days.
Yes they are you stupid ass moron.
I hvae shown you the atomic time is still "adjusted to" Earth
spin rate.
Wrong. The opposite is true.
Wrong you stupid ass moron,
If the opposite was true noon time would end up turning into a
time that it was dark at.
Nope, they adjust Earth time to match atomic clocks to _prevent_ it
from being dark at noon in a few million years.
You truly are lost huh?
They adjust the atomic clocks so they will match the Earth time,
They do not adjust the Earth and where Greenwich is to match
the atomic clocks.
Noon and the 0 meridian of Greenwich do not get adjusted.
That is what they adjust the clocks to.
The observatory at Greenwich is no longer the world's official time
source. It hasn't been since 1954. Get with the times, in case you
haven't noticed it is now the 21st century!
Nobody is talking about moving meridians or anything. In fact the
opposite is true. By adjusting the length of the year on occasion,
we assure that when the clocks read noon at Greenwich, the sun is at
its peak elevation.
And you do not get that means you are adjusting the atomic clocks
to G.M.T .
sheesh you are dense.
Consider what would otherwise happen:
I have moron, it is you that is not thinking about such.
If you do not change the atomic clocks noon would stop being
when the sun is it's highest point after a while.
If you allow the atomic clocks to "adjust" G.M.T. time instead
you would end up with noon in the dark.
Sheesh
You are braindead.
.
- References:
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Prev by Date: Re: all the four fundamental interactions
- Next by Date: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Previous by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Next by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|