Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:58:36 -0400
Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Nobody is touching the atomic clock. The length of the solar day
is adjusted by inserting an occasional 86401 second day, rather
than the usual 86400 second day.
LOL
You are funny,
The length of the solar day is beign adjusted?
How you doing that.. changing the Earth spin rate huh?
Well, we're not changing it, that's for sure, but the Earth spin
rate does change, yes. That's precisely the point.
If the Earth is changing rate and you don't change the clocks.
You are not going to be in sync with noon.
Again you prove you are clueless about what is being changed.
You almost caught a clue, Space***. The UTC clock _is_ changed, by
adding leap seconds once in a while, in order to keep noon at noon.
The TAI time, which is more accurate, is not changed. It would
appear that TAI time is 33 seconds fast, but it is UTC that is
running slow, because of the leap seconds inserted because Earth is
running slow.
You are so lost is is funny.
You are actualyl saying the Earth is slow instead of saying
a human made clock is fast.
You are basically saying Nature is wrong and human clocks
are correct about "what" time it is on Earth.
LOL
You truly love to ignore Natural processes to support your
rubber ruler philosophy huh?
LOL
UTC time, upon which local civil time is based, is adjusted because
the Earth is running slow. This is precicely in order to keep noon
happening at noon.
No ***.
And for atomic time to tell us when it is actually noon still,
It has to be adjusted also like it always has been but you are
too stupid to realize it.
LOL
.
- References:
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Prev by Date: Re: Some transform sillyness
- Next by Date: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Previous by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Next by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Index(es):