Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: "Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:12:06 -0400
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Oct 22, 10:55 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[snip]
Sorry space*** I won't engage the terminally bored and stupid in
discussion.
Eric proves he can not prove the answer below as wrong:
a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the traveling twin count for the trip?
b)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the stay at home twin count?
answer) a = b
Run Eric Run! (or dance). (ding ding).
LOL
--
James M Driscoll Jr
Discoverer of the Clock Malfunction Fact.
Spaceman
.
- References:
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- From: Eric Gisse
- Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Prev by Date: Re: "A Basic Look at Hebie Herbie"
- Next by Date: Mastering Physics answers
- Previous by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Next by thread: Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
- Index(es):