Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down

Eric Gisse wrote:
On Oct 22, 9:44 am, "Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <space...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Michael Moroney wrote:

Oh ya sure Mikey, we were all using Internet time in the 70's.

What the hell is "Internet time"? NTP? (From what source?)

That alone lets me just say screw off Mikey.
You are so lost it does not matter what I try to inform you about

No, tell me. What is "internet time"? In all my years on the net,
I've never heard of "internet time". Tell me.

It is what a lot of ISP servers and large corperations sync their
networks clocks to so all the computers will have the same
times on them.

So, it appears that what Space*** refers to as "internet time" is
his made-up name for, collectively, NTP time services or other time
services (such as GPS or WWV/WWVB), most of which ultimately derive
their time from NIST atomic clocks.

Poor Mikey,
He thinks I made up the term.
Poor Mikey
He thinks the atomic clocks are not adjusted to GMT.
LOL

Prove that they are.

How would you set a new atomic clock?
Would you set it to be "33 seconds off" and always
have to remember that and change that number instead
of actually just changing the clock's time reading?
:)

And Eric, while you are here
prove the answer below is wrong since it is actually what the
post is about instead of this dance you are all doing to ignore such.

a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the traveling twin count for the trip?
b)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the stay at home twin count?

answer) a = b

Prove that answer is wrong Eric.
Or go back and stick your head in the sands of time with the
rest of the rubber ruler dorks.

--
James M Driscoll Jr
Discoverer of the Clock Malfunction Fact.
Spaceman





.

Quantcast