Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down

Michael Moroney wrote:
"Spaceman" <spaceman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

How would you set a new atomic clock?
Would you set it to be "33 seconds off" and always
have to remember that and change that number instead
of actually just changing the clock's time reading?
:)

What they actually did was set up the new atomic clock time to be 10
seconds off. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Atomic_Time .
Leap seconds since 1972 have accumulated so that it is now 33 (soon to
be 34) seconds off.

So your clock is always off from Earth time.
That is a great clock.
LOL


Computers are very good at subtracting the leap seconds so you don't
have to remember anything.

Again you are ignoring NST even though you explained all about it.
And now you are ignorant to the fact that computers are not
atomic clocks so again your atomic clock would be off by 33 seconds
(soon to be 34) and yet a computer using NST would be correct about
noon time more than your atomic clock would be.
and again..
You ignore the actual reason for this post because you can not
prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction.
a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the traveling twin count for the trip?
b)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does
the stay at home twin count?

answer) a = b

You like to ignore the above to keep your atomic clock god that
can "change time itself" to continue to be worshipped.
LOL








.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... noon time more than your atomic clock would be. ... prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction. ... a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... noon time more than your atomic clock would be. ... prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction. ... a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does ... especially when I type LOL. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... noon time more than your atomic clock would be. ... prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction. ... a)How many Earth revolutions with reference to the Sun does ... Rapidly proving I can not teach stupid dogs simple facts. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... noon time more than your atomic clock would be. ... prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction. ... There is no evidence. ... especially when I type LOL. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down
    ... noon time more than your atomic clock would be. ... prove the traveling twins clock did not malfunction. ... Rapidly proving I can not teach stupid dogs simple facts. ... So that is yet more proof you have no concept of proof of accomplishment. ...
    (sci.physics)