Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.

On Oct 22, 8:39 pm, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:
NoEinstein wrote:
On Oct 20, 10:28 am, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:

NoEinstein wrote:

Dear PD:  I care about science very much, but for having to reply to
"ticks" like you.  — NoEinstein —

If you cared about science you would not dismiss experimental data. No
one who cares about science dismisses experimental data.

PD- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

OK, PD.  Then why do you dismiss my experimental data?  — NoEinstein —

Probably because there are a million experiments that have been
done and many thousands done daily that show your experiment was
wrong. That seems like a pretty good reason.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dear Doug:  ONE truthful contradiction negates a 1,000 experiments
that were WRONG.  Or, as someone on this news group said: "One 'aw
***' negates a hundred 'atta boys'!"  — NoEinstein —

No, you are trying to negate millions of experiments with one badly
done experiment. It does not work that way. You have been told where
your drop experiment is wrong and you refuse to show your interferemoter
so you know that is wrong as well.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Doug:  You just keep repeating garbage.  Learn to be objective
(reason), or post your own 'science', elsewhere.  — NoEinstein —

Lets see, I told you where you made a mistake in your detection scheme.
You can either try a different scheme and verify that you have made
a major discovery or you can call my comments garbage and continue
to spout nonsense.  You know that the experiment is wrong and you
are afraid to have it tested.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

:-} ~ ~ - - - — NoEinstein —
.

Quantcast