Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein <noeinstein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 23, 1:29 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 23, 11:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 23, 10:01 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Oct 22, 11:53 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear PD: I reply to most pot shots.
Why? Why is it so important to you to respond to a pot shot? Is your
ego so fragile that you feel you MUST not let a pot shot go
unanswered? Do you not see that this turns control over to the one
issuing pot shots, forcing you to respond at their whim? All it would
take to keep you completely occupied would be for someone to issue a
string of potshots, and they would completely OWN your time. How
worthless is your time that you would turn over control of it to
someone else?
:-} ~ ~ - - - — NoEinstein —
So you didn't consider this question long enough to exert control over
your own actions?
PD
:-} ~ ~ - - - — NoEinstein —
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- From: PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Prev by Date: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Next by Date: Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
- Previous by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Next by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|