Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?

From: "Androcles" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:13:46 +0100

<sheepshaggerx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:486160c2-b6b1-42ef-9079-ae46ec99c546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Oct 25, 8:06 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Jang Jin Hong" <mo...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
messagenews:f42d58d8-6be9-490a-914b-69525f2c6a22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Physical theory is not only opinion, that can be prooved by
experiment.

Prove, by experiment, that this pencil is broken as observation
indicates:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg

No theory can be proven, theories can only be disproven.

You sound like a Twat!
--------------------------
You ARE a ***, with Crank's Disease.

.

References:
- Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
  - From: sheepshaggerx

Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
Next by Date: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
Previous by thread: Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
Next by thread: Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread