sci.physics
- WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 31 Oct 08 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
- where exactly newton made da wrong turn,
dedanoe
- "Gravity",
Loc
- Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time,
Uncle Al
- How much do you weigh ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Calculating force in different lever classes,
shareyourknowledge@xxxxxxxxxxx
- the lever law is not about conservation of energy,
dedanoe
- Quantum Gravity 295.4: U.K. and Japan Find Protons and Neutrons to be Skyrmion-Type (Multi-) Solitons,
OsherD
- Quantum Gravity 295.3: Maximizing q(x, y) at F = 1/2 or p = 1/2,
OsherD
- JSH: Tail does not wag the dog, simply explained,
JSH
- Quantum Gravity 295.2: Bi-Logistic q(x, y) Differential Equation using Probable Causation/Influence (PI),
OsherD
- Re: Michelson and Morley experiment,
John Park
- SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS,
Nintendoislife
- Re: Republicans are Saying it Appears We Won In Iraq,
Tom Potter
- JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies,
JSH
- Re: Sizes of infinity jump,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's ...,
W. eWatson
- Quantum Gravity 295.1: Simplification of q(x, y) when A U B = universe,
OsherD
- Quantum Gravity 295.0: When q(x, y) is in [0, 1] for q = ap + bp^2 + cF + dF^2,
OsherD
- Rowan University "validate" free/new energy claim,
Cwatters
- what srt comes down to,
dedanoe
- Re: Scotch Tape-potent x-ray source Hammer creates magnetisum,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- "Communicating at Translight Velocities",
Loc
- Vehicle taking a turn,
Gan
- Double slit exp.,
winston71
- the direction of gravity and electric force,
dedanoe
- Quantum Gravity 294.9: Some More on Lie Fields,
OsherD
- Quantum Gravity 294.8: A "Double-Logistic-Like" Causal Probability of Form q(x, y) = aP + bP^2 + cF + dF^2 with a, c > 0, b, d < 0,
OsherD
- Quantum Gravity 294.7: Quantum Theory/Physics May be Continuous and Fundamentally Probabilistic (Yale University),
OsherD
- Re: Solutions manual to Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (1 & 2 Edition), By David J. Griffiths,
huntds
- New Thermo in Sci Am,
Bluuuue Rajah
- Re: The growing list of the lies, sins, and scandals of Sarah Palin. It has grown quite a lot since 08/29/08!,
John Polasek
- "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Loc
- Giuen Holding Trust Ltd. Financial Derivatives,
Bank-1.
- Quantum Gravity 294.6 Re-Announced: Probable Causation/Influence --> Memory --> Life (Czech Republic),
OsherD
- Hypergeometrical Universe Predicts both Mercury Perihelion Precession and Gravitational Lensing,
ny2292000
- arxiv endorsement request,
Jang Jin Hong
- smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
john271008
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Uncle Al
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
PD
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Igor
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Ivan Gorelik
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Ivan Gorelik
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
john271008
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
john271008
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- We can Never Ever claim anything is infinitely dense||vacuous.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: We can Never Ever claim anything is infinitely dense||vacuous.,
Bill Snyder
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Androcles
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
PD
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
john271008
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Androcles
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
PD
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
Sam Wormley
- Re: smallest particles and the LHC mentality,
gabydewilde
- how to add a spin -1/2 to a singlet state?,
ginzzer
- Inside Science News Briefs,
Sam Wormley
- Re: DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD,
Spaceman
- This is a test.,
Mitchell Jones
- CMB and expanding wavelength energy question,
Stico
- Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
Jim Black
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
Uncle Al
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
srp2inc
- Re: Black holes and escape velocity --> help request, naive paradox,
srp2inc
- Re: discovering the proo/anti nuclear forces,
Uncle Al
- Re: stretching spacetime & CMB wavelength,
Uncle Al
- "General Relativity Examined",
Loc
- New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 27, 2008,
PhDs . org
- Who is Androcles?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Androcles
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
eric gisse
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Androcles
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Androcles
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
hanson
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
tg
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Androcles
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
srp2inc
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Tom Potter
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Greg Neill
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
John Bailey
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
Uncle Al
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
hanson
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
eric gisse
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
srp2inc
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
testtest505050
- Re: Who is Androcles?,
gabydewilde
Nonexistent B fields,
RP
Time Machine question,
sheepshaggerx
The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
tadchem
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
strich . 9993
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
PD
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.,
Spaceman
please help stop wars and starvation -C,
Kirk Gregory Czuhai
Re: PLEASE STOP ALL WARS NOW !!!!!!! http://georgewbush.ws,
Uncle Al
Re: hello everyone,
OsherD
electric fields on vid cams,
Buboise
theoratical physics,
spidertrap160
The Litvinenko Polonium 210 poisoning case,
Surfer
test,
Uncle Ben
InovaBrasil 25_10_08 - OS 20 ARTIGOS MAIS LIDOS - (83 artigos postados),
Rogerio
Explain magnetic field lines please.,
jim
Quantum Gravity 294.6: Probable Causation/Influence --> Memory --> Life (Czech Republic),
OsherD
Chemical Thermodynamics part 1 is uploaded,
adichemadi
Re: Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists for fraud,
Bernd Felsche
JSH: Trying to be objective, patient differential,
JSH
BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Message not available
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Jim Black
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
Androcles
- Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
Re: BRAIN FRY PROBLEM #5,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
Message not available
Re: The highest limit of acceleration/deceleration,
Uncle Al
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Loc
Q? Gravity Probe B,
Aetherist
Is it possible to suck your own cock?,
sheepshaggerx
If these are inorganic, then so is NASA.,
fossilid
Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
mike3
Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
xxein
Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
Darrell Lakin
Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
PD
Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
carlip-nospam
Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?,
Igor
Z[sqrt(-2)] euclidean domain,
G Patel
External Electric Field vs. Electric Field,
G Patel
Quantum Gravity 294.5: As x --> 0, p^2 - xy --> 0+,
OsherD
A good one for Spaceshit to ponder..,
sheepshaggerx
Re: work, play, pray for peace!!!!!!! http://georgewbush.ws,
Uncle Al
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Oct 08 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
velocity is primarily position over time instance not distance over elapsed time,
dedanoe
Re: if someone is flying towards the earth at 0.9 c (90% of speed o...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
solid state chemistry IIT file upgraded,
adichemadi
Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
AshtarSheran
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
RichD
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
sheepshaggerx
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
sheepshaggerx
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
Androcles
- Re: Is it possible for amateur to publish via journal?,
srp2inc
Is it possible for a amateur to publish via journal?,
Jang Jin Hong
Quantum Gravity 294.4: A, B Positively Dependent and P(A) < = 1/2 Imply p^2 > = P(A)P(B) = xy,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 294.3: A, B Statistically Dependent Implies p > = xy = P(A)P(B),
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 294.2: Inequalities on dp/dt with various functions x of time t.,
OsherD
From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 43),
Sam Wormley
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 23 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Quantum Gravity 294.1: Some PI Scenarios in y < = x < = (1/2) + y/2,
OsherD
Re: Wreck Of The Titan,
tj Frazir
Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole,
Eric Gisse
Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole,
Edward Green
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole,
Uncle Al
Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole,
Sam Wormley
Maximal entropy random walk and euclidean path integrals,
Jarek Duda
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Loc
Physics Class Change or Free Hydrogen Causation,
Douglas Eagleson
Gravity due to rotation,
donkey71
Scotch tape's surprising power: X-rays,
Jan Panteltje
Reflection and refraction,
Cwatters
Exponential video,
Dave Typinski
X-Rays from sticky tape,
Eric Baird
Mastering Physics answers,
Tipu Jaffar
FRINGE “SCIENCE GUYS” TALK MORE SCIENCE FACT THAN FICTION,
Sam Wormley
Re: A Good Battey Justifies Some Drug Use In Some Researchers,
Uncle Al
.holographic romance,
HolographicRomance
"The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances",
Loc
Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra,
happyman
Solutions manua to Separation Process Principles, 2nd Ed., by Seader, Henley,
solutioncollector
Re: Do Plasmas Naturally Occur in the Earth's Lower Atmosphere?,
W. eWatson
How Dangerous Are Common Halogen 100W Bulbs?,
W. eWatson
Advanced Quantum Theory: Relative state,
Douglas Eagleson
Quantum Gravity 294.0: Bulgarians and USA Go From PI^2 To "Square Wedge Wedge Products (in Forms)",
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 294.0: When p^2 = P ' (A-->B) ^2 > = P(A)P(B),
OsherD
Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go dry,
tj Frazir
Re: Thirty years of warmer temperatures go poof,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 293.9: The Cause of Alternating Accelerating/Constant/Decelerating Universe,
OsherD
Re: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 38),
BradGuth
Where is there an OOL Informed Discussion Group?,
erudyte
Re: Is coal liquefaction/gasification pointless? Progress Energy Polut,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Gigantic black holes threw their weight around in the early universe,
John Polasek
Optimisation in Reverse Auctions (Price combinations),
Merrows
"Space, Vacuum, and the Aether",
Loc
Solution manual to Vector Mechanics Dynamics Beer 8th Edition,
solutioncollector
Synergetics definition,
Clifford Nelson
The rapports about Remote manipulation weapons are of historical importance, really,,
alice
Quantum Gravity 293.8: Golden Mean and Riccati dp/dt = 2C for p = (x-->y),
OsherD
Explaining things to some of you guys (not all) is like wading through molasis in January.,
Hank Kroll
electrostatics,
shahars10
Some transform sillyness,
Spaceman
Early Jurassic watering hole,
Sam Wormley
Re: all the four fundamental interactions,
Uncle Al
Is Global Warming Caused By Man?,
Loc
The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
gabydewilde
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Each ship could be made of two ships, in case one fails.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
Ian Parker
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
tj Frazir
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
tj Frazir
- Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.,
tj Frazir
Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.,
Spaceman
Re: UNDISPUTABLE TRUTH about LHC's proton collider,
tj Frazir
Re: Dark matter is a commie sucker,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 293.7: Riccati Equation for Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Linearizes Time Coefficients and Creates Opposing Two-Force Scenario,
OsherD
InovaBrasil 19_10_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (80 artigos postados),
Rogerio
Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?,
Tej
The LHC creates very compact neutron starlet,
Ivan Gorelik
Quantum Gravity 293.6: Japan Results Yield Relationships between Spectral Theory and Probable Causation/Influence,
OsherD
Re: time must also be three dimensional as space is,
Uncle Al
Re: the sun must be in the center of earths elliptic trajectory,
Uncle Al
Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Androcles
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
mL
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Androcles
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Androcles
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Möbius
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Androcles
- Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Dave Typinski
Re: Of the WGS84 model and surface acceleration,
Eric Gisse
Universe beginning and end,
Therese Shellabarger
CHESSCLUBFRIENDS <=== http://tinyurl.com/chessclubfriend <===,
Kirk Gregory Czuhai
solution manual for Probability and Statistical Inference ( 7th edition by Hogg & Tanis),
sendsolutions
"Causality",
Tej
TINC-Blog Award 2008,
nanopaprika
where could you fing Who kann man die "Annalen der Physik" als Texte finden? Where could you find the "Annalen der Physik" in a textual format?,
lbrtchx
Re: #14 the reason why all these strange particles of pions, K-mesons,,
Matthew Johnson
JSH: Now I'm getting upset,
JSH
JSH: Pondering the idea rejections,
JSH
Doug can not define resonance.,
Spaceman
Re: 'g' is Time its self.,
tj Frazir
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Oct 08 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Pure Gamma Ray Pulsar,
Sam Wormley
dedanoe's a.i.processor, e.t.generator and light accumulator united in one warp engine for intergalactic cruisers (building castles in the sky),
dedanoe
Women and Minority Students Now More Likely to Take Physics,
Sam Wormley
Science and Math Education Challenges Face Next President, Congress,
Sam Wormley
Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Igor
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Uncle Al
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
Spaceman
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
- Re: Prediction before facts paradox,
PD
Re: WAS EINSTEIN A FAKE AFTER ALL?,
Uncle Al
All solution manuals you want are here,
lsms9
Re: ain't no God without Devil nor Goddess without Satan,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
student manual solution instructor solution manual study guide,
sms123
Re: Where is the universe?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: I'm a big fan of â?? Classic â?? Bic lighters.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Definition of 'Money' - basic to know - {HRI 20081011-V1.0},
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Photons Do so Much,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: A magnetic field does not exist.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
"How the Aether Leads to Our Reality",
Tej
Quantum Gravity 293.5: Is Dark Energy = Probable Causation/Influence (PI)?,
OsherD
magnetic field polarization,
ssylee
Quantum Gravity 293.4: Does Uniform Distribution of Causation Explain Alternating Acceleration/Deceleration/Constancy of Universe?,
OsherD
Electric field polarization questions,
ssylee
Re: La grande myopie,
Helmut Wabnig
Electric field of a uniform plane wave at a interface,
ssylee
Time-harmonic magnetic field analysis,
ssylee
Quantum Gravity 293.2: (x-->y)^2 > = d^2 iff d < = 1/2 iff (x-->y) > = 1/2 for d = |y - x| = x - y, y < = x,
OsherD
Questions about a time-harmonic wave analysis,
ssylee
From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 42),
Sam Wormley
galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs,
john161008
- Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs,
Sam Wormley
- Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs,
john161008
- Re: galactic centers are totally void 'black holes' where the spin is intense enough to split all the virtual pairs,
Sam Wormley
- BHs *produce* the matter surrounding them.,
john161008
- BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Ivan Gorelik
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Ivan Gorelik
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Ivan Gorelik
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
john161008
- Re: BHs transform the matter into strong magnetic field and...,
hanson
- LHC. Alive will envy dead.,
Ivan Gorelik
Re: the next generation of propulsion,
Uncle Al
Garrett Lisi: A beautiful new theory of everything,
Tim Tyler
History will remember you George,
Rick
The physical education.,
socratus
physics help,
A2
“ c = 1, m = 0, v = 1, Energy = Momentum ”,
Jeff▲Relf
"A Basic Look at the Aether",
Tej
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
Matthew Johnson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
Uncle Al
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
hanson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
hanson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
hanson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
hanson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
hanson
- Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: "A Basic Look at Hebie Herbie",
hanson
Books on Python and Science/Physics,
W. eWatson
Higher Education World University Guide,
family-living
boundary of the universe... for dummies.,
ronybc3
Solution for no indent posts.,
Tom Potter
Who are these guys #2?,
Tom Potter
how to answer this problem??,
rigor
Quantum Gravity 293.1: PI Squared is Closer to PI (Probable Causation/Influence) than Euclidean Distance Squared is For Uncommon Events,
OsherD
Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Igor
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
- Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Sam Wormley
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Uncle Al
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
RP
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Androcles
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
RP
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Androcles
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
RP
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Androcles
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
RP
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
RP
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Message not availableRe: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Vince Morgan
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Eric Gisse
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
doug
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Spaceman
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
PD
Re: Twins paradox debunked and broken down,
Vince Morgan
Re: Valuing assests based on earnings and management, not the market.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Comet Tuttle's Split Personality,
Sam Wormley
how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
dedanoe
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Sanny
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Uncle Al
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
tadchem
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
tj Frazir
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
tj Frazir
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
RP
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Androcles
- I like you, RP ― What's your background ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
PD
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Robert J. Kolker
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Dwib
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
BradGuth
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
BradGuth
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
Dave Typinski
- Re: how does light (photon) escapes sun's gravity?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Oil Industry Biggest thing on earth must see,
tj Frazir
- Sea Giant was bigger than TI Africa.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Sea Giant was bigger than TI Africa.,
tj Frazir
- Fearless Johnny's Sea Giant ( France, 1979 ) was 1,360 feet long.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Fearless Johnny's Sea Giant ( France, 1979 ) was 1,360 feet long.,
tj Frazir
- Fearless Johnny's “ Whale ” engines.,
Jeff▲Relf
- “ Hummingbird ” engines.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Why Whale engines haven't hit the market.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Why Whale engines haven't hit the market.,
tj Frazir
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.,
tj Frazir
- I'm doing fine, I don't need more money, I like my landlord and my city.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I'm doing fine, I don't need more money, I like my landlord and...,
tj Frazir
- Re: I've been a Professional coder for 27 year now, VC++ 9 and VBA.,
tj Frazir
- I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
tj Frazir
- Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
tj Frazir
- Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
tj Frazir
- Re: I'm not looking to enter your business, Giant John.,
tj Frazir
- How would I know if you were pulling my leg or not ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: How would I know if you were pulling my leg or not ?,
tj Frazir
- Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?,
hanson
- Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?,
tj Frazir
- If you send me a ticket and directions ..,
Jeff▲Relf
- I'm not one of T.J's Bermuda buddies.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I'm not one of T.J's Bermuda buddies.,
tj Frazir
- I can't afford a “ free ” house.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I can't afford a â?? free â?? house.,
tj Frazir
- This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.,
tj Frazir
- Re: This map shows Namu in relation to Seattle, Alaska and Vancouver.,
tj Frazir
- Ocean Falls, BC was a paper-mill town, not a mining town.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: Why do you want me to live in Port Clinton, Ohio ?,
tj Frazir
- I'm not one of your Bermuda buddies, Giant John.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I'm not looking Seattle skyline cam,
tj Frazir
- What ship are you on ? where are you headed ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: What ship are you on ? where are you headed ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: 1880 tank boiler Whale pic,
tj Frazir
- Re: â?? Hummingbird â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.,
tj Frazir
- Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.,
tj Frazir
- Re: The Marshall Traction Engine 62121 uses metal pistons.,
tj Frazir
- You can't buy a Doble-run “ Super Soaker ”-like fire hose.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: You can't buy a Doble-run â?? Super Soaker â??-like fire hose.,
tj Frazir
- Seeing, testing, and verifying Giant John's inventions.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Seeing, testing, and verifying Giant John's inventions.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Fearless Johnny's â?? Whale â?? engines.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Evel kevel Jumps canion with 1 stroke water rocket.,
tj Frazir
- Evel Knievel's Thunderbolt-II 475°F Water Rocket engine.,
Jeff▲Relf
- How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: How hot is the liquid in the cylinder ?,
tj Frazir
- Giant John's recently-created, sea-going, automated, hydro-drill rig.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Giant John's recently-created, sea-going, automated, hydro-dril...,
tj Frazir
- You're on the cutting-edge, Giant John.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: USS Bush and USS Bob Hope,
tj Frazir
"Is String Theory Justified?",
Tej
Applications of the renolyds number and uncertain geometry Navier Stokes!,
Jacko
Training & jobs,
kiran
Dhuh, why don;t our politicians get this?,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
Quantum Gravity 293.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Prime Number Geometry/Factorizations From France,
OsherD
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 14 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Re: ESA - The Next Big Rocket,
tj Frazir
Re: 'g' is TIME Slope is a energy gradiant,
tj Frazir
Re: conflation and expansion of levers,
Uncle Al
Re: 'g' is a FORCE not an ACCELERATION.,
tj Frazir
squashed sunset,
mrdarrett
Re: Science Verses Religion - The Final Battle,
Sam
American Vacuum Society antique ?,
MarkAren
"What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe",
Tej
Re: Small Businesses avoided the shotgun weddings.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Who are these guys?,
Tom Potter
send to me too!,
shadowsamurai35
Inside Science News Briefs - October 13, 2008,
Sam Wormley
Is the Concensus being threatened?,
tadchem
A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
jimp
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Igor
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
doug
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Richard Tobin
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Androcles
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Message not available
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Message not available
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
gabydewilde
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Benj
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Uncle Al
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Benj
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Cwatters
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
doug
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
doug
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
doug
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Rick
- Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
doug
Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Fact checker
Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Cwatters
Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?,
Paul Cardinale
Re: Light Accelerates,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Electromagnetic Signals Influencing Human Thought?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?",
Y.Porat
Re: Where does infinity begin?,
Uncle Al
Re: LEVER is upon what NEWTON's mechanics breaks apart,
Uncle Al
Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car,
tj Frazir
- A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
tj Frazir
- Re: A bulker of coal comes to town,
tj Frazir
- The Knock Nevis ( 1981, .3 miles long ).,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: The Knock Nevis ( 1981, .3 miles long ).,
tj Frazir
- Re: A bulker of coal comes to town,
tj Frazir
- Seattle real estate.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: A bulker of coal comes to town,
tj Frazir
- Re: A bulker of coal comes to town,
tj Frazir
- Re: A bulker of coal comes to town,
tj Frazir
- Marinas with permenantly docked, upright “ Disney ” ships.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Marinas with permenantly docked, upright â?? Disney â?? ships.,
tj Frazir
- Re: Marinas with permenantly docked, upright â?? Disney â?? ships.,
tj Frazir
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: A billionaire can't demonstrate working/testable engine ? !,
gabydewilde
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car,
tj Frazir
- Re: Oil Industry Suppressed Plans for 200-mpg Car,
tj Frazir
New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 13, 2008,
PhDs . org
Laser,
swapna
Quantum Gravity 292.999: 292.998 Related to Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Relationship to Minimal Distance of 1-point Algebraic Geometry Codes,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.998: Germany, Spain, France Find Open Problems in Fibonacci Numbers,
OsherD
energy <=infotwist=> anarchy,
dedanoe
Re: General Relativity Meditations & Antigravity,
Spaceman
Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
doug
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
doug
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
doug
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
Spaceman
- Re: Physical Correlate of Minkowski Spacetime,
doug
Re: How do you explain Gravitational Lensing ?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Paper on Uncertain Geometry Available,
Jacko
light-gravity link & universe architecture,
Ajmal
The speed of light is not the highest speed in the Universe, it is actually the slowest,
cjcountess
Re: c-squared as c-circled is pivotal point around which a new revolution in physics is taking place,
cjcountess
O.T. -- Internet Anywhere?,
hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
Acceleration and mass,
fido
Minkowski spacetime and GRT.,
socratus
"The Properties of the Aether",
Ecir
Re: A brief history of sunspots.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
InovaBrasil 12_10_08 - 20 artigos + lidos (107 artigos postados),
Rogerio
Quantum Gravity 292.997: The Infinite-Velocity Zero (Nil) Acceleration Big Bang,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.996: Remarkable Case of a = sqrt(1 - v^2) Near v = 0,
OsherD
QG 292.995: More Regarding Acceleration vs Velocity in Universe,
OsherD
electric field outside infinitely long cyclinder,
tinesan
How to calculate the work of a mass which is on a circle ?,
bluemanca
Layman's explanation of Nambu's work,
JunoExpress
Re: Water Explosions Using Voltage,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: NASA's EGRET is not X-Ray film in a tin can over Lake Union.,
tj Frazir
Quantum mechanics proof that God does not exist.,
David
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity",
Ecir
Fermilab and symmetry breaking,
socratus
Re: Waving at light speed,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- Re: Waving at light speed,
BURT
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Waving at light speed,
BURT
- Re: Waving at light speed,
Spaceman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Waving at light speed,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
The Media’s Loss is SCI.PHYSIC’S Gain.,
NoEinstein
LHC. I fear the neutron droplet!,
Ivan Gorelik
The conception “acceleration”.,
socratus
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Oct 08 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Re: Nasdaq turned 10 pounds of gold into just one, 9 years later.,
tj Frazir
BattChgPro Ver 1.7,
scott93727g
Curious battery effect,
Edward Green
Re: Monopoly game allways ends same way,
tj Frazir
Re: Who will Eric Gisse ME RIGHT ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Who will Eric Gisse work for ? a Nasdaq company ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Coldest September for 14 years,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Winding the clock back to the big bang - or not?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Six Sigma Course Materials,
SixSigmaCourse
Re: Resonant WFC Theory,
Uncle Al
Scientists Create Ultracold Molecules,
Sam Wormley
"The Arrow of Time",
Ecir
Quantum Gravity 292.994: Velocity versus Acceleration Domination (Canada),
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.993: Mass is a Cause in Gravitation, an Effect in Accelerating Universe Scenario,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.992: Variable G Changes "Velocity and Space Causes Acceleration" to "Acceleration Causes Velocity and Space",
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.991: Remarkable Reversals of Causation from Accelerating to Decelerating/Constant Universe Scenarios,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.99: How PI Converts "Deterministic Laws" to Probability,
OsherD
From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 41),
Sam Wormley
Re: was it space-time, space-velocity or space-time-velocity metrics?,
Uncle Al
Re: when push comes to shove, the only way Special Relativity can be proven is by first assuming it is correct,
Uncle Al
what is CERN after?,
dedanoe
Could you make a working ion drive toy blimp?,
Dave
Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics",
glird
Re: EINSTEIN'S PROOF OF THE 12 GODS OF EGYPT,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Interior of a star comparable place to an high energy colliders?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
maximum work during reversible process??????,
adichemadi
Re: Time speeding up,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Stretching Apartment Spacetime Size,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Ecir
Re: I invest in myself, not others, not stock or houses.,
tj Frazir
Re: Physicists caused wall street melt down...,
tj Frazir
Re: Physicists caused wall street WAR we won,
tj Frazir
Gravity Waves,
HardySpicer
Quantum Gravity 292.98: Pakistan and India Again on Riccati-Like Solution of Cosmic Triple Coincidence Problem By Triple Interacting Fluids,
OsherD
Accelerating universe + Unruh Radiation = Energy?,
Starblade Enkai
Quantum Gravity 292.97: The Probable Causation/Influence (PI) of One Set on Another Can Influence Their Mutual Cardinality (Hungary),
OsherD
Why No Second Nobel for Einstein in Relativity??,
Calorie
2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry goes to Three U.S. Researchers...,
swormley1
The race from A to B. and the corrupt relativist judge.,
Spaceman
solar car gets 5-20 miles on 8 hrs of sunlight,
misterfact@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Solution to Elements of Electromagnetics ,Mathew O Sadiku 3rd or 4th edition,
jason . r . fuller
Damn, the traveling relativity twin can't login to his computer account.,
Spaceman
"The Einstein Hoax",
Ecir
Re: CERN's LHC burns a lot of fuel .. but the sun burns more.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: has light got mass?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Balanced transmission lines in a progressive wave regime. 'Cos seeing is believing!,
www.Radiondistics.com
Heat transfer in a dilute gas,
boblatest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Quantum Gravity 294.96: Remarkable Internal Similarity Between Minkowski Measure and Riccati Equations,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.95: Correction: Dr. L.A. Glinka is Not Russian,
OsherD
Re: Solving Quadratic Diophantine equations in 2 variables,
JSH
Re: "Impossible" EM space drive?,
Timo A. Nieminen
Interstellar Boundary Explorer set to launch Oct. 19 on a Pegasus rocket,
Mike Jr
NASA’s David Hathaway updates solar cycle 24 prediction,
Mike Jr
Re: Can't look back in time,
Uncle Al
Big Bang main proof of General Relativity?,
Calorie
Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Uncle Al
Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Uncle Al
Re: Who pissed off Allah?,
gabydewilde
THE 2008 NOBEL PRIZE in Physics: Nambu, Kobayashi & Maskawa,
Sam Wormley
Is Einstein a Time Traveller?,
Calorie
Re: Who is Obama really!",
Fact checker
How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
nonsense
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
John Polasek
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
John Polasek
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Uncle Al
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
hanson
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
tj Frazir
- T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.,
tj Frazir
- Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.,
gabydewilde
- When can I see, test and/or read about actual, running engines ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.,
gabydewilde
- Re: T.J.'s engine has never been tested in the retail market.,
tj Frazir
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Uncle Al
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
RP
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
RP
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
tj Frazir
- You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.,
BradGuth
- Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You're bull shitting us T.J., like Brad Guth.,
BradGuth
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Igor
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
PD
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Igor
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Igor
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
RP
- “ Rest Mass ” is notional, virtual, not real.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
RP
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- “ Rest Mass ” is virtual, notional, not real.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: “ Rest Mass ” is virtual, notional, not real.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: â?? Rest Mass â?? is virtual, notional, not real.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- A neutron ( spin-1 ) is Not spinning faster than a proton ( spin-.5 ).,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: A neutron ( spin-1 ) is Not spinning faster than a proton ( spin-.5 ).,
PD
- Neutron ( spin-.5 ) condensates via opposite-spin pairing.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
Y.Porat
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
RP
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: ESSENCE OF GENERAL RELATIVITY: AMBIGUOUS SPEED OF LIGHT,
Uncle Al
Re: Curvature isn't energy,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: NASA Kool-Aid,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The U.S. is borrowing like||because there's no tomorrow.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
udar vrz fundamentite na vashata fizika,
dedanoe
Quantum Gravity 292.94: KdV Equation in Real Zero Approximation Via Probable Causation/Influence,
OsherD
Matter and “dark matter",
socratus
There is no Higgs.,
smithjd15
Head in the beam,
Boris Mohar
Has anyone seen Poincaré?,
Rick
Inovabrasil 05_10_08 - 10 artigos + lidos (65 artigos postados),
Rogerio
Re: Need help from members,
Uncle Al
Re: could someone enlighten us as to the precise relationship between differentiation,
Cwatters
How can“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” be keeping?,
socratus
Re: Porn Addiction,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Discs formation,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: "No Change" implies "No Time Dilation",
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Nobel Prize 2008 in Physics goes to...,
Calorie
Re: Is Time Quantized Motion (Time Dilation)?,
tj Frazir
Online Bullying Hits Most Teens,
Sam Wormley
Proof of Farmer Brown's Conjectuure that two mulitiplied one time equals two,
Rick
Re: How can a metal spring shrink to 26% on Mars?,
Lin Liangtai
New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Oct 06, 2008,
PhDs . org
What's the difference between Gravity and gravitation?,
lundslaktare
Quantum Gravity 292.93: Newton's Law of Gravitation Examined by 292.9,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.92: List of Quantum and Wave-Related PDEs Satisfying 292.9 Approximately,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 292.91: 292.92 Derived From Optimizing Probable Causation/Influence (PI),
OsherD
eve rabotim na dokrajchuvanje na vashiot svet!!!,
dedanoe
Quantum Gravity 292.9: Quantum Theory As An Approximation to Zero-Valued Variables,
OsherD
"Hot Point:" Question on Fusion,
giveitawhirl2008
Digitizing Vibrating Strings, Cords, in Oscillating Renosance Chambers ! (:-D,
Kirk Gregory Czuhai
Jokes heard on other planets all over the Universe.,
Spaceman
Re: New Specie of Ape-Man Discovered, Almost Human,
Spaceman
** Mein Kampf ** by Hebie Herbie,
hanson
Gravity interaction of ellipsoid,
Raghar
Global Warming Alarmism is Unacceptable and Should be Confronted,
Mike Jr
Re: Like a drunk, the U.S. is bipolar, it loves booms and busts.,
eric gisse
Wildest dream and nightmare come true on Mars.,
Lin Liangtai
Idea for getting a piece of Google's ten million.,
Tom Potter
The birth of General Relativity,
Tom Potter
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Sam Wormley
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
eric gisse
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Spaceman
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Tom Potter
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Tom Potter
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Androcles
- Newton didn't know: “ c = 1, Energy = Mass ”.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Tom Potter
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Androcles
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Sam Wormley
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Tom Potter
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Sam Wormley
- Re: The birth of General Relativity,
Igor
Test Message,
OsherD
Re: Question: Mass, gravity and energy,
Jacko
Re: Antigravity,
ny2292000
Re: sucessfull is the business which in every next turn makes more and more money,
Uncle Al
pls help me find info on this,
o-michael-o
Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator,
Uncle Al
Re: you must maintain the formal equality in your relativity,
Uncle Al
Re: Stan Meyer's Water Fuel Cell International Independent Test-Evaluation Report,
Uncle Al
Re: Motion and the unified field,
Uncle Al
Re: Solutions manual to Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 7/e JAY L.DEVORE,
Hwhitney
NASA misidentified Mars salts in press conference.,
Lin Liangtai
Motion is quantized (Time Dilation)??,
Calorie
DARK FLOW and HUBBLE REDSHIFT are not contradicting each other IF.,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 3 October 2008 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Winds are Dominant Cause of Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheet Losses,
Mike Jr
Quantum Gravity 292.8: Some Mathematical Indications Via Probable Causation/Influence That Light Speed is Not a Maximum Barrier Due To Wrong Inversion/Duality,
OsherD
Re: Time is No More (must invent new term for Time),
tj Frazir
Two of my works before the election next month. New Direction Europe against unconditional powers and solution to Dark Matter established,
gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Oct 08 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
dedanoe
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
HardySpicer
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Jim Newman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
OG
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
OG
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
OG
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
OG
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Igor
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
The Draper family
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
The Draper family
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9991
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
john180908
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Perceived wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9991
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9993
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9993
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9993
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
strich . 9991
- Message not available
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
PD
- Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Spaceman
Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
Uncle Al
Re: Percieved wavelength times frequency.,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
srt previdot na ajnstajn & lorenc,
dedanoe
sensor faucet online,
chinabestsanitary@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
sean
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Mastering Physics Solutions,
unstoppablespam
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
hochun0809
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
kev
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
robert . joiner
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
ellebelle1988
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
ystrasystrar
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
thsfr31
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
grcn_3
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
sir . illegal
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
a . lazy . hobo
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
schuby87
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
drownfrog
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
ronncher
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
ronncher
- Re: Mastering Physics Solutions,
Nintendoislife
2008 could rack up a whopping 290 spotless days by the end of December,
Mike Jr
electromagnetic waves reflection and transmission,
ssylee
Re: can a hole be yellow?,
Mike Jr
You thought that science research funding was tight before the $700B bailout,
Mike Jr
The mystery of the varying nuclear decay [Really?],
Sam Wormley
Electromagnetics boundary conditions.,
ssylee
Macroscopic motion, kinetic energy is also quantized,
Calorie
Re: Dark flow,
Uncle Al
attraction; repulsion and neutral interaction,
dedanoe
Re: Bailout from Armageddon?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
no more no less,
dedanoe
knee jerking the EM space drive,
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
Light may not be an EM-field after all.,
lundslaktare
Physics World: Latest Issue,
Sam Wormley
The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
doug
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
Jim Newman
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
doug
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
BURT
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
Jim Newman
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
Jim Newman
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
Jim Newman
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
doug
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
NoEinstein
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein?s Theories.,
Uncle Al
- Re: The Energy Demands of Falling Objects Doom Einstein’s Theories.,
Y.Porat
Re: The GPS question relativists are afraid to answer.,
tj Frazir
Re: Basic Question About Relativity,
carlip-nospam
Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
Strich.9
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
Androcles
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9991
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
gabydewilde
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
BradGuth
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
BradGuth
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
gabydewilde
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
gabydewilde
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
gabydewilde
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
tj Frazir
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
tj Frazir
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
strich . 9993
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
doug
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
NoEinstein
- Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.,
PD
Using Sunlight More Efficiently,
Sam Wormley
Re: Neutrino oscillation & energy,
Jacko
Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Robert J. Kolker
Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
- Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.,
NoEinstein
Twins Paradox Car for sale,
Spaceman
Re: the situation is worse than you thought,
Dylan_Grace
Re: Causal Mechanism why A Circle is Round,
Y.Porat
Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Androcles
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Uncle Al
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
John Park
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Spaceman
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Cwatters
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Cwatters
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Cwatters
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
Cwatters
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
jimp
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
- Re: Air canon, sanity check on my calculations,
thomas . greenleaf
Re: Who will stun the world as next Einstein?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: THE BAILOUT,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Congress should keep non-leveraged earnings yields steady.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Game Theory Shows How Salmonella Bacteria Stack the Deck to make you Sick,
Sam Wormley
Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9992
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Eric Gisse
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
tadchem
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9992
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9992
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9992
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
tadchem
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
tadchem
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
John Park
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Strich.9
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Androcles
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Androcles
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9993
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
iqgoogol
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
iqgoogol
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Androcles
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
PD
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
hanerim
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Spaceman
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
doug
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Spaceman
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
iqgoogol
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Spaceman
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Androcles
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
Spaceman
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
dkelvey@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: An experiment to test the Emission Theory of light,
strich . 9991
If worse comes to worse, I'll be happy with less.,
Jeff▲Relf
Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Senator Obama doesn't get it.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
conversation of momentum,
gdewilde@xxxxxxxxx
Quantum Gravity 292.7: IBM and CalTech USA Use Fibonacci Numbers in Quantum Computer,
OsherD
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
strich . 9991
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Uncle Al
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Strich.9
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Message not available
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Uncle Al
- Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
Message not availableDid Spaceman make more money as a system administrator ?,
Jeff▲Relf
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Uncle Al
Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity",
Spaceman
Re: Sun to Moon and Moon to Earth,
Igor
JSH: Using tautological spaces,
JSH
Why does a real world circle obey.... (Black Hole, etc...),
Calorie
Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
doug
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- Re: cesium clock question,
gabydewilde
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
tadchem
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Sam Wormley
- Re: cesium clock question,
Tom Potter
- Re: cesium clock question,
Spaceman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: cesium clock question,
orbound
Re: There's only one John Fredriksen.,
tj Frazir
- I ponder the long-term obligations.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.,
tj Frazir
- Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.,
Eric Gisse
- How 'bout you, Gisse ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: I ponder the long-term obligations.,
tj Frazir
- What do you mean “ No lawyers ” ?,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?,
tj Frazir
- Re: What do you mean â?? No lawyers â?? ?,
tj Frazir
Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.,
tj Frazir
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.,
tj Frazir
Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.,
tj Frazir
Re: T.J.'s a virtual â?? Weyerhaeuser.COM â??, trees ships and all.,
tj Frazir
Re: Photons -- Hidden Fundamentals,
Uncle Al
Re: I'm clueless.,
tj Frazir
Re: heath and weight,
dedanoe
Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Inside Science News Briefs -- Sept. 26, 2008,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: You, me, all of us, need â?? Banksters â??.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Can the con men explain this,
PD
Re: Can the con men explain this,
Spaceman
Re: Can the con men explain this,
Spaceman
Re: Can the con men explain this,
Spaceman
Re: Can the con men explain this,
Spaceman
Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Rick
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Rick
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Igor
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Puppet_Sock
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
PD
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Timo A. Nieminen
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
glhansen@xxxxxxx
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
jmfbahciv
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
- Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.,
Edward Green
- Automating plain-text editors on Flash||network drives.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: Automating plain-text editors on Flash||network drives.,
Edward Green
- Re: Individual.NET, an NNTP server, works like a dream.,
jmfbahciv
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
jmfbahciv
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
- A ‘ CAPTCHA ’ is a type of challenge-response test.,
Jeff▲Relf
- Re: A ‘ CAPTCHA ’ is a type of challenge-response test.,
Edward Green
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Two fundamental questions about QM,
Edward Green
Re: God OR Science,
Dylan_Grace
