sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: jimp
• The _real_ cause of global warming???
  • From: bearnol
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: Micik
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Edward Green
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Philip Holman
• Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where does infinity begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Day ?+? - The Sun is blank - President-elect Barack Obama will ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The real obstacles to controlled nuclear fusion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: Androcles
• Re: exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: Hermes
• Quantum Gravity 298.0: Generalized Quartic Riccati Equations in Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Dave Typinski
• IIT JEE - 2009 physical sciences last chance
  • From: adichemadi
• Quantum Gravity 297.9: U.K. Finds Gamma (PI-related) Clustering Rather Than Dispersion or Random/Chaotic (Exponential) Galaxy Distribution
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Emergency Blankets (the metallized plastic type)
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Classical Mechanics vs Quantum mechanics Structure
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Emergency Blankets (the metallized plastic type)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Desertphile
• Emergency Blankets (the metallized plastic type)
  • From: Robert11
• Re: judie tippett tiolets bear tiolet holder cheap tiolets
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Old Testament Torah Matrix Code Reveals New Discoveries
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Worship of Madness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Every sphere has its center
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: JSH
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: Androcles
• Re: exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: RLW
• Re: exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Vres
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Vres
• Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What does a clock measure ?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• exactphilosophy.net 2009 preview
  • From: Hermes
• Classical Mechanics vs Quantum mechanics Structure
  • From: Ali
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: john271108
• Re: Super Conductivity, Super Fluid, Super Slipperiness
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: JSH
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: Huang
• Re: JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Stories are true and then some
  • From: Boner J. Skidmark
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• JSH: Stories are true and then some
  • From: JSH
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: jimp
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Dan Riley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Super Conductivity, Super Fluid, Super Slipperiness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Proton and neutron masses calculated from first principles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: jimp
• Re: Proton and neutron masses calculated from first principles
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• looking for description or drawing of early Ratio Spectrometer
  • From: Sean
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: PD
• Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Super Conductivity, Super Fluid, Super Slipperiness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Super Conductivity, Super Fluid, Super Slipperiness
  • From: Greg Neill
• Super Conductivity, Super Fluid, Super Slipperiness
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: Huang
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Q
• Quantum Gravity 297.8: Generalization of Riccati Equation to Linear-Quadratic Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: Huang
• Proton and neutron masses calculated from first principles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: jimp
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Breakthrough in the physics of ice-shelf break-up
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: sheepshaggerx
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Tom Potter
• A better GPS Syetem
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: YKhan
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Voltage vs Potential
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: There are two kinds of charge pairs.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Stephen Hawking going to Canada’s Perimeter Institute
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Q
• Re: Note to climate change deniers: it's real, you idiots!
  • From: Dave Typinski
• There are two kinds of charge pairs.
  • From: john271108
• Re: Note to climate change deniers: it's real, you idiots!
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: annalissa
• Re: Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: What does a clock measure ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Creation of Universe and the Gravity Transformations"
  • From: Vres
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Heat we emit could warm the Earth
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: michalchik@xxxxxxx
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: Class in the academic world
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Sysco?
  • From: jimp
• JSH: Class in the academic world
  • From: JSH
• Sysco?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Huang
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Edwards
• LHC sychrotron radiation, proton energy
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: john231108
• Re: Trying to measure abstraction -- please help!
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: As Demand for Organic Poultry Rises, Food Scientists Begin Safety Study
  • From: Benj
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: doug
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: As Demand for Organic Poultry Rises, Food Scientists Begin Safety Study
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: New era in ultra-hard materials imminent: arbitrarily large diamonds.And with it routine space access, the hydrogen economy, room-temperaturesuperconductivity and ultra large telescopes.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Strength of gravity inside the Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Theo Wollenleben
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: papa_rios
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• As Demand for Organic Poultry Rises, Food Scientists Begin Safety Study
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Can physics be used to interpret dreams?
  • From: Tom Potter
• A couple of questions about black holes (probably dumb ones)
  • From: michalchik@xxxxxxx
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: John Park
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Nathan Moschkin
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Nathan Moschkin
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Nathan Moschkin
• Re: Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: eric gisse
• Note to climate change deniers: it's real, you idiots!
  • From: Q
• Hypothetical question for all good physicists.
  • From: Nathan Moschkin
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: doug
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: doug
• Suppose a muon could ( and did ) move at the speed of light.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: doug
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: doug
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: doug
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: doug
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Edwards
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: finally, another f**king epiphany, I was afraid I was running out of good thoughts
  • From: Igor
• Re: No frame's “ Reality ” is any more “ real ” than another's.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Igor
• No frame's “ Reality ” is any more “ real ” than another's.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The real obstacles to controlled nuclear fusion
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: CIRCULAR reasoning at its best
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: eric gisse
• A Disturbance in the Neighborhood
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The real obstacles to controlled nuclear fusion
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: The real obstacles to controlled nuclear fusion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: Damir
• Re: Les imbéciles de professeurs de physique nous ressassent les crétineries que Einstein répète de Descartes. Mais Newton, lui-même, dans ses travaux préparatoires aux Principia - Principes mathématiques de philosophie naturelle-, avait complètement démoli les prétentions de Descartes à considérer les mouvements comme des mouvements relatifs.Quelques remarques sur De Gravitio d'Isaac Newton
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: Damir
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Theo Wollenleben
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: Damir
• Re: Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: Androcles
• Are all Relativists complete Idiots !?
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: BorisPetrovic
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: BorisPetrovic
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: J.B.
• Re: Muon Time Dilation is Proved to be a Fallacy
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: J.B.
• Lecture @ The Tesla Museum
  • From: BorisPetrovic
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: J.B.
• "H.E.Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Vres
• Re: Muon Time Dilation is Proved to be a Fallacy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: REDSHIFT LAW, SPEED OF LIGHT, PIONEER ANOMALY
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Adam
• Re: Crank Level
  • From: gabydewilde
• Crank Level
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• photons are hard to picture
  • From: john231108
• Re: finally, another f**king epiphany, I was afraid I was running out of good thoughts
  • From: john231108
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: john231108
• Asia's largest conference on Green Energy, Clean Technology and Renewable energy
  • From: Shaguf
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 24 November 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Huang
• Re: The Old Testament Torah Matrix Code Reveals New Discoveries
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: finally, another f**king epiphany, I was afraid I was running out of good thoughts
  • From: Igor
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Igor
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ginasummers17
• Re: constructivism in physicas
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: gabydewilde
• constructivism in physicas
  • From: JohnF
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: REDSHIFT LAW, SPEED OF LIGHT, PIONEER ANOMALY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHY EINSTEINIANS HAVE A JOB
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sci.Physics.Research Moderators Censor Science
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 24, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: john231108
• Re: finally, another f**king epiphany, I was afraid I was running out of good thoughts
  • From: john231108
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Jim Black
• finally, another f**king epiphany, I was afraid I was running out of good thoughts
  • From: john231108
• Re: The Old Testament Torah Matrix Code Reveals New Discoveries
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: john211108
• The Old Testament Torah Matrix Code Reveals New Discoveries
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: sevek . im
• Re: LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Preserving Snow
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Huang
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: doug
• Re: Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Adam
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: OG
• Re: Cosmic Rays from Mysterious Source Bombarding Earth
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Igor
• Curiosity and skepticism to reports that the sun causes variations in the decay rates of some isotopes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: Igor
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What does a clock measure ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Where does infinity begin?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What does a clock measure ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: eric gisse
• LHC repairs now beginning
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Einstein's E=mc² confirmed at the quantum chromodynamics level
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: OG
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: ed wolf
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Russel Sprout
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Androcles
• Re: quest
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: alertjean
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: jimp
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Re: CO2 in Winter
  • From: Androcles
• CO2 in Winter
  • From: Jean
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: tadchem
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Huang
• Cosmic Rays from Mysterious Source Bombarding Earth
  • From: Mike Muad'Dib
• Re: Preserving Snow
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Preserving Snow
  • From: tadchem
• Preserving Snow
  • From: Wrongfellow
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: quest
  • From: Androcles
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: STANDARD MODEL GETS RIGHT ANSWER FOR PROTON, NEUTRON MASSES
  • From: Glenn Møller-Holst
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Androcles
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Benj
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: random thoughts :)
  • From: Huang
• random thoughts :)
  • From: winston71
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: doug
• THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Stico
• Re: Relativity of Simultaniety Revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: STANDARD MODEL GETS RIGHT ANSWER FOR PROTON, NEUTRON MASSES
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Indian space agency Isro to roll out a rival to Google Earth
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual [NEW Collection] 22/11/2008
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Huang
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: pchan2046
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: tadchem
• Re: STANDARD MODEL GETS RIGHT ANSWER FOR PROTON, NEUTRON MASSES
  • From: BURT
• Re: Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Androcles
• STANDARD MODEL GETS RIGHT ANSWER FOR PROTON, NEUTRON MASSES
  • From: Sam Wormley
• At Long Last, Physicists Calculate the Proton's Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Nedwsgroup crammed funn of crackpots
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Muon Time Dilation is Proved to be a Fallacy
  • From: Uncle Al
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Osp
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sonoluminescence: sonofusion explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual [NEW Collection] 22/11/2008
  • From: Student Plus
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Gravity 297.6: Causation Difficulties in Both GR and Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 297.6: Causation Difficulties in Both GR and Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The End of American Capitalism
  • From: davidmabus
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Huang
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Benj
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Benj
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: mike3
• Re: Calculating the Actual Muon Half LIfe - The Muon Co-Inertial Measurement
  • From: spudnik
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Huang
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Igor
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 21 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Calculating the Actual Muon Half LIfe - The Muon Co-Inertial Measurement
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Huang
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: jimp
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: john211108
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: daves1617
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity and mass-energy equivalence
  • From: mike3
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Peter
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE - Number 877 November 21, 2008 www.aip.org/pnu
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Peter
• Re: Calculating the Actual Muon Half LIfe - The Muon Co-Inertial Measurement
  • From: spudnik
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galaxies precess
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Peter
• Re: galaxies precess
  • From: dedanoe
• galaxies precess
  • From: john211108
• Re: i am just a tiny sperm (one of six billions) and planet earth is my egg-cell-objective
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Indian space agency Isro to roll out a rival to Google Earth
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: quest
  • From: Dave Typinski
• "Gravity"
  • From: Osp
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Peter
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Benj
• Re: Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Lowest detectable frequency
  • From: Peter
• Re: quest
  • From: Androcles
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calculating the Actual Muon Half LIfe - The Muon Co-Inertial Measurement
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein Who?
  • From: marc
• Re: Gas Adsorption
  • From: tadchem
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Gas Adsorption
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: quest
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The End of American Capitalism
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: The End of American Capitalism
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Temperature and Life.
  • From: BURT
• Gas Adsorption
  • From: Fahed
• Re: Question about the Nordtvedt effect
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question about the Nordtvedt effect
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about the Nordtvedt effect
  • From: eric gisse
• Question about the Nordtvedt effect
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: quest
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Desertphile
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The solution is simple.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: quest
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calculating the Actual Muon Half LIfe - The Muon Co-Inertial Measurement
  • From: Edwards
• Re: quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• The solution is simple.
  • From: john
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Osp
• Re: quest
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: quest
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about gravity and time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: quest
  • From: Androcles
• Question about gravity and time
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• quest
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Old Greek Differential
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Example, "A"
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Tom Potter
• What is the shape of the multiverse?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Benj
• Re: Failure of Newtonian gravitation
  • From: Adam
• Re: Failure of Newtonian gravitation
  • From: Adam
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: jimp
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: RLW
• Re: planet earth is the entire universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Temperature and Life.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: gma2914ernest
• Re: Temperature and Life.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Quantum Gravity 297.4: p^2 = (x1 - y1 - 1)^2 + (x2 - y2 - 1)^2 is Maximum iff (x1-->y1) and (x2-->y2) are Maximum
  • From: Huang
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: Noisy Kettles - typo corrected
  • From: OG
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: OG
• Re: Temperature and Life.
  • From: BURT
• Re: Failure of Newtonian gravitation
  • From: hanson
• Re: Temperature and Life.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The Sacred Letters
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: The Sacred Letters
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 297.5: p^2 = (x1 - y1 - 1)^2 + (x2 - y2 - 1)^2 (Proximity) is Maximum (= 2, or normalized = 1) iff d^2 = (x1 - y1)^2 + (x2 - y2)^2 is Minimum ( = 0)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 297.4: p^2 = (x1 - y1 - 1)^2 + (x2 - y2 - 1)^2 is Maximum iff (x1-->y1) and (x2-->y2) are Maximum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: BURT
• Re: thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: Uncle Al
• thermonuclear propulsion, Electrokinetics etc
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: BURT
• Re: A new study shows why it’s sometimes better to stay out front
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A new study shows why it’s sometimes better to stay out front
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fairly Insignificant Event (big bang, matter-antimatter, blackholes, galaxies)
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Sacred Letters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: westom1
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ginasummers17
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: PD
• A new study shows why it’s sometimes better to stay out front
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: sarah
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Fairly Insignificant Event (big bang, matter-antimatter, blackholes, galaxies)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger?s Cat paradox
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Straight geometry in curved space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Osp
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: strich . 9991
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 November 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Fairly Insignificant Event (big bang, matter-antimatter, blackholes, galaxies)
  • From: Kamil.Szot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: s . esta17
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Inside Science News Briefs - November 17, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: jimp
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Androcles
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Benj
• Re: damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Benj
• damaging circuits with ????
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SEND ME MASTERPHYSICS ANSWERS
  • From: Nintendoislife
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: my page
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Global Warming Trend Continues
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Osp
• A weird but serious solution for the Schrödinger’s Cat paradox
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Benj
• Re: Why Neutron Security?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: I Was Reading Aristotle Again
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: DOE Radiolysis [2019]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Howling of Dogs
  • From: hanson
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Neutron Security?
  • From: Boner J. Skidmark
• Re: Noisy Kettles
  • From: OG
• Re: Howling of Dogs
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: PD
• Why Neutron Security?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• What if a matter travel from earth to boundary of the universe faster than the speed of universe expansion ?
  • From: Ridwan
• Re: I Was Reading Aristotle Again
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• I Was Reading Aristotle Again
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Noisy Kettles
  • From: gjedwards
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 17, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Benj
• Re: Howling of Dogs
  • From: Androcles
• Howling of Dogs
  • From: annalissa
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Failure of Newtonian gravitation
  • From: Hayek
• Failure of Newtonian gravitation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sodium detected in Saturn E ring might point to a subsurface ocean on Enceladus..
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: my page
  • From: Uncle Al
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Edward Green
• Diophantane
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: my page
  • From: Androcles
• Re: my page
  • From: tadchem
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Wod
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 297.3: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) As a Directed Interaction Ratio
  • From: OsherD
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 297.3: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) As a Directed Interaction Ratio
  • From: OsherD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: BURT
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: my page
  • From: Igor
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: tadchem
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: BURT
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: my page
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Quantum Gravity 297.2: Acceleration/Deceleration of Universe Via y = at^4 + bt^3 + ct + d
  • From: OsherD
• Get frequently asked questions in THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Global Warming Trend Continues
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Fred_Bartoli
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Fred_Bartoli
• my page
  • From: kurtstocklmeir
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Fred_Bartoli
• Re: I am crank that says we doe not understand the atom
  • From: Benj
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: john131108
• Re: Severn Trent is owned by investors, the CEO is just another emp...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Gazeous oxygen magnetic behaviour...
  • From: Fred_Bartoli
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Re: Binaural Brainwave Generator
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: zar5018
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Igor
• Re: What President-Elect Obama Needs to Know About Physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 14 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: hlmackie
• Severn Trent is owned by investors, the CEO is just another employee.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• FAQ Thermodynamics
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: PD
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Dave Typinski
• What President-Elect Obama Needs to Know About Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Distance is absolute space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: i offer you prove against newton's gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Drop
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Newton's 3rd law (again)
  • From: Galois271
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Wod
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: john131108
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Iowa State physicists part of research team testing Nobel-winning theory (EurekAlert!)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Maximal entropy random walk and euclidean path integrals
  • From: Jarek Duda
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 46)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 297.1: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) in Quantum Gravity via Japan and Diophantine Approximation via France
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 297.0: Phi-4 Quantum Theory and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: dedanoe
• Quantum Gravity 297.0: Phi-4 Quantum Theory and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: john131108
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Tom Potter
• There is no smallest because smaller is smaller.
  • From: john131108
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Denial wasn't an option
  • From: also gabydewilde
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: BURT
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: BURT
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: BURT
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Denial wasn't an option
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Doug LIES about going to a prestigious University
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Szabolcs
• Re: challenging questions in physical sciences
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: The nightmare I couldn't stop
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Szabolcs
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Szabolcs
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Why is the auroral zone ring shaped?
  • From: Szabolcs
• Re: galaxy rotation curves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: warped discs of galaxies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• galaxy rotation curves
  • From: john131108
• Re: Flow Related: Surface of Water Question
  • From: armistid_rap
• warped discs of galaxies
  • From: john131108
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Cosmo Joe
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: Cosmo Joe
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: john121108
• Quantum Gravity 296.91: 296.9 Continued on Poland and Platonic Solids and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Hayek
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Denial wasn't an option
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: herkgrad06
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: herkgrad06
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: jaymcneil41
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.9: Conversion of k + y - x to 1 + y -x and Poland on Quantum Communication/Information Relating to Platonic Solids & Thence to Golden Ratio
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 296.9: Conversion of k + y - x to 1 + y -x and Poland on Quantum Communication/Information Relating to Platonic Solids & Thence to Golden Ratio
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Denial wasn't an option
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Obering and "The Industrial-Military Complex"
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Announcing New Physics
  • From: Androcles
• Announcing New Physics
  • From: Cosmo Joe
• JSH: Denial wasn't an option
  • From: JSH
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: john121108
• Re: what is at the center
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 11 November 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• what is at the center
  • From: john121108
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: strich . 9991
• challenging questions in physical sciences
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: PD
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Report makes Recommendations for Saving Energy in Buildings and Automobiles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Dwib
• Re: Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Question on Bubble.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Flow Related: Surface of Water Question
  • From: Hero
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: doug
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: doug
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Flow Related: Surface of Water Question
  • From: armistid_rap
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: Strich.9
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Wod
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: PD
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Relativity Does Not Owe Us A Proof - Accept It As It Is
  • From: PD
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Sailing, sailing.... spinning seperator gas can
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: hungtakwai
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
  • From: JSH
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
  • From: JSH
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Happy days… 2
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Winter Solstice Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Analysis of Space-Time - Relativity Does Not Hold Water
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sailing, sailing.... spinning seperator gas can
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: PD
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Winter Solstice Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Winter Solstice Question
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Winter Solstice Question
  • From: Richard Tobin
• FQXi Essay Contest on the Nature of Time
  • From: geo4mon
• Winter Solstice Question
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Aleksandr Timofeev
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Wod
• Re: Are we giving too much weight to IQ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Radio the Douglas Way.\
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: JSH: z constraint and solving quadratic residues
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: bbeeler
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: bbeeler
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: winston71
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Igor
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: winston71
• Inside Science News Briefs - November 10, 2008
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: winston71
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: shell theorem
  • From: eric gisse
• Positron Ladders as Nuclear Triggers
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: jimp
• shell theorem
  • From: winston71
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Mahipal Virdy
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: jimp
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Giuen Holding Ltd. ™ Retail Goods Forum
  • From: Bank jobs legal document
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Benj
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Benj
• r=0 pole in field theories
  • From: Jacko
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Aleksandr Timofeev
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NIST neglects Law of Conservation of Momentum in explaining the WTC tower near-free-fall collapses on 9/11
  • From: Mike E . Fullerton
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A multiverse is more logical than one unique universe.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Spooky correlations
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: mitchsperkins
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Wod
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: PD
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: PD
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: PD
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: Y.Porat
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 10, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: VSWR
  • From: Cwatters
• Quantum Gravity 296.8: U.K., Germany, Canada Restore Friction Force To Tachyon Condensation In Accordance with Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Physicists of today should be called abstractists instead.
  • From: unusualanimal
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.7: Buckyonions Derivation From Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: shahars10
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: breaking a stick
  • From: Sam Wormley
• breaking a stick
  • From: shahars10
• Re: Inventor's next step to dark matter (wallpaper). The utilization of axle forces. (Nobel Prize stuff)
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: no newton and no einstein any more, capito?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Know your gravity from a hole in the ground
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Know your gravity from a hole in the ground
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.7: Buckyonions Derivation From Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: This might be interesting
  • From: Edward Green
• Quantum Gravity 296.7: Buckyonions Derivation From Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I'm encountering some impedance, here.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Inventor's next step to dark matter (wallpaper). The utilization of axle forces. (Nobel Prize stuff)
  • From: gb6724@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. V
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativity expert...! this is for you you are going to be defeated now.
  • From: Uncle Al
• no newton and no einstein any more, capito?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Know your gravity from a hole in the ground
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: VSWR
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JohnF
• Re: VSWR
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: JSH: Pondering the idea rejections
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Cwatters
• VSWR
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Relativity expert...! this is for you you are going to be defeated now.
  • From: Androcles
• Relativity expert...! this is for you you are going to be defeated now.
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: induced voltage & current
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Nimo
• Quantum Gravity 296.6: U. Missouri USA and China On Buckyonions as Interstellar Grain
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Know your gravity from a hole in the ground
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Know your gravity from a hole in the ground
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: gabydewilde
• Beware of rip off artists
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: induced voltage & current
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• PBS Documentary Recounts Lifelong Struggles of U.S. Astronomer George Ellery Hale
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Androcles
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 07 Nov 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: tadchem
• Re: 4 states of Matter -> Solid, liquid gas & Plasma.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: PD
• Re: Experiment [updated], your observation would be needed
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Math outside of Time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: PD
• Re: Speed of Light explained
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: PD
• Re: The number of nearest atoms in aluminium crystal????
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Physics Topic GRE
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Can it happen that earth is a Zoo?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Barack Obama's First Day On The Job
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Relativity Doubt ?
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetism of matter effecting light possibly?
  • From: John Park
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Cwatters
• Physics Topic GRE
  • From: eratosthenes
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.5: Hyper-Exponential Velocities From Riccati dy/dt = A(t) + C(t)y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 296.5: Hyper-Exponential Velocities From Riccati dy/dt = A(t) + C(t)y^2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Occam’s razor and Special relativity are too simplistic in combination with an oscillating Higgs ether.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: zahraabbas
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: an idea about gravity
  • From: Igor
• an idea about gravity
  • From: winston71
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NIST neglects Law of Conservation of Momentum in explaining the WTC tower near-free-fall collapses on 9/11
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: RLW
• Re: A room type heater that runs on a triple A battery?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: BURT
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: tadchem
• Re: actually the world has six sides
  • From: tadchem
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: actually the world has six sides
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Obama's CO2 tax will put coal out of business and raise your ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The number of nearest atoms in aluminium crystal????
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: PD
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Ray Vickson
• induced voltage & current
  • From: shahars10
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: actually the world has six sides
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JohnF
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: PD
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: rtd
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Kin
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: PD
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: Benj
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: co2 scrubber
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Benj
• Re: Tweeking Gravity to seperate gasses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Sailing, sailing.... spinning seperator gas can
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: tj Frazir
• The number of nearest atoms in aluminium crystal????
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: Benj
• Re: Sizes of infinity jump
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: PD
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: PD
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: tj Frazir
• Experts how to prove the existence of electrons
  • From: Nimo
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Happy days… 2
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Happy days… 2
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.3: m1m2 = -(4/3)pi L^2 (rho + 3p) from 295 and 296.0,1,2
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 296.4: USA (U. Maryland) Finds "Causal" Relativistic Defects in Optics and Two-Level (Two-State) Systems
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: Androcles
• How a magnetic field can deflect the path of an electron
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.3: m1m2 = -(4/3)pi L^2 (rho + 3p) from 295 and 296.0,1,2
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• From: Physicsworld.com newswire (Week 45)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JohnF
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: kinematic question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Boris Mohar
• actually the world has six sides
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: macedonian "Svet.Lost.A"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Vince Morgan
• Re: Lesson learned, I hope.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: mini-magnetosphere - how did the moon shots manage without it?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Dark Flow Detected - Not!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Circuits of light" are the dream
  • From: Igor
• Re: mini-magnetosphere - how did the moon shots manage without it?
  • From: Igor
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Sailing, sailing....
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: PD
• Re: mini-magnetosphere - how did the moon shots manage without it?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: NIST neglects Law of Conservation of Momentum in explaining the WTC tower near-free-fall collapses on 9/11
  • From: Mike E . Fullerton
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Lesson learned, I hope.
  • From: Cwatters
• Sailing, sailing....
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich.9
• kinematic question
  • From: rtd
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: PD
• Re: NIST neglects Law of Conservation of Momentum in explaining the WTC tower near-free-fall collapses on 9/11
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Michael Moroney is inventing stories about me and Deadbeat Dad police.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Michael Moroney is inventing stories about me and Deadbeat Dad police.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: "Circuits of light" are the dream
  • From: hanson
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Experiment [updated], your observation would be needed
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Distance between Sun and Earth remain same?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Strong Force ???
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: physics of anti topple devices
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• physics of anti topple devices
  • From: sam . n . seaborn
• Re: Strich is “ ranting ”, I'm just discussing investments.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: doug
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: doug
• Strich is “ ranting ”, I'm just discussing investments.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Strong Force ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is it “ mad ” to identify what's best, to pursue it ?
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: All solution manuals you want are here
  • From: surenderbansal11
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: strich . 9993
• Is it “ mad ” to identify what's best, to pursue it ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 296.3: m1m2 = -(4/3)pi L^2 (rho + 3p) from 295 and 296.0,1,2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bubbles aint good; burning investors and tossing “ CEO ”s aint good.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Bubbles aint good; burning investors and tossing “ CEO ”s aint good.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Fate of Obama ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Strong Force ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Fate of Obama ???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bush tanking dollar, as measured in oil.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Bush tanking dollar, as measured in oil.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: mini-magnetosphere - how did the moon shots manage without it?
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Who asked for money ? cite please.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Commerical break
  • From: Androcles
• mini-magnetosphere - how did the moon shots manage without it?
  • From: Mark Salter
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: "Circuits of light" are the dream
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.2: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Equation Compared With Raychaudhuri Equation Correctly Yield Behavior of Cosmological Constant
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Interactive soulution of time dependent Schroedinger equation
  • From: Geza
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.2: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Equation Compared With Raychaudhuri Equation Correctly Yield Behavior of Cosmological Constant
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Quantum Gravity 296.2: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Equation Compared With Raychaudhuri Equation Correctly Yield Behavior of Cosmological Constant
  • From: OsherD
• NIST neglects Law of Conservation of Momentum in explaining the WTC tower near-free-fall collapses on 9/11
  • From: Mike E . Fullerton
• Re: Quantum Gravity 296.1: India: Raychaudhuri Equation Relates to the 295 and 296.0 Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: eric gisse
• Quantum Gravity 296.1: India: Raychaudhuri Equation Relates to the 295 and 296.0 Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: hanson
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• "Circuits of light" are the dream
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: BradGuth
• Who asked for money ? cite please.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson and Morley experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Huang
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Igor
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: doug
• Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: doug
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Lesson learned, I hope.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: dazzday
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: dazzday
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: doug
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Lesson learned, I hope.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: How does fluid under pressure have potential energy?
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Lesson learned, I hope.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• o(B)ama versus o(S)ama
  • From: dedanoe
• Incumbents were tossed out Because they sank the dollar.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Benj
• Re: Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: john021108
• Re: Experiment [updated], your observation would be needed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Experiment, your observation would be needed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: Uncle Al
• Gang of Seven, Power of Six
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: My Revolt at the Polls
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Happy days… 2
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: john021108
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Big Bang Before The Point Theory
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: srp2inc
• Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation
  • From: Strich 9
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Experiment [updated], your observation would be needed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Congratulations to President Obama
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: A multiverse is more logical than one unique universe.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: Experiment, your observation would be needed
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Adam Chapman
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Adam Chapman
• Experiment [updated], your observation would be needed
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Palin fucked him up
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Experiment, your observation would be needed
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My Revolt at the Polls
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Experiment, your observation would be needed
  • From: Jamie
• Re: My Revolt at the Polls
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Experiment, your observation would be needed
  • From: Nimo
• Palin fucked him up
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: My Revolt at the Polls
  • From: eric gisse
• OT Anybody here have experience with the iRobot Rooba?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aether's polylogy
  • From: Bio Freak
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Igor
• Unexpected new particles found at Fermilab (found even without LHC)
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another simple time dilation debunk
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Androcles
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Another simple time dilation debunk
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can the electron create its own barycenter?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: doug
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: john021108
• Re: Maybe Jurassic Park will become real...
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: strich . 9991
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 296.0: Reinterpretation of E = mc^2 via 295 - Motion Generates Mass/Energy!
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: PD
• Maybe Jurassic Park will become real...
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Adam Chapman
• Re: magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Greg Neill
• magnetic field strength at radial distance
  • From: Adam Chapman
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Application Form - US President.
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• I need this confirmation about St.line..!
  • From: Nimo
• Quantum Gravity 295.9: Do Distance, Time, Velocity, Acceleration Create Mass, and How, From 295.8?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: john021108
• Re: Another simple time dilation debunk
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Another simple time dilation debunk
  • From: HardySpicer
• Another simple time dilation debunk
  • From: Spaceman
• Application Form - US President.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: So now you know
  • From: Jamie
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A truly classic and obviously drunken kook.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A truly classic and obviously drunken kook.
  • From: RLW
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Another great idea from Tom Potter!
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.8: France, Russia, Italy Find "Infinite Acceleration"
  • From: RLW
• Re: Resolved Relativity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Resolved Relativity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: about diffusion constant in porous media
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: Solutions Manual, Test Bank - COLLECTION******************
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
  • From: PD
• Re: Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: strich . 9993
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: john021108
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: PD
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: about diffusion constant in porous media
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.8: France, Russia, Italy Find "Infinite Acceleration"
  • From: greysky
• Did NASA cheat about Mars soil?
  • From: fossilid
• Re: A multiverse is more logical than one unique universe.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• TACS-09 call for papers
  • From: john
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Nov 03, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Jim Black
• The 5/4th dimension (was: fourth dimension)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Maximal entropy random walk and euclidean path integrals
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Quantum Gravity 295.8: France, Russia, Italy Find "Infinite Acceleration"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 295.7: A Generalized Riccati Equation From 295.6
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Quantum Gravity 295.7: A Generalized Riccati Equation From 295.6
  • From: OsherD
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Benj
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Benj
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: AshtarSheran
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does a singularity really exist in a black hole?
  • From: mike3
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: JSH
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• about diffusion constant in porous media
  • From: caoly05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Igor
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: So now you know
  • From: gabydewilde
• JSH: So now you know
  • From: JSH
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Androcles
• Re: fourth dimension
  • From: Androcles
• Oldie but Goodie
  • From: Edward Green
• fourth dimension
  • From: winston71
• Re: A galaxy's center (aka black hole) is a kink in spacetime.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Resolved Relativity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• A galaxy's center (aka black hole) is a kink in spacetime.
  • From: john021108
• Re: The mind controll victims will not be believed
  • From: gabydewilde
• HPCNCS-09 call for papers
  • From: john
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Xaustein
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: Androcles
• Scientific Thought
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: tadchem
• Solutions Manual, Test Bank - COLLECTION******************
  • From: Student Plus
• Being unemployed, SpaceMan only cares if it's daytime or not.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Quantum Gravity 295.6: Indications That Dark Energy May be Created By Distance Between Masses and That "Absence" of Mass or Inverse Mass May Cause Acceleration
  • From: OsherD
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: JSH: See the problem yet?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Benj
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: No Worries! Uncle Al's Black Hole 's ARE SAFE !!!
  • From: Rob Miller
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: a list of few dons (add yours)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: a list of few dons (add yours)
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: JSH: See the problem yet?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 31 Oct 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: Rob Miller
• Re: Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: Shubee
• Re: New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: gabydewilde
• JSH: Peer reviewed and published
  • From: JSH
• New study confirms climate change is man made
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Energy extracted from a mass falling into a black hole
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Function of weight is to detect motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Xaustein
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: Mrkite
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: pureautistic
• Re: Mastering Physics Solutions
  • From: ericmeb
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: srp2inc
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Kin
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The mind controll victims will not be believed
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How much do you weigh ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: tadchem
• Quantum Gravity 295.5: Why Electromagnetics and Gravitation Are So Closely Related and A Simple PI Method To Describe It
  • From: OsherD
• All Along the Watch Tower
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: This is a test.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Re-hashing cell phone popcorn video
  • From: James
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: JSH: See the problem yet?
  • From: JSH
• Physics World: {from] Latest Issue
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Who is Androcles?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Horizon Problem Resolution (10/29/08)
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: the lever law is not about conservation of energy
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is a test.
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: JSH: See the problem yet?
  • From: eric gisse
• What does and doesn't matter.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: jimp
• The PigPlane.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The REAL cause of the Titanic Disaster.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: JSH: If there is a parasitic subspecies
  • From: gabydewilde
• JSH: See the problem yet?
  • From: JSH
• Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
  • From: PD
• Re: The traveling twin of the twin paradox dies in the future.
  • From: PD
• Re: Calculating force in different lever classes
  • From: shareyourknowledge@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: rwjefferson