Quantum Gravity 296.0: Reinterpretation of E = mc^2 via 295 - Motion Generates Mass/Energy!
- From: OsherD <mdoctorow@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:49:03 -0800 (PST)
From Osher Doctorow
In Section 295, I pointed out (especially in 295.9) that acceleration
and distance implicitly contain or are associated with a mass constant
of magnitude 1, mo or m_o, with the dimension of Mass (M in the usual
dimensional analysis notation). This is a dimensional constant which
actually acts as a unit in magnitude, since if |A| represents the
magnitude of variable A, then we have mo |A| = |A| and this cannot be
just obtained by using a particular "scale".
The equation E = mc^2 of physics takes on a new interpretation and
arguably needs to be technically revised by the use of mo as meaning
that mass does not just "contain" energy that can be "released", but
that the "release" is actually generation of energy by motion, with
distance r and acceleration a as containing or linked with an implicit
mass-generating aspect mo.
The situation is similar to that of black holes. We know that giant
central galactic black holes are associated with new star generation
in the Universe. But those black holes accelerate objects that fall
into them until they are supposedly "decomposed" by tidal forces.
From the new viewpoint, however, what is actually happening is thatmass/energy is being generated by the tidal forces' acceleration a and
also by the distance r from the center or apex or even horizon and
photosphere of the black hole.
The viewpoint of "energy conservation" is also beginning to look
doubtful from the viewpoint of higher dimensional physics, where
energy going into or coming out of higher dimensions "spoils" the idea
of everything being nicely constant as in superstring theory and M
theory/brane theory.
Osher Doctorow
.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
- Next by Date: Re: The Nature of Physical Reality - Analyzing the Properties of Space-time
- Previous by thread: Maybe Jurassic Park will become real...
- Next by thread: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
