Re: Time Dilation Does Not Exist - Proper Analysis of the Lorentz Transformation Equation

On Nov 6, 2:23 pm, "Strich.9" <strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 6, 12:05 pm, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:



strich.9...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 5, 7:24 pm, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:

Strich 9 wrote:

For an observer O, a rod of length Xm and time interval of length Tm in
frame M moving at V respectively contracts and dilates according to the
LTE:

Xm' = (Xm -Vt) * gamma
Tm' = (Tm-VX/c^2) * gamma

Similarly, for the observer in M, a rod of length Xo and time interval
of length To in frame O with the relative velocity V changes according
to the LTE:

Xo' = (Xo -Vt) * gamma
To' = (To-Vx/c^2) * gamma

Now analyze the equations.  In the first equation, note the quantities
Xm and Tm, which are measured by M in M, stay constant.  This is while
the quantities Xm' and Tm' as measured by O vary with velocity.  Thus O
observes length contraction and time dilation, but M does not see this
happening in his frame.

Similarly, in the second equation, note the quantities Xo and To, which
are measured by O in O, stay constant.  This is while the quantities Xo'
and To' as measured by M vary with velocity.  Thus M observes length
contraction and time dilation, but O does not see this happening in his
frame.

Thus lenght contraction and time dilation are artifacts of remote
measurements not borne out be local measurements.

See the follwoing thread for details:
http://tinyurl.com/6gp7sh

Why are you pointing out where you looked stupid? Why do you need
a new thread to do that? Aren't you embarrassed enough just in
the thread?

I like your counter-argument.  It is full of science and math.  Keep
up the academic work :)

We are just waiting for you to try to put up a coherent statement so
we can respond. You still have not said what you think relativity
predicts that is not true.-

Look up to the title :)

What do you think time dilation means? What do you think the claim is,
using your own terminology that you coined?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: It is not always c!
    ... Jeckyl wrote: ... will use frame A and frame B as two valid SR ... measurements or calculations, ... To calculate closing or separation velocity, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: It is not always c!
    ... velocity measurements can be made where there are ... will use frame A and frame B. ... the measurable relative velocity between two objects, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: It is not always c!
    ... velocity measurements can be made where there are two ... frame A and frame B as two valid SR frames. ... I assume what you REALLY mean is you are taking closing and separation ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarr: Modifications of SR have begun.
    ... The statement above (that the velocity of light ... frame to be going past all other reference frames at ... laws of physics are completely unperturbed by this arbitrariness. ... science has abandoned the reliability of measurements and has instead ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: OBarr: Modifications of SR have begun.
    ... LET is the correct physics for our reality. ... reliability of measurements and has instead relied ... it says that there is an absolute frame in which all ... are small compared to the maximal velocity, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)