JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
- From: JSH <jstevh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:17:14 -0800 (PST)
I've said for years that I'm a major mathematical discoverer and
something was going wrong with the mathematical community which is why
my results weren't recognized, but that didn't seem to convince many
people, so for several years I worked on the factoring problem. You
know, finding a general way to solve for f_1 and f_2 such that f_1*f_2
= N because it seemed like the kind of result mathematicians couldn't
avoid.
Well I progressed at that task for years and last year started piling
result on top of result by analyzing the simple system of equations:
x^2 = y^2 + S
and
z^2 = y^2 + T
and as I worked at this I came across something I call the z
constraint: fine structure behavior within the seemingly simple second
equation which DEFINED z relative to two new variables I called k and
alpha.
Well I looked one way to generally solve the factoring problem with
this new information and argued as usual with people on math
newsgroups, but the issue came up about how fast it was, and they
claimed it was slow, and I contemplated getting close to my goal with
cold-feet.
Because I was TERRIFIED of crashing the world economy and all along
had believed that mathematicians would never let things go too far.
It was a game of chicken. A game of chicken with the fate of the
world...
But besides I didn't think I was quite done, and was still pondering
how to proceed, debating with myself when I thought back to a solution
for quadratic residues mod p that I'd come up with earlier. I'd done
so because I thought the method of final solution would require
finding quadratic residues modulo some prime, and why not see if that
could be done with my own method?
Well, I pondered that thing a bit and it kind of occurred to me that
maybe it might work mod N, and then I kind of let it drop.
I said I was giving up on factoring research and moving on to other
things, which I did.
But let me make an interesting point here: I'd had astounding research
finds to my mind which showed I was close to solving the factoring
problem and STILL couldn't get anywhere with the math community and
no, I wasn't just arguing with people on newsgroups. I was also
emailing people like Lenstra, and others.
And part of me thought, hey, I must be wrong, right? No way all these
people would just sit by if I'd solved the thing, would they?
And then I really got involved in other things. That was some months
ago.
But now, a couple of days ago, I found myself re-visiting the work
that was almost a year old, and I posted it again, puzzling over what
I'd said before as I thought about it, and noticed that hey, it looked
like a general solution to finding a quadratic residue mod N. Wow.
So that's the story.
So the approach has sat out there for around a year.
Um, let's say for the sake of argument that it is a solution to the
factoring problem, how did it sit out for so long?
I've done other things to occupy my time, like generally solving
binary quadratic Diophantine equations, and no one is paying attention
to that either.
But hey, if this solution is right, then your public key might be
easily factored. How could THAT have sat out for almost a year?
Oh, and I don't think it did crash the world economy as that's even
weirder as it would require a lot of people around the world lying
about what was actually going on, and why would they and just leave me
babbling out here like in this post?
The situation is befuddling.
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
- From: eric gisse
- Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
- From: JSH
- Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
- Prev by Date: Re: KE = ½ mv^2 is disproved in a new falling object impact test.
- Next by Date: Re: shell theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Analysis of Space-Time - Relativity Does Not Hold Water
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Weird situation, explanation attempt
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|