sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• SPAM - Was: "Re: Rock Solid Images Announces ...", tadchem
• "Causality", Ame
• Quantum Gravity 300.97: 300.96 Continued, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.96: P(A) - P(B) from Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac Distributions, OsherD
• JSH: The scary explanation, JSH
  • Re: JSH: The scary explanation, doug
• burp, Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews., Uncle Al
  • Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews., Kirk Gregory Czuhai
  • Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews., Darwin123
• Re: An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra, sendsolutions
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality", Ame
  • Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality", Uncle Al
• Tesla Science Project, Ray
  • Re: Tesla Science Project, Uncle Al
    • Re: Tesla Science Project, Huang
• Quantum Gravity 300.95: Germany/Austria and China Advance on Controlling Transition Probability for or Against Chaos, OsherD
• Soldiers and Bridges, annalissa
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, jimp
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Y.Porat
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Androcles
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Y.Porat
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Y.Porat
      • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Uncle Al
  • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, tadchem
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Uncle Al
    • Re: Soldiers and Bridges, Jang Jin Hong
• CMB: statistical significance of the asymmetry is controversial, Sam Wormley
• Re: is Jesus Christ God ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: is Jesus Christ God ?, Benj
• Re: Math Help, Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• "A Basic Look at the Aether", Uco
  • Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether", Uncle Al
• Re: THE ESSENCE OF POSTSCIENTISM, Uncle Al
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 29, 2008, PhDs . org
• nothing moves except energy, john291208
  • Re: nothing moves except energy, Sam Wormley
  • Re: nothing moves except energy, Uncle Al
• JSH: Over a hundred years, wrong stuff, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Over a hundred years, wrong stuff, Dr. Physics
• The science advances and the intelligence also, victorespinoza
  • Re: The science advances and the intelligence also, Kirk Gregory Czuhai
  • Re: The science advances and the intelligence also, Uncle Al
    • Re: The science advances and the intelligence also, Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• "Is String Theory Justified?", Ame
• Quantum Gravity 300.94: Solitons From P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.94: Solitons From P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt, OsherD
• On the multiverse, Iain
• Quantum Gravity 300.93: A Genetic Bio-Density "Probability Drive" Like Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, OsherD
• Physicists and Laws., socratus
  • Re: Physicists and Laws., tadchem
  • Re: Physicists and Laws., Uncle Al
    • Re: Physicists and Laws., gabydewilde
• The press and AGW, tadchem
• johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?, johnlawrencereedjr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?, johnlawrencereedjr
  • johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?, johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Very cheap wind power, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Is "transmission neutron spectroscopy" possible/feasible for heavy-metal detection?, Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: People, nuke the LHC!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: People, nuke the LHC!, Sam Wormley
• Re: People, nuke the LEC!, RLW
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe", Ame
  • Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe", dedanoe
• More thunderheads forming as tropical sea-surface temperatures rise, Sam Wormley
  • Re: More thunderheads forming as tropical sea-surface temperatures rise, tadchem
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Re: it is the OUTER force that causes the INNER mass to accelerate, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is 'motion'?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is 'motion'?, Boris Mohar
    • Re: What is 'motion'?, Edward Green
• Re: In Outer Space without a Space Suit?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 300.92: Dark Energy = Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.91: Relation of Energy Density rho and Pressure p to P(A) - P(B) = P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = k1sin(bt), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 301.0: Japan Models Accelerated Universe by Anisotropic Kasner Model Related to Probable Correlation/Influence (PI), OsherD
• Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton., wvrbysdodifkp
  • Re: Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton., tadchem
    • Re: Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton., RLW
• I say the truth, but you do not believe that, "In addition to the Jewish people outside of life and death will be none of my business", wvrbysdodifkp
  • Re: I say the truth, but you do not believe that, "In addition to the Jewish people outside of life and death will be none of my business", tadchem
• shot noise poisson distribution and central limit theorem, lanospam
  • Re: shot noise poisson distribution and central limit theorem, Edward Green
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Can You Handle The Truth?, schoenfeld . one
    • Re: Can You Handle The Truth?, Benj
    • Re: Can You Handle The Truth?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can You Handle The Truth?, RLW
• capacitor, swapu
  • Re: capacitor, Uncle Al
  • Re: capacitor, Sam Wormley
• I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!, wvrbysdodifkp
  • Re: I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!, Edward Green
• "The Properties of the Aether", Ame
  • Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Uncle Al
    • Re: "The Properties of the Aether", glird
    • Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Benj
  • Re: "The Properties of the Aether", hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: "The Properties of the Aether", Benj
• Re: If gravitons exist, then black holes do not, they couldn't escape., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 300.9: P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt), OsherD
• This is not a joke, I really Isaac Newton！I am the Messiah！, wvrbysdodifkp
• I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》, wvrbysdodifkp
  • Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》, tadchem
    • Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》, Edward Green
  • Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》, schoenfeld . one
• scattering vs reflection, NordinZ
  • Re: scattering vs reflection, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?, Jang Jin Hong
• November: Dark matter breakthrough is tantalizingly near, Sam Wormley
  • Re: November: Dark matter breakthrough is tantalizingly near, maxkeon
• Physicists Successfully Store and Retrieve Nothing, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Physicists Successfully Store and Retrieve Nothing, greysky
• Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky", Sam Wormley
  • Re: Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky", greysky
  • Re: Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky", Y.Porat
• Case Closed for Free Will?, Sam Wormley
• Merry Newtonmas, Michael E.Marotta
• Optical fibres feel light's recoil, Yousuf Khan
• Particle accelerator recovers 99.9% of energy input, Yousuf Khan
• Re: An Attractive Proposition, tj Frazir
• Death of a Star Scientist Inflicts Long-Term Damage on Field, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Death of a Star Scientist Inflicts Long-Term Damage on Field, Edward Green
• Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, dudajar
  • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, Ian Parker
    • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, dudajar
    • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, dudajar
      • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, dudajar
      • Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?, dudajar
• Quantum Gravity 300.7: When P(A-->B-->C-->D-->E) = P(A-->E), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.7: When P(A-->B-->C-->D-->E) = P(A-->E), OsherD
• Laplace transform as dot product?, Roy
  • Re: Laplace transform as dot product?, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Laplace transform as dot product?, Edward Green
• Re: An Attractive Proposition Time slope for idiots, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 300.6; Set Sequence Operators Related to 300.5, OsherD
• Re: Generators on reversal of friction will cool the climate (JP), Uncle Al
• Predictions for 2009, PD
  • Re: Predictions for 2009, Uncle Al
    • Re: Predictions for 2009, PD
  • Re: Predictions for 2009, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Predictions for 2009, PD
      • Re: Predictions for 2009, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Predictions for 2009, PD
      • Re: Predictions for 2009, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Predictions for 2009, PD
  • Re: Predictions for 2009, Sam Wormley
• AIEEE 2009 MODEL PAPER 1 is uploaded, adichemadi
• Re: Beijing's coldest December day in 57 years, tj Frazir
• Re: How to build an atom bomb???, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: radius of the universe, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Topics on Electronics, anju
  • Re: Topics on Electronics, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Topics on Electronics, gabydewilde
    • Re: Topics on Electronics, Benj
  • Re: Topics on Electronics, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Topics on Electronics, Uncle Al
• ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009, Hermes
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009 --- SPAM!, tadchem
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009 --- SPAM!, Androcles
• THE TRAIN PARADOX, Mike
  • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Sam Wormley
  • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Mike
      • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Mike
      • Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX, Dirk Van de moortel
• Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An), Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.3: The Double Probability "Operator" P(P) = P^2 Where Argument Involves -->, OsherD
• Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces?, allegretti
  • Re: Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces?, Igor
• Quantum Gravity 300.2: P(A1-->A2-->...) as P[P{(A1 U A2 U ...) --> P(an intersection)}], OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 300.2: P(A1-->A2-->...) as P[P{(A1 U A2 U ...) --> P(an intersection)}], hanson
• Inneresting theorem in classical physics, Proctologically Violated©®
  • Re: Inneresting theorem in classical physics, Uncle Al
• Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, tdp1001
  • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Uncle Al
    • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Uncle Al
    • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Tom Potter
      • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Uncle Al
      • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, Tom Potter
      • Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics, hanson
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• GALILEAN TRANSF, Mike
  • Re: GALILEAN TRANSF, Sam Wormley
    • Re: GALILEAN TRANSF, Mike
• Your tax dollars at work..., tadchem
  • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., OG
    • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., PD
  • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., Androcles
  • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., hanson
    • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., tadchem
      • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., Androcles
      • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., hanson
  • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., Eric Gisse
    • Re: Your tax dollars at work..., Strich.9
• To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, PD
  • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Eric Gisse
      • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, PD
      • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Y.Porat
  • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, PD
      • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • PD is a drooling imbicile., gabydewilde
    • Re: PD is a drooling imbicile., PD
      • Re: PD is a drooling imbicile., gabydewilde
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Ame
  • Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity", Uncle Al
• Physics Top Ten -- Annual Review of Best Research by Physicists, Sam Wormley
• solution manual for Probability and Statistical Inference ( 7th edition by Hogg & Tanis), sendsolutions
• Re: If electron made to the size of earth., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 22, 2008, PhDs . org
• Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Mathematical physics graduate programs, allegretti
  • Re: Mathematical physics graduate programs, Sam Wormley
• strong nuclear force, mrdarrett
  • Re: strong nuclear force, John Bailey
    • Re: strong nuclear force, Y.Porat
• Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual *** NEW Colloection 22/12/2008, Student Plus
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
  • Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
  • Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
  • Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., Jang Jin Hong
    • Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics., PD
• IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Sam Wormley
  • Re: IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Bernd Felsche
• 35 below, john181208
  • Re: 35 below, Sam Wormley
    • Re: 35 below, Sam Wormley
      • Re: 35 below, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: 35 below, Benj
  • Re: 35 below, Uncle Al
    • Re: 35 below, Ken S. Tucker
• JSH: So why all the arguing?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?, Dr. Physics
  • Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?, Dr. Physics
    • Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?, doug
  • Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?, Eric Gisse
• JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see, Eric Gisse
  • Re: JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see, Uncle Al
• Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is...., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is...., Benj
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is...., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Winter Solstice, 2008 - Sea Ice at historic extent, RLW
• JSH: A devastating error, JSH
  • Re: JSH: A devastating error, marcus_bruckner
• Re: Partially crystalline materials, Edward Green
• Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong, Lofty Goat
  • Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong, dedanoe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong, Uncle Al
• required reading (was: 'In God We Trust' - What does it mean? - Why, then, does it work?), RLW
• JSH: Not hard for me to prove, JSH
• Quantum Gravity 300.1: 300 Continued, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.0: France Finds Riccati Dark Fluid in Brane Theory, OsherD
• "The Arrow of Time", Tej
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Edward Green
  • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "The Arrow of Time", Tej
    • Re: "The Arrow of Time", Uncle Al
• Tested thermal windows (?)., Ken S. Tucker
• If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
  • Re: If it ain't broke..., tadchem
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., jmfbahciv
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., Lofty Goat
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., tadchem
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., tdp1001
  • Re: If it ain't broke..., Eric Gisse
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., jmfbahciv
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
      • Re: If it ain't broke..., tdp1001
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., Tom Potter
    • Re: If it ain't broke..., tdp1001
• Force and mass, Gan
  • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
    • Re: Force and mass, Gan
      • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
      • Re: Force and mass, Gan
      • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
      • Re: Force and mass, Gan
      • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
      • Re: Force and mass, glird
      • Re: Force and mass, Gan
      • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
      • Re: Force and mass, Gan
      • Re: Force and mass, Androcles
      • Re: Force and mass, glird
  • Re: Force and mass, Tom Potter
  • Re: Force and mass, Tom Potter
  • Re: Force and mass, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Force and mass, NoEinstein
      • Re: Force and mass, doug
      • Re: Force and mass, NoEinstein
      • Re: Force and mass, doug
      • Re: Force and mass, NoEinstein
      • Re: Force and mass, NoEinstein
    • Re: Force and mass, Y.Porat
  • Re: Force and mass, dedanoe
  • Re: Force and mass, PD
    • Re: Force and mass, Y.Porat
• The scientific method, gabydewilde
  • Re: The scientific method, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: The scientific method, Lofty Goat
  • Re: The scientific method, Uncle Al
    • Re: The scientific method, Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: The scientific method, Uncle Al
      • Re: The scientific method, tadchem
      • Re: The scientific method, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 299.9: France on Asymmetric Time Causation (continued), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 299.9: France on Asymmetric Time Causation (continued), OsherD
• complex numbers in physics, calvin
  • Re: complex numbers in physics, Uncle Al
    • Re: complex numbers in physics, calvin
      • Re: complex numbers in physics, calvin
      • Re: complex numbers in physics, Uncle Al
    • Re: complex numbers in physics, Benj
      • Re: complex numbers in physics, calvin
      • Re: complex numbers in physics, jmfbahciv
  • Re: complex numbers in physics, John Bailey
  • Re: complex numbers in physics, tadchem
• Re: Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?, Androcles
• Re: Is America governed by crooks and bluebloods?, tj Frazir
• Re: Eight inches of snow,, tj Frazir
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Tej
  • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Uncle Al
    • Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism", Benj
• Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
  • Re: Time-loop computers ?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
  • Re: Time-loop computers ?, nuny@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Time-loop computers ?, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
  • Re: Time-loop computers ?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Time-loop computers ?, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Time-loop computers ?, dudajar
• Applied mathematics coordinate system, Clifford Nelson
  • Re: Applied mathematics coordinate system, tadchem
    • Re: Applied mathematics coordinate system, Clifford Nelson
• JSH: In the complex plane, JSH
  • Re: JSH: In the complex plane, doug
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: In the complex plane, Rotwang
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
• Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, Lofty Goat
  • Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, tadchem
    • Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, Androcles
    • Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, jmfbahciv
  • Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass, Uncle Al
• intense spin, john181208
  • Re: intense spin, Sam Wormley
  • Re: intense spin, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, YKhan
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, Richard Tobin
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, Richard Tobin
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, Richard Tobin
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, Richard Tobin
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: intense spin, YKhan
      • Re: intense spin, Androcles
      • Re: intense spin, YKhan
      • Message not available
      • Re: intense spin, YKhan
      • Re: intense spin, Sam Wormley
      • Re: intense spin, john181208
      • Re: intense spin, Sam Wormley
      • Re: intense spin, Sam Wormley
  • Re: intense spin, Androcles
  • Re: intense spin, Uncle Al
    • Re: intense spin, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: intense spin, Strich.9
      • Re: intense spin, tadchem
• Re: Why are there heavy elements in the upper parts of the earth, a..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• ‘ I believe because it is absurd. ‘, socratus
• [TQC2009] TQC2009 2nd Call For Papers, simone severini
• Quantum Gravity 299.8: France Formulates Asymmetric and Symmetric Physical Time Causation Rather than Just its Boundary (Light Cone), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.71: More Re 299.7, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.7: Germany and India Find Temporal Logistic Causation in Neural Brain Learning, OsherD
• JSH: From weird to weirder, JSH
• johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life, tadchem
    • Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life, johnlawrencereedjr
  • Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life, Uncle Al
    • Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life, johnlawrencereedjr
• Quantum Gravity 299.6: Epochs Are Asymmetric in Cosmology and Most of Physics As is Probable Causation/Influence Usually, OsherD
• Re: What is the source of planetary heat?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What is the source of planetary heat?, cusanick98
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations", Tej
• Re: Dark Energy won't cause the "Big Rip", G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Forwarded from sci.space.news: VASIMIR plasma engine to fly test on ISS, Jan Panteltje
• To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
    • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., srp2inc
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Strich.9
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Strich.9
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Strich.9
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Lofty Goat
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Strich.9
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Strich.9
      • Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Benj
      • Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
  • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Cwatters
    • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., HardySpicer
  • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Benj
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Eric Gisse
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist., Uncle Al
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Tej
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", dedanoe
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2", Uncle Al
• The Harvard Yard, gabydewilde
  • Re: The Harvard Yard, gabydewilde
    • Re: The Harvard Yard, gabydewilde
  • Re: The Harvard Yard, gabydewilde
  • Re: The Harvard Yard, Jim Black
    • Re: The Harvard Yard, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 299.5: Italy Relates C of 299.3 to (Generalized) Riemann Zeta Function, OsherD
• Re: CMB radiation is a prove that photon energy has A bottom limit!!!, tj Frazir
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, Uncle Al
  • Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, Benj
    • Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, Uncle Al
  • Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, RLW
  • Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America, hanson
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. moron, tj Frazir
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. sam is a dumbass, tj Frazir
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. sam you dumbass, tj Frazir
• Electrons are real cutting machines. (Video), LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Tej
  • Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1", Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale, eaglesondouglas
  • Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale, eaglesondouglas
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing
• Quantum Gravity 299.4: Canada Finds an Infinite C in P(A-->B-->C) Non-Compactified Gravitation, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 299.4: Canada Finds an Infinite C in P(A-->B-->C) Non-Compactified Gravitation, OsherD
• How many shoes?, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: How many shoes?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: How many shoes?, Y.Porat
    • Re: How many shoes?, Benj
    • Re: How many shoes?, hanson
  • Re: How many shoes?, Uncle Al
  • Re: How many shoes?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How many shoes?, Uncle Al
      • Re: How many shoes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: How many shoes?, Tom Potter
      • Re: How many shoes?, Tom Potter
    • Re: How many shoes?, tj Frazir
• FYI - the Large Earth Collider, RLW
• OT WMD, WG
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • OT WMD, WG
    • Re: OT WMD, Cwatters
      • Re: OT WMD, jimp
      • Re: OT WMD, tadchem
• Inside Science News Briefs.08.12.15, Sam Wormley
• Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?, eric gisse
  • Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?, Igor
• Quantum Gravity 299.3: A Closer Look at P(A-->B-->C) in Gravitation and Expansion, OsherD
• Driverless Car ?!, Jean
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Androcles
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Ian Parker
    • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Bernd Felsche
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Bernd Felsche
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Lofty Goat
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Lofty Goat
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, gabydewilde
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Bernd Felsche
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Bernd Felsche
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jimp
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • The Fed is all about the yacht salesmen ― Frazir ― not the poorest, me., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: The Fed is all about the yacht salesmen â?? Frazir â?? not the ..., tj Frazir
      • You sound like Bernie Madoff ( Made Off ) selling his ponzi scheme., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: You sound like Bernie Madoff ( Made Off ) selling his ponzi sch..., tj Frazir
      • Only a fool would engage in business he doesn't understand., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: Only a fool would engage in business he doesn't understand., Eric Gisse
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Yevgen Barsukov
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Benj
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
      • Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?, Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?, hanson
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Driverless Car ?!, jmfbahciv
    • Re: Driverless Car ?!, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, tj Frazir
    • Re: Driverless Car ?!, Coater
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, gabydewilde
  • Re: Driverless Car ?!, RLW
• Re: Joulukadun avajaiset Raahessa 28112008015.mp4 [105/324], Vesa Scholz
• Re: NASA IS USING UP YOUR MONEY., Uncle Al
• Schrödinger's Universe, fitz
  • Re: Schrödinger's Universe, Uncle Al
  • Re: Schrödinger's Universe, Sam Wormley
• how do i resolve the damn dimensionality issue, dedanoe
• Colin Powel & presidency, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Colin Powel & presidency, Uncle Al
    • Re: Colin Powel & presidency, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Colin Powel & presidency, jmfbahciv
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity", Nir
• Toplogy Matrice Functions as Symmetric Effect Quantum Theory, eaglesondouglas
  • Re: Toplogy Matrice Functions as Symmetric Effect Quantum Theory, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 299.2: Distance is in A ' B ' , Proximity in BC, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 299.2: Distance is in A ' B ' , Proximity in BC, OsherD
• Re: Al Gore, New Orleans Snow, Obama and Global Cooling, tj Frazir
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor, Uncle Al
• Some FREE e-books on physics and relativity and more, fitz
  • Re: Some FREE e-books on physics and relativity and more, smart
• Quantum Gravity 298.992: P(A-->B-->A) = P(A<-->B) (Probable Correlation), OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.991: Remarkable Comparison Between P(A-->B-->C) and P(C-->B-->A), OsherD
• Re: 650 Scientists on Global Warming, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 650 Scientists on Global Warming, tj Frazir
• Re: Light curves while falling, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words., tadchem
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words., Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words., Uncle Al
    • Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Nir
  • Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Jang Jin Hong
  • Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity", Uncle Al
• questions regarding FT-IR parameters, lanospam
  • Re: questions regarding FT-IR parameters, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 298.99: Could P(A ' B ' ) Correspond to Dissimilarities Between A and B, While P(BC) Corresponds to Similarities Between B and C?, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.98: Could lim P(A-->B-->C) Distinguish Between Gravitation and Expansion?, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.97: Inequalities on lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(BC) --> r, r in (0, 1), OsherD
• Re: This is how I get an 'ought' from an 'is':, Uncle Al
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
  • Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC, jcon
• test, Juan R.
• Re: The Conservatism that Borders on Treason, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: The Conservatism that Borders on Treason, tj Frazir
• NIST Bell Inequality Test, eaglesondouglas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • NIST Bell Inequality Test, eaglesondouglas
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Nir
  • Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations", Uncle Al
• Free Will inside the multiverse., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Free Will inside the multiverse., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• cosmos expansion, muser
  • Re: cosmos expansion, Androcles
  • Re: cosmos expansion, Sam Wormley
    • Re: cosmos expansion, Benj
  • Re: cosmos expansion, Uncle Al
    • Re: cosmos expansion, Yousuf Khan
      • Re: cosmos expansion, Androcles
    • Re: cosmos expansion, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: cosmos expansion, Yousuf Khan
    • Re: cosmos expansion, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 299.1: Russia Moves Toward Reals Rather Than Complex Numbers in Physics, OsherD
• LHC will restart end of June 2009, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 298.96: Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 1/2, OsherD
• Spinning drops could model black holes, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Spinning drops could model black holes, Uncle Al
    • Re: Spinning drops could model black holes, john08,12,08
      • Re: Spinning drops could model black holes, Uncle Al
      • Re: Spinning drops could model black holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Possible types of black holes, tadchem
      • Re: Possible types of black holes, john08,12,08
      • Re: Possible types of black holes, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Possible types of black holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 298.95: Extreme Limits For P(A-->B-->C) Correspond to Exponentiation, OsherD
• OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past...., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past...., Uncle Al
  • Re: OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past...., Eric Gisse
• Thank you, guys, Peter
• Re: Gravity is not a force which acts on objects at a distance., Total Science
• What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Bert Harleman
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Yevgen Barsukov
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Uncle Al
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Michael Helland
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, PD
    • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Bert Harleman
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, PD
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Bert Harleman
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, PD
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Bert Harleman
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, tj Frazir
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Y.Porat
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, PD
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Y.Porat
    • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Tom Potter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?, Y.Porat
• "Corrections to Special Relativity", Nir
  • Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity", Uncle Al
• The Solid State 5f Hamiltonian as a Five Form Relativistic Quanta, eaglesondouglas
• Simultaneity, ahmadaalnaimi
  • Re: Simultaneity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Simultaneity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Simultaneity, Benj
  • Re: Simultaneity, Androcles
  • Re: Simultaneity, nuny@xxxxxxx
• Four Form Statistical Mech. to Five Form Quanta- Transform, eaglesondouglas
• Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???, bearnol
  • Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???, bearnol
  • Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???, Puppet_Sock
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???, tadchem
• Altitude and air pumps, me
• Quantum Gravity 298.94: Limits of P(A-->B-->C) as P(A), P(B) --> 1- Compared with --> 0+, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.0: Argentina Eliminates Dark Energy with a f(H)-Modified GR Using H = (da/dt)/a, OsherD
• Anton Zeilinger: Quantum Information and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Sam Wormley
• READING RIPPLES IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND, Sam Wormley
• Lamb shift spotted in solid qubit, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 298.93: Even More Re Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.93: Even More Re Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+, OsherD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Timo Nieminen
• For conspiracy theorists - a non-physics post in retaliation for your shit., Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 298.92: More Re lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.91: Limit of P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.91: Limit of P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0, OsherD
• Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, gabydewilde
    • Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
      • Big Bang is Big Lie of Big Bandits., Ivan Gorelik
      • Re: Big Bang is Big Lie of Big Bandits., gabydewilde
  • Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature), mahipal7638
  • Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature), Androcles
    • Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature), Androcles
      • Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature), mahipal7638
      • Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature), Androcles
• Is spacetime really curved? Embedded somewhere?, Jarek Duda
  • Re: Is spacetime really curved? Embedded somewhere?, Jarek Duda
• Re: Announcement, Uncle Al
• Re: <> Empty of Space & Time <>, Uncle Al
• Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Bert Harleman
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, doug
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, jimp
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, PD
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Androcles
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, gabydewilde
  • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Benj
    • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Bert Harleman
      • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Androcles
      • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, Bert Harleman
  • Message not available
    • Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?, doug
• Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, nuny@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, Benj
    • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, pcardinale
      • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, pcardinale
      • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, pcardinale
  • Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus, eric gisse
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, Uncle Al
  • Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, hanson
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Nir
  • Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?", Uncle Al
• Tesla Coil Science Project, Ray
  • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, Uncle Al
    • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, Benj
      • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, nuny@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, Benj
  • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, eric gisse
    • Re: Tesla Coil Science Project, gabydewilde
• The dual spinning electron propeller, driven by Higgs oscillations., LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The dual spinning electron propeller, driven by Higgs oscillations., Uncle Al
• A Break-through in Energy Resources, Zhang Yalin
  • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, Y.Porat
    • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, Zhang Yalin
      • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, Y.Porat
  • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, Uncle Al
  • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, Sam Wormley
    • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, gabydewilde
  • Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources, OG
• Quantum Gravity 298.9: How do We Physically Distinguish Between P(A-->B-->C), P(A) + P(A-->B-->C), and P(A(A-->B-->C)?, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.9: How do We Physically Distinguish Between P(A-->B-->C), P(A) + P(A-->B-->C), and P(A(A-->B-->C)?, lundslaktare
• Zero and Infinity in Physics, aj_corcoran
  • Re: Zero and Infinity in Physics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Zero and Infinity in Physics, Androcles
• JSH: Probably about the degree, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Probably about the degree, gjedwards
  • Re: Probably about the degree, almost
  • Re:JSH: Probably about the degree, almost
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE, Uncle Al
• where does carbon-13 come from?, mrdarrett
  • Re: where does carbon-13 come from?, Uncle Al
    • Re: where does carbon-13 come from?, Y.Porat
      • Re: where does carbon-13 come from?, Uncle Al
      • Re: where does carbon-13 come from?, Y.Porat
  • Re: where does carbon-13 come from?, tadchem
• EURASIP JASP - Special issue on Image Processing and Analysis in Biomechanics - Announce & Call for papers, tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Can we now build the "space tower"?, Uncle Al
• Absolute speed through the ether?, Jack Crenshaw
  • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Jack Crenshaw
      • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, doug
      • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Androcles
  • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Androcles
    • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Jack Crenshaw
      • Re: Absolute speed through the ether?, Androcles
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?", Nir
• solve this equation, maaya
  • Re: solve this equation, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: solve this equation, Androcles
      • Re: solve this equation, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: solve this equation, Sam Wormley
  • Re: solve this equation, Sam Wormley
  • So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ...., Sanny
    • Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ...., eric gisse
      • Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ...., Sanny
      • Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ...., eric gisse
      • Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ...., tadchem
  • Re: solve this equation, Uncle Al
    • Re: solve this equation, Sanny
      • Re: solve this equation, eric gisse
      • Re: solve this equation, Uncle Al
      • Re: solve this equation, Sanny
      • Re: solve this equation, eric gisse
      • Re: solve this equation, Uncle Al
      • Re: solve this equation, tadchem
  • Re: solve this equation: tan X = X; applications, JEMebius
  • Re: solve this equation, a1eah71
  • Re: solve this equation, tadchem
    • Re: solve this equation, Androcles
  • x=0, x=4.4935...., Sanny
    • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., Uncle Al
      • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., Sanny
      • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., tadchem
    • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., eric gisse
      • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., tadchem
      • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., Androcles
      • Re: x=0, x=4.4935...., Eric Gisse
• jets of supercharged ions, john08,12,08
  • Re: jets of supercharged ions, john08,12,08
• JSH: And that is the cycle, JSH
  • Re: JSH: And that is the cycle, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: And that is the cycle, Kirk Gregory Czuhai
  • Re: JSH: And that is the cycle, marcus_bruckner
• Need HElp??, polista64
• Left handed material, nutannathsharma
• E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
  • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
    • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
    • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
  • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., Blither
    • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
  • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
    • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., doug
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., gabydewilde
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
    • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., NoEinstein
      • Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law., PD
• Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: photon theory and tired light, Androcles
  • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
    • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, eric gisse
    • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Androcles
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, schoenfeld . one
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
      • Message not available
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, srp2inc
  • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, franklinhu
    • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Androcles
    • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, franklinhu
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, franklinhu
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, franklinhu
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Classical wave theory and tired light, Benj
• AMERICAN MILITARY R&D SECRECY DESTRUCTIVE AND WASTEFUL, Morpheal
• "Gravity", Nir
  • Re: "Gravity", Uncle Al
• All of absolute space, pekka . virtanen
  • Re: All of absolute space, Hayek
• TACS-09 call for papers, john
• Wasn't this an obvious frog on Mars?, fossilid
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 08, 2008, PhDs . org
• Quantum Gravity 298.8: A Recursive Equation for P(A-->B-->C), OsherD
• AMERICAN SPIRITUAL PRIDE AND ITS LOVE OF DIVISIVENESS, Morpheal
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., gabydewilde
    • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., gabydewilde
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., Benj
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., gabydewilde
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., Benj
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., gabydewilde
  • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., Benj
    • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., Benj
      • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Shelter is the solution., Jeff▲Relf
      • Re: Shelter is the solution., Eric Gisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., gabydewilde
  • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests", Erac
• Quantum Gravity 298.7: P(A(A-->B-->C)) = P(ABC) vs P(A) + P(A-->B-->C) = P(ABC) + P(B-->(A U C)), OsherD
• Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2, fossilid
  • Re: Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• commutation for commoners, Edward Green
  • Re: commutation for commoners, Jim Black
• What's the process that causes sparks?, Michael Helland
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, doug
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Igor
    • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Michael Helland
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Igor
      • What's the spark that causes process?, gabydewilde
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, nuny@xxxxxxx
    • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Michael Helland
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, doug
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, eric gisse
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, nuny@xxxxxxx
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, jmfbahciv
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Uncle Al
  • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, marcus_bruckner
    • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, jmfbahciv
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, marcus_bruckner
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, doug
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, jmfbahciv
      • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Michael Helland
    • Re: What's the process that causes sparks?, Michael Helland
• Isaac Newton, Iain
  • Re: Isaac Newton, dedanoe
  • Re: Isaac Newton, Michael Helland
    • Re: Isaac Newton, jmfbahciv
  • Re: Isaac Newton, Androcles
  • Re: Isaac Newton, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Isaac Newton, Uncle Al
• AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HAPPINESS, Morpheal
• Dark energy question, flak
  • Re: Dark energy question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Dark energy question, cusanick98
    • Re: Dark energy question, flak
      • Re: Dark energy question, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Dark energy question, Androcles
  • Re: Dark energy question, john301108
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Erac
  • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al
    • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", gabydewilde
      • Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches", Uncle Al
• E=M(C +/- theta)^2 explanation, fossilid
  • Re: E=M(C +/- theta)^2 explanation, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 298.6: What Intuition Do We Have About A U (A-->B-->C)?, OsherD
• Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Androcles
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Huang
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, hanson
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Androcles
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Androcles
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Androcles
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Androcles
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Edward Green
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Huang
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, schoenfeld . one
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, eric gisse
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, schoenfeld . one
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, eric gisse
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, gabydewilde
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, gabydewilde
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
  • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Lofty Goat
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, gabydewilde
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
    • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, tadchem
      • Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely, Lofty Goat
• Hubble's Law without recessional velocity, Michael Helland
  • Re: Hubble's Law without recessional velocity, Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Dec 08 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT., Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Global Warming?-NOT., tj Frazir
  • Re: Global Warming?-NOT., tj Frazir
• Men choking chickens, Michael Helland
  • Re: Men choking chickens, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Men choking chickens, Michael Helland
  • Re: Men choking chickens, Hagar
  • Re: Men choking chickens, Blither
• RF Field Enhancement of Thermonuclear Weapons, eaglesondouglas
• If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., 486DX
  • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Michael Helland
    • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., 486DX
      • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Michael Helland
      • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., 486DX
      • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., 486DX
      • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Michael Helland
      • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., 486DX
      • Experimental evidence for my atomic model, 486DX
  • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Androcles
    • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., cusanick98
  • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Uncle Al
    • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., Benj
  • Experimental evidence for my atomic model., 486DX
    • Re: Experimental evidence for my atomic model., Uncle Al
  • Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and..., franklinhu
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Erac
  • Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light", Uncle Al
• Minimum energy of photon, Peter
  • Re: Minimum energy of photon, eric gisse
    • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Peter
      • Re: Minimum energy of photon, PD
      • Re: Minimum energy of photon, eric gisse
      • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Androcles
      • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Androcles
  • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Minimum energy of photon, cusanick98
  • Re: Minimum energy of photon, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 298.5: P(A) vs P(ABC) vs P(A-->B-->C), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.5: P(A) vs P(ABC) vs P(A-->B-->C), OsherD
• Tunnel junction relates Kelvin degrees to Boltzmann constant, Sam Wormley
• What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?, MogeiWang
  • Re: What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?, MogeiWang
• Continuity of Spacetime, Huang
  • Re: Continuity of Spacetime, Y.Porat
• JSH: Really depressing, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Really depressing, eric gisse
    • Re: JSH: Really depressing, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Really depressing, almost
      • Re: JSH: Really depressing, eric gisse
  • Re: JSH: Really depressing, gjedwards
  • Re: Really depressing, Blither
  • Re: JSH: Really depressing, jimp
    • Re: JSH: Really depressing, almost
      • Re: JSH: Really depressing, JSH
      • Re: JSH: Really depressing, almost
• car towing?, poster
  • Re: car towing?, Androcles
  • Re: car towing?, pcardinale
    • Re: car towing?, Androcles
    • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, Cwatters
      • Re: car towing?, Cwatters
      • Re: car towing?, Cwatters
      • Re: car towing?, Jim Black
      • Re: car towing?, Cwatters
      • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, Jim Black
      • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, Jim Black
      • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, Jim Black
      • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, poster
      • Re: car towing?, Jim Black
• Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?, Matthew Johnson
    • Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?, Timo Nieminen
• "The Einstein Hoax", Erac
  • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "The Einstein Hoax", Tej
    • Re: "The Einstein Hoax", Uncle Al
• Re: Canada slides towards Green dictatorship - Troops on alert, Boris Mohar
• operational amplifier, sona
  • Re: operational amplifier, Androcles
• Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2, fossilid
  • Re: Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2, Igor
• Disidence and the NIST Neutron Standard, NBS-1, eaglesondouglas
• One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
  • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
    • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Coater
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Coater
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Androcles
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Sam Wormley
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jjsajd
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, eric gisse
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, doug
      • Re: One criticism stands out, Michael Helland
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
      • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
    • Re: One criticism stands out, gabydewilde
  • Re: One criticism stands out, Eric Gisse
  • Re: One criticism stands out, jmfbahciv
• AMERICA'S LOVE OF HOMELESSNESS, Morpheal
• Re: End of time in collapsing wave, Uncle Al
• OT: The Placebo Effect: Not All in Your Head, Sam Wormley
• Re: Welcome to the Police State, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Welcome to the Police State, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• OSA’s OpticsForKids Web Site Receives Parents’ Choice Foundation Award, Sam Wormley
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers", Erac
• solutions manual for Modern Control Systems 11th by Richard C Dorf and Robert H. Bishop, sendsolutions
• Alexander's Dictum, Haines Brown
• The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #), fossilid
  • Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #), fossilid
    • Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #), Puppet_Sock
  • Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #), hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AMERICA: THE POLITICS AND CULTURE OF EMPTINESS - SEQUAL, mike3
• Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where Probability of Observing Multiverse is 1/2 or More, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where Probability of Observing Multiverse is 1/2 or More, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where ..., Huang
• Re: Major Tom, eric gisse
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/, Uncle Al
• Re: 1O Energy Myths, Uncle Al
• Twiddling thumbs in Geneva, PD
• Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Michael Helland
  • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Michael Helland
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Uncle Al
    • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Michael Helland
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, dlzc
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, eric gisse
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, dlzc
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Michael Helland
      • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range, eric gisse
• Holiday Limerick for Potter (written is less that 180 seconds), Sam Wormley
  • Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message, Tom Potter
    • Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message, Tom Potter
      • Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message, Tom Potter
• My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
  • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Eric Gisse
    • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, doug
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, gabydewilde
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, doug
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Sam Wormley
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
  • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Uncle Al
    • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
  • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Igor
    • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
    • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, eric gisse
  • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, tadchem
    • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Eric Gisse
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, tadchem
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Androcles
      • Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy, Michael Helland
• Scientists Develop the Perfect Wrap -- graphene, Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 878 December 2, 2008 www.aip.org/pnu, Y.Porat
• Explaining Mantle Conductivity, Sam Wormley
• Views of Extrasolar Planets, Sam Wormley
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox", Erac
• Core of Jupiter?, mike3
  • Re: Core of Jupiter?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Core of Jupiter?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Core of Jupiter?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Core of Jupiter?, Yousuf Khan
• Quantum Gravity 298.3: Ellis of South Africa Finds That Time Generates Space and Physical States, OsherD
• Seeing the quantum world [with state-of-the-art animations], Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 298.2: Approximation of exp(x) by a 13th Degree Polynomial via Probable Causation/Influence, OsherD
• From Physics World: Latest Issue, Sam Wormley
  • Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue, G. L. Bradford
    • Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue, Sam Wormley
      • Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue, Richard Tobin
      • Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue, G. L. Bradford
• Needs no batteries!, Androcles
  • Re: Needs no batteries!, Cwatters
    • Re: Needs no batteries!, Benj
    • Re: Needs no batteries!, Androcles
  • Re: Needs no batteries!, tadchem
    • Re: Needs no batteries!, Androcles
      • Re: Needs no batteries!, tadchem
      • Re: Needs no batteries!, Androcles
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, NoEinstein
  • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, doug
    • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, NoEinstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, franklinhu
    • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, NoEinstein
      • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, franklinhu
      • Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!, NoEinstein
• Re: Just what's in a unit..., hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Just what's in a unit..., Tom Potter
  • Re: Just what's in a unit..., PD
  • Re: Just what's in a unit..., Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Just what's in a unit..., Jim Black
• Inside Science News Briefs, Sam Wormley
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Erac
  • Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?", Uncle Al
• Re: AMERICA: THE POLITICS AND CULTURE OF EMPTINESS, Androcles
• Where it ?, kiloVolts
• path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
  • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Androcles
    • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Androcles
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Androcles
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
  • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
    • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
  • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Edward Green
    • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Justintruth
      • Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time, Haines Brown
• properties on video, grigorova
• Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
  • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
    • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
  • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, Y.Porat
    • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, doug
      • Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!, NoEinstein
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 01, 2008, PhDs . org
• Re: Day ?+? - The Sun is blank - President-elect Barack Obama will hasten America's decline, marc
• Re: But NOBODY is Duplicating Meyer's Work?, eric gisse
• Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}, tadchem
    • Re: Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}, Androcles
• me too!!!, ca0710
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • me too!!!, ca0710
• mandelbrot, john301108
  • Re: mandelbrot, tadchem
  • Re: mandelbrot, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: mandelbrot, Uncle Al
    • Re: mandelbrot, Benj
      • Re: mandelbrot, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: mandelbrot, john301108
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Darwin123
  • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Haines Brown
    • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Darwin123
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Haines Brown
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Darwin123
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Haines Brown
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Darwin123
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Haines Brown
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Darwin123
      • Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains, Haines Brown
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, Dave Typinski
    • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, Benj
      • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, Benj
      • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, jmfbahciv
  • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate, Dave Typinski
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, Dave Typinski
  • Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, Micik
      • Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, gabydewilde
  • Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure, John Polasek
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website", Tej
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Uncle Al
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, jimp
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, Pranab
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, jimp
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, jmfbahciv
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel, Pranab
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Helmut Wabnig
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, gabydewilde
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, doug
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, gabydewilde
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, tadchem
      • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, gabydewilde
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Pranab
  • Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel, Y.Porat
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dreaming an odour, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Dreaming an odour, hanson
    • Re: Dreaming an odour, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Dreaming an odour, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dreaming an odour, Uncle Al
    • Re: Dreaming an odour, hanson
  • Re: Dreaming an odour, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Dreaming an odour, Androcles
  • Re: Dreaming an odour, tadchem
    • Re: Dreaming an odour, Androcles
      • Re: Dreaming an odour, tadchem
      • Re: Dreaming an odour, Androcles
  • Re: Dreaming an odour, john301108
    • Re: Dreaming an odour, Androcles

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)