sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• SPAM - Was: "Re: Rock Solid Images Announces ..."
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Causality"
  • From: Ame
• Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews.
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: JSH: The scary explanation
  • From: doug
• Quantum Gravity 300.97: 300.96 Continued
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.96: P(A) - P(B) from Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac Distributions
  • From: OsherD
• JSH: The scary explanation
  • From: JSH
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: is Jesus Christ God ?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: tadchem
• Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews.
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• burp
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: Tesla Science Project
  • From: Huang
• Re: I was writing a book, it is called "Mein Kampf".The book describes the object of non-Jews.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tesla Science Project
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An Attractive Proposition - ping Timo
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Solutions manua to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Y.Porat
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Ame
• Tesla Science Project
  • From: Ray
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quantum Gravity 300.95: Germany/Austria and China Advance on Controlling Transition Probability for or Against Chaos
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: jimp
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Soldiers and Bridges
  • From: annalissa
• Re: JSH: Over a hundred years, wrong stuff
  • From: Dr. Physics
• CMB: statistical significance of the asymmetry is controversial
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: is Jesus Christ God ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Math Help
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: The science advances and the intelligence also
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uco
• Re: THE ESSENCE OF POSTSCIENTISM
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: nothing moves except energy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The science advances and the intelligence also
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: nothing moves except energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 29, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: November: Dark matter breakthrough is tantalizingly near
  • From: maxkeon
• nothing moves except energy
  • From: john291208
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• JSH: Over a hundred years, wrong stuff
  • From: JSH
• Re: The science advances and the intelligence also
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is....
  • From: Benj
• The science advances and the intelligence also
  • From: victorespinoza
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists and Laws.
  • From: tadchem
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Ame
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.94: Solitons From P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.94: Solitons From P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt
  • From: OsherD
• On the multiverse
  • From: Iain
• Quantum Gravity 300.93: A Genetic Bio-Density "Probability Drive" Like Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
  • From: OsherD
• Physicists and Laws.
  • From: socratus
• johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: intense spin
  • From: john181208
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?
  • From: RLW
• Re: Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton.
  • From: RLW
• The press and AGW
  • From: tadchem
• Re: I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: intense spin
  • From: tadchem
• johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• johnreed take 26 - An Astonishing Fact?
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: People, nuke the LHC!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Very cheap wind power
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Is "transmission neutron spectroscopy" possible/feasible for heavy-metal detection?
  • From: Robert Maas, http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: People, nuke the LHC!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: People, nuke the LEC!
  • From: RLW
• Re: intense spin
  • From: YKhan
• Re: intense spin
  • From: YKhan
• Re: What is 'motion'?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: dedanoe
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Ame
• Re: More thunderheads forming as tropical sea-surface temperatures rise
  • From: tadchem
• More thunderheads forming as tropical sea-surface temperatures rise
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Benj
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is 'motion'?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: it is the OUTER force that causes the INNER mass to accelerate
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: What is 'motion'?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: In Outer Space without a Space Suit?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 300.92: Dark Energy = Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Quantum Gravity 300.91: Relation of Energy Density rho and Pressure p to P(A) - P(B) = P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = k1sin(bt)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mathematical physics graduate programs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 301.0: Japan Models Accelerated Universe by Anisotropic Kasner Model Related to Probable Correlation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: I say the truth, but you do not believe that, "In addition to the Jewish people outside of life and death will be none of my business"
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: capacitor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Forever the last post, I reveal what the Chinese, the termination of a third world war. I did Isaac Newton.
  • From: wvrbysdodifkp
• Re: Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky"
  • From: greysky
• Re: shot noise poisson distribution and central limit theorem
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Topics on Electronics
  • From: Benj
• I say the truth, but you do not believe that, "In addition to the Jewish people outside of life and death will be none of my business"
  • From: wvrbysdodifkp
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Benj
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?
  • From: Benj
• Re: I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》
  • From: tadchem
• shot noise poisson distribution and central limit theorem
  • From: lanospam
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: glird
• Re: Can You Handle The Truth?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: capacitor
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Topics on Electronics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: hanson
• capacitor
  • From: swapu
• I really Newton, I will not be on this account and mailbox, or the Chinese government will absolutely kill me!
  • From: wvrbysdodifkp
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Ame
• Re: If gravitons exist, then black holes do not, they couldn't escape.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 300.9: P(B-->A) - P(A-->B) = P(A) - P(B) = k1 sin (bt)
  • From: OsherD
• This is not a joke, I really Isaac Newton！I am the Messiah！
  • From: wvrbysdodifkp
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• I Isaac Newton，《With Israel nation in Western Europe during the nation》
  • From: wvrbysdodifkp
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: scattering vs reflection
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physicists Successfully Store and Retrieve Nothing
  • From: greysky
• scattering vs reflection
  • From: NordinZ
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.8: Could Radiation "Pull" Matter Outward and Matter "Pull" Radiation Inward?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: glird
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: glird
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Death of a Star Scientist Inflicts Long-Term Damage on Field
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Laplace transform as dot product?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: PD
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: PD
• November: Dark matter breakthrough is tantalizingly near
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Laplace transform as dot product?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Physicists Successfully Store and Retrieve Nothing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Physics Gets "Spooky"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Case Closed for Free Will?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Merry Newtonmas
  • From: Michael E.Marotta
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Optical fibres feel light's recoil
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: strong nuclear force
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: dudajar
• Particle accelerator recovers 99.9% of energy input
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: An Attractive Proposition
  • From: tj Frazir
• Death of a Star Scientist Inflicts Long-Term Damage on Field
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: PD
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: strong nuclear force
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Re: Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Can high energy scattering produce reverse temporal momentum particles?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.7: When P(A-->B-->C-->D-->E) = P(A-->E)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.7: When P(A-->B-->C-->D-->E) = P(A-->E)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.2: P(A1-->A2-->...) as P[P{(A1 U A2 U ...) --> P(an intersection)}]
  • From: hanson
• Laplace transform as dot product?
  • From: Roy
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: hanson
• Re: PD is a drooling imbicile.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: PD
• Re: An Attractive Proposition Time slope for idiots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009 --- SPAM!
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 300.6; Set Sequence Operators Related to 300.5
  • From: OsherD
• Re: ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009 --- SPAM!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Mike
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: PD
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: PD
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Mike
• Re: Predictions for 2009
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Topics on Electronics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Inneresting theorem in classical physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Generators on reversal of friction will cool the climate (JP)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Topics on Electronics
  • From: gabydewilde
• Predictions for 2009
  • From: PD
• AIEEE 2009 MODEL PAPER 1 is uploaded
  • From: adichemadi
• Re: PD is a drooling imbicile.
  • From: PD
• PD is a drooling imbicile.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Beijing's coldest December day in 57 years
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Topics on Electronics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to build an atom bomb???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: radius of the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: PD
• Topics on Electronics
  • From: anju
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: PD
• ANNOUNCE: exactphilosophy.net 2009
  • From: Hermes
• Re: Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An)
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• THE TRAIN PARADOX
  • From: Mike
• Quantum Gravity 300.4: First Three Terms of P(A1-->A2-->...-->An) Are 1 - P(A1 U A2 U ... An-1) + P(A2A3...An)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.3: The Double Probability "Operator" P(P) = P^2 Where Argument Involves -->
  • From: OsherD
• Finite dimensional Hilbert spaces?
  • From: allegretti
• Quantum Gravity 300.2: P(A1-->A2-->...) as P[P{(A1 U A2 U ...) --> P(an intersection)}]
  • From: OsherD
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Inneresting theorem in classical physics
  • From: Proctologically Violated©®
• Seven dimensional vector operator explains physics
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: tdp1001
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 22 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intense spin
  • From: YKhan
• Re: IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GALILEAN TRANSF
  • From: Mike
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: hanson
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GALILEAN TRANSF
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: OG
• GALILEAN TRANSF
  • From: Mike
• Your tax dollars at work...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: JSH: A devastating error
  • From: marcus_bruckner
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: tadchem
• To those who long to make some small contribution to physics
  • From: PD
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Strich.9
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Ame
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Physics Top Ten -- Annual Review of Best Research by Physicists
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Uncle Al
• solution manual for Probability and Statistical Inference ( 7th edition by Hogg & Tanis)
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: PD
• Re: If electron made to the size of earth.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: intense spin
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 22, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Humans and the Cosmic Law of Free choice between Hatred and
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Mathematical physics graduate programs
  • From: allegretti
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Benj
• strong nuclear force
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Solutions Manual, Test Bank, Instructor's Manual *** NEW Colloection 22/12/2008
  • From: Student Plus
• Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quality of articles on theoritical physics.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?
  • From: doug
• IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?
  • From: Dr. Physics
• Re: JSH: So why all the arguing?
  • From: Dr. Physics
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: doug
• Re: 35 below
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• 35 below
  • From: john181208
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see
  • From: Eric Gisse
• JSH: So why all the arguing?
  • From: JSH
• Re: Applied mathematics coordinate system
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• JSH: Difficult problem, as you can see
  • From: JSH
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: the best thing about the financial crisis is....
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Winter Solstice, 2008 - Sea Ice at historic extent
  • From: RLW
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: doug
• JSH: A devastating error
  • From: JSH
• Re: Partially crystalline materials
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: newton's shitty gravity is wrong
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Lofty Goat
• required reading (was: 'In God We Trust' - What does it mean? - Why, then, does it work?)
  • From: RLW
• JSH: Not hard for me to prove
  • From: JSH
• Quantum Gravity 300.1: 300 Continued
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 300.0: France Finds Riccati Dark Fluid in Brane Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Tej
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Tej
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Tested thermal windows (?).
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Free Will inside the multiverse.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: If it ain't broke...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The scientific method
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• If it ain't broke...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Force and mass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Force and mass
  • From: Gan
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intense spin
  • From: YKhan
• The scientific method
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Quantum Gravity 299.9: France on Asymmetric Time Causation (continued)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.9: France on Asymmetric Time Causation (continued)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Benj
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: calvin
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: calvin
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: calvin
• Re: complex numbers in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• complex numbers in physics
  • From: calvin
• Re: intense spin
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Only a fool would engage in business he doesn't understand.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Only a fool would engage in business he doesn't understand.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: You sound like Bernie Madoff ( Made Off ) selling his ponzi sch...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Climate Science: Is it currently designed to answer questions?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is America governed by crooks and bluebloods?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Eight inches of snow,
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: Time-loop computers ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Tej
• Time-loop computers ?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Applied mathematics coordinate system
  • From: tadchem
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Applied mathematics coordinate system
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: JSH: In the complex plane
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: JSH: In the complex plane
  • From: Rotwang
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• JSH: In the complex plane
  • From: JSH
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: tadchem
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?
  • From: hanson
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Androcles
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Solving the mysteries of metallic glass
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: intense spin
  • From: Sam Wormley
• intense spin
  • From: john181208
• Re: johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life
  • From: tadchem
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Strich.9
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Tej
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: Why are there heavy elements in the upper parts of the earth, a...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• ‘ I believe because it is absurd. ‘
  • From: socratus
• Re: Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• [TQC2009] TQC2009 2nd Call For Papers
  • From: simone severini
• Quantum Gravity 299.8: France Formulates Asymmetric and Symmetric Physical Time Causation Rather than Just its Boundary (Light Cone)
  • From: OsherD
• Eric Gisse hates cranks because that's what he hates about himself.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 299.71: More Re 299.7
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Y.Porat
• You sound like Bernie Madoff ( Made Off ) selling his ponzi scheme.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 299.7: Germany and India Find Temporal Logistic Causation in Neural Brain Learning
  • From: OsherD
• JSH: From weird to weirder
  • From: JSH
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• johnreed Take 25A - Radioactive Half Life
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: What is the source of planetary heat?
  • From: cusanick98
• Quantum Gravity 299.6: Epochs Are Asymmetric in Cosmology and Most of Physics As is Probable Causation/Influence Usually
  • From: OsherD
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Fed is all about the yacht salesmen â?? Frazir â?? not the ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is the source of planetary heat?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: hanson
• Re: Shelter is the solution.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Strich.9
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Cwatters
• The Fed is all about the yacht salesmen ― Frazir ― not the poorest, me.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: The Harvard Yard
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Shelter is the solution.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Tej
• Re: The Harvard Yard
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Dark Energy won't cause the "Big Rip"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Harvard Yard
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Forwarded from sci.space.news: VASIMIR plasma engine to fly test on ISS
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• To make a journal for amateur scientist.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: RLW
• Re: The Harvard Yard
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: RLW
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: The Harvard Yard
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• The Harvard Yard
  • From: gabydewilde
• Are you holding smaller Christmas party this year ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 299.5: Italy Relates C of 299.3 to (Generalized) Riemann Zeta Function
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: CMB radiation is a prove that photon energy has A bottom limit!!!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A Foreigner Takes Over America
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. moron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. sam is a dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT. sam you dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Benj
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Electrons are real cutting machines. (Video)
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Nuclear Weapon Training Simulator- For sale
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: hanson
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 299.4: Canada Finds an Infinite C in P(A-->B-->C) Non-Compactified Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.4: Canada Finds an Infinite C in P(A-->B-->C) Non-Compactified Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: All of absolute space
  • From: Hayek
• Re: How many shoes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How many shoes?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• FYI - the Large Earth Collider
  • From: RLW
• Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Bernd Felsche
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Coater
• Re: OT WMD
  • From: tadchem
• Re: OT WMD
  • From: jimp
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: tj Frazir
• OT WMD
  • From: WG
• OT WMD
  • From: WG
• Re: OT WMD
  • From: Cwatters
• Inside Science News Briefs.08.12.15
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?
  • From: eric gisse
• Can "Absolute Motion" be defined?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Tej
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: jimp
• Quantum Gravity 299.3: A Closer Look at P(A-->B-->C) in Gravitation and Expansion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Colin Powel & presidency
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Driverless Car ?!
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Driverless Car ?!
  • From: Jean
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: Possible types of black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Joulukadun avajaiset Raahessa 28112008015.mp4 [105/324]
  • From: Vesa Scholz
• Re: Schrödinger's Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Colin Powel & presidency
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Schrödinger's Universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Colin Powel & presidency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Toplogy Matrice Functions as Symmetric Effect Quantum Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NASA IS USING UP YOUR MONEY.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Schrödinger's Universe
  • From: fitz
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: hanson
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• how do i resolve the damn dimensionality issue
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Possible types of black holes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Colin Powel & presidency
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Possible types of black holes
  • From: john08,12,08
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Nir
• Possible types of black holes
  • From: tadchem
• Toplogy Matrice Functions as Symmetric Effect Quantum Theory
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: Quantum Gravity 299.2: Distance is in A ' B ' , Proximity in BC
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.2: Distance is in A ' B ' , Proximity in BC
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some FREE e-books on physics and relativity and more
  • From: smart
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Al Gore, New Orleans Snow, Obama and Global Cooling
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: questions regarding FT-IR parameters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: All physical matter is life created by a common ancestor
  • From: Uncle Al
• Some FREE e-books on physics and relativity and more
  • From: fitz
• Re: Spinning drops could model black holes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 298.992: P(A-->B-->A) = P(A<-->B) (Probable Correlation)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.991: Remarkable Comparison Between P(A-->B-->C) and P(C-->B-->A)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Conservatism that Borders on Treason
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 650 Scientists on Global Warming
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: 650 Scientists on Global Warming
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: jcon
• Re: Welcome to the Police State
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light curves while falling
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Modern Bible is incorrect on Jesus' last words.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: PD
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Nir
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Androcles
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Androcles
• questions regarding FT-IR parameters
  • From: lanospam
• Quantum Gravity 298.99: Could P(A ' B ' ) Correspond to Dissimilarities Between A and B, While P(BC) Corresponds to Similarities Between B and C?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.98: Could lim P(A-->B-->C) Distinguish Between Gravitation and Expansion?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Quantum Gravity 298.97: Inequalities on lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(BC) --> r, r in (0, 1)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: This is how I get an 'ought' from an 'is':
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spinning drops could model black holes
  • From: Uncle Al
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: PD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: PD
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spinning drops could model black holes
  • From: john08,12,08
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Coater
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Coater
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• test
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: The Conservatism that Borders on Treason
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Benj
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Uncle Al
• NIST Bell Inequality Test
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• NIST Bell Inequality Test
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: Spinning drops could model black holes
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Nir
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: cosmos expansion
  • From: Androcles
• Free Will inside the multiverse.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• cosmos expansion
  • From: muser
• Quantum Gravity 299.1: Russia Moves Toward Reals Rather Than Complex Numbers in Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is spacetime really curved? Embedded somewhere?
  • From: Jarek Duda
• LHC will restart end of June 2009
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Jim Black
• Quantum Gravity 298.96: Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 1/2
  • From: OsherD
• Spinning drops could model black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: PD
• Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 298.95: Extreme Limits For P(A-->B-->C) Correspond to Exponentiation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past....
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past....
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???
  • From: tadchem
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• OT: Ghosts of Christmas Past....
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Thank you, guys
  • From: Peter
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity is not a force which acts on objects at a distance.
  • From: Total Science
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• What happens with almost all of the photons in the universe?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: Simultaneity
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Simultaneity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: Benj
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Simultaneity
  • From: Benj
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simultaneity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Big Bang is Big Lie of Big Bandits.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: eric gisse
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Nir
• The Solid State 5f Hamiltonian as a Five Form Relativistic Quanta
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Simultaneity
  • From: ahmadaalnaimi
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Four Form Statistical Mech. to Five Form Quanta- Transform
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???
  • From: bearnol
• Re: The _real_ cause of global warming???
  • From: bearnol
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
  • From: mahipal7638
• Big Bang is Big Lie of Big Bandits.
  • From: Ivan Gorelik
• Altitude and air pumps
  • From: me
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: tadchem
• Quantum Gravity 298.94: Limits of P(A-->B-->C) as P(A), P(B) --> 1- Compared with --> 0+
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 299.0: Argentina Eliminates Dark Energy with a f(H)-Modified GR Using H = (da/dt)/a
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: Sanny
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Zhang Yalin
• Anton Zeilinger: Quantum Information and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• READING RIPPLES IN THE COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Lamb shift spotted in solid qubit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.93: Even More Re Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 298.93: Even More Re Lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Androcles
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• For conspiracy theorists - a non-physics post in retaliation for your shit.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 298.92: More Re lim P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0+
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.91: Limit of P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Quantum Gravity 298.91: Limit of P(A-->B-->C) as P(B) --> 0
  • From: OsherD
• Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: doug
• Re: ``$me$ always changes" (A Poetic Force of Nature)
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Is spacetime really curved? Embedded somewhere?
  • From: Jarek Duda
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: Benj
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: Benj
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Announcement
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: <> Empty of Space & Time <>
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: flak
• Re: Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: doug
• Does the number of radio-receivers influence the signal ?
  • From: Bert Harleman
• Re:JSH: Probably about the degree
  • From: almost
• Senate Minority Report: Global Warming Bogus
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Probably about the degree
  • From: almost
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Androcles
• x=0, x=4.4935....
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: doug
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: OG
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: The dual spinning electron propeller, driven by Higgs oscillations.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• Re: where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Nir
• Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.9: How do We Physically Distinguish Between P(A-->B-->C), P(A) + P(A-->B-->C), and P(A(A-->B-->C)?
  • From: lundslaktare
• Tesla Coil Science Project
  • From: Ray
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: JSH: Probably about the degree
  • From: gjedwards
• The dual spinning electron propeller, driven by Higgs oscillations.
  • From: LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• A Break-through in Energy Resources
  • From: Zhang Yalin
• Re: where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Zero and Infinity in Physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: eric gisse
• Quantum Gravity 298.9: How do We Physically Distinguish Between P(A-->B-->C), P(A) + P(A-->B-->C), and P(A(A-->B-->C)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Zero and Infinity in Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Zero and Infinity in Physics
  • From: aj_corcoran
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: franklinhu
• JSH: Probably about the degree
  • From: JSH
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Sanny
• Re: LOOKING GOD IN THE FACE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: doug
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: tadchem
• where does carbon-13 come from?
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: JSH: And that is the cycle
  • From: marcus_bruckner
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ....
  • From: tadchem
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: marcus_bruckner
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: a1eah71
• Re: solve this equation: tan X = X; applications
  • From: JEMebius
• EURASIP JASP - Special issue on Image Processing and Analysis in Biomechanics - Announce & Call for papers
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Experimental evidence for my atomic model.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Experimental evidence for my atomic model
  • From: 486DX
• Experimental evidence for my atomic model.
  • From: 486DX
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: 486DX
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ....
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ....
  • From: Sanny
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can we now build the "space tower"?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: PD
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ....
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Absolute speed through the ether?
  • From: Jack Crenshaw
• So x = 0, pi, 2*pi, 3*pi, ....
  • From: Sanny
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Nir
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Androcles
• Re: solve this equation
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• solve this equation
  • From: maaya
• Re: JSH: And that is the cycle
  • From: Kirk Gregory Czuhai
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: Blither
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: jets of supercharged ions
  • From: john08,12,08
• jets of supercharged ions
  • From: john08,12,08
• Re: JSH: And that is the cycle
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: And that is the cycle
  • From: JSH
• Need HElp??
  • From: polista64
• Left handed material
  • From: nutannathsharma
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: photon theory and tired light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: marcus_bruckner
• E = mc^2 VIOLATES Conservation of Energy Law.
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Classical wave theory and tired light
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: 486DX
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• AMERICAN MILITARY R&D SECRECY DESTRUCTIVE AND WASTEFUL
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: gabydewilde
• "Gravity"
  • From: Nir
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• All of absolute space
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• TACS-09 call for papers
  • From: john
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Wasn't this an obvious frog on Mars?
  • From: fossilid
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 08, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 298.8: A Recursive Equation for P(A-->B-->C)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: commutation for commoners
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Lofty Goat
• What's the spark that causes process?
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Igor
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Uncle Al
• AMERICAN SPIRITUAL PRIDE AND ITS LOVE OF DIVISIVENESS
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: solar car is should now be made ready for assembly line manuf...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: eric gisse
• Quantum Gravity 298.7: P(A(A-->B-->C)) = P(ABC) vs P(A) + P(A-->B-->C) = P(ABC) + P(B-->(A U C))
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Huang
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: almost
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Apology on E=m(c +/- alpha)^2
  • From: fossilid
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: Hubble's Law without recessional velocity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• commutation for commoners
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: doug
• What's the process that causes sparks?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: cusanick98
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: john301108
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Isaac Newton
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Isaac Newton
  • From: Iain
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: doug
• AMERICAN SCIENCE AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF HAPPINESS
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dark energy question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dark energy question
  • From: flak
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: hanson
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: JSH
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Huang
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Erac
• Re: E=M(C +/- theta)^2 explanation
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: Androcles
• E=M(C +/- theta)^2 explanation
  • From: fossilid
• Quantum Gravity 298.6: What Intuition Do We Have About A U (A-->B-->C)?
  • From: OsherD
• Why it is important to communicate precisely
  • From: tadchem
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: 486DX
• Re: Men choking chickens
  • From: Blither
• Hubble's Law without recessional velocity
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Michael Helland
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 5 Dec 08 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: 486DX
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Benj
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Global Warming?-NOT.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Men choking chickens
  • From: Hagar
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Men choking chickens
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Men choking chickens
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Men choking chickens
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• RF Field Enhancement of Thermonuclear Weapons
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: cusanick98
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: almost
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: cusanick98
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• If there was an aether, what would it imply? A new atomic model, and...
  • From: 486DX
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: jimp
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Really depressing
  • From: Blither
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: almost
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: doug
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: JSH
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: eric gisse
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: PD
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Peter
• Re: Minimum energy of photon
  • From: eric gisse
• Minimum energy of photon
  • From: Peter
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: Really depressing
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?
  • From: MogeiWang
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.5: P(A) vs P(ABC) vs P(A-->B-->C)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 298.5: P(A) vs P(ABC) vs P(A-->B-->C)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Continuity of Spacetime
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?
  • From: Matthew Johnson
• Tunnel junction relates Kelvin degrees to Boltzmann constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Androcles
• What do you think of the magzine "Nonlinearity"?
  • From: MogeiWang
• Re: car towing?
  • From: pcardinale
• Continuity of Spacetime
  • From: Huang
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where ...
  • From: Huang
• Re: car towing?
  • From: Androcles
• JSH: Really depressing
  • From: JSH
• Re: Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2
  • From: Igor
• car towing?
  • From: poster
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What do you regard as the 2 best inventions in history and why ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Erac
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Canada slides towards Green dictatorship - Troops on alert
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: operational amplifier
  • From: Androcles
• operational amplifier
  • From: sona
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Real theory of relativity:E=M(C +/- theeta)^2
  • From: fossilid
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Disidence and the NIST Neutron Standard, NBS-1
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: One criticism stands out
  • From: doug
• One criticism stands out
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• AMERICA'S LOVE OF HOMELESSNESS
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where Probability of Observing Multiverse is 1/2 or More
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #)
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: tadchem
• Re: End of time in collapsing wave
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: dlzc
• OT: The Placebo Effect: Not All in Your Head
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Welcome to the Police State
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• OSA’s OpticsForKids Web Site Receives Parents’ Choice Foundation Award
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Erac
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• solutions manual for Modern Control Systems 11th by Richard C Dorf and Robert H. Bishop
  • From: sendsolutions
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Alexander's Dictum
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #)
  • From: fossilid
• The real theory of relativity is E= square of M + (C +/- #)
  • From: fossilid
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Esoteric General Relativity Christmas message
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: AMERICA: THE POLITICS AND CULTURE OF EMPTINESS - SEQUAL
  • From: mike3
• Quantum Gravity 298.4: Princeton U. USA Finds Conditions Where Probability of Observing Multiverse is 1/2 or More
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Major Tom
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 2 December 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Core of Jupiter?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: 1O Energy Myths
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Igor
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: eric gisse
• Twiddling thumbs in Geneva
  • From: PD
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: Benj
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Hubble's Limit is proof photons have some sort of range
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Holiday Limerick for Potter (written is less that 180 seconds)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Core of Jupiter?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• My paper is awesome, and your criticisms are lousy
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: Micik
• Re: Needs no batteries!
  • From: Cwatters
• Scientists Develop the Perfect Wrap -- graphene
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Core of Jupiter?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 878 December 2, 2008 www.aip.org/pnu
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Explaining Mantle Conductivity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Views of Extrasolar Planets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Core of Jupiter?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: PD
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Erac
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Y.Porat
• Core of Jupiter?
  • From: mike3
• Re: From Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 298.3: Ellis of South Africa Finds That Time Generates Space and Physical States
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Seeing the quantum world [with state-of-the-art animations]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 298.2: Approximation of exp(x) by a 13th Degree Polynomial via Probable Causation/Influence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: doug
• From Physics World: Latest Issue
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Needs no batteries!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: THE GRAVITY OF MASSES DOESN’T BEND LIGHT!
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Just what's in a unit...
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: john301108
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: john301108
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: doug
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: gabydewilde
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: Benj
• Inside Science News Briefs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Benj
• "How Does Light 'Know' How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Erac
• Re: AMERICA: THE POLITICS AND CULTURE OF EMPTINESS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: jimp
• Where it ?
  • From: kiloVolts
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: Androcles
• path-dependence: a philosophical issue concerning time
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: jmfbahciv
• properties on video
  • From: grigorova
• Einstein’s Space-Time doesn’t bend light; varying ether density and flow does!
  • From: NoEinstein
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Dec 01, 2008
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Day ?+? - The Sun is blank - President-elect Barack Obama will hasten America's decline
  • From: marc
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Androcles
• Re: But NOBODY is Duplicating Meyer's Work?
  • From: eric gisse
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Quantum Gravity 298.1: Power Law Potentials From the PI Set {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 26}
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Benj
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Haines Brown
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• me too!!!
  • From: ca0710
• me too!!!
  • From: ca0710
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: hanson
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without ?any fuel
  • From: jimp
• Re: mandelbrot
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• mandelbrot
  • From: john301108
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Pranab
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Philosophical questions concerning physical Markov chains
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Bit rate vs Baud rate
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics behind combustion's pressure
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Air as a source of energy, a new of producing electricity without any fuel
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hawking accepts post in Canada
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Dreaming an odour
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx