Re: Force and mass

On Dec 21, 2:55 pm, doug <x...@xxxxxx> wrote:
NoEinstein wrote:
On Dec 21, 7:18 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Gan wrote:

Which is fundamental? force or mass? A few books i read specifies mass
to be fundamental but i have difficulty in accepting it.

  Which of your fingers is more fundamental? Kind of a stoopid question
  yours. Isaac Newton made a nice observation relating mass, force, etc.

   http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/NewtonsLaws.html

                        Fgrav = G m1 m2 / r2                   (5.2)

Gravity is the force exerted by all objects having mass on all other
objects having mass. Newton's Law of Gravitation says that the
gravitational force between to masses is proportional to their masses
and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Newton's Law of Gravitation incorporates the inverse-square law,
which states that some physical quantity or strength is inversely
proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that
physical quantity. Gravity, light, and sound all obey the
inverse-square law.

Dear Sam:  Gravity has limits of its action.  When you say "...exerts
on ALL" other masses, that simply isn't true!  The latter error in
science is the cause of all of the arguements over an "open" vs. a
"closed" Universe.  By my invalidating M-M, I disprove Lorentz's
rubber-ruler notions which form the basis for SR and GR.  My
disproving both of the latter also disproves the Big Bang.

Except, of course, you have disproved no physics at all.  What
you have proved is that you have no knowledge of physics or
experimentation at all.



The Universe isn't expanding and doesn't need gravity to hold it
together!  To act over long distances, gravity must be manifested by
ether flow from areas of greater to lesser pressure... or... from
areas hear masses toward ether-deficient areas in those same masses.
The Swiss Cheese voids between galaxies are devoid of ether.  So, in
most cases, gravity doesn't act over distances much larger than the
galactic interval.  Gravity requires a continuous ether, and drop-in-
the-bucket ether variances, here, won't change the ether pressures way
over there!  — NoEinstein —

The humor in your statements is wearing thin. You need to find another
area of physics that you do not understand.

Read the following threads to see noeinstein embarrass himself by
showing a complete lack of understanding of even high school physics:





Where Angels Fear to Fall
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/8152ef3e...
Last Nails in Einstein's Coffin
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thre...
Pop Quiz for Science Buffs!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/43f6f316...
An Einstein Disproof for Dummies
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/f7a63...
Another look at Einstein
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/41670721...
Three Problems for Math and Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/bb07f...
Matter from Thin Air
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ee4fe...
Curing Einstein’s Disease
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/4ff9e...
Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-M  (at sci.math)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/d9f98526...
Cleaning Away Einstein’s Mishmash
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/5d847...
Dropping Einstein Like a Stone
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/989e1...
Plotting the Curves of Coriolis, Einstein, and NoEinstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/713f8...
Are Jews Destroying Objectivity in Science?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/d4cbe...
The Gravity of Masses Doesn’t Bend Light.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/efb99...
KE = 1/2mv^2 is disproved in new falling object impact test.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/51a85...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Folks: As usual Doug in the hobo casting aspersions at the well
dressed gentleman. Like an uninvited guest, he just free-loads in the
groups, while contributing nothing constructive. He should POST UP OR
SHUT UP! — NoEinstein —
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Difference between predictions of SR and LET - perhaps!
    ... formal statements of 1920 about the underlying physics. ... exists an ether. ... The ether of electrodynamics now no longer had any special or ... The Origin of Gravity ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Force and mass
    ... NoEinstein wrote: ... gravitational force between to masses is proportional to their masses ... Gravity, light, and sound all obey the ... Except, of course, you have disproved no physics at all. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Force and mass
    ... NoEinstein wrote: ... gravitational force between to masses is proportional to their masses ... gravity must be manifested by ... The Swiss Cheese voids between galaxies are devoid of ether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Force and mass
    ... NoEinstein wrote: ... gravitational force between to masses is proportional to their masses ... Gravity, light, and sound all obey the ... The Swiss Cheese voids between galaxies are devoid of ether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Force and mass
    ... Gravity is the force exerted by all objects having mass on all other ... gravitational force between to masses is proportional to their masses ... By my invalidating M-M, I disprove Lorentz's ... The Swiss Cheese voids between galaxies are devoid of ether. ...
    (sci.physics)