NUCLEAR FUSION, Water fueled reactors & cars

Phemax Technology: Microsun Plasmagnetic Alternator
http://www.phemax.com.tw/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec-UQrHWZtU
http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Plasma/PhemaxTechnology/

Noblefuse Electromagnetic Fusion
http://noblefuse.com/
I have found the perfect energy device-Period. CALL and or write to
Princeton for example and encourage them to discharge a Tesla coil
into heavy water as per my freely disclosed papers and videos
portray-
the solution to the energy crisis is in your hands- it will take a
third party- not the discoverer himself professing it- go ahead prove
me right or wrong already- 21 months now as economy crumbles over
energy and our soldiers battle for it- what will you do.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8855084931490387351

Noblefuse Electromagnetic Fusion
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Noblefuse_Electromagnetic_Fusion
The IBR announces Dr. Santilli's discovery of the Hadronic Reactors
(tm)
which: recycle nonradioactive liquid wastes, produce clean, cost-
competitive, combustible gases, and have an independently certified
commercial efficiency bigger than one. (Trademarks and Patents
Pending). Industrial descriptions of the Reactors, specifications of
various models, applications, and costs, are available in the web
site:
http://www.magnegas.com/
http://www.i-b-r.org/
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:MagneGas
MagneGas Technology has been developed to process liquid wastes into
a
clean burning fuel known as magnegas, plus heat and other usable
byproducts, said processing occurring without noise, liquid, gaseous
or other pollutions.

Professor Kanarev's Electrolysis Processes
http://www.guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/index.html
http://guns.connect.fi/innoplaza/energy/story/Kanarev/index.html
Introduction and index of works by Professor Kanarev
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Kanarev_Electrolysis

WATER POWERED POLICE CARS:

On Jan 9, 3:53 pm, gdewilde <fotot...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cghck7rhwVI
Build your own,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdR6FeSaBhc&feature=PlayList&p=C6720F6

http://knol.google.com/k//introduction-to-the-water-fueled-car/1yrf1mzjtxzk5/15#

Besides from the popular variate of hydrogen on demand fuel saving
technologies scientists and inventors have also discovered various
different technologies to run a cars on water alone. If you want to
save fuel you should obtain this pdf document from the panacea
university and build a smack booster by it's instructions. The
documentation below aims to show the validity of 100% water powered
vehicles. Historically quite a few water powered autos have been build
but the technology was either lost or never made public. The
petrochemical industry is a powerful multi billion Euro enterprise.
Governments depend on fuel taxes. Military power relies on
technological advantage. The news media depend on advertisement
revenue and the academic establishment loves clinging on to dogma.

Scientists
1968, Daniel Dingle (NASA scientist) converted his first car to run on
water.
1971, Herman P. Anderson (NASA scientist) converted a Ford LTD to run
on water.
1974, Yull Brown (Heavy water physicist) converted various vehicles to
run on water.
1970, Dr. Andrija Puharich (MD) Converted his motor home to run on
water.

Inventors
1935, Charles and Dad Garrett's car had been in operation continuously
for several days.
1980, Stanley Meyer converted and drove a VW buggy on water for four
years.
1983, Carl Cela converted a 1979 Cadilac Coupe de Ville to run on
water.
2002, Dennis Klein converted his car to run on water.
2005, Steve Ryan made a stock 350cc motorbike run on water.
2008, Genepax developed a battery charger and fitted it onto a stock
electric car

Researchers
1874, John Ernst Worrell Keely discovered a way to disassociate water
using acoustics.
1966, Dr. William A. Rhodes was the first to obtain a US patent using
a common delivery duct for both gases.
1989, Dr. Stanley Pons and Dr. Martin Fleishman sucessfully produced
room temprature fusion.
19??, Paul Pantone developed the GEET engine producing plasma from
exhaust heat.
1990, Dr. Yoshiro Nakamats developed the Nostradam II engine.
1999 Dr. Leslie Bromberg, Dr. Alex Rabinovich and Dr. Daniel Cohn
developed the Plasmatron fuel converter to transform gasoline or other
hydrocarbons into hydrogen rich gas.
2003, Xogen Technologies developed a waste-water treatment system that
produces power as a byproduct.

Popular counter reasoning

"car companies would have encorporated such an easy solution"
Car companies have quite consistantly produced less efficent cars.
Nixon made fuel efficency the law, later this law was abolished and
today we have less efficent cars then when Nixon moved into office.
In1973 Shell Oil converted this "of the shelve" Opel and it did 160 km
per liter or 376 miles per Gallon. Thankfully, history is well
documented, we don't have to guess what happend.
"It violates the laws of thermodynamics."
The technology is made up out of seperate parts, the sum of the parts
makes the whole. If this indeed invalidates the laws of thermodynamics
then so be it, hundreds of emperical observations have shown the laws
to be wrong in the micro world. Electron orbit doesn't decay. Thus,
from a sientific point of view this technology fits under the category
nuclear reactions.
"Nuclear energy is not safe"
Yull Brown demonstrated it to be more than safe.

Oxygen depletion
We had 38% oxygen in the atmosphere in 1940. Today in 2008 the oxygen
content of air in Tokyo can be as low as 6%, we have over 400 dead
zones in the ocean and millions of people die per year from causes
related to hypoxia, a pathological condition in which the body is
deprived of oxygen. We are not just burning a hydrogen-carbon based
substance, we are burning up the atmosphere along with it. Coal and
petroleum are not a free rides but can and will eventually kill
everyone. We should all agree we need air to breath. Burning hydro-
carbons is not a perpetual motion device or a free lunch.

Scientific dishonesty
Money talks, scientists have prostituted themselves to debunk
aviation, nuclear reactions, global warming, anti-gravity, artificial
intelligence, bio plasma, Orgone energy, telekinesis, telepathy,
reincarnation, bio plastics, industrial hemp, extra terrestrial life
and of course cold fusion.

It may be hard for you to understand the fruits of research can not be
judged without doing the actual research however the lack of vision is
apparent to a child where 5 years into commercial aviation the
establishment was finally prepared to implement the real world into
the books. At no stage did mainstream science so much as entertain the
thought. For 5 years the aerocrafts flew over the university while
professors continued to debunk the "hoax". It doesn't take much
imagination to see what happened to the few noble scientists who long
before had produced workable theories towards such devices. Laughing
people off the stage is never a constructive scientific endeavor. It
equates with witch burning and decapitating heretics. In the short run
one may earn Enronian millions in the long run it makes it impossible
for anyone to see the truth.


The septics
The truth is not anyone's opinion. The data requires hard work, in
depth investigation and a review with honesty rather than preconceived
arguments. The knife cuts at both ends, we have psychiatrists to
diagnose insanity, such diagnosis from a physicist would be far
outside his area of expertise. It would be an act of quackery in it
self. We have wind tunnels because the math still doesn't fit the real
world. Fission, superconductivity, crystal radio, optical lasers,
microwave masers, X-rays and radio -research all suffered needless
delay by ignorant skeptics. Why not be skeptical about oil reserves?
Why not be skeptical about Exxon debunking alternative energy? Are you
sure your septi think tank is not funded by big business?

The energy crisis
Even to a mind with very limited imagination it cant escape the energy
crisis fills big pockets with big money. From this single fact alone
we can derive why mankind has no need for a Large hadron collider.
(sorry Brian) Furthermore we conclude that while the global economy
plunges into depression public funding is consumed by giant toys
having zero potential for return on investment. If one argues the data
is scientifically interesting we may then conclude scientific
interests to be unrelated to real world progress. Compared to mind
controll experiments on children, nuclear weapons, weaponizing of
space or any other cryptonym of slavery the water fueled car is more
than worthy of in-depth investigation, funding and implementation.

http://knol.google.com/k/gaby-de-wilde/water-fueled-car/1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2


.

Relevant Pages

  • Turning Power Plant Challenges into Clean Technology Opportunities
    ... Turning Power Plant Challenges into Clean Technology Opportunities ... Looks at Water and Renewable Energy ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • New technology uses rivers motion to generate power
    ... A University professor has developed new technology that he says will extract energy from water in an environmentally-friendly way. ... That's similar to the way a school of fish moves through water. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Hydrostar generator
    ... Um...I know I said I don't want to run the car off of water. ... What I asked is whether it's possible to use the excess electricity ... form of electrolysis and end up with any result except a net energy ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: food from space
    ... technology more gradually in a way that sees it more of an investment ... food and use the energy to desalinate sea water. ... is that you need to transport water and CO2 to your space stations. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • MIT study touts geothermal energy
    ... America needs to get more steamed up to meet its future energy needs, a new Massachusetts Institute of Technology study says. ... The technology - in which water is pumped thousands of feet into the hot rock crust and extracted as steam - should be tested first in western states where underground hot rocks are closer to the surface, ...
    (sci.energy)