Re: Do photon's obey "an object in motion stays in motion unless acted on by a force"?

On Jan 28, 11:19 am, pcardin...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 27, 3:08 pm, Michael Helland <mobyd...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip crap]

This interpretation of the redshift suggests that apparent recessional
velocities are an illusion that results of from my newly proposed
quantum behavior of light.

Hubble's Law could then be rewritten as:

v = c - Hd

where v is the velocity of cosmologically redshifted light. Since it's
velocity and frequency are intertwined (c = fw) and it's energy and
frequency are intertwined (E = hf) then a drop in v at cosmological
distances d should lead to the observed cosmological redshift, which
can be modeled in by my photon class as a reduction in the
energy_to_deliver property.

If redshift were cause by a change in v, then f would change, and
wavelength would remain the same.

Indeed.

What we observe is that the wavelength changes.

Are you sure we don't observe energy, and calculate wavelength
axiomatically?

.

Quantcast