Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:03:12 GMT
Tom Potter wrote:
Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity.
<laughing>
You've gotta be kidding, Potter! GTR is one of the most successful
theories to date. In more than 90 years, there has not been a
prediction of GTR that's been contradicted by an observation.
Potter, here's a bit of background about GTR that I'm sure you
will enjoy reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
Oh, and Potter, if you feel the urge...
Bluster on, Potter, bluster some more! Froth at the mouth! Whatever!
.
Flipping a coin, rolling a die, tunneling, creating sparks, observing an event...
General Relativity is continuous. Reality is discrete.
There is no room for sentient man in General Relativity,
If you can perform any of these experiments, you have disproved General Relativity.
General Relativity is a non-viable, non-cost-effective model of reality. It is a Tower of Babel, that generates more heat than light, and wastes time, money, and brains on such pursuits as black holes, warped spaces, time travel, time tunnels, etc.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
- From: Tom Potter
- Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
- Next by Date: Solutions manual to Separation Process Principles, 2nd Ed.,by Seader, Henley
- Previous by thread: Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
- Next by thread: Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
