sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: iamjohngabriel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a layman's queston about quantum physics and interference
  • From: none
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Anti gravity
  • From: hanson
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: john210309
• Re: Define mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 317.91: Russia Advances Born-Infeld Theory to Unification Theory
  • From: OsherD
• A more efficient way to search scientific articles and make bibliographies
  • From: RefNavigator
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Anti gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: pmb
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: BURT
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: lwalke3
• Re: Anti gravity
  • From: hanson
• Re: a layman's queston about quantum physics and interference
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: BURT
• Inside Science News Briefs -- March 30, 2009
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Agents of Despair
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: PD
• the Devil, and Satan
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: Florian
• Re: Earth's internal heat
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: one over prime has all the nines
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: one over prime has all the nines
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: john210309
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Anti gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: MORPHEAL'S COMMENTARY - March 30 2009 - G20 And Inflation Fears Result in Crimes Against Humanity, AND Water, Water Everywhere - A Lesson in Values Economics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Mar 30, 2009
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 317.9: Japan Researches Born-Infeld Lagrangian and Noncommutative Spacetime
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Naming the aether particle - the poselectron
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Quantum Gravity 317.8: Max Born, Physicist-Mathematician
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Quantum Gravity 317.8: Max Born, Physicist-Mathematician
  • From: OsherD
• Point energy aether
  • From: BURT
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: polar mounted mirror rotating at 1 rev every 48 hours reflects inthe same direction all day?
  • From: redrok
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions to divorce themselves from Mr. Ed Conrad
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: John Park
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Define mass
  • From: Florian
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Impotent Blithering
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Quantum Gravity 317.7: Austin Texas Computer Researcher Pioneers in Nonintertial Including Superluminal Regimes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Impotent Blithering
  • From: kiloVolts
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions to divorce themselves from Mr. Ed Conrad
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: photovoltaics why do they work better when cold?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: photovoltaics why do they work better when cold?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: hanson
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 317.7: Austin Texas Computer Researcher Pioneers in Nonintertial Including Superluminal Regimes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Some questions about motion
  • From: doug
• Some questions about motion
  • From: Albert
• Re: photovoltaics why do they work better when cold?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 317.6: A Debate (In Abstentia) Between I. Schmelzer and O. Doctorow on QM Interpretations: Copenhagen, Bohm, Collapse, Decoherence, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How the West was lost...
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Another BIG Inconsistency
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 317.5: More On Netherlands Gravitational Information
  • From: OsherD
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Florian
• Re: polar mounted mirror rotating at 1 rev every 48 hours reflects inthe same direction all day?
  • From: brian white
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light has momentum and it imparts inertia to solar sails.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Square root of -1 is no longer imaginary number but actually real natural unite (c or speed of light)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Re: In how many years all ice on earth will melt?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Define mass ALL ou dumbasses got busted
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Define mass Thermal energy and I won
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Define mass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Define mass
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Another BIG Inconsistency
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 317.4: Netherlands Indicates Local Solar System vs Galaxy Differences in Gravitational Information
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 317.3: USA and France Advance Lukaciewicz Propositional Logic (Related to Probable Causation/Influence) To Prove Completeness for Continuous First Order Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Global Cooling Revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Global Cooling Revisited
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Quantum Gravity 317.2: Where Does Thermodynamics Go Wrong in Cosmology?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• a layman's queston about quantum physics and interference
  • From: none
• Re: Global Cooling
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Global Cooling Revisited
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 317.1: (Probable) Causes in Thermodynamics
  • From: OsherD
• Global Cooling Revisited
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Global Cooling
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: photovoltaics why do they work better when cold?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Another BIG Inconsistency
  • From: Uncle Al
• photovoltaics why do they work better when cold?
  • From: none
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If superconductors magnetized at c ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: If superconducting sheets reflected gravitational waves...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Global Cooling
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: Pia
• Re: Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 Mar 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Define mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Square root of -1 is no longer imaginary number but actually real natural unite (c or speed of light)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: PD
• Re: Square root of -1 is no longer imaginary number but actually real natural unite (c or speed of light)
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Global Cooling
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I Believe In The Easter Bunny
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: O! Sweet Sixteen - Just 16 Days!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Square root of -1 is no longer imaginary number but actually real natural unite (c or speed of light)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Our Universe is an "Open System"
  • From: Uncle Al
• FINAL REMINDER: ECCOMAS VipIMAGE 2009 Submission deadline: April 6
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light has momentum and it imparts inertia to solar sails.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 317.0: Thermodynamic Laws and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light has momentum and it imparts inertia to solar sails.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does light have inertia? as much as time does
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How Towers Burn and Fall.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light has momentum and it imparts inertia to solar sails.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Light has momentum and it imparts inertia to solar sails.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Does light have inertia?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Amy wineHouse -- growing up too fast.
  • From: John Park
• Does light have inertia?
  • From: Hongyi Zhao
• 1.5 billon awarded to the EELVIS project
  • From: GNN-News
• Earth Hour and Large Hadron Collider - cover up?
  • From: Willy Sylers
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 316.92: Indications of a Slow-Acting Gravitational "Primeval-To-Present" Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: I Believe In The Easter Bunny
  • From: Androcles
• I Believe In The Easter Bunny
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Global Cooling
  • From: z
• Re: Global Cooling
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Surfer
• Global Cooling
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: schoenfeld . forever
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: hanson
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: NoEinstein
• Quantum Gravity 316.91: Force Causes Potential (Energy) By Usual Methods
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Our Universe is an "Open System"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Four-dimensional Rotation of the Universe.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Have you tried slrn ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Quantum Gravity 316.9: Vienna Austria Pioneers in Simplifying Recurrence Sequences (Relates Strongly to PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity is distance per second near earth at c.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: hanson
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Is slrn too hard for Gisse to handle ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Our Universe is an "Open System"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.8: Tidal Forces of Black Holes, the Big Bang, and Force Generates Energy/Mass
  • From: frogma
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Text answers
  • From: jfisher864
• everyThing everyWhere is forever moving through time.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• from time to time i don't mind your (c), my argument is primarily about your understanding of time without which the speed-of-the-light concept cannot do
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Is slrn too hard for Gisse to handle ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Dark Energy and Dark Matter
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Our Universe is an "Open System"
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Unravelling the Dark Matter - Dark Energy Paradigm
  • From: Surfer
• Our Universe is an "Open System"
  • From: Steve Puetz
• Information transfer without energy transfer ?
  • From: 5 . d
• Re: Indications That Black Hole Tidal Forces Generate Mass/Energy
  • From: pmb
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Does Dark Energy Really Exist?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: Benj
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Does Dark Energy Really Exist?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is distance per second near earth at c.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is distance per second near earth at c.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 316.8: Tidal Forces of Black Holes, the Big Bang, and Force Generates Energy/Mass
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: PD
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: It is official, We have prevented catastrophe and continue on saving the Ozone Layer!
  • From: Cwatters
• sale Nike airmaxTN , Nike airmaxLTD sneaker trainer www.footwearclothes.com
  • From: linfptc1@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Indications That Black Hole Tidal Forces Generate Mass/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Indications That Black Hole Tidal Forces Generate Mass/Energy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: It is official, We have prevented catastrophe and continue on saving the Ozone Layer!
  • From: Benj
• Specialized nanoparticles floating in water make a fluid that can...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: Benj
• It is official, We have prevented catastrophe and continue on saving the Ozone Layer!
  • From: Armadillo_Tamer
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: what is a Body?
  • From: Gad-Noe
• what is a Body?
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: For Those Interested -- Summary Presentation for Plan B 3.0: Mobilizingto Save Civilization by Earth Policy Institute
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Square root of -1 is no longer imaginary number but actually real natural unite (c or speed of light)
  • From: cjcountess
• For Those Interested -- Summary Presentation for Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization by Earth Policy Institute
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Image resolution
  • From: alai777
• Southern California (Mission Viejo) IYA Event Announcement
  • From: RStember
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: franklinhu
• sell hot nike air jordan shoes
  • From: tangchao325@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: PD
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hematite crystals in Australian rocks hint that Earth’s atmosphere was oxygenated early
  • From: Dov Henis
• Re: Gravity is distance per second near earth at c.
  • From: hanson
• Re: NASA Scientists Find Clues to a Secret of Life
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: hanson
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.7: The Role of 3 in the Arizona State Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 316.7: The Role of 3 in the Arizona State Solutions
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 316.6: Arizona State U. USA Pioneers in Riccati and Schrodinger Related t (time)-factor Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Army has new design for EMP bomb
  • From: miso@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Thorlabs SP1-USB spectrometer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Life is short: Worthwhile reforming the work teams
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions to divorce themselves from Mr. Ed Conrad
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• P=NP
  • From: valls
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fuel for Cars, Energy for Homes, By NGEN
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Benj
• Re: FBI or the like coerced all of the top U.S. scientific institutions to divorce themselves from Mr. Ed Conrad
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Cwatters
• US Navy evidence for cold fusion
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Physics Question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: PD
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: jbriggs444
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.5: Macroscopic vs Microscopic May Be Different "Dimensions"
  • From: john210309
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.4: Applying the V - S Idea to E = hv (v frequency)
  • From: kenp
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Saint Alphonsus Liguori on 5-8-93
  • From: mcinnez
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.5: Macroscopic vs Microscopic May Be Different "Dimensions"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum entanglement can be too much of a good thing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.2: V - S (volume - surface area) Obeys the x^n Solution Type Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: frogma
• Need help in the development and use JMCAD
  • From: Yuriy
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.5: Macroscopic vs Microscopic May Be Different "Dimensions"
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: How to make a thermo cyphon water pump?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: john210309
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: john210309
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: john210309
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.5: Macroscopic vs Microscopic May Be Different "Dimensions"
  • From: john210309
• Quantum Gravity 316.5: Macroscopic vs Microscopic May Be Different "Dimensions"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lunar Lander still wount work
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Now take your UFO and play some place else
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity Time is less distance near earth per second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is distance per second near earth at c.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: jc
• Quantum Gravity 316.4: Applying the V - S Idea to E = hv (v frequency)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• How to make a thermo cyphon water pump?
  • From: Bear Stone
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Ray Vickson
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: john210309
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: Benj
• Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
  • From: dudajar
• Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Nuclear Physics Question
  • From: John Park
• Nuclear Physics Question
  • From: bbbbbbubbles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.2: V - S (volume - surface area) Obeys the x^n Solution Type Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: How the West was lost...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Slow down to keep shoes dry
  • From: alien8er
• Re: How the West was lost...
  • From: alien8er
• Quantum Gravity 316.3: Dimensional Homogeneity of V - S Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: Benj
• Re: A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: hanson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 316.2: V - S (volume - surface area) Obeys the x^n Solution Type Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: frogma
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
  • From: Igor
• A magnet is an aether pump
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Solid state physics: best book?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Time dilation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 316.2: V - S (volume - surface area) Obeys the x^n Solution Type Riccati Differential Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Solid state physics: best book?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: DOUBLE Le Sage gravity solves the Wang and Yang eclipse anomalies.
  • From: Leo Vuyk
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Solid state physics: best book?
  • From: twiki
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The ebook - Gravity from a new angle - is free to download
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravityphysics busted Uncle idiot Time Lines
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: jc
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: PD
• Re: Slow down to keep shoes dry
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: LHC vs FNAL B*tch-slapping fest
  • From: Eric Gisse
• LHC vs FNAL B*tch-slapping fest
  • From: PD
• Slow down to keep shoes dry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: DOUBLE Le Sage gravity solves the Wang and Yang eclipse anomalies.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 316.1: USA Uses Gauss-Bonnet Gravity For Heavy Quark Potentials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Max Keon
• Quantum Gravity 316.0: An Argument with Julian Barbour (Oxford College Farm Banbury Oxon) On Time
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: dudajar
• Quantum Gravity 315.99: 315.98 Continued on Stable Traversable Wormholes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: Uncle Al
• I need em please, ASAP
  • From: srk8887
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: BradGuth
• Quantum Gravity 315.97: The Gauss-Bonnet and Modified f(R) Gravity Interpretation of 3 in 315.96
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Thorlabs SP1-USB spectrometer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: glird
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Wol
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: Cwatters
• Quantum Gravity 315.96: Volume/Surface Area < = (1/3)r and = (1/3)r for Sphere Indicates Scale Anomaly in Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: jimp
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: UncleEnglish
• Re: Gravity is nothing but the Strong Nuclear force.
  • From: Wolfman
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: john210309
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Play dead again in broken shells, evolutionists, your
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: dudajar
• Quantum Gravity 315.95: Does The Number 3 Have Significance in Volume Divided By Surface Area?
  • From: OsherD
• global warming expedition to north pole halted by cold
  • From: john210309
• HandyMan DataBase Over 1,000,000 Specs
  • From: scott93727g
• Re: I disappeared up my own arse-hole
  • From: Benj
• I disappeared up my own arse-hole
  • From: kiloVolts
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: doug
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: doug
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: doug
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: glird
• Re: Instead of the Higgs - better look for Paul Draper
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA Scientists Find Clues to a Secret of Life
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: tj Frazir
• MAYBE it exists.
  • From: Huang
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 315.93: Germany Uses Power-Law Distributions For Many-Worlds Subjective Histories
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Exercises in temporal logic
  • From: dudajar
• Re: QM and A-bomb developement.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: QM and A-bomb developement.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Quantum Gravity 315.92: Probability Density Functions Satisfy Riccati Differential Equations Because they are Dimensionless
  • From: OsherD
• QM and A-bomb developement.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Quantum Gravity 315.91: Logistic Differential Equation Dimensions
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 315.9: dy/dt = (r/t)y is equivalent to "time dimensionless" t dy/dt = ry
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Click to feed the needy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: Heliyummm
• Quantum Gravity 315.8: y = exp(-t) and y = t^r respective obey Riccati Differential Equations dy/dt = -y and dy/dt = (r/t)y
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lunar Landing
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Mar 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Nuclear Weapon Breakout Scenarios: Correcting the Record
  • From: mike
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 315.7: 1/e < = t < = 1 Clarifies "Interpolating" Between t^(a-1) and exp(-bt) for a > 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: Heliyummm
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 Mar 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How Black?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Instead of the Higgs - better look for Paul Draper
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can't you copy links to your web browser ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can't you copy links to your web browser ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Instead of the Higgs - better look for Paul Draper
  • From: hanson
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study
  • From: Benj
• Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study
  • From: erschroedinger@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Exercises in temporal logic
  • From: Androcles
• Re: DOUBLE Le Sage gravity solves the Wang and Yang eclipse anomalies.
  • From: Leo Vuyk
• Re: Exercises in temporal logic
  • From: dudajar
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 315.6: What Does it Mean to Interpolate or "Average" Between x^a and exp(bx)?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Can't you copy links to your web browser ?
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Re: Official 9-11 Myths
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The façade of capitalism has vanished.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 315.5: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Disadvantages of the Gaussian (Normal) Distribution Compared to the Gamma, Exponential, Chi Square(d) Distributions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oxygen consumption is lethal.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 315.5: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Disadvantages of the Gaussian (Normal) Distribution Compared to the Gamma, Exponential, Chi Square(d) Distributions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Oxygen consumption is lethal.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Researchers for the first time directly observe Alfvén waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 19 Mar...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Instead of the Higgs -better look for the Handy Ha Ha
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Oxygen consumption is lethal.
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Oxygen consumption is lethal.
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Now you can understand the parasites
  • From: Wolfman
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Tis only lust...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: operator jay
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gisse's bookShelf.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How Black?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How Black?
  • From: hanson
• Re: How Black?
  • From: BURT
• Re: How Black?
  • From: hanson
• Re: How Black?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: NASA Scientists Find Clues to a Secret of Life
  • From: hanson
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: erg
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How Black?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: hanson
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: hanson
• Re: sell Air max 90 shoes
  • From: hanson
• Re: NASA Scientists Find Clues to a Secret of Life
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: jimp
• Re: How Black?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: DOUBLE Le Sage gravity solves the Wang and Yang eclipse anomalies.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: Now you can understand the parasites
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Oxygen consumption is lethal.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
  • From: mpc755
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: we_pretty
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: we_pretty
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Benj
• Re: How Black?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How Black?
  • From: john130309
• Re: How Black?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 315.4: Choosing Simple Coefficients in Riccati To Give Numerous Extrema or Critical Points
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Androcles
• How Black?
  • From: williamwdriver@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Piggy Brown confirms Androcles' statement.
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 315.3: The Geometry of the Riccati Differential Equation with Constant Coefficients
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Giant Ice Sheet Is Safe ... for Now
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: doug
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: jimp
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Surfer
• Re: EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• EPR-paradox and special relativity
  • From: we_pretty
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: pmb
• wholesale Polo www.sneaker-shop08.com
  • From: forarege4ede
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Soif
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Heliyummm
• Exercises in temporal logic
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Measure Electric Field Strength?
  • From: Trespasser
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• What if we make CPT transformation of free electron laser?
  • From: dudajar
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: What Happened, indeed
• Re: Dirac-Maxwell coupled equations
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: hanson
• Re: JSH: Now you can understand the parasites
  • From: hhc314
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: Dirac-Maxwell coupled equations
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: russell kym horsell
• JSH: Now you can understand the parasites
  • From: JSH
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: frogma
• Scaled M41 Nuke.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: Haword
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: JSH
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• JSH: These people are stupid
  • From: JSH
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Igor
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bubbles and beer bottles: an explosive combination
  • From: Benj
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bubbles and beer bottles: an explosive combination
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: hanson
• Re: "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Benj
• Re: Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Doctorates/Tucker
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Dirac-Maxwell coupled equations
  • From: marcofuics
• Re: Explain Physics principles with animal locomotion (,Behaviour)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Bubbles and beer bottles: an explosive combination
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Wol
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Explain Physics principles with animal locomotion (,Behaviour)
  • From: a . elilraj
• Explain Physics principles with animal locomotion (,Behaviour)
  • From: a . elilraj
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Einstein/Roosevelt letter.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Quantum Gravity 315.2: Netherlands and Romania Advance PI Set, PI Regarding Vertexes and Edges, and Riccati Equation on Triangular Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 315.2: Netherlands and Romania Advance PI Set, PI Regarding Vertexes and Edges, and Riccati Equation on Triangular Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: polar mounted mirror rotating at 1 rev every 48 hours reflects inthe same direction all day?
  • From: brian white
• Quantum Gravity 315.1: D'Alembert Solution of 1-Dimensional Wave Equation and Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: polar mounted mirror rotating at 1 rev every 48 hours reflects inthe same direction all day?
  • From: Uncle Al
• The flaw in Planck's constant (update).
  • From: maxkeon
• polar mounted mirror rotating at 1 rev every 48 hours reflects in the same direction all day?
  • From: brian white
• Re: Praesumo Diligo ut exsisto Supremus
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Quantum Step Closer To Entanglement Filter
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: lwalke3
• Re: Shuttle launch tonight at 7:43 EDT
  • From: william cogswell
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Changed to: Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: doug
• Re: Changed to: Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A new gravity field mapping mission
  • From: qqq
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Changed to: Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Changed to: Relativity of Simultaneity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Testing relativity from the 1919 eclipse— a question of bias
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The concept of the aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Stress damages critical area of brain
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Elusive Higgs particle has fewer hideouts
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Elusive Higgs particle has fewer hideouts
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Wol
• Elusive Higgs particle has fewer hideouts
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: PD
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: John Bailey
• Quantum Gravity 315.0: Role of Dt(u) - kDx(u) Expressions or Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Space expansion
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Stress damages critical area of brain
  • From: hhc314
• What is complementary to spread out light?
  • From: BURT
• Space expansion
  • From: BURT
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: BURT
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: BURT
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: doug
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: doug
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: What Happened, indeed
• Re: Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Power lines : danger or not?
  • From: charlescalculus_robertobaggio
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: BURT
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: doug
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: OG
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Worked example using Kane's method to determine equations of motion?
  • From: Roy
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: JSH: So what happened?
  • From: JSH
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: OG
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Stress damages critical area of brain
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Discovery is in orbit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Top Scientist To Investigate Thermoelectric Behavior Of Metal ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Top Scientist To Investigate Thermoelectric Behavior Of Metal ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Energyless motion of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Energyless motion of light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: Androcles
• HHO Gas Mileage Crap
  • From: Happy Dog
• Re: New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: jjsajd
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Benj
• New Testable Consequence for the Reality of Expansion
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Here's a good job for Gisse.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Wol
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: jmfbahciv
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Mar 16, 2009
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: alien8er
• Quantum Gravity 314.91: Heat Equation Classically Similar to Schrodinger, and
  • From: OsherD
• 314.9: Schrodinger and Classical Wave Equations Relate Birkhoff and Maxwell Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Hematite crystals in Australian rocks hint that Earth’s atmosphere was oxygenated early
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 314.8: 314.7 Proves that Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Solves the Birkhoff-Maxwell Causation Conservation Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: YKhan
• Quantum Gravity 314.7: Exp(P(A-->B)) Solves Dx(f) + Dxx(f) = 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Bye-bye batteries, hello new tech supercapacitors?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: nuclear bomb is not about E=MC^2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: GOLD OUNCE IRREMEDIATELY IN FREE FALL DOWN THE SHAFT TO ROCK BOTTOM VALUE 37$ / ounce
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Finite Relativism: Review Request
  • From: doug
• Re: Finite Relativism: Review Request
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Finite Relativism: Review Request
  • From: doug
• Re: Finite Relativism: Review Request
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Perhaps nothing demonstrates the weirdness of quantum mechanics quiteas starkly as a superconductor
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Metal Becomes Transparent Under High Pressure
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Perhaps nothing demonstrates the weirdness of quantum mechanics quite as starkly as a superconductor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GOLD OUNCE IRREMEDIATELY IN FREE FALL DOWN THE SHAFT TO ROCK BOTTOM VALUE 37$ / ounce
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Next Step In Physics, Chemistry and Astronomy-new free ebook release
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GOLD OUNCE IRREMEDIATELY IN FREE FALL DOWN THE SHAFT TO ROCK BOTTOM VALUE 37$ / ounce
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: alien8er
• Quantum Gravity 314.6: (Probable) Causation and 2-Dimensional Local Maxima and Minima
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quandumb Quackitry 9314.50a part ff subpart ks: Dxxx(f*f) -Dx(f) = constant (depending on quack factor ) is
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Shuttle launch tonight at 7:43 EDT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: Sue...
• test - ignore
  • From: phys2new
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on ?relativity theory
  • From: PD
• Quandumb Quackitry 9314.50a part ff subpart ks: Dxxx(f*f) -Dx(f) = constant (depending on quack factor ) is
  • From: kOsherDuck
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 314.5: Dxx(f) + Dx(f) = constant (depending on f ) is Generalized Riccati Equation
  • From: OsherD
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Soif
• Quantum Gravity 314.4: Maxwell Self-Axis Causation and Decrease of Birkhoff Causation (Dx(f(a,b)) = (Dy(f(a,b)) = 0) at Local Extrema in 3 Dimensions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 314.3: Dxx(f) > 0 v.s. < 0 Interpretation As All Fundamental Interactions are Reversible
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: Androcles
• A Set theory Explaination of Group
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: Crimea sunspot drawing - Current Conditions
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Quantum Gravity 314.2: The Sphere and Ellipsoid are Determined by 3 Orthogonal Directions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 314.1: 3-Dimensional Maximum-Minimum Theorem and PI-Maxwell-Riccati Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 314.1: 3-Dimensional Maximum-Minimum Theorem and PI-Maxwell-Riccati Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 314.0: Dxx(f)Dyy(f) > [Dxy(f)] of Local Minima-Maxima and its Probable Causation Interpretation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.99: 2-Dimensional (in Domain) Maxima and Minima Appear to Relate to Negative Statistical Dependence
  • From: dogma
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on ?relativity theory
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.99: 2-Dimensional (in Domain) Maxima and Minima Appear to Relate to Negative Statistical Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: alien8er
• Quantum Gravity 313.99: 2-Dimensional (in Domain) Maxima and Minima Appear to Relate to Negative Statistical Dependence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Magnetic light interacting with Earth's magnetic field
  • From: BURT
• The Next Step In Physics, Chemistry and Astronomy-new free ebook release
  • From: Laurette Trudeau
• Re: Speculating About Uranium-234 + n = U-235 ?
  • From: Lester Welch
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: BURT
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: BURT
• Re: Speculating About Uranium-234 + n = U-235 ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Speculating About Uranium-234 + n = U-235 ?
  • From: CJ Stevermer
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 313.98: Dt(E(x, t)) = approx Dt(E(0, t)) if x near 0 and t in [0, 1]
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: YKhan
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Soif
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Tapping satellite data to better predict killer heat waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 313.97: Does dE/dH = dx/dt in the New Notation?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.96: Can The Partial Derivatives Be Approximated By Derivatives in Maxwell's Equations?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 313.96: Can The Partial Derivatives Be Approximated By Derivatives in Maxwell's Equations?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: LASERS PROVIDE ANTIMATTER BONANZA
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: LASERS PROVIDE ANTIMATTER BONANZA
  • From: Benj
• Re: gravity is not inverse square law and there's no such thing as gravitational constant
  • From: Gad-Noe
• LASERS PROVIDE ANTIMATTER BONANZA
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 313.95: More Regarding Charge Density in Maxwell's Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Buy cheap levaquin | No Prescription | ONLINE
  • From: uxgrangerleachate
• Re: everything
  • From: john130309
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Mar 09 Washington, DC [No Higgs]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 313.94: Charge Density in Maxwell's Equations Further Relates to the Riccati Picture
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: gravity is not inverse square law and there's no such thing as gravitational constant
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: gravity is not inverse square law and there's no such thing as gravitational constant
  • From: BURT
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: BURT
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 13 Mar 09 Washington, DC [No Higgs]
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Higgs boson didn't turn up. Whoo hoo!
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Recognize your human side
  • From: th.deflo@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Effect of Black Hole Impact Against a Planet?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: doug
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: everything
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• RELATIVITY/EVOLUTION/MATHEMATICS IS WRONG!
  • From: nuny@xxxxxxx
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: cjcountess
• Is recognizing climate change half the battle?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Sculpting the Asteroid Belt
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Researchers Developing New Ways to Reduce Bird Strikes on Airplanes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• everything
  • From: john130309
• Re: PN junction
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery that could...
  • From: Yevgen Barsukov
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: Bill Snyder
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery thatcould...
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "The 'Speedup' of the Universe's Expansion at Extreme Distances"
  • From: Soif
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Daniel Huber
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Daniel Huber
• Re: Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery that could...
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: please send to me too!
  • From: Hoofington P. McSnort
• Re: Scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery problem...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Determining the moment of inertia of a wheel
  • From: John Polasek
• testing
  • From: eugeniusz
• please send to me too!
  • From: mandiddy
• please send to me too!
  • From: mandiddy
• Material scientists at MIT have created a new type of battery that could...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 313.93: Ampere's Law in Maxwell's Equations Yields Similar Results To the Previous Sections More Directly
  • From: OsherD
• free energy
  • From: eugeniusz
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity Speed
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: is it possible to escape the universe without expending any fuel like thus...?
  • From: sean
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Low level of scientific journalism
  • From: Uncle Al
• NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: three lethal proves
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Low level of scientific journalism
  • From: jimp
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.92: How Fermat Generalized Parabolas, Hyperbolas
  • From: dogma
• Gravity Speed
  • From: justafriendfromanothersta
• "Space, Vacuum, and the Aether"
  • From: Soif
• Re: PN junction
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: PD
• PN junction
  • From: Daniel Huber
• Re: Quantum Gravity 319.1: Fermat Hyperbolas and Parabolas of 313.9 Are Solutions of Riccati Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 313.92: How Fermat Generalized Parabolas, Hyperbolas
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 319.1: Fermat Hyperbolas and Parabolas of 313.9 Are Solutions of Riccati Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.9: Indiana University USA Proves Fermat's Last Theorem in Extremely Short Proof (3 pages or Less), Indicating Fermat May Have Proved His Theorem in the 1600s
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 313.9: Indiana University USA Proves Fermat's Last Theorem in Extremely Short Proof (3 pages or Less), Indicating Fermat May Have Proved His Theorem in the 1600s
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Tom Potter
• Phantom knowledge
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.8: tanh(x), arctanh(x), arcsinh(x) Approximations by/to x
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 313.8: tanh(x), arctanh(x), arcsinh(x) Approximations by/to x
  • From: OsherD
• Storm systems can also influence the number of subatomic particles slamming into detectors
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 313.7: Other Cases of f(x) Approximation By/To x
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 313.5 and 313.6: Last Two Subsections Should be Relabelled 313.5 and 313.6
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 215.5: Why is Curl Related to Radius Rather than Angle?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 215.5: Why is Curl Related to Radius Rather than Angle?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 314.5: Does Mass Approximate t2 - t1 or dt?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Surfer
• Quantum Gravity 313.4: From Electrostatics to Maxwell's Equations and Their Relationship to Riccati Differential Equations
  • From: OsherD
• LD50 of Dark Matter is firmly established, 2.65e-5 mcg
  • From: Huang
• Re: Maharaj's Pro-Einstein Bombardment of Posts
  • From: dogma
• Low level of scientific journalism
  • From: engineman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.3: More Regarding Exp[ln(p1) + ln(p2) + ... + ln(pn)] As Fundamentally Additive
  • From: dogma
• Re: Maharaj's Pro-Einstein Bombardment of Posts
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: doug
• Re: 1 Billion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Complete proof against evolution
  • From: Benj
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Benj
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Understanding Dark Energy and the Environmental Impact
  • From: srp2inc
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: BURT
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• 1 Billion
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Complete proof against evolution
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Uncle Al
• Is Global Warming Caused By Man?
  • From: Soif
• Re: .9 repeating
  • From: John Park
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: PD
• Re: Complete proof against evolution
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: What is Bucky Fuller's 4-D?
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Complete proof against evolution
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum Gravity 313.3: More Regarding Exp[ln(p1) + ln(p2) + ... + ln(pn)] As Fundamentally Additive
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.2: How "Averages" (Means, Medians, Modes, Expectations, etc.) Distort Mathematics and Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Maharaj's Pro-Einstein Bombardment of Posts
  • From: OsherD
• Maharaj's Pro-Einstein Bombardment of Posts
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.2: How "Averages" (Means, Medians, Modes, Expectations, etc.) Distort Mathematics and Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Light seems to have an air of "Absolute-ness" about it
  • From: Michael Helland
• A FEW THOUGHTS ABOUT THE UNIVERSE c. 1994 to 2008
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Understanding Dark Energy and the Environmental Impact
  • From: Uncle Al
• Understanding Dark Energy and the Environmental Impact
  • From: bkh99
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.2: How "Averages" (Means, Medians, Modes, Expectations, etc.) Distort Mathematics and Physics
  • From: dogma
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Quantum Gravity 313.2: How "Averages" (Means, Medians, Modes, Expectations, etc.) Distort Mathematics and Physics
  • From: Gad-Noe
• Re: (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 313.2: How "Averages" (Means, Medians, Modes, Expectations, etc.) Distort Mathematics and Physics
  • From: OsherD
• (E=mc^2) transcends dimensional analysis and leads to unity of constants.
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: BURT
• Re: Electric current, covalent bound and modern physics absurdities
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: DID THE PHOENIX SPACECRAFT FIND LIQUID WATER ON MARS?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: DID THE PHOENIX SPACECRAFT FIND LIQUID WATER ON MARS?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Mea
• Re: How can you believe in the Higgs particle field and deny the aether at the same time?
  • From: PD
• Quantum Gravity 313.1: A Few Online Wikipedia Articles on 313.0 Aspects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Quantum Gravity 313.0: Exponential (Decay) Nature of Weak Interaction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Open Letter to Richard Dawkins
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: I am a Monad scientist
  • From: jjsajd
• Open Letter to Richard Dawkins
  • From: davemabus2000
• Electric current, covalent bound and modern physics absurdities
  • From: sorin
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group - trans-capacitance or trans-inductance?
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: How can you believe in the Higgs particle field and deny the aether at the same time?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: How does the Higgs field explain inertia?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Why do scientists think the Higgs particle would be unstable
  • From: BURT
• Re: Why do scientists think the Higgs particle would be unstable
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: BURT
• DID THE PHOENIX SPACECRAFT FIND LIQUID WATER ON MARS?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• ISNS ADVISORY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: dogma
• Re: ideal rocket equation
  • From: Androcles
• ideal rocket equation
  • From: c . pastor
• Re: What are the three parameters in the hydrogen density plots?
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: BURT
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: BURT
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I am a Monad scientist
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I am a Monad scientist
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: What are the three parameters in the hydrogen density plots?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GOLD OUNCE IRREMEDIATELY IN FREE FALL DOWN THE SHAFT TO ROCK BOTTOM VALUE 37$ / ounce
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: PD
• Re: I am a Monad scientist
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fire Flys on wings and cries
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantum Gravity 312.9: The Numerical Constant pi (the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter) May Give Clues as To Tangential versus Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: dogma
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• I am a Monad scientist
  • From: Michael Helland
• What are the three parameters in the hydrogen density plots?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Eagles Evil
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Fire Flys on wings and cries
  • From: Automutt
• "Causality"
  • From: Soif
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: PD
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: PD
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: PD
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Udo Obiechefu: Udo Obiechefu, Cheater (Was: Physics 1)
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Udo Obiechefu: Udo Obiechefu, Cheater (Was: Physics 1)
  • From: safd
• ECCOMAS VipIMAGE 2009 – submission DEADLINE APPROACHING
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: ANOther one**
  • From: Androcles
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Mar 09, 2009
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: ANOther one**
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
  • From: russell kym horsell
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: john030309
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: john030309
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: john030309
• Quantum Gravity 312.9: The Numerical Constant pi (the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter) May Give Clues as To Tangential versus Expansion-Contraction Motion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Draft paper submission deadline extended (will not be extended further): TACS-09
  • From: devipsrs@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Eagles Evil
  • From: hhc314
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: GOLD OUNCE IRREMEDIATELY IN FREE FALL DOWN THE SHAFT TO ROCK BOTTOM VALUE 37$ / ounce
  • From: Uncle Al
• What is Bucky Fuller's 4-D?
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: erg
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: erg
• Re: Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Once a virtual particle, always a virtual particle?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: Lofty Goat
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 6 Mar 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: My Pal the Professor on History Channel
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My Pal the Professor on History Channel
  • From: dangerousbill
• Re: More Bigger Milky Way
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Lofty Goat
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Mea
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Androcles
• prolixus
  • From: Saul Carrol
• mastering physics
  • From: myemailworld999
• New Physics: Most Original Scientific Explanation Of the Year
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Danny Deger
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: K. Bunny
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: qqq
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: Quantum Gravity 312.8: South Africa Finds Riccati Equation for Radiative Stellar Collapse With Solutions Prominently Involving Number 3
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 312.8: South Africa Finds Riccati Equation for Radiative Stellar Collapse With Solutions Prominently Involving Number 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: udosean
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: jimp
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Danny Deger
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: Fred J . McCall
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: udosean
• Re: Silence is Golden
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My ultimate universal dream
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Physics 1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NASA Kepler Mission Launch
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An important missing piece of the Standard Model of particle physicshas been discovered
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: jimp
• Re: Manuals ?? EG&G Model 1460 Optical Multichannel Analyzer
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: BURT
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Physics 1
  • From: udosean
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: BURT
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Badger
• An important missing piece of the Standard Model of particle physics has been discovered
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: hanson
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 312.7: Pierre de Fermat's Work in the 1600s Contributes to the Additive-Subtractive Rather than Multiplicative/Divisive Nature of Prime Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 312.7: Pierre de Fermat's Work in the 1600s Contributes to the Additive-Subtractive Rather than Multiplicative/Divisive Nature of Prime Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Mea
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is 'motion'?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Quantum Gravity 312.6: The Prime Numbers Are Not Fundamentally Multiplicative/Divisive But Additive/Subtractive
  • From: OsherD
• Books.! only books
  • From: Nimo
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: Big Bad Wolf
• Quantum Gravity 312.5: Netherlands Relates the Number 3 to Supersymmetry and Lattice Fermions and Rhombus Tilings of the Plane
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: erg
• Quantum Gravity 312.4: Recipe For An Acceleration via Spacetime and/or (Probable) Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 312.3: How our Universe Developed 3+1 Dimensions by Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Aether as time sustaining every physical element
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Dark Energy" as a Power Source: A Thought Experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Scruffy Rat, a story of Special Relativity for Children
  • From: Big Bad Wolf
• Re: More Bigger Milky Way
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Dark Energy" as a Power Source: A Thought Experiment
  • From: bkh99
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Focal length of Sun's gravitational lens
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: More Bigger Milky Way
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Igor
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Ice Age Returns to Florida this weekend
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: jimp
• Re: gold synthesis
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: More Bigger Milky Way
  • From: ESKI
• Re: gold synthesis aqua regia
  • From: tj Frazir
• Amazon's Carbon Sink Under Threat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• More Bigger Milky Way
  • From: Sam Wormley
• As computer chips shrink ever smaller, the background flicker of electronic noise threatens
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Reward for Murder
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group - trans-capacitance or trans-inductance?
  • From: alien8er
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group - ?trans-capacitance or trans-inductance?
  • From: jimp
• An electrical engineer's question to physics group - trans-capacitance or trans-inductance?
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Mea
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: dogma
• Re: Two REAL likley Time Distortions Exist, or the Sun and Moon have Distortions
  • From: eaglesondouglas
• Re: How does an EM wave progagate?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Solution Manual, Test Bank, NEW COLLECTION 2009
  • From: Student Plus
• Quantum Gravity 312.2: How the 3 Spatial Dimensions Can Be Causal
  • From: OsherD
• Watching Earth for 25 years
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 312.1: Holographic Principle Explains Heat vs Temperature, Heat Capacity, and Relationship to 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Strings and physical dimensions
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: doug
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: JSH
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• JSH: So how can they lie?
  • From: JSH
• Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: hanson
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does space tell matter how to mov?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: PD
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrical field and refraction index
  • From: Androcles
• Re: is there a physics that allows dense rocks to come to the surfa...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: is there a physics that allows dense rocks to come to the surfa...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Zircon Crystals in my meteorites?? Re: Eucrite Meteorite cand...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: zircon crystals in the Solar System Re: catalog of how many m...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Electrical field and refraction index
  • From: Dwib
• Help for my third grade kid's physics questions
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Electrical field and refraction index
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: dogma
• An electrical engineer's question to physics group
  • From: Bhushit Joshipura
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: mahipal7638
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Mea
• Re: How to Boil a Frog
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Quantum Gravity 311.91: The Euler-Mascheroni Constant "Upstages" Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 311.91: The Euler-Mascheroni Constant "Upstages" Logarithms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 311.9: The Euler-Mascheroni Constant Relates to the Number 3 and to Physics and to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 311.9: The Euler-Mascheroni Constant Relates to the Number 3 and to Physics and to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 311.8: Zeta(3) and Gyromagnetic Ratio q/m and Electromagnetism Divided by Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• discovered the most tightly bound pair of supermassive black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Androcles
• Manuals ?? EG&G Model 1460 Optical Multichannel Analyzer
  • From: DEFAULT
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Two Black Holes on a Collision Course
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Photoelectric effect and absurdities in modern physics
  • From: Benj
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: john030309
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: ryno
• Re: Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: john030309
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: john030309
• Would you believe in "Down" without "Up"?
  • From: Michael Helland
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: jimp
• Re: Photoelectric effect and absurdities in modern physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: doug
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: charlescalculus_robertobaggio
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: rgvickson
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: jimp
• Re: measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: Androcles
• Photoelectric effect and absurdities in modern physics
  • From: sorin
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: mahipal7638
• measuring the resistance of a piece of play dough
  • From: charlescalculus_robertobaggio
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Quantum Gravity 311.6: Some Open Problems involving "Encounters of the Third Kind"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: john030309
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Inside Science News Briefs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The extraordinary sound of the hang
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• The Pseudo-Physicist Index (v1.00)
  • From: Eric Baird
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Fire and magnetism [was Re: My ultimate universal dream]
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: ryno
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: mpc755
• Re: galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: Black holes split charges.+Spin
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Black holes split charges.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: ryno
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes split charges.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: ryno
• Re: Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: doug
• Black holes split charges.
  • From: john030309
• Physics and the Perennial Philosophy, part 1
  • From: Michael Helland
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Mea
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 311.5: Japan and Germany Advance the Number 3 in F(R) Supergravity Scalar Potentials
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: hanson
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Lofty Goat
• Re: ¿Why one cannot push light but just in the normal direction to the ray?
  • From: RLW
• Re: MOTHBALLED NASA SATELLITE AWAITS NEW LIFE
  • From: RLW
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: dogma
• MOTHBALLED NASA SATELLITE AWAITS NEW LIFE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: ( P₁ ∈ S ) ∧ ( P₂ ∈ S ) ∧ ( P₃ ∈ S ) ... ∧ ( Pₓ ∈ S ) ∧ ...
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: doug
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electricity questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is your thought about my English
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: RLW
• Re: What is your thought about my English
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: mahipal7638
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: dogma
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• Insect Camouflage - Information "Traveling"?
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: What is your thought about my English
  • From: Androcles
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: dogma
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: BradGuth
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: juandiego
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: What is your thought about my English?
  • From: alien8er
• Re: galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: Sam Wormley
• galactic jets- positive and negative
  • From: john190209
• Re: What is your thought about my English
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• What is your thought about my English?
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• What is your thought about my English
  • From: Jang Jin Hong
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Mea
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Final straw of evolution
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Electricity questions
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Final straw of evolution
  • From: fossillin
• Re: Electricity questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Market of Men
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Electricity questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: M.O.B. i L.
• Re: Electricity questions
  • From: OG
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Mar 02, 2009
  • From: PhDs . org
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: Androcles
• Electricity questions
  • From: Albert
• Re: Seven bogus Physics Nobel Prizes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Seven bogus Physics Nobel Prizes
  • From: Jim Black
• Quantum Gravity 311.4: Sir Michael Atiyah (U.K.), the Number 3 in Physics, and Sphere-Making
  • From: OsherD
• Solution Manual, Test Bank, NEW COLLECTION 2009
  • From: Student Plus
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Time scales for U-235 enrichment.
  • From: dogma
• Peter Relf writes no code, but he and his customers shape code.
  • From: Jeff▲Relf
• Nostradamus predicts the collapse of the capitalist system and the world-wide socialist revolution
  • From: dave mabus
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: Phil the Farmer
• Re: Our 500000 acre uranium ore
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Matter
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Matter mass of all light
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The time framed Universe 28 BYL at this rate
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Energy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Time scales for U-235 enrichment.
  • From: Fred the Red Shirt
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I have no wang
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: juandiego
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Benefits of Global Warming
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: juandiego
• Re: Simultaneity of Relativit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The scientist as idiot
  • From: John Polasek
• I have no wang
  • From: Huang
• Solution Manual, Test Bank, NEW COLLECTION
  • From: Student Plus
• Quantum Gravity 311.3: z = 1 + y - x = P ' (A-->B) is Triangle Thru (1, 0, 0), (0, 0, 1), (1, 1, 1)
  • From: OsherD
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Soif
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: Does space tell matter how to mov?
  • From: Y.y.Porat
• Re: Smith Chart Tutorial
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does space tell matter how to mov?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Matter
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Junior, behave yourself
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Width of photons hitting antennas made of net
  • From: M.O.B. i L.
• Does space tell matter how to mov?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Proof about impossibility of experimental verification on relativity theory
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Is General Relativity a useful TOOL or aesthetic ART?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Simple experiments that conclusively disprove General Relativity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Physics in crisis?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• LATEST NEWS: ASTEROIDS STOLEN BY AUTYMN!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Physics in crisis?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Our visible Trillion has a golden valley.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Our visible Trillion has a golden valley.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Our visible Trillion has a golden valley.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 311.2: Sqrt(3) as Length of Unit Diagonal in (Cause, Effect, Probable Causation/influence) Space
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Our visible Trillion has a golden valley.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 311.1: Exp(x) vs 1 + x + (x^2)/2 vs 1 - x - x^2/2 vs 1 + x - x^2/2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Our visible Universe has an energy deficit, net negative energy.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Matter
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Infinte Universe and Dark Matter
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 311.0: How The Inverse-Square (Coulomb) Force is Related to The Exponential
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Ben Newsam
• Re: If I only had'a brain
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Horizon Problem Resolution (2/28/09)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 310.9: "Reverse Interactions" in Weak and Strong Interactions from Belgium, Spain, Italy, USA
  • From: OsherD
• Re: My ultimate universal dream
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Micro black holes are everywhere, even inside Sprites.
  • From: Leo Vuyk