Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics

On Feb 28, 7:02 pm, Heliyummm <huangxienc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 28, 2:25 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





Huang wrote:

[snip]

So, my strategy is very simple. I have some ideas and I have a vision
of what I believe to be a valid model.

[snip crap]

I think that Im right, and if correct, it will revolutionize math and
physics,

[snip rest of crap]

   1) Calculate Mercury's perihelion precession over time.
   2) Compare with empirical observation.
   3) idiot

Prepare to be owned, Uncle Smell...

The orbit of Mercury is observed to be 87.969 days. From this,
astronomers calculate the geometry of it's orbit around the sun.

Unfortunately traditional calculations do NOT consider points to be
existentially indeterminate. Therefore, it is neccesary to indicate
that our methodology takes a major detour at this point.

Claim:
There is an Existential Potential which precisely explains the
anomalous precession of perihelion of Mercury. The easiest way to
explain this is by considering a simplified model and then getting
more technical with successive refinements to our model.

Assume that the orbit is a circle. Then, the observed diameter of the
circle is taken as the distance from the position of Mercury at times
t=0 and t=87.969/2 days.

This model claims that the diameter is expressible using numbers of
the form (a, b), where a exists and b does not exist.

As a reminder, astronomers are all doing all their calculations with
this "number system" anyway, but in their calculations you have that
everywhere b=0. So they are just doing Newtonian calculus with the
real number system (typically).

Before we can proceed any further, the class needs to acknowledge the
fundamental philosophical shift between traditional physics and what I
will show you next.

Speak cowards - and meet your fate.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -




The situation is the same for all the planets. But the ratio b/a is
greatest for Mercury, then Venus, Earth, Mars etc.....in that order.

The ratio b/a is _conjectured_ as decreasing similar to the inverse
square law.....just as the strength of gravity decreases until one is
far, far from the sun where the pointwise probability of existence
converges to 1.

Every point along the diameter of the Mercury's circular orbit is
existentially indeterminate, and those probabilities are given by a
potential function.

The reason why this is conjectural is because we are not doing
mathematics, but conjecture. But the conjecture is formal and
systematic. It is conjecture with respect to mathematics.
- Mathematics yields truths based on existence
- Existential indeterminacy yields _conjectures_ with respect to the
structure known as math

One additional note - that existential indeterminacy is itself
indeterminate, implying that while this approach provides a valid
method of spacebending it is not the only valid methodology. That fact
must be remembered in order to understand the difference between
conjectural modelling and orthodox mathematics - lest we confuse the
two.

Again - restating - that a conjecture is ONLY valid if it is reducible
to a mathematical statement - and this qualifies as such because we
can set b=0 everywhere to yield some Newtonian Mechanics.







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Strategy for revolutionizing math and physics
    ... far from the sun where the pointwise probability of existence ... Every point along the diameter of the Mercury's circular orbit is ... mathematics, but conjecture. ... It is conjecture with respect to mathematics. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Can Space be created within space?
    ... Universe governed by what I call "conjecture", ... mathematics but based on existential indeterminacy. ... So instead of "probability p" I prefer to use ... existence is made indeterminate you lose the ability to prove things. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: $!,000 USD says so.
    ... mathematics I can nevertheless solve probabilistic problems using ... It is true that in mathematics existence is always explicit. ... conjecture existence is never explicit, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Python from Wise Guys Viewpoint
    ... >> the sketch of the proof in his head when he wrote his correct program. ... I was specifically talking about the existence of proofs, ... Without this disclaimer one could easily disprove this conjecture ... it is impossible to give a counterexample to the above ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Help - Goldbach Conjecture
    ... proposal of the solution of Goldbach Conjecture")? ... 'prove the existence' of inifinitely many integers, ... have an existence in reality - the symbol 0 does not ... On the other hand, pure mathematics does meet reality if, as might be the case, ...
    (sci.math)