Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
- From: "Max Keon" <maxkeon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:12:55 +1100
I wrote:
Jang Jin Hong wrote:---
It is difficult to read your math expression.
On Mar 8, 9:28pm, maxk...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
Using the Compton wavelength photon, the fine structure constant
becomes, e^2/(2*eo*w*m*c^2): e is the electron charge. But such
a photon would carry 3.66e+21 times the energy of a Planck photon
and could not explain the Compton or photoelectric effects (not
that Planck's photon can do that now).
e^2/(2*eo*w*m*c^2)
e is the electron charge. e0 is the permittivity of free space
(not eo). w is the Compton wavelength. m is the electron mass.
The result should be 8.8462e-12.
That of course should be 7.29e-7.
Make that 7.29e-3.
That's what happens when I reply in haste, as I have now.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
- Next by Date: Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
- Previous by thread: Re: The fundamental flaw in Planck's constant.
- Next by thread: Quantum Gravity 312.9: The Numerical Constant pi (the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter) May Give Clues as To Tangential versus Expansion-Contraction Motion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
