Re: MAYBE it exists.
- From: Heliyummm <huangxienchen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 21, 3:44 pm, "tadc...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tadc...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 21, 4:31 pm, Heliyummm <huangxienc...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
You can produce the same damn answers using my methods that you would
get form GR so kiss my ass everybody in this whole place, if ya dont
like the facts it aint my problem.-
RIIIGHT!!!
That's the way to advance a dialectic.
*PLONK*
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
A Coward ?
Could it really be a coward ?
You're not really "afraid" to debate me are you ????
I knew that Doug was a coward but I didnt know that there were others.
Wow.
You morons have no imagination. You think that the only quantitative
tool that makes any sense is mathematics. What a bunch of imbeciles
you are. Did God come down from Mt Ararat and tell Moses that this was
so ? Is it written on a stone tablet somewhere ?
One more time for all the thick skulls -
It does not matter if you are using mathematics, conjectural
modelling, or voodoo. IF you can construct MODELS in such a way that
your modelling is
quantitative
qualitative
reproducible
falsifiable and
predictive,
THEN you are doing science and it does not matter how you got that
result. Mathematics is NOT the only tool that will get you there,
imbeciles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MAYBE it exists.
- From: doug
- Re: MAYBE it exists.
- References:
- MAYBE it exists.
- From: Huang
- Re: MAYBE it exists.
- From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MAYBE it exists.
- From: Heliyummm
- Re: MAYBE it exists.
- From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- MAYBE it exists.
- Prev by Date: Re: MAYBE it exists.
- Next by Date: Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether
- Previous by thread: Re: MAYBE it exists.
- Next by thread: Re: MAYBE it exists.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
