Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
- From: PD <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 26, 3:01 pm, 5...@xxxxxxx wrote:
That makes sense to me.
BTW - Are you a physicist ?
Well, that's part of the fun of the group, isn't it, figuring that
out. I wouldn't dream of shortcutting the sweep of the divining rod.
I would like to submit a proposal to someone who have
enough knowledge to discuss the subject. ( I'm not doing
weird physics or anything like that, this is serious really )
It's one page only, and I don't see anything wrong with it,
but it involves some standard calculus on wave function
and its collapse. Would you be interested to check it out ?
Only if you post it here, or a link to it here (say, to a blog site).
I will not look at it in an email, unless I ask for it, but thank you
for asking me first.
On 26 mar, 20:50, PD <TheDraperFam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 26, 1:34 pm, 5...@xxxxxxx wrote:
Does a transfer of information necessary need a transfer of energy ?
If this is not the case, the speed of information transfer could
exceed the speed of light, since it does not infringe the causality
principle ?
Right ?
It's hard to imagine how information could be transferred without a
physical interaction. And to date, all known physical interactions are
mediated by carriers that bear energy, momentum, angular momentum, and
certain conserved quantum numbers. Another way of saying this is that
some kind of Feynman diagram is involved in any kind of information
diagram.
PD
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
- Next by Date: from time to time i don't mind your (c), my argument is primarily about your understanding of time without which the speed-of-the-light concept cannot do
- Previous by thread: Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
- Next by thread: Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
