sci.physics
- New list of solution manuals,
instructors . team
- A Systems Theoretical Formal Logic for Category Theory,
C Pedro
- Quantum Gravity 321.7: Do Complex Variables "Code" For or "Represent" Probable Causation/Influence P ' (A-->B)?,
OsherD
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
Sanny
- A limit for carbon emissions: 1 trillion metric tons,
Sam Wormley
- Re: true power of shaolin kung fu,
Sam Wormley
- Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?,
_
- Re: Why might TJ send Roy a camera, on loan ?,
tj Frazir
- Message not available
- Message not available
- TJ is a very nice fellow, but he ain't no billionaire.,
_
- Re: TJ is a very nice fellow, but he ain't no billionaire.,
Roy L
- People with money tend to spend it.,
_
- Re: People with money tend to spend it.,
Roy L
- Frazier Yachts, John Fredriksen builds ships and yachts.,
_
- John Fredriksen, Trader Joe's, Frazier Yachts, tj Frazir.,
_
- Re: John Fredriksen, Trader Joe's, Frazier Yachts, tj Frazir.,
Roy L
Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Why send Roy a mountain, as a gift ?,
tj Frazir
Re: tj's â?? white elephants â??.,
tj Frazir
Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Uncle Al
Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?,
countableinfinity
Re: Time dilation #2,
Strich 9
Re: In how many years all ice on earth will melt?,
BradGuth
Why is the unit of length defined in terms of the speed of light?,
countableinfinity
Re: Patagonian caterpillar flu.,
Jacko
Re: "Speed" of Gravity,
Y.y.Porat
Saturn's icy/spongy moon Hyperion, is a former Comet?,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
Quantum Gravity 321.6: Probable Causation/Influence Algebra Versus Complex Algebra,
OsherD
LHC creates a destructive black hole after all -- Breaking news,
PD
Energy from viscosity in SPH,
Jack DD
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?",
Einsteinhoax
4th Type of Chemical Bond,
Sam Wormley
Re: Does light has mass?(YES) Plus Wave and particle can be Equivalent,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Laughter Machine Hanson Banned,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Quantum Gravity 321.5: A Real Analog of Born's Probability Equation that Yields Both Positive and Negative Probable Influence/Causation,
OsherD
Help Bob in deciding Zoom %,
AI
U(1):SU(2):SU(3):? :: 1D:2D:3D:4D harmonic oscillator?,
andy everett
Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?,
andy everett
UNEXPECTED SOLAR ACTIVITY,
Sam Wormley
Re: Slot Car the Freeways. Fuel Is Already Spiraling 1 cent/,
tj Frazir
it will be convenient to also distinguish matter into absolute and relative.,
Michael Helland
Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?,
Marris Horan
Why Restrict Outcomes?,
Damaeus
How do I get funding for my research?,
Michael Helland
Message not available
Re: The existence of immortal souls is confirmed by physical and m...,
tj Frazir
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics",
Einsteinhoax
UV light question,
beerismygas
The physics of moving proteins around the body.,
john030409
Re: Can earth escape World War III,
tj Frazir
From green leaves to bird brains, biological systems may exploit quantum phenomena,
Sam Wormley
Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
mpc755
Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment,
Problem #2
The Object+Subject Approach,
Michael Helland
Quantm Gravity 321.4: Size-Breaking (SIB) Rather than Symmetry-Breaking (SB) in Probable Causation/Influence (PI),
OsherD
Re: Faraday “magnetic” induction without a magnetic field…,
Benj
Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?,
andy everett
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Re: Can earth escape World War III rich nuke poor,
tj Frazir
Re: bad entry in Wikipedia where they fail to well-define a list,
Dr Science
3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?,
andy everett
Morpheal's Commentary - April 24th, 2009 - Education Needs Change, South Africa, Star Trek - The Final Episode on Imagination's Old Frontier ?, Taxation Reforms Need to Promote Basic Values, Obama's First 100 Days, Social and Cultural Recession,
Morpheal
Quantum Gravity 321.3: Austria and Spain Find a New Way of Generating the PI (Probable Causation/Influence) Set,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 321.2: Australia on Tachyon Infinite Velocity "Leaving the Universe" and Probable Causation/Influence (PI),
OsherD
The Atheist Apocalypse,
michelnostradamus9@xxxxxxxxx
have to cut the [CO2] emissions even more than we thought,
Sam Wormley
?:?:SU(2) :: S^1,S^2,S^3 Group associated with quantum particle on S^n?,
andy everett
Re: Coffee will do that to you, Sanny.,
tj Frazir
Re: CBS Claims Cold Fusion Is Real,
tj Frazir
Re: New ancient Egypt temples discovered in Sinai,
tj Frazir
Evolutionary feedback of neo-nicotine pesticides and bees,
Jacko
Re: My first Research,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Memory test,
Androcles
Re: Why electron not move in Fixed Orbit?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: 'Space blob' baffles astronomers,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The existence of immortal souls is confirmed by physical and medical evidence, by photographs, and even by an experiment (JP),
Uncle Al
Re: Life is a party, â?? God â?? ( a.k.a. evolution ) is the bouncer.,
tj Frazir
- You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Re: You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one.,
tj Frazir
- I don't care if you have money or not, tj, the result is the same.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Keep feeding the poors.,
Sanny
- Replace tj Frazir with a penniless bum posting fantasies ...,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Re: Replace tj Frazir with a penniless bum posting fantasies ...,
Sanny
- Re: Replace tj Frazir with a trader posting leads,
tj Frazir
- tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
tj Frazir
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
tj Frazir
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
Sanny
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
tj Frazir
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
tj Frazir
- Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money.,
Roy L
- Re: Keep feeding the poors.,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 321.1: Australia, USA, Probable Causation/Influence and Tachions, Axions,
OsherD
Re: Weight at the speed of light X c stupid,
tj Frazir
Re: Inside Science News Briefs,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Ultrashort, ultraintense laser pulses undergo competing interactions,
Sam Wormley
Re: What have you discovered ?,
tj Frazir
Re: Miro sound waves cooking dangers,
tj Frazir
Tevatron New Phenomena & Higgs Working Group,
Sam Wormley
Constraining the Higgs mass,
Sam Wormley
Re: The nuclear atom is illogical. H is conductor,
tj Frazir
Re: For a really good laugh...,
tj Frazir
Unified Field; Relative Distance,
bkh99
Sigmoids. A new example of ZPE COSMIC ELECTRIC GENERATION between pairing black holes?,
LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
Quantum Gravity 321.0: Texas A&M University USA Replaces GR by Minkowski Flat Space Non-Black-Hole Physics with Axions and Tachyons as Dark Matter,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 320.92: The Creation of Mass-Energy-Strings-Springs From Phase-Changing Riccati Differential Equation,
OsherD
Re: What have you discovered?doble,
tj Frazir
Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries.,
tj Frazir
Re: Electromagnetic field power question....,
John Polasek
Re: Mirowave Cooking Dangers,
tj Frazir
Re: Mirowave lightning dangers from storms,
tj Frazir
Obesity and a rational model,
Jacko
johnreed take 26 Part-4, Modified April 21, 2009,
johnlawrencereedjr
Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?,
Peter
- Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?,
Androcles
- Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?,
Igor
- Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?,
Sanny
Fifth power distribution maps Particle mass,
rom126
Dorigo: The Subtle Art of Bump-Hunting,
PD
Re: What have you discovered?,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 320.91: How To Obtain Dtt(y) = k(t)y From Riccati Differential Equations,
OsherD
Re: 100 trillion Bactarias and virus die at 170 feet,
tj Frazir
Re: Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't ...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Which Banquet frozen dinners do you prefer ?,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?,
Trespasser
Re: 100 trillion Bacterial living on our body. Just like we live on...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro...,
mpc755
U(1):?:SU(3):: 1D:2D:3D harmonic oscillator.,
andy everett
Re: Wave on string, c^2 = T/rho. Assume T proportional to rho ==> c^2 = conatant.,
andy everett
Re: Cold Fusion is Back,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
If Gisse wasn't proud of his FaceBook entry, he'd delete it, no ?,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Physical Cycles Forecast a Stock Market Crash,
Steve Puetz
telepatic and humen brain,
kwantummechanica
Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't interact with vacuum?,
dudajar
Quantum Gravity 320.7: South Korea Uses the Probable Causation/Influence Set to Find Chaplygin Gas Equations for Matter-Dominated and Dark-Energy Dominated Eras of Universe,
OsherD
Re: Gravity is due to spacetime,
tj Frazir
Meteor impact vs atomic bombing,
mike3
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 April 2009 http://focus.aps.org/,
Sam Wormley
Re: I can stop without slowing down,
Foxtrot Hotel
electrical confinement,
muser
Re: Revolution Rich take over R&R,
tj Frazir
ECONOMY: The Big Takeover,
tj Frazir
Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Why are green CFLs filtered?,
SherLok Merfy
Quantum Gravity 320.6: U.K. and Sweden Explore Cosmological Constant in a Probabilistic Bound Framework,
OsherD
Re: Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof,
Sam Wormley
Variational Calculus and a falling water droplet,
charlescalculus_robertobaggio
Morpheal's Comment - On Teleology - The Future of the Species,
Morpheal
light speed is slow,
calvin
Re: Nothingness and the Absolute Beginning of the universe,
tj Frazir
Does gravity vary with each season?,
Yousuf Khan
Mosquito Radar,
Eugene
Physics Disproves Government 9/11 LIES,
Freedom Fighter
plasma conductivity,
Bernhard Kuemel
solar core solid?,
Bernhard Kuemel
Posted in alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.obama; was Re: Google grading rules and puppet socks,
Ms. 2
Alfvén waves may heat the Sun's corona,
Sam Wormley
Wave Properties of Buckyballs from Experiment,
Sam Wormley
what is Quantum Mechanics ?,
Nimo
Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?,
dudajar
Quantum Gravity 320.5: PI Information Relates to Quantum Logic "Yes-No" Experiments,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 320.4: "Exponential-Permutation-Combination Information",
OsherD
Cloaked eye still sees,
Sam Wormley
Re: more idiocy from henry,
. p . jm
HUBBLE WITNESSES FLARING IN JET FROM BLACK HOLE,
Sam Wormley
Myths in physics,
Michael Helland
Re: How is Gravity "acting at distance"???,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material.,
Hongyi Zhao
Speed of EM waves constant in all circumstances?,
Positron
Quantum Gravity 320.3: U.K. Finds That Additive and Multiplicative Structures Find it Difficult to Coexist,
OsherD
Re: Take Hold Of My Strength,
Uncle Al
Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life,
tj Frazir
Re: Time dilation #2 backwards idiot,
tj Frazir
Re: super-quake in 3 months,
tj Frazir
Re: super-precise ionic thruster passed by solar sail,
tj Frazir
Re: It's Brad Guth's fault why we do not have Selene L1,
tj Frazir
Re: Is 2012 earth gets fried by gravity lense,
tj Frazir
Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1,
tj Frazir
Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Uncle Al
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Benj
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Androcles
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Benj
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Androcles
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Sam Wormley
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
RP
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
mpc755
- Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule,
Androcles
Why are clouds white?,
Dwib
Re: Tiny Black Hole Created By The Cern Large Hadron Collider,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Dynamic light scattering. Meaning of baseline subtracted normalized intensity correlation functio,
tripatthi
How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers,
Yousuf Khan
Quantum Gravity 320.2: cos(t)dy/dt vs tdy/dt in Riccati Differential Equation,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 320.1: "A Deeper Relationship Between...",
OsherD
A Deeper Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Bernoulli/Euler Numbers and Information,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 320.0: Chaplygin Gas Via Combined Gas Law Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riccati Differential Equation,
OsherD
BradGuth is Thee Easter Bunny.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Velocity and Kinetic Energy,
Tom
the way of physics to quantum physics,
kwantummechanica
What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?,
mpc755
NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT,
Sam Wormley
Titan may have a subterranean ocean of hydrocarbons,
Sam Wormley
Re: The â?? Joule II Sounding Rocket â??.,
tj Frazir
Re: The H space inflatable wing flys to the edge at mock 3,
tj Frazir
How to get a job in physics,
PD
Measuring Electric Field Strength?,
Trespasser
Solution manual to Linear Algebra and its Applications 3rd ed - D. Lay Solutions Manual,
hotsolution
New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
anandsr21
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Surfer
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Surfer
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales,
Surfer
New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 13, 2009,
PhDs . org
Re: GLOBAL WARMING - FEAR MONGERING,
tj Frazir
Re: Question about grading rules,
tj Frazir
Re: Is Time Universal (Repost),
Uncle Al
Re: Is Time Universal ***Continious / descrete***?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Super fluid Coupling,
eratosthenes
~~> KICK ASS <~~,
battonanoidusy
Quantum Gravity 319.91: Memory and Exponential Generating Functions,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 319.9: More Relationships Among PI Set, Euler Numbers, tan(x), sec(x),
OsherD
Re: Weight at the speed of light,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Universe mass and scale,
Joe Avery
Quantum Gravity 319.8: U.K. Finds Probable-Causation/Influence (PI) Indexed Algebra Key to Open Topological String Theory,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 319.7: The Remarkable Case of tan(x) + sec(x), The Bernoulli Numbers Bn, The Zeta Function, and The PI Set,
OsherD
What did Planck do?,
socratus
Quantum Gravity 319.6: More on Green's Function of 319.5,
OsherD
Re: The Ph.D. Thesis of NASA GISS Chief James E Hansen, a reappraisal, coming soon - was Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life,
Sam Wormley
Solution manual to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra,
hotsolution
Re: Scientists accurately measure the 'edge of space',
tj Frazir
JSH: A hundred years plus of error,
JSH
Re: Committee to re-elect Barack Obama,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
JSH: Why it's white collar welfare,
JSH
Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum,
Mike Jr
Re: Slot Car the Freeways. Fuel Is Already Spiraling 1 cent/day.,
tj Frazir
JSH: Physics relevance of Pell's Equation?,
JSH
Solution manual to Accounting 7e by Horngren Harrison,
hotsolution
potentiometers,
heidi
Quantum Gravity 319.5: Italian "Pseudo-Curvature" of 319.4 Via Green's Function or "Fundamental Solution",
OsherD
Re: George Hammond and copyright,
UncleEnglish
Did you catch this, Sam?,
Lofty Goat
re Hammond and copyright,
UncleEnglish
Re: SR is rigth - GR (with curved space time) -is wrong!,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
socratus
- Re: Why physicists never say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?,
Androcles
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
S T R I C H
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
PD
- Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?,
Sam Wormley
- Message not available
Re: NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex,
GDenke
MORPHEAL'S COMMENTARY - April 10 - Why Democracy Is Failing, Peaceful Protests Need Rules, Emotional Changes in Society, And Educators Fear Their Tests,
Morpheal
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
Re: free online music,
Androcles
Quantum Gravity 319.4: Italy Indicates That Bose-Einstein Condensates Can Simulate Non-Existent Curvature of Spacetime,
OsherD
Re: A minor real-world exercise for those who fashion themselves to...,
tj Frazir
Re: 911 article,
tj Frazir
Re: The Rabbit blasted stone to get stone stupid.,
tj Frazir
Re: The Rabbit Hole Keeps Getting Deeper,
tj Frazir
Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study,
tj Frazir
From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 15),
Sam Wormley
Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory,
mpc755
A new look ast some old data/ideas,
ESKI
Only humans can pick out galaxies,
PD
TJ Frazir Exposed!,
Mitchell Jones
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
Androcles
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
Uncle Al
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
BURT
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
hanson
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight,
tj Frazir
- Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!,
tj Frazir
A Useful Website for Physics Researchers - MyNetResearch.com,
Arin280
Solution manual to Computer Networks, 4th Ed., by Andrew S. Tanenbaum,
hotsolution
Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?,
dudajar
Quantum Gravity 319.3: USA, U.K., Japan, Canada Find How Universe Became Non-Gaussian,
OsherD
Re: Studing Black holes.,
Jim Black
Ask for help, about the Krieger’s theorem,
MogeiWang
Problem with PIL/Tkinter Program Example,
W. eWatson
Re: The U.S. won't be able to service its debt without hyperInfla...,
tj Frazir
Re: Nano-Thermite in WTC Dust,
tj Frazir
Re: Nano-Thermite in WTC Dust from blasting stone stupid,
tj Frazir
Re: Can Strong Magnets Effect your health?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The nuclear atom is illogical.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The Aether Explains the Double-Slit and the Photoelectric Expe...,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
What does ‘ Yahoo’ mean ?,
socratus
Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum,
franklinhu
If time can go backwart ?,
eugeniusz
JSH: And they will wait to see,
JSH
Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ...,
W. eWatson
My computer is my car, my plane, my boat, it's how I get around.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !,
warmbeach
Superconductors may boost wind power,
Sam Wormley
A YOUNG PULSAR SHOWS ITS HAND IN CHANDRA PICTURE,
Sam Wormley
The Galilean Limit of EM (and Gauge Theory) Done Right (or: Correcting Levy-Leblond's Mistake),
Rock Brentwood
Uncle Al, How's Win98 working out for you ? got the swing of it yet ?,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Simply Best gomuzik.com,
sam
Re: any climate change NOT caused by mankind,
Androcles
Re: Why all ciggerates are dangerous to health?,
Uncle Al
Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment,
dudajar
Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?,
Sam Wormley
Computer Program Self-Discovers Laws of Physics,
Yousuf Khan
What can affect the ionization energy,
franklinhu
Evidence?,
J-Bird
Lay back and watch the physical laws get cranked out?,
Sam Wormley
Ocean’s ice cap is smaller than long-term average and thinnest yet as melt season begins,
Sam Wormley
Re: All About me,
tj Frazir
Re: A pic of the river rock in seattle,
tj Frazir
Earthquake Prediction by Radon Analysis?,
mrdarrett
Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you mo...,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 319.2: U.K., USA, Canada, Japan Break Through on Non-Gaussianity Via 3-Point Correlation Functions and Comparison with 3-Set Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Correlation,
OsherD
New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 06, 2009,
PhDs . org
Does Light Quanta have mass?,
socratus
MAKIUKIM BASNAMIUM: DEDALASTOLOSTOPODIOSTAOSOSVIBASTUMI,
NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes,
eratosthenes
Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice Shelf Area, Antarctica: 1940–2005,
Sam Wormley
I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the following.,
qhi0hxqlyfr
I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the follow.,
qhi0hxqlyfr
Quantum Gravity 319.1: India Interprets Cosmological Constant as a Repulsive Force and Interprets this Force and Rest Mass as Topological,
OsherD
Re: RELATIVITY/EVOLUTION/MATHEMATICS IS WRONG!,
Lofty Goat
Re: There is no before the beginning,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: Barack Obama says he wants to eliminate all baryonic matter!,
tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Exercises in temporal logic,
dudajar
JSH: Math society realities,
JSH
Quantum Gravity 319.0: Cosmological Constant as the (Modified) GR Analog of Schrodinger Equation (Born's) Probability,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 318.92: Why To Use A - B = AB ' Even Though Wikipedia Doesn't Recommend It, and Relationship to P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = 1 - P(B-->A),
OsherD
Re: Conic sections and D number,
Harris Moran
DEDANOE is searching for INFORMATIC 3DVectoring Matrix Coworker,
NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
Re: The Big Bang is the Exploding Lump Theory,
Uncle Al
A new concept of flying. How can that be?,
Yuriy
New conic section rational parameterization,
JSH
Happy Easter ! Wester ! 7 Days,
Garry Denke
PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 3 April 2009 http://focus.aps.org,
Sam Wormley
Basic physics without words.,
socratus
Where can I get the answer?,
mike3
Where does the mass of the particle come from?,
socratus
WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
- Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Uncle Al
- Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
- Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC,
Sam Wormley
johnreed take 26 Part-4 on the Principle of Equivalence: Saturday, 28 March, 2009 - Summary,
johnlawrencereedjr
NOBEL SPICE DONOT HOLDY QUAKY WETNT VOLUME,
NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms,
franklinhu
causality?,
marcofuics
NASA rescinds John Mather Nobel Discovery,
a_guest
torus,
john030409
Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr.,
studentdoctoronline@xxxxxxxxx
event horizonty asaturnsust virgoegg iddle,
NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
Avery 6fox1 x fixY5 windows win-win commby anatorica: mos.dos.los.nto.ost V1.00.AD&DB,
NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
Re: The continuum hypothesis,
Uncle Al
Quantum Gravity 318.91: P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = 1 - P(B --> A),
OsherD
->>> NURSING JOBS <<<-,
maurenehalifaxdudley
Friction causes increase in speed?,
jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
Quantum Gravity 318.9: Generalization of Sum of Causations Between 1 and 2 to Sum Between n - 1 and n,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 318.8: P(A1-->A2) + P(A2-->A3) + ... + P(An-->An+1) Versus P ' of the same quantities,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 318.7: Time Reversal As "Almost" Reversal of P(A-->B) to P(B-->A),
OsherD
Re: The U.S. won't be able to service its debt without hyperInflation.,
tj Frazir
Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 318.6: Spain and Brazil's Physics Relationship and Also Politics,
OsherD
Science Fraud Hall of Shame,
a_guest
Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
Roy L
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
- Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street.,
tj Frazir
Quantum Gravity 318.5: Spain Leads the Way in Reversing Directionality in Physics,
OsherD
Re: Define mass,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Going back to the Einstein’s question.,
socratus
Quantum Gravity 318.4: Also P(A-->B) + P(B--->A) > = 1,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 318.3: The "2-Theorem" Regarding P(A-->B) + P(B-->A) and P ' (A-->B) + P ' (B-->A),
OsherD
QG 318.2: PI Searches for What Changes Probabilities Through Time, While GR and BI (Born-Infeld) Just Add Terms To Equations,
OsherD
Quantum Gravity 318.1: More On PI Beyond Born-Infeld Theory,
OsherD
John Enderby describes the life of the "strangest man": Paul Dirac,
Sam Wormley
Quantum Gravity 318.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Beyond Born-Infeld Theory,
OsherD
Re: a layman's queston about quantum physics and interference,
russell kym horsell
Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron,
John Polasek
Re: #3 looking for anomalous iridium in Great Lakes for 12,900, ins...,
tj Frazir
Re: NOVA's "Last Extinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac...,
tj Frazir
Principles of Ultra Relativity,
T. Parker
Re: Dragons, remember your origin....,
Gad-Noe
Neutron Stars,
eratosthenes
Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC,
Tom Potter
Re: Does light have inertia?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: S.I.'s protoType kiloGram lost mass, where did it go ?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
Florian
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
mpc755
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Re: what is a Body?,
marcofuics
Re: Little's Theory of Elementary Waves,
Benj
Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?,
Heliyummm
Re: You don't pass a 5000 ton hover-ship,
tj Frazir
Re: You don't need her, Gisse.,
tj Frazir
- I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: You don't need her, Gisse.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You don't need her, Gisse.,
tj Frazir
- You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
Roy L
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
Roy L
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
Androcles
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can see this hovercraft 400 pas do 60,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't Miss Odysee tonight on tv,
tj Frazir
- Re: Discovery Of Black Swan 500,000 coins,
tj Frazir
- Re: You will see 1 billion in gold tonight hit the deck,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are.,
tj Frazir
- Trust is the bread and butter of both con men and saints.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
- Re: Trust is the bread and butter of both con men and saints.,
NoEinstein
- Sci.Physics is breadless.,
Jeffâ–²Relf
Re: Where are you going Gisse ?,
tj Frazir
Re: What mass isn't relativistic ?,
tj Frazir
LIGO detects first gravity waves,
Nature
Re: What is Gods Active Force called Time for 500,
tj Frazir
Re: What prevents protons and electrons from coming together?,
tj Frazir
