Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- From: dudajar@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
If something is interested, there are two more interpretations of QM
in which we try to understand QM fourdimensionally as in CPT
conserving field theories - 'transactional interpretation' and 'theory
of elementary waves'.
I believe here starts new large discussion about it:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.electromag/browse_thread/thread/749d5a06be67485f/eac28a1f73a81aab?lnk=raot#eac28a1f73a81aab
.
- References:
- Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- From: dudajar
- Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Next by Date: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Next by thread: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
