sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• New list of solution manuals, instructors . team
• A Systems Theoretical Formal Logic for Category Theory, C Pedro
• Quantum Gravity 321.7: Do Complex Variables "Code" For or "Represent" Probable Causation/Influence P ' (A-->B)?, OsherD
• Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Sanny
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Roy L
    • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Androcles
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Roy L
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Androcles
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Roy L
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Androcles
• A limit for carbon emissions: 1 trillion metric tons, Sam Wormley
• Re: true power of shaolin kung fu, Sam Wormley
• Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?, _
  • Re: Why might TJ send Roy a camera, on loan ?, tj Frazir
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • TJ is a very nice fellow, but he ain't no billionaire., _
      • Re: TJ is a very nice fellow, but he ain't no billionaire., Roy L
      • People with money tend to spend it., _
      • Re: People with money tend to spend it., Roy L
      • Frazier Yachts, John Fredriksen builds ships and yachts., _
      • John Fredriksen, Trader Joe's, Frazier Yachts, tj Frazir., _
      • Re: John Fredriksen, Trader Joe's, Frazier Yachts, tj Frazir., Roy L
  • Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?, tj Frazir
    • TJ is great, Sanny
      • Re: TJ is great, Roy L
  • Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?, tj Frazir
    • Re: Why won't TJ send Roy a camera, as a gift ?, Roy L
  • Re: Why send Roy a mountain, as a gift ?, tj Frazir
• Re: tj's â?? white elephants â??., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: tj's â?? white elephants â??., tj Frazir
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Uncle Al
  • Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether", Benj
• Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, countableinfinity
  • Re: Why was length defined in terms of the speed of light (c) and not vice versa?, Uncle Al
• Re: Time dilation #2, Strich 9
  • Re: Time dilation #2, Sam Wormley
• Re: In how many years all ice on earth will melt?, BradGuth
• Why is the unit of length defined in terms of the speed of light?, countableinfinity
  • Re: Why is the unit of length defined in terms of the speed of light?, Androcles
  • Re: Why is the unit of length defined in terms of the speed of light?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Why is the unit of length defined in terms of the speed of light?, Uncle Al
• Re: Patagonian caterpillar flu., Jacko
  • Re: Patagonian caterpillar flu., jmfbahciv
    • Re: Patagonian caterpillar flu., Jacko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Patagonian caterpillar flu., Uncle Al
• Re: "Speed" of Gravity, Y.y.Porat
• Saturn's icy/spongy moon Hyperion, is a former Comet?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 321.6: Probable Causation/Influence Algebra Versus Complex Algebra, OsherD
• LHC creates a destructive black hole after all -- Breaking news, PD
• Energy from viscosity in SPH, Jack DD
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?", Einsteinhoax
• 4th Type of Chemical Bond, Sam Wormley
  • Re: 4th Type of Chemical Bond, Jean-Christophe
    • Re: 4th Type of Chemical Bond, Cwatters
  • Re: 4th Type of Chemical Bond, Yousuf Khan
• Re: Does light has mass?(YES) Plus Wave and particle can be Equivalent, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Laughter Machine Hanson Banned, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Laughter Machine Hanson Banned, hanson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Laughter Machine Hanson Banned, tj Frazir
    • Re: Laughter Machine Hanson Banned, hanson
• Quantum Gravity 321.5: A Real Analog of Born's Probability Equation that Yields Both Positive and Negative Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 321.5: A Real Analog of Born's Probability Equation that Yields Both Positive and Negative Probable Influence/Causation, OsherD
• Help Bob in deciding Zoom %, AI
  • Re: Help Bob in deciding Zoom %, Sanny
    • Re: Help Bob in deciding Zoom %, tj Frazir
• U(1):SU(2):SU(3):? :: 1D:2D:3D:4D harmonic oscillator?, andy everett
  • Re: U(1):SU(2):SU(3):? :: 1D:2D:3D:4D harmonic oscillator?, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: U(1):SU(2):SU(3):? :: 1D:2D:3D:4D harmonic oscillator?, Igor
• Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?, andy everett
  • Re: Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?, john030409
    • Re: Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?, andy everett
      • Re: Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?, john030409
  • Re: Spacetime is the surface of a 5 dimensional ball?, Uncle Al
• UNEXPECTED SOLAR ACTIVITY, Sam Wormley
  • Re: UNEXPECTED SOLAR ACTIVITY, Uncle Al
    • Re: UNEXPECTED SOLAR ACTIVITY, Sam Wormley
      • Re: UNEXPECTED SOLAR ACTIVITY, jimp
• Re: Slot Car the Freeways. Fuel Is Already Spiraling 1 cent/, tj Frazir
• it will be convenient to also distinguish matter into absolute and relative., Michael Helland
  • Re: it will be convenient to also distinguish matter into absolute and relative., Eric Gisse
  • Re: it will be convenient to also distinguish matter into absolute and relative., Uncle Al
• Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Marris Horan
  • Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Androcles
    • Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Maris Horan
      • Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Androcles
      • Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Maris Horan
      • Re: Day F??*10^3 - The Sun hibernates - global food crisis?, Androcles
• Why Restrict Outcomes?, Damaeus
  • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Androcles
    • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Heliyummm
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Tom Potter
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Heliyummm
  • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Cwatters
  • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, OG
    • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Androcles
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Heliyummm
    • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Damaeus
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Heliyummm
      • Re: Why Restrict Outcomes?, Androcles
• How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
    • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Uncle Al
      • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Androcles
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, doug
    • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Uncle Al
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Eric Gisse
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
      • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, PD
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, Michael Helland
      • Re: How do I get funding for my research?, jjsajd
• Re: The existence of immortal souls is confirmed by physical and m..., tj Frazir
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Einsteinhoax
  • Re: "The Flaw in High Energy Physics", Uncle Al
• UV light question, beerismygas
  • Re: UV light question, Neil B.
• The physics of moving proteins around the body., john030409
  • Re: The physics of moving proteins around the body., Sanny
    • Re: The physics of moving proteins around the body., john030409
      • Re: The physics of moving proteins around the body., john030409
• Re: Can earth escape World War III, tj Frazir
  • Re: Can earth escape World War IIIinventory of planet, tj Frazir
    • Re: Can earth escape World War IIIinventory of planet, Sanny
      • Re: Can earth escape World War IIIinventory of planet, tj Frazir
      • Re: Can earth escape World War IIIinventory of planet, tj Frazir
      • Re: Can earth escape World War IIIinventory of planet, tj Frazir
• From green leaves to bird brains, biological systems may exploit quantum phenomena, Sam Wormley
  • Re: From green leaves to bird brains, biological systems may exploit quantum phenomena, Jean-Christophe
  • Re: From green leaves to bird brains, biological systems may exploit quantum phenomena, Neil B.
• Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
  • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
    • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Sue...
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, mpc755
  • Re: Problem with Einstein's Train Thought Experiment, Problem #2
• The Object+Subject Approach, Michael Helland
  • Re: The Object+Subject Approach, Androcles
• Quantm Gravity 321.4: Size-Breaking (SIB) Rather than Symmetry-Breaking (SB) in Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
  • Re: Quantm Gravity 321.4: Size-Breaking (SIB) Rather than Symmetry-Breaking (SB) in Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
• Re: Faraday “magnetic” induction without a magnetic field…, Benj
• Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett
  • Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, andy everett
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Re: Can earth escape World War III rich nuke poor, tj Frazir
  • Re: Can World War nuke pandemic, tj Frazir
• Re: bad entry in Wikipedia where they fail to well-define a list, Dr Science
• 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, andy everett
  • Re: 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, andy everett
    • Re: 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, andy everett
      • Re: 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, andy everett
      • Re: 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, john030409
      • Re: 3-D harmonic osscilator in S^3 , group still SU(3)?, andy everett
• Morpheal's Commentary - April 24th, 2009 - Education Needs Change, South Africa, Star Trek - The Final Episode on Imagination's Old Frontier ?, Taxation Reforms Need to Promote Basic Values, Obama's First 100 Days, Social and Cultural Recession, Morpheal
• Quantum Gravity 321.3: Austria and Spain Find a New Way of Generating the PI (Probable Causation/Influence) Set, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 321.2: Australia on Tachyon Infinite Velocity "Leaving the Universe" and Probable Causation/Influence (PI), OsherD
• The Atheist Apocalypse, michelnostradamus9@xxxxxxxxx
• have to cut the [CO2] emissions even more than we thought, Sam Wormley
  • Re: have to cut the [CO2] emissions even more than we thought, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: have to cut the [CO2] emissions even more than we thought, Benj
• ?:?:SU(2) :: S^1,S^2,S^3 Group associated with quantum particle on S^n?, andy everett
  • Re: ?:?:SU(2) :: S^1,S^2,S^3 Group associated with quantum particle on S^n?, andy everett
    • Re: ?:?:SU(2) :: S^1,S^2,S^3 Group associated with quantum particle on S^n?, andy everett
  • Re: ?:?:SU(2) :: S^1,S^2,S^3 Group associated with quantum particle onS^n?, Igor
• Re: Coffee will do that to you, Sanny., tj Frazir
• Re: CBS Claims Cold Fusion Is Real, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CBS Claims Cold Fusion Is Real, Uncle Al
    • Re: CBS Claims Cold Fusion Is Real, Tom
• Re: New ancient Egypt temples discovered in Sinai, tj Frazir
• Evolutionary feedback of neo-nicotine pesticides and bees, Jacko
  • Re: Evolutionary feedback of neo-nicotine pesticides and bees, Jacko
  • Re: Evolutionary feedback of neo-nicotine pesticides and bees, Uncle Al
    • Re: Evolutionary feedback of neo-nicotine pesticides and bees, Jacko
• Re: My first Research, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: My first Research, Sam Wormley
• Memory test, Androcles
  • Re: Memory test, Sanny
• Re: Why electron not move in Fixed Orbit?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why electron not move in Fixed Orbit?, tj Frazir
• Re: 'Space blob' baffles astronomers, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The existence of immortal souls is confirmed by physical and medical evidence, by photographs, and even by an experiment (JP), Uncle Al
  • Re: The existence of immortal souls is confirmed by physical and medical evidence, by photographs, and even by an experiment (JP), Benj
• Re: Life is a party, â?? God â?? ( a.k.a. evolution ) is the bouncer., tj Frazir
  • You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one., Jeffâ–²Relf
    • Re: You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one., tj Frazir
    • Re: You can't spare a dime, tj Frazir, not one., tj Frazir
      • I don't care if you have money or not, tj, the result is the same., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Keep feeding the poors., Sanny
      • Replace tj Frazir with a penniless bum posting fantasies ..., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: Replace tj Frazir with a penniless bum posting fantasies ..., Sanny
      • Re: Replace tj Frazir with a trader posting leads, tj Frazir
      • tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Sanny
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir would help his online friends, if he had the money., Roy L
      • Re: Keep feeding the poors., tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 321.1: Australia, USA, Probable Causation/Influence and Tachions, Axions, OsherD
• Re: Weight at the speed of light X c stupid, tj Frazir
• Re: Inside Science News Briefs, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Ultrashort, ultraintense laser pulses undergo competing interactions, Sam Wormley
• Re: What have you discovered ?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What have you discovered ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered ?, tj Frazir
• Re: Miro sound waves cooking dangers, tj Frazir
• Tevatron New Phenomena & Higgs Working Group, Sam Wormley
• Constraining the Higgs mass, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Constraining the Higgs mass, Uncle Al
    • Re: Constraining the Higgs mass, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Constraining the Higgs mass, Y.y.Porat
• Re: The nuclear atom is illogical. H is conductor, tj Frazir
• Re: For a really good laugh..., tj Frazir
• Unified Field; Relative Distance, bkh99
  • Re: Unified Field; Relative Distance, Uncle Al
• Sigmoids. A new example of ZPE COSMIC ELECTRIC GENERATION between pairing black holes?, LeoVuyk@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Sigmoids. A new example of ZPE COSMIC ELECTRIC GENERATION between pairing black holes?, john030409
• Quantum Gravity 321.0: Texas A&M University USA Replaces GR by Minkowski Flat Space Non-Black-Hole Physics with Axions and Tachyons as Dark Matter, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 320.92: The Creation of Mass-Energy-Strings-Springs From Phase-Changing Riccati Differential Equation, OsherD
• Re: What have you discovered?doble, tj Frazir
• Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., tj Frazir
  • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., tj Frazir
    • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., hanson
      • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., Sanny
      • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., tj Frazir
      • Re: Only 3 people told their discoveries., tj Frazir
• Re: Electromagnetic field power question...., John Polasek
• Re: Mirowave Cooking Dangers, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mirowave Cooking Dangers, tj Frazir
• Re: Mirowave lightning dangers from storms, tj Frazir
• Obesity and a rational model, Jacko
• johnreed take 26 Part-4, Modified April 21, 2009, johnlawrencereedjr
• Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, Peter
  • Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, Androcles
  • Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, Igor
    • Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, andy everett
  • Re: Do electrons, protons, and neutrons have ground states?, Sanny
• Fifth power distribution maps Particle mass, rom126
• Dorigo: The Subtle Art of Bump-Hunting, PD
• Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, Sanny
    • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
    • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
    • Re: What have you discovered?, Tom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What have you discovered?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 320.91: How To Obtain Dtt(y) = k(t)y From Riccati Differential Equations, OsherD
• Re: 100 trillion Bactarias and virus die at 170 feet, tj Frazir
• Re: Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't ..., Y.y.Porat
    • Re: Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Which Banquet frozen dinners do you prefer ?, Jeffâ–²Relf
  • Re: Which Banquet frozen dinners do you prefer ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Which Banquet frozen dinners do you prefer ?, tj Frazir
  • Re: Which Banquet frozen dinners do you prefer ?, tj Frazir
• Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
    • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, isw
    • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
  • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, jimp
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, jimp
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, Trespasser
      • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Spark Gap Electrodes?, John Polasek
• Re: 100 trillion Bacterial living on our body. Just like we live on..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going thro..., mpc755
• U(1):?:SU(3):: 1D:2D:3D harmonic oscillator., andy everett
  • Re: U(1):?:SU(3):: 1D:2D:3D harmonic oscillator., Igor
    • Re: U(1):?:SU(3):: 1D:2D:3D harmonic oscillator., andy everett
      • Re: U(1):?:SU(3):: 1D:2D:3D harmonic oscillator., Igor
• Re: Wave on string, c^2 = T/rho. Assume T proportional to rho ==> c^2 = conatant., andy everett
  • Re: Wave on string, c^2 = T/rho. Assume T proportional to rho ==> c^2 = conatant., Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Wave on string, c^2 = T/rho. Assume T proportional to rho ==> c^2 = conatant., andy everett
      • Re: Wave on string, c^2 = T/rho. Assume T proportional to rho ==> c^2 = conatant., Puppet_Sock
• Re: Cold Fusion is Back, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cold Fusion is Back, Benj
    • Re: Cold Fusion is Back, Androcles
  • Re: Cold Fusion is Back, Igor
• If Gisse wasn't proud of his FaceBook entry, he'd delete it, no ?, Jeffâ–²Relf
• Physical Cycles Forecast a Stock Market Crash, Steve Puetz
• telepatic and humen brain, kwantummechanica
• Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't interact with vacuum?, dudajar
• Quantum Gravity 320.7: South Korea Uses the Probable Causation/Influence Set to Find Chaplygin Gas Equations for Matter-Dominated and Dark-Energy Dominated Eras of Universe, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 320.7: South Korea Uses the Probable Causation/Influence Set to Find Chaplygin Gas Equations for Matter-Dominated and Dark-Energy Dominated Eras of Universe, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 320.7: South Korea Uses the Probable Causation/Influence Set to Find Chaplygin Gas Equations for Matter-Dominated and Dark-Energy Dominated Eras of Universe, habitoid
• Re: Gravity is due to spacetime, tj Frazir
• Meteor impact vs atomic bombing, mike3
  • Re: Meteor impact vs atomic bombing, Sanny
    • Re: Meteor impact vs atomic bombing, mike3
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 April 2009 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• Re: I can stop without slowing down, Foxtrot Hotel
• electrical confinement, muser
  • Re: electrical confinement, Uncle Al
    • Re: electrical confinement, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: electrical confinement, jimp
    • Re: electrical confinement, muser
      • Re: electrical confinement, Sam Wormley
      • Re: electrical confinement, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: electrical confinement, muser
    • Re: electrical confinement, tj Frazir
  • Re: electrical confinement, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Revolution Rich take over R&R, tj Frazir
• ECONOMY: The Big Takeover, tj Frazir
• Re: Does gravity do work on the freely falling body?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why are green CFLs filtered?, SherLok Merfy
  • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, JimboCat
  • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Benj
      • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Androcles
      • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Benj
      • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Androcles
    • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 320.6: U.K. and Sweden Explore Cosmological Constant in a Probabilistic Bound Framework, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 320.6: U.K. and Sweden Explore Cosmological Constant in a Probabilistic Bound Framework, OsherD
• Re: Finite Relativism & Special Relativity Disproof, Sam Wormley
• Variational Calculus and a falling water droplet, charlescalculus_robertobaggio
  • Re: Variational Calculus and a falling water droplet, Androcles
  • Re: Variational Calculus and a falling water droplet, Jim Black
• Morpheal's Comment - On Teleology - The Future of the Species, Morpheal
• light speed is slow, calvin
  • Re: light speed is slow, Sam Wormley
    • Re: light speed is slow, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: light speed is slow, Sam Wormley
      • Re: light speed is slow, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: light speed is slow, Sam Wormley
      • Re: light speed is slow, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nothingness and the Absolute Beginning of the universe, tj Frazir
• Does gravity vary with each season?, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Does gravity vary with each season?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Does gravity vary with each season?, Y.y.Porat
  • Re: Does gravity vary with each season?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does Gravity Vary with Each Season?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Mosquito Radar, Eugene
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, Androcles
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, hanson
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, jimp
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Mosquito Radar, YKhan
      • Re: Mosquito Radar, jimp
      • Re: Mosquito Radar, Benj
      • Re: Mosquito Radar, jimp
  • Re: Mosquito Radar, Uncle Al
    • Re: Mosquito Radar, jmfbahciv
• Physics Disproves Government 9/11 LIES, Freedom Fighter
• plasma conductivity, Bernhard Kuemel
  • Re: plasma conductivity, Androcles
    • Re: plasma conductivity, Bernhard Kuemel
      • Re: plasma conductivity, Androcles
  • Re: plasma conductivity, Uncle Al
    • Re: plasma conductivity, jimp
• solar core solid?, Bernhard Kuemel
  • Re: solar core solid?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: solar core solid?, Bernhard Kuemel
      • Re: solar core solid?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: solar core solid?, Bernhard Kuemel
      • Re: solar core solid?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: solar core solid?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: solar core solid?, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: solar core solid?, Uncle Al
• Posted in alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.obama; was Re: Google grading rules and puppet socks, Ms. 2
  • Re: Posted in alt.conspiracy,alt.politics.obama; was Re: Google grading rules and puppet socks, Jacko
• Alfvén waves may heat the Sun's corona, Sam Wormley
• Wave Properties of Buckyballs from Experiment, Sam Wormley
• what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Nimo
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Androcles
    • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Nimo
      • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Androcles
      • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Jacko
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, Uncle Al
    • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: what is Quantum Mechanics ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, dudajar
• Quantum Gravity 320.5: PI Information Relates to Quantum Logic "Yes-No" Experiments, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 320.4: "Exponential-Permutation-Combination Information", OsherD
• Cloaked eye still sees, Sam Wormley
• Re: more idiocy from henry, . p . jm
• HUBBLE WITNESSES FLARING IN JET FROM BLACK HOLE, Sam Wormley
  • Re: HUBBLE WITNESSES FLARING IN JET FROM BLACK HOLE, john030409
    • Re: HUBBLE WITNESSES FLARING IN JET FROM BLACK HOLE, Sam Wormley
• Myths in physics, Michael Helland
  • Re: Myths in physics, Androcles
    • Re: Myths in physics, Michael Helland
      • Re: Myths in physics, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Myths in physics, Michael Helland
    • Re: Myths in physics, Androcles
• Re: How is Gravity "acting at distance"???, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., Hongyi Zhao
  • Re: The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., JimboCat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., Hongyi Zhao
    • Re: The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., Androcles
    • Re: The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., habitoid
    • Re: The conditions for becoming UV-transparent material., kenp
• Speed of EM waves constant in all circumstances?, Positron
  • Re: Speed of EM waves constant in all circumstances?, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: Speed of EM waves constant in all circumstances?, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Speed of EM waves constant in all circumstances?, Positron
• Quantum Gravity 320.3: U.K. Finds That Additive and Multiplicative Structures Find it Difficult to Coexist, OsherD
• Re: Take Hold Of My Strength, Uncle Al
  • Re: Take Hold Of My Strength, habitoid
• Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
  • Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
  • Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
  • Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
    • Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, tj Frazir
    • Re: mesosphere flying infateable wing, tj Frazir
• Re: Time dilation #2 backwards idiot, tj Frazir
• Re: super-quake in 3 months, tj Frazir
• Re: super-precise ionic thruster passed by solar sail, tj Frazir
• Re: It's Brad Guth's fault why we do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
  • Re: It's Brad Guth's fault why we do not have Selene L1, BradGuth
    • Re: It's Brad Guth's fault why we do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
• Re: Is 2012 earth gets fried by gravity lense, tj Frazir
  • Re: Is 2012 earth gets fried by gravity lense, Cwatters
    • Re: Is 2012 earth gets fried by gravity lense, Androcles
    • Re: Is 2012 earth gets fried by gravity lense, tj Frazir
• Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
  • Sadly, TJ Frazir blames one person for what evolution has done to us., Jeffâ–²Relf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
    • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, BradGuth
      • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is this why we still do not have Selene L1, tj Frazir
• Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, alien8er
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Uncle Al
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Uncle Al
      • Re: Vote for wavelength bigger then hole stupid., tj Frazir
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Uncle Al
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Uncle Al
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Uncle Al
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going throug..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going throug..., tj Frazir
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
  • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Benj
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, RP
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, mpc755
      • Re: Vote for the generally accepted what is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule, Androcles
• Why are clouds white?, Dwib
  • Re: Why are clouds white?, chuck
  • Re: Why are clouds white?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Why are clouds white?, PD
  • Re: Why are clouds white?, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why are clouds white?, Androcles
• Re: Tiny Black Hole Created By The Cern Large Hadron Collider, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Tiny Black Hole Created By The Cern Large Hadron Collider, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Tiny Black Hole Created By The Cern Large Hadron Collider, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Dynamic light scattering. Meaning of baseline subtracted normalized intensity correlation functio, tripatthi
  • Re: Dynamic light scattering. Meaning of baseline subtracted normalized intensity correlation functio, Sanny
• How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers, Yousuf Khan
  • Re: How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers, Sanny
    • Re: How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers, jimp
    • Re: How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers, YKhan
  • Re: How to redirect lightening bolts with lasers, JimboCat
• Quantum Gravity 320.2: cos(t)dy/dt vs tdy/dt in Riccati Differential Equation, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 320.1: "A Deeper Relationship Between...", OsherD
• A Deeper Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Bernoulli/Euler Numbers and Information, OsherD
  • Re: A Deeper Relationship Between Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Bernoulli/Euler Numbers and Information, chuck
• Quantum Gravity 320.0: Chaplygin Gas Via Combined Gas Law Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) and Riccati Differential Equation, OsherD
• BradGuth is Thee Easter Bunny., Jeffâ–²Relf
  • Brad Guth is The DARPA Easter Bunny., hanson
• Velocity and Kinetic Energy, Tom
  • Re: Velocity and Kinetic Energy, Androcles
  • Re: Velocity and Kinetic Energy, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Velocity and Kinetic Energy, PD
  • Re: Velocity and Kinetic Energy, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Velocity and Kinetic Energy, Androcles
• the way of physics to quantum physics, kwantummechanica
• What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, mpc755
  • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, Benj
    • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, mpc755
    • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, Androcles
      • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, mpc755
  • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, Con Worm Nibbler
  • Re: What is physically going through both slits in the Double Slit Experiment when the particle is a carbon-60 molecule?, mpc755
• NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, Sam Wormley
  • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, tj Frazir
    • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, tj Frazir
      • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, Benj
    • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, hanson
      • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, tj Frazir
      • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, tj Frazir
  • Re: NORTH KOREAN ROCKET FLEW FURTHER THAN EARLIER THOUGHT, tj Frazir
• Titan may have a subterranean ocean of hydrocarbons, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Titan may have a subterranean ocean of hydrocarbons, tj Frazir
• Re: The â?? Joule II Sounding Rocket â??., tj Frazir
• Re: The H space inflatable wing flys to the edge at mock 3, tj Frazir
• How to get a job in physics, PD
  • Re: How to get a job in physics, tj Frazir
• Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Trespasser
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Trespasser
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Benj
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Androcles
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, jimp
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Androcles
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Eric Gisse
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Trespasser
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Benj
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Androcles
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, jimp
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Trespasser
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Androcles
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Trespasser
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Cwatters
  • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Lester Welch
    • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Benj
      • Re: Measuring Electric Field Strength?, Androcles
• Solution manual to Linear Algebra and its Applications 3rd ed - D. Lay Solutions Manual, hotsolution
• New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
  • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
    • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, anandsr21
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Surfer
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Surfer
      • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
  • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Surfer
    • Re: New mond law: An empirical Gravity law up to galactic scales, Eric Gisse
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 13, 2009, PhDs . org
• Re: GLOBAL WARMING - FEAR MONGERING, tj Frazir
• Re: Question about grading rules, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about grading rules, tj Frazir
• Re: Is Time Universal (Repost), Uncle Al
• Re: Is Time Universal ***Continious / descrete***?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Is Time Universal ***Continious / descrete***?, Heliyummm
• Super fluid Coupling, eratosthenes
• ~~> KICK ASS <~~, battonanoidusy
• Quantum Gravity 319.91: Memory and Exponential Generating Functions, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 319.9: More Relationships Among PI Set, Euler Numbers, tan(x), sec(x), OsherD
• Re: Weight at the speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Weight at the speed of light, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Weight at the speed of light, Sam Wormley
• Universe mass and scale, Joe Avery
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, Androcles
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, Uncle Al
    • Re: Universe mass and scale, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, Mahipal
    • Re: Universe mass and scale, hanson
      • Re: Universe mass and scale, Mahipal
      • Re: Universe mass and scale, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, tj Frazir
  • Re: Universe mass and scale, Joe Avery
• Quantum Gravity 319.8: U.K. Finds Probable-Causation/Influence (PI) Indexed Algebra Key to Open Topological String Theory, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 319.7: The Remarkable Case of tan(x) + sec(x), The Bernoulli Numbers Bn, The Zeta Function, and The PI Set, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 319.7: The Remarkable Case of tan(x) + sec(x), The Bernoulli Numbers Bn, The Zeta Function, and The PI Set, OsherD
• What did Planck do?, socratus
  • Re: What did Planck do?, Androcles
  • Re: What did Planck do?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What did Planck do?, hanson
  • Re: What did Planck do?, Uncle Al
    • Re: What did Planck do?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What did Planck do?, BradGuth
    • Re: What did Planck do?, Heliyummm
• Quantum Gravity 319.6: More on Green's Function of 319.5, OsherD
• Re: The Ph.D. Thesis of NASA GISS Chief James E Hansen, a reappraisal, coming soon - was Re: Carl Sagan was a clandestine marijuana junkie his whole life, Sam Wormley
• Solution manual to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra, hotsolution
• Re: Scientists accurately measure the 'edge of space', tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Scientists accurately measure the 'edge of space', G=EMC^2 Glazier
• JSH: A hundred years plus of error, JSH
  • Re: JSH: A hundred years plus of error, hhc314
  • Re: JSH: A hundred years plus of error, Eric Gisse
  • Re: JSH A hundred years plus of error, Con Worm Nibbler
• Re: Committee to re-elect Barack Obama, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• JSH: Why it's white collar welfare, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Why it's white collar welfare, JSH
  • Re: Why it's white collar welfare, chuck
• Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Mike Jr
  • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Uncle Al
    • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Mike Jr
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Uncle Al
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Mike Jr
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Uncle Al
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Mike Jr
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Request for data on solar neutrino flux during the current solar minimum, Mike Jr
• Re: Slot Car the Freeways. Fuel Is Already Spiraling 1 cent/day., tj Frazir
• JSH: Physics relevance of Pell's Equation?, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Physics relevance of Pell's Equation?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Physics relevance of Pell's Equation?, chuck
• Solution manual to Accounting 7e by Horngren Harrison, hotsolution
• potentiometers, heidi
  • Re: potentiometers, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: potentiometers, Androcles
  • Re: potentiometers, Cwatters
  • Re: potentiometers, isw
• Quantum Gravity 319.5: Italian "Pseudo-Curvature" of 319.4 Via Green's Function or "Fundamental Solution", OsherD
• Re: George Hammond and copyright, UncleEnglish
• Did you catch this, Sam?, Lofty Goat
  • Re: Did you catch this, Sam?, alien8er
• re Hammond and copyright, UncleEnglish
• Re: SR is rigth - GR (with curved space time) -is wrong!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: SR is rigth - GR (with curved space time) -is wrong!, Y.y.Porat
    • Re: SR is rigth - GR (with curved space time) -is wrong!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, socratus
  • Re: Why physicists never say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, Androcles
  • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
    • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, socratus
  • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, S T R I C H
    • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
    • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Y.y.Porat
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ?potential mass/energy E=Mc^2? ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Why physicists never say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Why physicists never say: 'potential mass/energy E=Mc^2' ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, Strich-Reply-To-Idiots
      • Re: Why physicists never say: ‘potential mass/energy E=Mc^2’ ?, PD
• Re: NoSex SusSex EsSex WesSex, GDenke
• MORPHEAL'S COMMENTARY - April 10 - Why Democracy Is Failing, Peaceful Protests Need Rules, Emotional Changes in Society, And Educators Fear Their Tests, Morpheal
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Re: free online music, Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 319.4: Italy Indicates That Bose-Einstein Condensates Can Simulate Non-Existent Curvature of Spacetime, OsherD
• Re: A minor real-world exercise for those who fashion themselves to..., tj Frazir
• Re: 911 article, tj Frazir
  • Re: 911 article, jmorriss
• Re: The Rabbit blasted stone to get stone stupid., tj Frazir
• Re: The Rabbit Hole Keeps Getting Deeper, tj Frazir
• Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Antarctic ice close to melting tipping point-study, tj Frazir
• From: physicsworld.com newswire (Week 15), Sam Wormley
• Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
  • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, hhc314
    • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, Benj
    • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
    • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
  • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
  • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, Uncle Al
    • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
      • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, Uncle Al
      • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
      • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, mpc755
      • Re: Aether Displacement is the Grand Unification Theory, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• A new look ast some old data/ideas, ESKI
  • Re: A new look ast some old data/ideas, Uncle Al
  • Re: A new look ast some old data/ideas, Benj
• Only humans can pick out galaxies, PD
  • Re: Only humans can pick out galaxies, mike3
    • Re: Only humans can pick out galaxies, PD
  • Re: Only humans can pick out galaxies, Uncle Al
  • Re: Only humans can pick out galaxies, alien8er
    • Re: Only humans can pick out galaxies, PD
• TJ Frazir Exposed!, Mitchell Jones
  • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, Androcles
  • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, Uncle Al
    • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, BURT
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, hanson
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed! 3 inch to moonlight, tj Frazir
      • Re: TJ Frazir Exposed!, tj Frazir
• A Useful Website for Physics Researchers - MyNetResearch.com, Arin280
• Solution manual to Computer Networks, 4th Ed., by Andrew S. Tanenbaum, hotsolution
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Solution manual to Computer Networks, 4th Ed., by Andrew S. Tanenbaum, hotsolution
• Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 319.3: USA, U.K., Japan, Canada Find How Universe Became Non-Gaussian, OsherD
• Re: Studing Black holes., Jim Black
  • Re: Studing Black holes., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Ask for help, about the Krieger’s theorem, MogeiWang
  • Re: Ask for help, about the Krieger’s theorem, Helmut Wabnig
• Problem with PIL/Tkinter Program Example, W. eWatson
  • Re: Problem with PIL/Tkinter Program Example, W. eWatson
• Re: The U.S. won't be able to service its debt without hyperInfla..., tj Frazir
• Re: Nano-Thermite in WTC Dust, tj Frazir
• Re: Nano-Thermite in WTC Dust from blasting stone stupid, tj Frazir
• Re: Can Strong Magnets Effect your health?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The nuclear atom is illogical., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The nuclear atom is illogical., tj Frazir
  • Re: The nuclear atom is illogical., tj Frazir
• Re: The Aether Explains the Double-Slit and the Photoelectric Expe..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Aether Explains the Double-Slit and the Photoelectric Expe..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: The Aether Explains the Double-Slit and the Photoelectric Expe..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What does ‘ Yahoo’ mean ?, socratus
  • Re: What does ‘ Yahoo’ mean ?, socratus
• Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, John Polasek
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Uncle Al
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, PD
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, PD
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Cwatters
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Jim Black
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Cwatters
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, PD
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Jim Black
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Jim Black
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, Jim Black
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
      • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, John Polasek
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
    • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum, franklinhu
  • Re: Experiments do not confirm conservation of angular momentum-, JEMebius
• If time can go backwart ?, eugeniusz
  • Re: If time can go backwart ?, eugeniusz
  • Re: If time can go backwart ?, Uncle Al
    • Re: If time can go backwart ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: If time can go backwart ?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: If time can go backwart ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: If time can go backwart ?, Y.y.Porat
• JSH: And they will wait to see, JSH
  • Re: JSH: And they will wait to see, Eric Gisse
  • Re: JSH: And they will wait to see, kenp
    • Re: JSH: And they will wait to see, JSH
  • Re: JSH: And they will wait to see, Uncle Al
• Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., W. eWatson
  • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., W. eWatson
      • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., W. eWatson
  • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., PD
    • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., W. eWatson
  • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., HardySpicer
    • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., Sam Wormley
    • Re: Remove All the Empty Space from the Human Body ..., W. eWatson
• My computer is my car, my plane, my boat, it's how I get around., Jeffâ–²Relf
  • Re: My computer is my car, my plane, my boat, it's how I get around., PD
  • Re: My computer is my car, my plane, my boat, it's how I get around., tj Frazir
• Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !, warmbeach
  • Re: Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !, Uncle Al
  • Re: Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !, Androcles
  • Re: Unification of GRAVITY with RELATIVITY finally discovered ! !, alien8er
• Superconductors may boost wind power, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Superconductors may boost wind power, jimp
  • Re: Superconductors may boost wind power, Uncle Al
• A YOUNG PULSAR SHOWS ITS HAND IN CHANDRA PICTURE, Sam Wormley
• The Galilean Limit of EM (and Gauge Theory) Done Right (or: Correcting Levy-Leblond's Mistake), Rock Brentwood
  • Re: The Galilean Limit of EM (and Gauge Theory) Done Right (or: Correcting Levy-Leblond's Mistake), mL
• Uncle Al, How's Win98 working out for you ? got the swing of it yet ?, Jeffâ–²Relf
• Simply Best gomuzik.com, sam
• Re: any climate change NOT caused by mankind, Androcles
• Re: Why all ciggerates are dangerous to health?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why all ciggerates are dangerous to health?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Why all ciggerates are dangerous to health?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment, dudajar
  • Re: Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment, Surfer
    • Re: Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment, dudajar
  • Re: Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment, Benj
    • Re: Expansions of Schrodinger's cat thought experiment, dudajar
• Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?, as
    • Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?, Damaeus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: is it possible to escape the universe like thus ...?, Bill
• Computer Program Self-Discovers Laws of Physics, Yousuf Khan
• What can affect the ionization energy, franklinhu
  • Re: What can affect the ionization energy, Sanny
  • Re: What can affect the ionization energy, Eric Gisse
  • Re: What can affect the ionization energy, Uncle Al
  • Re: What can affect the ionization energy, Cwatters
• Evidence?, J-Bird
  • Re: Evidence?, Benj
    • Re: Evidence?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Evidence?, chuck
  • Re: Evidence?, Uncle Al
• Lay back and watch the physical laws get cranked out?, Sam Wormley
• Ocean’s ice cap is smaller than long-term average and thinnest yet as melt season begins, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Ocean’s ice cap is smaller than long-term average and thinnest yet as melt season begins, Benj
    • Re: Ocean’s ice cap is smaller than long-term average and thinnest yet as melt season begins, Cwatters
• Re: All About me, tj Frazir
  • Re: All About me, hanson
• Re: A pic of the river rock in seattle, tj Frazir
• Earthquake Prediction by Radon Analysis?, mrdarrett
• Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you mo..., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you mo..., tj Frazir
  • Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you mo..., tj Frazir
  • Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you mo..., tj Frazir
    • Re: A â?? white elephant â?? is a pseudoGift that only costs you m..., tj Frazir
      • Yellowish green epidote., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: Evry colr rock in river is out top of volcano, tj Frazir
      • Re: Yellowish green epidote., tj Frazir
      • Re: Yellowish green Tyuyamunite mountain, tj Frazir
      • Re: Yellowish green epidote., tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 319.2: U.K., USA, Canada, Japan Break Through on Non-Gaussianity Via 3-Point Correlation Functions and Comparison with 3-Set Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Correlation, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 319.2: U.K., USA, Canada, Japan Break Through on Non-Gaussianity Via 3-Point Correlation Functions and Comparison with 3-Set Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Correlation, chuck
• New physical sciences / mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, Apr 06, 2009, PhDs . org
• Does Light Quanta have mass?, socratus
  • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, Bob Remeaux
    • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, Androcles
      • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, hhc314
      • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, Androcles
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Does Light Quanta have mass?, Y.y.Porat
• MAKIUKIM BASNAMIUM: DEDALASTOLOSTOPODIOSTAOSOSVIBASTUMI, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes, eratosthenes
  • Re: Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes, Lofty Goat
  • Re: Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes, Uncle Al
  • Re: Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Tidal Acceleration and Black Holes, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice Shelf Area, Antarctica: 1940–2005, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice Shelf Area, Antarctica: 1940–2005, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice Shelf Ar..., tj Frazir
    • Re: Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice Shelf Ar..., tj Frazir
      • Re: Coastal-Change and Glaciological Map of the Larsen Ice ShelfAr..., Roy L
• I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the following., qhi0hxqlyfr
  • Re: I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the following., Sam Wormley
  • Re: I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the following., Uncle Al
  • Re: I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the following., qhi0hxqlyfr
  • Re: I am due for a change in medication, but my psychaitrist is having a weekend at the beach., Lofty Goat
• I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the follow., qhi0hxqlyfr
  • Re: I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the follow., Sam Wormley
  • Re: I am Isaac Newton. My identity had been proven though "Esdras II" and Nostradamus. I have a physics question. Theory of relativity is wrong though the fact. Science cannot explain the follow., Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 319.1: India Interprets Cosmological Constant as a Repulsive Force and Interprets this Force and Rest Mass as Topological, OsherD
• Re: RELATIVITY/EVOLUTION/MATHEMATICS IS WRONG!, Lofty Goat
• Re: There is no before the beginning, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: There is no before the beginning, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Barack Obama says he wants to eliminate all baryonic matter!, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Barack Obama says he wants to eliminate all baryonic matter!, jimp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Barack Obama says he wants to eliminate all baryonic matter!, PD
• Re: Exercises in temporal logic, dudajar
• JSH: Math society realities, JSH
  • Re: JSH: Math society realities, chuck
• Quantum Gravity 319.0: Cosmological Constant as the (Modified) GR Analog of Schrodinger Equation (Born's) Probability, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 318.92: Why To Use A - B = AB ' Even Though Wikipedia Doesn't Recommend It, and Relationship to P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = 1 - P(B-->A), OsherD
• Re: Conic sections and D number, Harris Moran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Conic sections and D number, Harris Moran
    • Re: Conic sections and D number, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Conic sections and D number, Androcles
• DEDANOE is searching for INFORMATIC 3DVectoring Matrix Coworker, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• Re: The Big Bang is the Exploding Lump Theory, Uncle Al
• A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
  • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Bluuuue Rajah
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, jimp
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Bluuuue Rajah
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Lofty Goat
    • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Yuriy
      • Re: A new concept of flying. How can that be?, Bluuuue Rajah
• New conic section rational parameterization, JSH
  • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, Uncle Al
  • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, Eric Gisse
    • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, JSH
      • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, willo_thewisp
      • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, doug
  • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, JSH
    • Re: New conic section rational parameterization, doug
• Happy Easter ! Wester ! 7 Days, Garry Denke
  • Re: Happy Easter ! Wester ! 7 Days, Garry Denke
    • Re: Happy Easter ! Wester ! 2 Days, Garry Denke
  • Happy Easter ! Wester ! 1 Day, GDenke
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 3 April 2009 http://focus.aps.org, Sam Wormley
• Basic physics without words., socratus
  • Re: Basic physics without words., Androcles
  • Re: Basic physics without words., andy everett
    • Re: Basic physics without words., tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Basic physics without words., andy everett
• Where can I get the answer?, mike3
  • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
    • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Androcles
    • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Mahipal
  • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Androcles
    • Re: Where can I get the answer?, hanson
  • Re: Where can I get the answer?, PD
    • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, mike3
      • Re: Where can I get the answer?, PD
• Where does the mass of the particle come from?, socratus
  • Re: Where does the mass of the particle come from?, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
  • Re: Where does the mass of the particle come from?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Where does the mass of the particle come from?, Sam Wormley
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
    • Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Apr 09 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• johnreed take 26 Part-4 on the Principle of Equivalence: Saturday, 28 March, 2009 - Summary, johnlawrencereedjr
• NOBEL SPICE DONOT HOLDY QUAKY WETNT VOLUME, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• Re: Why a skater spins faster as they close their arms, franklinhu
• causality?, marcofuics
  • Re: causality?, Uncle Al
    • Re: causality?, marcofuics
• NASA rescinds John Mather Nobel Discovery, a_guest
  • Re: NASA rescinds John Mather Nobel Discovery, Uncle Al
• torus, john030409
  • Re: torus, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: torus, Uncle Al
    • Re: torus, john030409
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: torus, john030409
    • Re: torus, Uncle Al
      • Re: torus, john030409
      • Re: torus, Uncle Al
      • Re: torus, john030409
      • Re: torus, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
      • torus, john030409
      • Re: torus, Uncle Al
• Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., studentdoctoronline@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., studentdoctoronline@xxxxxxxxx
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., solutionmanualdoctor
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., studentdoctoronline1
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., studentdoctoronline1@xxxxxxxxx
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., student . dr . online
  • Fastest and Cheapest Solution Manuals- The Solution Dr., student . dr . online
• event horizonty asaturnsust virgoegg iddle, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
  • Message not available
    • Re: event horizonty asaturnsust virgoegg iddle, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• Avery 6fox1 x fixY5 windows win-win commby anatorica: mos.dos.los.nto.ost V1.00.AD&DB, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
  • Re: Avery 6fox1 x fixY5 windows win-win commby anatorica: mos.dos.los.nto.ost V1.00.AD&DB, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
  • Re: Avery 6fox1 x fixY5 windows win-win commby anatorica: mos.dos.los.nto.ost V1.00.AD&DB, NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• Re: The continuum hypothesis, Uncle Al
• Quantum Gravity 318.91: P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = 1 - P(B --> A), OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.91: P ' (A-->B) - P(A-->B) = 1 - P(B --> A), NoeDOTNatDOTNoe
• ->>> NURSING JOBS <<<-, maurenehalifaxdudley
• Friction causes increase in speed?, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, Greg Neill
    • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, Gad-Noe
    • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, Ray Vickson
      • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, Greg Neill
      • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, jbriggs444
      • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, Greg Neill
  • Message not available
    • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, PD
  • Message not available
    • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Friction causes increase in speed?, russell kym horsell
• Quantum Gravity 318.9: Generalization of Sum of Causations Between 1 and 2 to Sum Between n - 1 and n, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 318.8: P(A1-->A2) + P(A2-->A3) + ... + P(An-->An+1) Versus P ' of the same quantities, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 318.7: Time Reversal As "Almost" Reversal of P(A-->B) to P(B-->A), OsherD
• Re: The U.S. won't be able to service its debt without hyperInflation., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The U.S. won't be able to service its debt without hyperInflation., tj Frazir
    • If I were homeless, I'd join Mary Jane's hustlers., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: If I were homeless, I'd join Mary Jane's hustlers., tj Frazir
• Re: Computer Experts Unite to Hunt Worm, tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 318.6: Spain and Brazil's Physics Relationship and Also Politics, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.6: Spain and Brazil's Physics Relationship and Also Politics, OsherD
• Science Fraud Hall of Shame, a_guest
• Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
    • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
    • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., Roy L
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
      • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
  • Re: As if the poor, and only the poor, could bail out Wall Street., tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 318.5: Spain Leads the Way in Reversing Directionality in Physics, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.5: Spain Leads the Way in Reversing Directionality in Physics, chuck
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.5: Spain Leads the Way in Reversing Directionality in Physics, alien8er
• Re: Define mass, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Define mass, Y.y.Porat
• Going back to the Einstein’s question., socratus
• Quantum Gravity 318.4: Also P(A-->B) + P(B--->A) > = 1, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.4: Also P(A-->B) + P(B--->A) > = 1, Gad-Noe
• Quantum Gravity 318.3: The "2-Theorem" Regarding P(A-->B) + P(B-->A) and P ' (A-->B) + P ' (B-->A), OsherD
• QG 318.2: PI Searches for What Changes Probabilities Through Time, While GR and BI (Born-Infeld) Just Add Terms To Equations, OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 318.1: More On PI Beyond Born-Infeld Theory, OsherD
• John Enderby describes the life of the "strangest man": Paul Dirac, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 318.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Beyond Born-Infeld Theory, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Gravity 318.0: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Beyond Born-Infeld Theory, Gad-Noe
• Re: a layman's queston about quantum physics and interference, russell kym horsell
• Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron, John Polasek
  • Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron, john210309
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron, John Polasek
  • Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron, Benj
    • Re: Naming the aether particle - the poselectron, franklinhu
• Re: #3 looking for anomalous iridium in Great Lakes for 12,900, ins..., tj Frazir
• Re: NOVA's "Last Extinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., tj Frazir
  • Re: NOVA's "LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., hanson
    • Re: NOVA's "LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., tj Frazir
      • Re: NOVA's"LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., hanson
    • Re: NOVA's "LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., tj Frazir
    • Re: NOVA's "LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., tj Frazir
    • Re: NOVA's "LastExtinction" and Great Lakes as the meteorite impac..., tj Frazir
• Principles of Ultra Relativity, T. Parker
  • Re: Principles of Ultra Relativity, Androcles
  • Re: Principles of Ultra Relativity, Surfer
• Re: Dragons, remember your origin...., Gad-Noe
• Neutron Stars, eratosthenes
  • Re: Neutron Stars, PD
  • Re: Neutron Stars, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Neutron Stars, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Neutron Stars, Uncle Al
    • Re: Neutron Stars, PD
      • Re: Neutron Stars, hanson
• Re: Undergraduate reveals errors in LHC, Tom Potter
• Re: Does light have inertia?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does light have inertia?, Y.y.Porat
    • Re: Does light have inertia?, pmb
      • Re: Does light have inertia?, Y.y.Porat
  • Re: Does light have inertia?, Y.y.Porat
  • Re: Does light have inertia?, marcofuics
  • Re: Does light have inertia?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Does light have inertia?, Florian
      • Re: Does light have inertia?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: S.I.'s protoType kiloGram lost mass, where did it go ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
  • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, Florian
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: The Earth is buoyant in the Aether, mpc755
• Re: what is a Body?, marcofuics
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is a Body?, PD
    • Re: what is a Body?, marcofuics
  • Re: what is a Body?, pmb
  • Re: what is a Body?, tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Little's Theory of Elementary Waves, Benj
  • Re: Little's Theory of Elementary Waves, Androcles
• Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?, Heliyummm
  • Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?, 5 . d
    • Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?, Heliyummm
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Information transfer without energy transfer ?, Benj
• Re: You don't pass a 5000 ton hover-ship, tj Frazir
  • Re: You don't pass a 5000 ton hover-ship, tj Frazir
• Re: You don't need her, Gisse., tj Frazir
  • I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it., Jeffâ–²Relf
    • Re: I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it., tj Frazir
    • Re: I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it., G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it., tj Frazir
      • Re: I have some rights to a 12 by 12 foot room, that's it., NoEinstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: You don't need her, Gisse., tj Frazir
  • Re: You don't need her, Gisse., tj Frazir
    • You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., Roy L
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., Roy L
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., Androcles
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can see this hovercraft 400 pas do 60, tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't Miss Odysee tonight on tv, tj Frazir
      • Re: Discovery Of Black Swan 500,000 coins, tj Frazir
      • Re: You will see 1 billion in gold tonight hit the deck, tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Re: You can't help anyone here without revealing who you are., tj Frazir
      • Trust is the bread and butter of both con men and saints., Jeffâ–²Relf
      • Re: Trust is the bread and butter of both con men and saints., NoEinstein
      • Sci.Physics is breadless., Jeffâ–²Relf
• Re: Where are you going Gisse ?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Where are you going Gisse ?, tj Frazir
• Re: What mass isn't relativistic ?, tj Frazir
• LIGO detects first gravity waves, Nature
  • Re: LIGO detects first gravity waves, Androcles
  • Re: LIGO detects first gravity waves, Uncle Al
    • Re: LIGO detects first gravity waves, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: LIGO detects first gravity waves, Eric Gisse
      • Re: LIGO detects first gravity waves, john210309
• Re: What is Gods Active Force called Time for 500, tj Frazir
• Re: What prevents protons and electrons from coming together?, tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What prevents protons and electrons from coming together?, tj Frazir
  • Re: What prevents protons and electrons from coming together?, Tom Potter
  • Re: What prevents protons and electrons from coming together?, G=EMC^2 Glazier

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.physics  > 2009-04