Re: If my hypothesis were wrong, Hawking radiation would make no sense

From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:28:45 -0700

solletica@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

My hypothesis states that antimatter, like matter, has POSITIVE
inertial (and gravitational) mass, but a REPULSIVE gravitational field
proportional to its inertial mass.

[snip rest of crap]

idiot

Positrons are unremarkable.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.

References:
- If my hypothesis were wrong, Hawking radiation would make no sense
  - From: solletica

Prev by Date: Re: Adamantium Chemical Composition
Next by Date: Re: GPS maybe be dead soon
Previous by thread: Re: If my hypothesis were wrong, Hawking radiation would make no sense
Next by thread: Re: If my hypothesis were wrong, Hawking radiation would make no sense
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Current technology/theories cant explain positrons.
... Certainly not how much momentum it _Directly_ imparted ... to an electron along a certain path... ... As far as I can tell, current technology/theories can't explain positrons. ... A positron might have negative inertial mass, ...
(sci.physics)
Re: The Least Action Consistent Stable Universe and the Mathematics, Section 3, johnreed
... which we feel as resistance and quantify in terms of our ... inertial mass, as weight, inertial mass is independent of the ...
(sci.physics)