randomness in a system? not for long!




The idea that any part of any system be random
is nonsensical on its face, and besides, doesn't it
violate some sacred physics priciple, what was it?
No two things can occupy the same space at the same time?

If you got random movement, it won't be long before two things
are gonna want to occupy the same space at the
same time. And we know what happens then, right?
(hint: Isreal/Palestine for example)

There is no randomness in an atom's
movement, if left alone. There can't be.
It is self-eliminating.

john
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: randomness in a system? not for long!
    ... *must* yield each and every time is common sense. ... violate some sacred physics priciple, ... No two things can occupy the same space at the same time? ... If you got random movement, it won't be long before two things ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: randomness in a system? not for long!
    ... violate some sacred physics priciple, ... No two things can occupy the same space at the same time? ... If you got random movement, it won't be long before two things ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: randomness in a system? not for long!
    ... violate some sacred physics priciple, ... No two things can occupy the same space at the same time? ... If you got random movement, it won't be long before two things ... John do you remember registering as a crank? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: randomness in a system? not for long!
    ... A box filled with gas phase helium atoms. ... violate some sacred physics priciple, ... No two things can occupy the same space at the same time? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: randomness in a system? not for long!
    ... face, and besides, doesn't it violate some sacred physics priciple, what ... No two things can occupy the same space at the same time? ... If you got random movement, it won't be long before two things are gonna ...
    (sci.physics)