sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• THUNDERHEAD ACCELERATOR -- PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 30 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: tadchem
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: What is off topic?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: What is off topic?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: John Polasek
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 328.5: The Similarity-Differences Decomposition Universe = (AB) U (A ' B ' ) U (AB ' ) U (A ' B)
  • From: Mackly
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: hanson
• Jedi Mind Trick Toys?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Bob
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• What is off topic?
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 328.5: The Similarity-Differences Decomposition Universe = (AB) U (A ' B ' ) U (AB ' ) U (A ' B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: guskz
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Neutrons & protons inside nucleus have different structure than free-floating ones
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Benj
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Benj
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: Socks
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: Socks
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Roots to Power Series
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Shell theorem vs. Black hole
  • From: Khattak
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Re: Losing Louisiana
  • From: hanson
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: wow
  • From: Test Toob
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Do Oceans Cause Plate Tectonics?
  • From: Diap
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Dilbert
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Losing Louisiana
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: wow
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: wow
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Quantum Gravity 328.4: What the Electromagnetic Interaction Tells us About the Other Interactions Via PAFLEG
  • From: Mackly
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• wow
  • From: wow
• Fundamental Accounting Principles, 18/e John J. Wild Barbara Chiappetta Kermit D. Larson solution manual and test bank
  • From: beak angel
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Losing Louisiana
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Losing Louisiana
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Quantum Gravity 328.4: What the Electromagnetic Interaction Tells us About the Other Interactions Via PAFLEG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• i want and demand before i begin to command google groups and unix eggo to return my "dedanoe" membership
  • From: Argir Pandev
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Losing Louisiana
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: alien8er
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: alien8er
• solutions manual for Financial management theory and practice 12e by Brigham
  • From: beak angel
• Quantum Gravity 328.3: The Expression: A looks at A ' and B to decide whether to Attract (A) or Repel (A ' ) B
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 328.2: How Does the Interaction "Know" Whether to Pull or Push, Via PAFLEG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Roots to Power Series
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Here is a story that will die a quick death in America's mass media.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Dilbert
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WORLD VALUE OF I and -1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Science FICTION!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Causality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Magnetic effects around electric currents and absurdities of modern physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: High data rate space transmissions through visible light communication.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: tadchem
• Re: ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WORLD VALUE OF I and -1
  • From: tadchem
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: So how does this work?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• So how does this work?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WORLD VALUE OF I and -1
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Adam
• Re: PHYSICS/MATH ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WORLD
  • From: calvin
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Benj
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Causality"
  • From: Tretne
• PHYSICS/MATH ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WORLD
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem
• Solution manual to Numerical methods for engineers 5th by Chapra
  • From: hotsolution
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Bob
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Magnetic effects around electric currents and absurdities of modern physics
  • From: sorin
• Quantum Gravity 328.1: How PAFLEG Generates Fundamental Forces/Interactions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: OwlHoot
• Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lecture: Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Androcles
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: tadchem
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: troll
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Bob
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Max Keon
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: doug
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: A Practical Model of Spacetime using Everett's Many Worlds Hypothesis
  • From: OwlHoot
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Practical Model of Spacetime using Everett's Many Worlds Hypothesis
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: tadchem
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: jimp
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: hanson
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Insanity; relative and empirical -- Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: hanson
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: hanson
• Reinforcement of Geometrical interpretation of E=mc^2 and c=(square root -1)
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: WHAT?S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Solution manual for South-Western Federal Taxation 2010: Individual Income Taxes 33rd Edition William Hoffman, James E. Smith, Eugene Willis
  • From: beak angel
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: Test Toob
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: Cwatters
• A Practical Model of Spacetime using Everett's Many Worlds Hypothesis
  • From: OwlHoot
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Tretne
• Re: Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Bob
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: jmfbahciv
• WHAT’S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Madoff a Modern Robin Hood
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Quantum Gravity 328.0: P(A-->B) + P(A ' --> B ' ) = 1 + P(A <--> B)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Sanny
• Re: Silicon based Brain
  • From: Mackly
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Test Toob
• Silicon based Brain
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: samothrace
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Quantum Gravity 327.9: g_0(P(A-->B)) + g_0(P(A ' --> B ' )) = P(A <--> B) = Probable Correlation of A and B
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Michelson-Morley and the Aether
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: Musatov
• Re: The cracks in the consensus are widening
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: RichD
• Re: Bullrt Energy Effifiency
  • From: Dave Typinski
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: PARTICLE PHYSICS--smallest inverse particle by proportion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: PD
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: I am the inverse of physics!
  • From: Greg Neill
• PARTICLE PHYSICS--smallest inverse particle by proportion
  • From: inverse 19
• I am the inverse of physics!
  • From: eBayer
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether" aka "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Re: "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: hanson
• Supernovae: Cosmic-Ray Superfactories
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "How the Aether Leads to Our Reality"
  • From: Tretne
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Tim BandTech.com
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity 327.8: Modified PAGLEGs Yield Inverses or Almost-Inverses
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 327.8: Modified PAGLEGs Yield Inverses or Almost-Inverses
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Quantum Gravity 327.7: France and USA Find Local Force Field Asymptotics Are of PI Type
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Predicting the spectra of hydrogen without using quantum mechanics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether" aka "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Benj
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether" aka "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Predicting the spectra of hydrogen without using quantum mechanics
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: SHAME ! SHAME! PHYSICS/MATH THEORY for missing this
  • From: Mackly
• Re: SHAME ! SHAME! PHYSICS/MATH THEORY for missing this
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem
• Re: new quantum mechanics?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Beast Wars untold... The true beast in prophecy
  • From: Automutt
• new quantum mechanics?
  • From: RichD
• Re: SHAME ! SHAME! PHYSICS/MATH THEORY for missing this
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether" aka "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: mL
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Sam Wormley
• SHAME ! SHAME! PHYSICS/MATH THEORY for missing this
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• The anti-Big Bang conjecture
  • From: Dario de Judicibus
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to calculate this?
  • From: Alex
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to calculate this?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Feynman QED - which first?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Robert Hubbard
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether" aka "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: REGISTERED STATEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL FACT BY INVERSE 19
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: REGISTERED STATEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL FACT BY INVERSE 19
  • From: Igor
• Re: The ABSOLUTE TRUTH and the RELATIVE ONE, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• solutions manual for International Accounting 6e Frederick D. Choi Gary K. Meek
  • From: beak angel
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• The ABSOLUTE TRUTH and the RELATIVE ONE, by Romano Amodeo
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "A Basic Look at the Aether"
  • From: Tretne
• Re: REGISTERED STATEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL FACT BY INVERSE 19
  • From: Mackly
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How to calculate this?
  • From: Alex
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Thermodynamic efficiency of small diesel engines.
  • From: andy everett
• Solution manual to Managerial Accounting 12th ed By Garrison Noreen solution manual
  • From: hotsolution
• Homeless Guy Smashes Other Homeless Guy Upside Head With Skateboard During Quantum Physics Argument
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• REGISTERED STATEMENT OF MATHEMATICAL FACT BY INVERSE 19
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: Electrons in orbit
  • From: OG
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How to calculate this?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Cwatters
• Electrons in orbit
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• How to calculate this?
  • From: Alex
• Re: Feynman QED - which first?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Neural Patterns and Self Awareness
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Feynman QED - which first?
  • From: OG
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: Mackly
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Conservation ??? Transformation ???
  • From: socratus
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: john240509
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: BURT
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: A HIGGS BOSON WITHOUT THE MESS ???
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Darwin123
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A HIGGS BOSON WITHOUT THE MESS ???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: PD
• Re: SQUARE OF A CIRCLE ---DIAGRAM for the whiners
  • From: Igor
• Probability, Statistics, and Random Processes For Electrical Engineering - Alberfor Leon-Garcia (3rd ) （SOLUTIONS MANUAL）
  • From: beak angel
• Auditing and Assurance Services An Intergrated Approach and ACL Software, 12e by Alvin Arens Randal J. Elder, ark Beasley solution manual
  • From: beak angel
• fundamentals of thermodynamics, 7th edition,sonntag,borgnak, SOLUTIONS MANUAL
  • From: beak angel
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: PD
• Re: Bullrt Energy Effifiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: john240509
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Tretne
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Should NASA bomb the Moon?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• IRON-IC TWIST DEEPENS COSMIC RAY PUZZLE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: Wimpie
• Re: The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• The physical significance of wavenumber (Beta)
  • From: jozamm
• Quantum Gravity 327.6: Ireland Develops a Quantum Gravity Based On Gauge Theory Similar to the Other Fundamental Interactions, Similar to Idea of PAFLEG
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: BURT
• Re: CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: Musatov
• Re: Difference between Quantum Mechanics and Aether Displacement
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Soul is useless without memory
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bullrt Energy Effifiency
  • From: jimp
• Re: Bullrt Energy Effifiency
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: Uncle Al
• Bullrt Energy Effifiency
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 327.5: PAFLEX (a "Probabilistic-Atomic-Force-Local--Extended-Group") Yields Statistical Dependence From Probable Causation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: HardySpicer
• CIRCLE A SQUARE , DIAGRAM WILL BE IN SCI MATH
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Total energy of universe constant
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SQUARE OF A CIRCLE ---DIAGRAM for the whiners
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Total energy of universe constant
  • From: HardySpicer
• SQUARE OF A CIRCLE ---DIAGRAM for the whiners
  • From: inverse 19
• So Solon Says --- "Father of Democracy"
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• solutions manual to Fundamentals of Database Systems, 5E Ramez Elmasri,Shamkant B. Navathe
  • From: beak angel
• cost Accounting 13e Horngren test bank
  • From: beak angel
• Re: SQUARE OF A CIRCLE---and run
  • From: Dave P
• Differential Equations and Linear Algebra - Stephen W. Goode (3rd ed) Instructor manual
  • From: beak angel
• solutions manual and Test Bank
  • From: beak angel
• Re: SQUARE OF A CIRCLE---and run
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Uncle Al
• SQUARE OF A CIRCLE---and run
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: Chris W
• "What Relativity Theories Tell Us About the Universe"
  • From: Tretne
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: Chris W
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• More that 2800 solutions manuals (PART 3)
  • From: BERGH
• More that 2800 solutions manuals (PART 2)
  • From: BERGH
• More that 2800 solutions manuals (PART 1)
  • From: BERGH
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: doug
• Re: 2 Pi ^2 -.75 =19degrees, Pi value EXACT 3.1428571 by this method, a new Physics proof
  • From: Dave P
• Re: John McCain compares Irainian election to Gore loss
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: flipping of earth's poles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: SQUARE OF MASS---and run
  • From: Mackly
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: Mackly
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: johnreed
• Large Hadron Collider restart delayed till October
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Mackly
• Re: 2 Pi ^2 -.75 =19degrees, Pi value EXACT 3.1428571 by this method, a new Physics proof
  • From: Mackly
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• 2 Pi ^2 -.75 =19degrees, Pi value EXACT 3.1428571 by this method, a new Physics proof
  • From: inverse 19
• Humidity and air pressure question
  • From: Chris W
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: Why are green CFLs filtered?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: SQUARE OF MASS---and run
  • From: King of Physics
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: PD
• Re: SQUARE OF MASS---and run
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Is More Than One Quark Needed?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Benj
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: doug
• SQUARE OF MASS---and run
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: Narthix
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: doug
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: doug
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: IS RELATIVITY IMMORTAL?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: TO KINGS OF PHYSICS at Sci physicsan admonition
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Narthix
• Re: Quantum Gravity 327.4: Statistical Independence Also Uses the Atomic gB Operator
  • From: Narthix
• Re: Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: Narthix
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Magnetic field flips caused by the Earth's oceans?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Solution manual to Mechanics of Materials By R.C.Hibbeler 7th edition
  • From: hotsolution
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• Re: TO KINGS OF PHYSICS at Sci physicsan admonition
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: inverse 19
• Pi Value 3.1412614, 3.1512334, 3.138255, by novel new method and a seperate equation
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Quantum Gravity 327.4: Statistical Independence Also Uses the Atomic gB Operator
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 327.3: Is There An "Atomic Algebraic Operator"?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: King of Physics
• Re: Quantum Gravity 327.1: A = 1 - A Solution A = 1/2 vs P(A-->B) = P(A ' --> B) Solution P(AB ' ) = P(A ' B ' ) = (1/2)P(B ' )
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Mahipal
• Re: Variability of Pi value
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• Variability of Pi value
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Magnetic field flips caused by the Earth's oceans?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: TO KINGS OF PHYSICS at Sci physicsan admonition
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• TO KINGS OF PHYSICS at Sci physicsan admonition
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Ken Quirici
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: Ken Quirici
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: BURT
• Re: where did the big bang start?
  • From: calvin
• Re: Lakes on Mars.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Difference between Quantum Mechanics and Aether Displacement
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• where did the big bang start?
  • From: kquirici@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magnetic field flips caused by the Earth's oceans?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Dragons of Islam, remember your origins...
  • From: Automutt
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NEW FAST HAMMOND =SPOG= WEBSITE
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: inverse 19
• Can a ideal black body be model of real Vacuum T= 0K ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: King of Physics
• Why are green CFLs filtered?
  • From: Bohgosity BumaskiL
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Edarg
• EXACT MATHEMATICAL VALUE OF Pi , NO IFS , NO BUT
  • From: inverse 19
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Finiancial Accounting 7e by Horngren（SOLUTIONS MANUAL
  • From: beak angel
• Test Bank for fundamentals of financial management, concise 6th edition by Brigham, Houston
  • From: beak angel
• Re: Bacteria found on Mars?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Gravity 327.2: Brazil Advances 2D Quantum Gravity
  • From: OsherD
• The rest of universe
  • From: Clifford Nelson
• CFP: Optical SuperComputing Workshop 2009
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 327.1: A = 1 - A Solution A = 1/2 vs P(A-->B) = P(A ' --> B) Solution P(AB ' ) = P(A ' B ' ) = (1/2)P(B ' )
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 327.0: Set/Event Division By Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: doug
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: doug
• Re: when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• when is the CERN collider to be up and running?
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: hanson
• A pair of 2D harmonic oscillators at a point and Dirac eq.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: The Underlying Cause to All Relatvity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Underlying Cause to All Relatvity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• The Underlying Cause to All Relatvity
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: What is gravity?
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Herschel’s daring test: a glimpse of things to come
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: Herschel’s daring test: a glimpse of things to come
  • From: BDR529
• Re: Herschel’s daring test: a glimpse of things to come
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is gravity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Herschel’s daring test: a glimpse of things to come
  • From: BDR529
• The ABSOLUTE in PHYSICS (by Romano Amodeo)
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Solution manual to Computer Networks A Systems Approach 3ed by Larry L. Peterson & Bruce S. Davie solutions manual
  • From: hotsolution
• Re: Quantum Gravity 326.9: The Strange Case of Statistical Dependence versus Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 326.9: The Strange Case of Statistical Dependence versus Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is gravity?
  • From: Benj
• Re: What is gravity?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: RichD
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics Today subscription fulfillment
  • From: Uncle Al
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Benj
• Herschel’s daring test: a glimpse of things to come
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: mechanism to hydrate world's deserts
  • From: Paul
• Re: Rolling ring model - odd and even sets
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: johnreed
• Physics Today subscription fulfillment
  • From: JohnF
• Re: PHYSICS UNIFICATION
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: What is gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Neural Patterns and Self Awareness
  • From: Uncle Al
• solutions manual for Corporate Finance: A Focused Approach 3e Brigham
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 326.8: P(A-->B) = 1 is a Generalized Holographic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 326.7: Correction on P(A-->B) = 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: God preserved these RBC's on Mars
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: CARBON DIOXIDE NOT TO BLAME IN ICE AGE MYSTERY
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quantum Gravity 326.6: So What Kinds of Equations Remain with P(A-->B), P ' (A-->B)?
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 326.6: So What Kinds of Equations Remain with P(A-->B), P ' (A-->B)?
  • From: OsherD
• site percolation with squares that can cover each other
  • From: MogeiWang
• Re: PHYSICS UNIFICATION
  • From: Antony
• The Unification of Physics, or Physics Unification
  • From: Antony
• What is gravity?
  • From: franklinhu
• CARBON DIOXIDE NOT TO BLAME IN ICE AGE MYSTERY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Neural Patterns and Self Awareness
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: john240509
• Re: Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Neural Patterns and Self Awareness
  • From: Trish Raggens
• Re: Rolling ring model - odd and even sets
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Mars had lakes??
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Mars had lakes??
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Mars had lakes??
  • From: noauth
• 3D phase space of point particle and spinors.
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Mentally Time Travel (into both the past and future)
  • From: Uncle Al
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: Rolling ring model - odd and even sets
  • From: ABV
• Re: Mystery of the Missing Sunspots, Solved?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Quantum Gravity 326.5: What Happens To Operator and Non-Operator Squares and Square Roots in Going from GR and Quantum Theory to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can ‘Theory of Ideal Gas’ be model of Vacuum ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Can ‘Theory of Ideal Gas’ be model of Vacuum ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Try this with Google
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Rolling ring model - odd and even sets
  • From: Androcles
• Rolling ring model - odd and even sets
  • From: ABV
• Pour Cicero ont dit de Césarienne;
  • From: Automutt
• Re: 3 Point Load Bearing Capacity of Pressurized Pipe
  • From: andy everett
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A lot of NEW ITALIC SCHOOL assumptions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: alien8er
• Quantum Gravity 326.4: A Reverse Almost-Anthropic Principle in Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: Benj
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: hanson
• 3 Point Load Bearing Capacity of Pressurized Pipe
  • From: James A. Bowery
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: Today first day with brain me
  • From: Narthix
• Today first day with brain me
  • From: Sanny
• AT&T Usenet Netnews Service Shutting Down
  • From: newsmaster
• Instructor manual for Fundamentals of Physics (8th Edition) By Halliday
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• solutions manual for intermediate accounting 5e by spiceland
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Solution manual to Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences 7/e JAY L.DEVORE
  • From: hotsolution
• Solution manual to Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis by Charles T. Horngren 13th edition
  • From: hotsolution
• Scratch-Plot
  • From: KBH
• A lot of NEW ITALIC SCHOOL assumptions
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: WHITE HOUSE RELEASES REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
  • From: BDR529
• Re: WHITE HOUSE RELEASES REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
  • From: Benj
• Re: WHITE HOUSE RELEASES REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHITE HOUSE RELEASES REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Adam
• The Profit Sea...
  • From: Automutt
• Re: James W. von Brunn's side of the story
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: Carlos L
• Re: Most powerful sound laser (saser) produced
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Missing Link on the History Channel?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Vacuum and virtual particles.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A model of the aether
  • From: hanson
• A model of the aether
  • From: Carlos L
• Vacuum and virtual particles.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Schroedinger: One Way Cool Cat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Schroedinger: One Way Cool Cat
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Question: Planck mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Universe itself is a black hole.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is it "Green" or Is It Just Theft?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHYSICS UNIFICATION
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ATOMIC FUSION KNOW-HOW
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Most powerful sound laser (saser) produced
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Last 2 days, Eric Gisse made these posts...
  • From: Tom Potter
• PHYSICS UNIFICATION
  • From: well
• ATOMIC FUSION KNOW-HOW
  • From: well
• Question: Planck mass
  • From: .
• Re: Quantum Gravity 326.3: A Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Explanation of An Almost-Anthropic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 326.3: A Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Explanation of An Almost-Anthropic Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Last 2 days, Eric Gisse made these posts...
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dark Matter Structure of the Universe better dark energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Schroedinger: One Way Cool Cat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: hanson
• Re: mechanism to hydrate world's deserts
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: hanson
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: mechanism to hydrate world's deserts
  • From: Bill
• Re: mechanism to hydrate world's deserts
  • From: Bill
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Benj
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Uncle Al
• [Fwd: RFD: sci.physics.acoustics.moderated]
  • From: Angelo Campanella
• Re: Dark Matter Structure of the Universe better dark energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Edarg
• Re: spinning space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Rotation is motion gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: spinning space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: LARGE HADRON COLLIDER AND MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Buy yourself an ambassadorship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 326.2: Wave Equation Derived From Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Time Causation of Space at Acceleration Level
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Adam
• Re: Buy yourself an ambassadorship
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Solution manual to Intermediate Accounting 12e Kieso Weygant Warfield
  • From: wenbo liang
• Snake trails made to look like a mirage...
  • From: Automutt
• Re: spinning space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: spinning space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: hanson
• Bell's inequality - Matlab source code
  • From: Bob
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Ylluf
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: spinning space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: IBM's Super Battery
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: spinning space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Anatomy of a scare tactic...
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: New Essay from Livingston and Penn
  • From: Mike Jr
• New Essay from Livingston and Penn
  • From: Mike Jr
• Re: Buy yourself an ambassadorship
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of Perfect Cadence
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: BDR529
• Why Do Meteors Travel Along a Great Circle?
  • From: W. eWatson
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Optical photoconductor charge distribution
  • From: N_Cook
• Re: How ,,induction’’ lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis
  • From: Benj
• Re: What does SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) means ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Anatomy of a scare tactic...
  • From: Benj
• Quantum Gravity 326.0: The Wave Equation From Probability Causation/Influence Maximization
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.9: Exact Derivation of Superstring Theory From E/F = r or E = Fr
  • From: Narthix
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: BURT
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physics of Perfect Cadence
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How ,,induction?? lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: IBM's Super Battery
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: IBM's Super Battery
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rainbows outside the visible spectrum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rainbows outside the visible spectrum
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Khattak
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: johnreed
• Re: Physics of Perfect Cadence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physics of Perfect Cadence
  • From: Jean
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• How ,,induction’’ lamp works and absurdities of quantum hypothesis
  • From: sorin
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: spinning space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Benj
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Khattak
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ylluf
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: spinning space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Antiparticle creation through boson absorption?
  • From: C Pedro
• What does SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) means ?
  • From: Jaba
• Quantum Gravity 325.9: Exact Derivation of Superstring Theory From E/F = r or E = Fr
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antiparticle creation through boson absorption?
  • From: alien8er
• Re: spinning space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Rainbows outside the visible spectrum
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: alien8er
• Re: spinning space
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: john240509
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gravity
  • From: mL
• Antiparticle creation through boson absorption?
  • From: C Pedro
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: john240509
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 12 June 2009 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A battery in car to run for 500 miles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• One Universe: too many?
  • From: UncleEnglish
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Ylluf
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: hanson
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Jetpacks on the moon!or Polo sticks
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A battery in car to run for 500 miles
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Hidden dimensions of string theory "hiding" in 4D spacetime?
  • From: john240509
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: john240509
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• A new study analyzes the features that help maple seeds stay airborne
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Hidden dimensions of string theory "hiding" in 4D spacetime?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: the self is nothing but a bundle of interconnected perceptions linked by relations of similarity and causality...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Force Energy
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: BURT
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Ylluf
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: For GLB: SOLAR SYSTEM'S FUTURE COULD BE BUMPY
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Androcles
• To get a theory of everything, say bye-bye to Lorentz Invariance?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: srp
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: Khattak
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Khattak
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: For GLB: SOLAR SYSTEM'S FUTURE COULD BE BUMPY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Solletica
• Re: Gravity-
  • From: JEMebius
• Re: For GLB: SOLAR SYSTEM'S FUTURE COULD BE BUMPY
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Mistress Helios
• For GLB: SOLAR SYSTEM'S FUTURE COULD BE BUMPY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity
  • From: Khattak
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Mistress Helios
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: .
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: johnreed
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: VMCM1905
• solutions manual and Test Bank
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Test Bank for fundamentals of financial management, concise 6th edition by Brigham, Houston
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Density in theory and practice
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Cwatters
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Quantization of Circlons
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ARE HUMAN BRAINS UNIQUE?
  • From: Uncle Al
• solution manual for ENGINEERING MECHANICS DYNAMICS/statics by BEDFORD 5th.
  • From: servicepp@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Jacko
• Re: Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Coulomb force and gravity have been unified
  • From: .
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: Benj
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: Benj
• Pestilence
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: BURT
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: Earle Jones
• Pinning down a pulsar’s age
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can I calculate the velocity for a phonon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Simplification of SR and GR for the Layman
  • From: BURT
• Re: A Simplification of SR and GR for the Layman
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How can I calculate the velocity for a phonon?
  • From: Androcles
• A Simplification of SR and GR for the Layman
  • From: W. eWatson
• How can I calculate the velocity for a phonon?
  • From: Hongyi Zhao
• Re: Quantization of Circlons
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: I was taken to a distant future - what I saw in there, how I understand it, and what this confirms (JP)
  • From: Benj
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Quantization of Circlons
  • From: Gaba
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Possible Jet Blown Shells Near Microquasar Cygnus X-1
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Galactic black holes [M87] may be more massive than thought
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Vehicle Battery Load Leveling
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Possible Jet Blown Shells Near Microquasar Cygnus X-1
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Galactic black holes [M87] may be more massive than thought
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Possible Jet Blown Shells Near Microquasar Cygnus X-1
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: erg
• Re: Book Revies of Likely Interest to sci.physics readers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Book Revies of Likely Interest to sci.physics readers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: erg
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Hidden dimensions of string theory "hiding" in 4D spacetime?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Galactic black holes [M87] may be more massive than thought
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.8: String Theory and Spring Theory Relate to E = Fr
  • From: Narthix
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Density in theory and practice
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I was taken to a distant future - what I saw in there, how I understand it, and what this confirms (JP)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Richard Herring
• Quantum Gravity 325.8: String Theory and Spring Theory Relate to E = Fr
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Density in theory and practice
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Galactic black holes [M87] may be more massive than thought
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Density in theory and practice
  • From: zarmewa
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hidden dimensions of string theory "hiding" in 4D spacetime?
  • From: Bill Obscured
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Hidden dimensions of string theory "hiding" in 4D spacetime?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: john240509
• A NEW WAY TO MEASURE COSMIC DISTANCES
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• FOG LIFTED ON DARK GAMMA-RAY BURSTS ACROSS THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: john240509
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: singularity
  • From: john240509
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: john240509
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 June 2008 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: NoEinstein
• The scratches that woke the rock...
  • From: Automutt
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: PD
• Re: Very cheap wind power
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: singularity
  • From: Androcles
• Do satellite galaxies point to modified gravity?
  • From: Surfer
• Re: singularity
  • From: pcardinale
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: PD
• power required to turn water wheel?
  • From: acannell@xxxxxxx
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Y.Porat
• Increasing Solar Trend Can can Claim Climate
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Benj
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: Benj
• Re: Possible Jet Blown Shells Near Microquasar Cygnus X-1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.7: E = Fr Versus the Usual Work Equation W = E2 - E1 = Fr if F in Direction of Motion
  • From: Narthix
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: singularity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: PD
• Possible Jet Blown Shells Near Microquasar Cygnus X-1
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for calculating force needed for 1G thrust ?
  • From: jbriggs444
• Quantum Gravity 325.7: E = Fr Versus the Usual Work Equation W = E2 - E1 = Fr if F in Direction of Motion
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Heliyummm
• Re: singularity
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• cheap wow gold on igvir.com!
  • From: http://www.igvir.com
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: erg
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• singularity
  • From: Jon
• Re: Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Lorentz Contraction of
  • From: Jon
• solution manual and test bank for Macroeconomics 5E Olivier Blanchard
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: 36. Financial Account 7e Horngren (SOLUTIONS MANUAL)
  • From: findSolutionManual
• solution manual for ENGINEERING MECHANICS dynamics/statics by BEDFORD 5th.
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I like equations
  • From: Uncle Al
• Duality: The particle and the displacement wave it creates in the aether acting as one.
  • From: mpc755
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Vehicle Battery Load Leveling
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What if there is only one universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is the bending of light is due to the presence of the heavenly bodies or just following the geometry of the spacetime?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Jetpacks on the moon!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do you think there will be a big crunch?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: I like equations
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: I like equations
  • From: HardySpicer
• I like equations
  • From: Bluuuue Rajah
• Re: I like equations
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Heliyummm
• Is the bending of light is due to the presence of the heavenly bodies or just following the geometry of the spacetime?
  • From: Nimo
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Formula for calculating force needed for 1G thrust ?
  • From: Virtuo
• Solution manual to Intermediate Accounting 12e Kieso Weygant Warfield
  • From: hotsolution
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Tom Potter
• The Principle of Equivalence Explained
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: hi
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Quantum Gravity 325.6: Remarkable Equations from E/F = r For Constant F and/or Constant E
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Formula for calculating force needed for 1G thrust ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atompairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Formula for calculating force needed for 1G thrust ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Formula for calculating force needed for 1G thrust ?
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make? or war head??
  • From: hanson
• Re: hi
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: hi
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atompairs
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Does a smaller light speed in a medium rule out the wave theory of light?
  • From: PD
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Weirdness
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does a smaller light speed in a medium rule out the wave theory of light?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Quantum Weirdness
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.5: Expansion-Contraction Unification Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Qs. Lagrangian chiral-symmetry breaking.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Quantum Gravity 325.5: Expansion-Contraction Unification Via Probable Causation/Influence (PI) Equation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: Androcles
• What's the formula for the mass of an atom?
  • From: solletica
• Does a smaller light speed in a medium rule out the wave theory of light?
  • From: sorin
• Re: Modern Elementary Statistics, 12/e by Freund & Perles （SOLUTIONS MANUAL）
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: Solution Manual, Instructor Manual, Test Bank COLLECTION part:1
  • From: findSolutionManual
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 05 Jun 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A Research Methods Adviser for physics Researchers
  • From: Arin280
• Re: How many dimensions does the universe have?
  • From: John Polasek
• Solution Manual, Instructor Manual, Test Bank COLLECTION part:2
  • From: Student.Plus(at)Hotmail(Dot)com
• Solution Manual, Instructor Manual, Test Bank COLLECTION part:1
  • From: Student.Plus(at)Hotmail(Dot)com
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Mind-bending quantum connection between two mechanical widgets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Science of Even More Cute (was: The Science of Cute)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: "Background Radiation and "Dark Matter"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Romano Amodeo's appeal: World?s Chiefs, ?throw your nets by the right part of your boat!?... of the AtomicFusion!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solutions Manual HUGE COLLECTION
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: 36. Financial Account 7e Horngren (SOLUTIONS MANUAL)
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Solution Manual for Advanced Accounting 9e Beams
  • From: findSolutionManual
• "Background Radiation and "Dark Matter"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Quantum Gravity 325.4: Indications of (Neo-) Cyclic Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Re: hi
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Science of Cow Tipping
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Romano Amodeo's appeal: World’s Chiefs, “throw your nets by the right part of your boat!”... of the Atomic Fusion!
  • From: Romano Amodeo
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: The contracted parabola looks like garbage
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lorentz Contraction of a Moving Parabola
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atom pairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atom pairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Albert Einstein a thief, a liar and a plagiarist
  • From: Tommy144
• Re: Is this Guy for Real Or WHAT?
  • From: Tommy144
• Re: Lorentz Contraction of a Moving Parabola
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atom pairs
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: Albert Einstein a thief, a liar and a plagiarist
  • From: HardySpicer
• The contracted parabola looks like garbage
  • From: Jon
• Re: Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atom pairs
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Lorentz Contraction of a Moving Parabola
  • From: Uncle Al
• Lorentz Contraction of a Moving Parabola
  • From: Jon
• Re: Was space-time present before Big Bang?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The Science of Cow Tipping
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Science Learns. Does God?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make? or war head??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How many dimensions does the universe have?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Energy Loss in EM radiations
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: hi
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Question - adding velocity to an orbit
  • From: jbriggs444
• Re: Is this Guy for Real Or WHAT?
  • From: Androcles
• Is this Guy for Real Or WHAT?
  • From: jonathan
• The Science of Cow Tipping
  • From: jonathan
• SCIENCE WINS IN TEXAS!! Barely.
  • From: jonathan
• The Science of Cute
  • From: jonathan
• Science Learns. Does God?
  • From: jonathan
• hi
  • From: jonathan
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: Energy Loss in EM radiations
  • From: PD
• Re: Black box replaced with continous data transfer?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Black box replaced with continous data transfer?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Energy Loss in EM radiations
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: PD
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• "Gravity"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: mechanism to hydrate world's deserts
  • From: Bill
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: voltage references
  • From: PD
• Re: Albert Einstein a thief, a liar and a plagiarist
  • From: gabydewilde
• Albert Einstein a thief, a liar and a plagiarist
  • From: gabydewilde
• Researchers have linked the vibrations of two separated atom pairs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question - adding velocity to an orbit
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Androcles
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Black box replaced with continous data transfer?
  • From: Jean-Christophe
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Gnimoc
• Re: Black box replaced with continous data transfer?
  • From: jimp
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Androcles
• Black box replaced with continous data transfer?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.3: Dimensional Unification of Energy (E), Pressure (p), (Energy) Density (rho), Temperature
  • From: Narfix
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: voltage references
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• family of functions/attractors?
  • From: noone@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: JohnF
• RE: HUBBLE Observations - The Age of the Universe - And Our Bad Assumptions
  • From: Bob Ezergailis
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Quantum Gravity 325.3: Dimensional Unification of Energy (E), Pressure (p), (Energy) Density (rho), Temperature
  • From: OsherD
• Re: [OFF TOPIC] Re: Can Obama Defeat the Jews?
  • From: Aaron
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: Mahipal
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: PD
• Dragons, remember your origin....
  • From: Automutt
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: JohnF
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Credibility
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: "Speed" of Gravity
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: TIME TRAVEL BEATS QUANTUM MECHANICS
  • From: supertech
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: jimp
• Re: CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Finite Relativism -- Endorser
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Finite Relativism -- Endorser
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why is Nuclear bomb so difficult to make?
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Advanced hole theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Advanced hole theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Lightning & Modern Airliners
  • From: fitz
• Re: Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: jmorriss
• CO2 increasing now, but way in the future...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• TIME TRAVEL BEATS QUANTUM MECHANICS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Cost Accounting: Foundations and Evolutions 7E By Kinney (SOLUTIONS MANUAL)
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Biology Concepts and Connections 6e Neil A. Campbell Jane B. Reece Martha R. Taylor Eric J. Simon Jean L. Dickey test bank
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• 131. Understanding Financial Statements 8e Lyn M. Fraser Aileen Ormiston test bank
  • From: solutionsservice@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Advanced hole theory
  • From: john240509
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: Benj
• Re: Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: Benj
• Re: Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: Benj
• Re: Atheists are like "people...
  • From: Benj
• Re: Advanced hole theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Advanced hole theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: Justintruth
• Re: Atheists are like "people...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• important
  • From: kev
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: nonsense
• Re: Considerable improbability space drive
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Jeff Relf's sci.physics posters list
  • From: Androcles
• Jeff Relf's sci.physics posters list
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Considerable improbability space drive
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: "Speed" of Gravity
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• Re: "Speed" of Gravity
  • From: Ace0f_5pades
• End Times Explained, Trinity Understood and Beast Wars
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Energy Loss in EM radiations
  • From: Benj
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Androcles
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Benj
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Solution Manuals, Instructor Manuals, Test Bank Part:2
  • From: Student.Plus(at)Hotmail(Dot)com
• Solution Manuals, Instructor Manuals, Test Bank Part:1
  • From: Student.Plus(at)Hotmail(Dot)com
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: alien8er
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: Androcles
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: HardySpicer
• Re: voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Re: voltage references
  • From: chum ley
• Re: Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: chum ley
• Looking for examples of calculus in engineering
  • From: nonsense
• voltage references
  • From: Chris
• Energy Loss in EM radiations
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Photons & Charge
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Photons & Charge
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Determining the charge of a particle in a magnetic field
  • From: Carl Gauss #1
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: porton . victor
• Re: Considerable improbability space drive
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: PD
• Re: Was space-time present before Big Bang?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: porton . victor
• Re: Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Fluctuations and asteroids
  • From: Victor Porton
• Re: Was space-time present before Big Bang?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: jmfbahciv
• Considerable improbability space drive
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Quantum Gravity 325.2: Unification Via Probability, Pressure, (Energy) Density, Temperature
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 325.2: Unification Via Probability, Pressure, (Energy) Density, Temperature
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 325.1: Probable Causation/Influence (PI) As (Energy) Density
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• HUBBLE Observations - The Age of the Universe - Which Paradigm ?
  • From: Morpheal
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: YKhan
• Great Hubble repair pictures
  • From: Tom Potter
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: erg
• End Times Explained, Trinity Understood and Beast Wars
  • From: Automutt
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: hanson
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Hologram Labels are Necessary for Protecting Counterfeit
  • From: holographic . solutions
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: freq-to-amp
  • From: Cwatters
• Re: How can 'Fields' Escape a Neutron Star when Light cannot?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Solution manual to Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis by Charles T. Horngren 13th edition
  • From: hotsolution
• Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: François Guillet
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  • From: Sanny
• Re: freq-to-amp
  • From: Haiku Harry
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Green Xenon wants to convert pressure to vibration rate
  • From: chum ley
• Green Xenon wants to convert pressure to vibration rate
  • From: GreenXenon
• Freq-to-Amp||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  • From: GreenXenon
• |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  • From: GreenXenon
• freq-to-amp
  • From: GreenXenon
• Amp-to-freq
  • From: GreenXenon
• Hz to eV and visa versa interests me to no end
  • From: GreenXenon
• Electron-volt to Hz is so interesting
  • From: GreenXenon
• eV to Hz, Hz to eV
  • From: GreenXenon
• v to Hz, Hz to v
  • From: GreenXenon
• v to Hz
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Tom Potter
• Space drive?
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Artfishlintlgenz
• Re: What if(on Gravitons)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Universe itself is a black hole.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• volt-to-Hz -- and visa versa
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: tadchem@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: VMCM1905
• Re: What if(on Gravitons)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Speed" of Gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fuel Savings from Roadbed Electrification Pays for the Power Plant In 14 Months
  • From: Uncle Al
• What if(on Gravitons)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Smoluchowski Symposium on Statistical Physics
  • From: PFG
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: NoEinstein
• Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: jimp
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Blow up the moon
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Blow up the moon
  • From: qqq_qqq
• Re: Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: François Guillet
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: hanson
• Re: God preserved these RBC's on Mars
  • From: Uncle Al
• Exact frequency-to-amplitude -- and visa versa -- conversion. Is it possible and existant?
  • From: GreenXenon
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: GPS maybe be dead soon
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Yousuf Khan's manners are better than 99 percent of the people here.
  • From: Yousuf Khan
• Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
  • From: YKhan
• Re: Speciation Process: Excrement Color Skin Proven Harmful (Poverty, Crime and Disease)
  • From: sealocaronyrobaronotracuenta
• Re: Neutron Stars
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Newtonian gravitation between two isolated stars
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Tom Potter
• God preserved these RBC's on Mars
  • From: Fossil Lin
• Re: GPS maybe be dead soon
  • From: chum ley
• Re: Credibility
  • From: hanson
• Re: Solution manual to Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis by Charles T. Horngren 13th edition
  • From: findSolutionManual
• solution manual for Macroeconomics, 5E Olivier Blanchard and test bank
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: solutions manual for Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity by James B. Hartle
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Re: Solution manual to Engineering Mechanics, Dynamics, 6th edition, By J. L. Meriam, L. G. Kraige
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Solution manual to Cost Accounting A Managerial Emphasis by Charles T. Horngren 13th edition
  • From: findSolutionManual
• Reversible Engine
  • From: Juan F. Lara
• Re: Charged spinning disks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Qs. Lagrangian chiral-symmetry breaking.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 May 09 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newtonian gravitation between two isolated stars
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Credibility
  • From: mitchsperkins
• Re: Newtonian gravitation between two isolated stars
  • From: Androcles
• Qs. Lagrangian chiral-symmetry breaking.
  • From: Jaba
• Re: Newtonian gravitation between two isolated stars
  • From: Dwib
• Symposium “Computational Methods for Image Processing and Analysis” within the 30° CILAMCE, Brazil - Announce & Call for Papers
  • From: tavares@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Charged spinning disks
  • From: RP
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Marvin the Martian
• Re: Observations about sci.physics.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Auditing and Assurance Services An Intergrated Approach and ACL Software, 12e by Alvin Arens Randal J. Elder, ark Beasley solution manual
  • From: hotsolution